NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Abstract
Evidence syntheses use multidisciplinary and intersectoral sources of evidence to support policy-making. The Health Evidence Network (HEN) has supported and strengthened the use of evidence in health policy-making in the WHO European Region since 2003. The HEN synthesis report series responds to public health questions by summarizing the best available global and local findings from peer-reviewed and grey literature, as well as policy options, and proposes general directions, strategies and actions for consideration. This resource has been developed to outline key approaches, methods and considerations for a HEN evidence synthesis to support the systematic and routine use of the best available evidence for decision-making relevant to the needs of public health decision-makers. It proposes approaches that hold both scientific rigour and practical applicability for individuals and institutions that perform, commission, review and/or publish evidence syntheses.
Contents
- ABBREVIATIONS
- CONTRIBUTORS
- SUMMARY
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. EVIDENCE SYNTHESES IN SUPPORT OF POLICY-MAKING: STEPS
- 2.1. Formulating a synthesis question
- 2.2. Defining the scope
- 2.3. Review methods
- 2.4. A dissemination and communication strategy
- 2.5. Searching and data extraction
- 2.6. Appraising and synthesizing data
- 2.7. Proposing policy options
- 2.8. Writing and presenting findings in a HEN synthesis report
- 2.9. Characteristics of policy-friendly synthesis
- 2.10. Quality control
- 3. SKILLS, CAPACITY AND RESOURCES REQUIRED TO UNDERTAKE A SYNTHESIS
- 4. CONCLUSIONS
- REFERENCES
- ANNEX 1. A FORMAT FOR A HEN SYNTHESIS REPORT
- ANNEX 2. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MAIN REVIEW TYPES RELEVANT TO HEN SYNTHESIS REPORTS
- ANNEX 3. A SELECTION OF USEFUL DATABASES
- ANNEX 4. SELECTION OF TOOLS FOR APPRAISING EVIDENCE
- ANNEX 5. EXAMPLES OF DIFFERENT GRADING SYSTEMS FOR EVIDENCE
Suggested citation:
Eklund Karlsson L, Takahashi R. A resource for developing an evidence synthesis report for policy-making. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2017 (Health Evidence Network (HEN) synthesis report 50).
The Health Evidence Network
HEN – the Health Evidence Network – is an information service for public health decision-makers in the WHO European Region, in action since 2003 and initiated and coordinated by the WHO Regional Office for Europe under the umbrella of the European Health Information Initiative (a multipartner network coordinating all health information activities in the European Region).
HEN supports public health decision-makers to use the best available evidence in their own decision-making and aims to ensure links between evidence, health policies and improvements in public health. The HEN synthesis report series provides summaries of what is known about the policy issue, the gaps in the evidence and the areas of debate. Based on the synthesized evidence, HEN proposes policy options, not recommendations, for further consideration of policy-makers to formulate their own recommendations and policies within their national context.
Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to:
Publications
WHO Regional Office for Europe
UN City, Marmorvej 51
DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
ISSN 2227-4316
ISBN 978 92 890 5266 5
© World Health Organization 2017
All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The views expressed by authors, editors, or expert groups do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008][Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7:S225-46. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
- Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.[Eur J Health Econ. 2008]Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1:5-29.
- Review Intersectoral Policy Priorities for Health.[Disease Control Priorities: Im...]Review Intersectoral Policy Priorities for Health.Watkins DA, Nugent R, Saxenian H, yamey G, Danforth K, González-Pier E, Mock CN, Jha P, Alwan A, Jamison DT. Disease Control Priorities: Improving Health and Reducing Poverty. 2017 Nov 27
- Obstacles and opportunities to using research evidence in local public health decision-making in England.[Health Res Policy Syst. 2019]Obstacles and opportunities to using research evidence in local public health decision-making in England.Kneale D, Rojas-García A, Thomas J. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 28; 17(1):61. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
- Review The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.[Prev Vet Med. 2014]Review The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.Young I, Waddell L, Sanchez J, Wilhelm B, McEwen SA, Rajić A. Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1; 113(4):339-55. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
- A Resource for Developing an Evidence Synthesis Report for Policy-MakingA Resource for Developing an Evidence Synthesis Report for Policy-Making
- DEGS2 delta 4-desaturase, sphingolipid 2 [Sus scrofa]DEGS2 delta 4-desaturase, sphingolipid 2 [Sus scrofa]Gene ID:100739329Gene
- Layn layilin [Mus musculus]Layn layilin [Mus musculus]Gene ID:244864Gene
- Apoa2 apolipoprotein A2 [Rattus norvegicus]Apoa2 apolipoprotein A2 [Rattus norvegicus]Gene ID:25649Gene
- Gene Links for GEO Profiles (Select 14455706) (1)Gene
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...