U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.487A>G (p.Met163Val) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Uncertain significance (1 submission)
Last evaluated:
Dec 24, 2021
Review status:
1 star out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, single submitter
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000037860.10

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.487A>G (p.Met163Val)]

NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.487A>G (p.Met163Val)

Gene:
GJB2:gap junction protein beta 2 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
13q12.11
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.487A>G (p.Met163Val)
HGVS:
  • NC_000013.11:g.20189095T>C
  • NG_008358.1:g.8881A>G
  • NM_004004.6:c.487A>GMANE SELECT
  • NP_003995.2:p.Met163Val
  • LRG_1350t1:c.487A>G
  • LRG_1350:g.8881A>G
  • LRG_1350p1:p.Met163Val
  • NC_000013.10:g.20763234T>C
  • NM_004004.5:c.487A>G
  • c.487A>G
Protein change:
M163V
Links:
dbSNP: rs80338949
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs80338949
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_004004.6:c.487A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
Functional consequence:
loss_of_function_variant [Sequence Ontology: SO:0002054]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV002051362Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Uncertain significance
(Dec 24, 2021)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (17)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

DNA sequence analysis of GJB2, encoding connexin 26: observations from a population of hearing impaired cases and variable carrier rates, complex genotypes, and ethnic stratification of alleles among controls.

Tang HY, Fang P, Ward PA, Schmitt E, Darilek S, Manolidis S, Oghalai JS, Roa BB, Alford RL.

Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Nov 15;140(22):2401-15. Erratum in: Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Nov 15;146A(22):2979..

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
17041943
PMCID:
PMC3623690

Loss-of-function and residual channel activity of connexin26 mutations associated with non-syndromic deafness.

Bruzzone R, Veronesi V, Gomès D, Bicego M, Duval N, Marlin S, Petit C, D'Andrea P, White TW.

FEBS Lett. 2003 Jan 2;533(1-3):79-88.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
12505163
See all PubMed Citations (17)

Details of each submission

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV002051362.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (17)

Description

Variant summary: GJB2 c.487A>G (p.Met163Val) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the extracellular 2 domain (Tang_2006) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 251140 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00075 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in GJB2 causing Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss phenotype (0.00034), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.487A>G has been reported in the literature as a VUS with a non-informative genotype (i.e., second allele not specified or heterozygous) for a recessive mode of inheritance among individuals with various forms of moderate non sensorineural hearing loss undergoing genetic evaluation in small and large sized gene panels for hearing loss (example, Marlin_2001, Janecke_2002, Bayazit_2003, Tang_2006, Hamid_2009, Padma_2009, Bonyadi_2009, Yilmaz_2010, Al-Qahtani_2010, Mahdieh_2011, Falah_2012, Leone_2017, Buonfiglio_2020, Xie_2021). At-least one individual with moderate hearing loss reported a homozygous genotype although no family history, co-segregation/co-occurrence was specified (Amorini_2015). One family where the variant was transmitted from a father with late onset hearing impairment to two affected siblings with early onset hearing loss reported a possible instance of autosomal dominant transmission with anticipation (Falah_2012). Another report speculates a role in digenic inheritance with synergistic heterozygosity for this variant and variants in the TMPRSS3 gene (Leone_2017). However, a firm conclusion regarding these atypical modes of inheritance remain speculative. These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. At least two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (example, Bruzzone_2003, Press_2017). The most pronounced variant effect results in a complete inability to form homotypic channels since the level of junctional conductance measured never exceeded background values (Bruzzone_2003) and impaired gap junction function (Press_2017). Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with a predominant consensus as VUS (n=6) (likely pathogenic, n=1). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation and the prevailing interpretation even in most recent publications remains as VUS (example, Buonfiglio_2020). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2024