U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

O'Neil ME, Peterson K, Low A, et al. Suicide Prevention Interventions and Referral/Follow-Up Services: A Systematic Review [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2012 Mar.

Cover of Suicide Prevention Interventions and Referral/Follow-Up Services: A Systematic Review

Suicide Prevention Interventions and Referral/Follow-Up Services: A Systematic Review [Internet].

Show details

APPENDIX BSTUDY SELECTION FORM

VA ESP Suicide Prevention Study Selection Process: Coding

Step 1. Importing citations

  • Enter database name, search date, and other details into Custom 1.

Step 2. Title/Abstract level coding

  • The objective of the title/abstract review phase is to eliminate obviously irrelevant publications. Abstracts that lack an explicit reference to suicidal self-directed violence (e.g., suicidally, behaviors, attempts, and suicides) will be excluded at this phase. Reviewers will provide decision and characteristic codes and these will be recorded in Custom 3 of the EndNote library.
    • Decision codes:
      • R=Retrieve
      • E=Exclude
      • B=Retrieve for Background
    • Characteristic codes: Our first priority is retrieval of systematic reviews, especially those focusing on Veteran/military populations. Our second priority is retrieval of primary studies in Veteran/military populations. For ease of identifying these subsets of publications in the ENL, reviewers should add either or both of the following codes when applicable:
      • SR=systematic review
      • V=Veteran and/or military population

Step 3. Full-text level coding

  • Record final decision to include study in review, and any other study characteristics of interest.
    • Characteristics of interest (recorded in Custom Fields):
      • Population: Veteran/Military or Non-Veteran/Military
      • Intervention Type: Psychotherapy, Pharmacotherapy, or Referral/Follow-up
      • Study Design: Systematic Review, clinical trial (randomized or nonrandomized), observational study, other
    • Full-text exclusion codes to be entered into Custom 4:
      • 1=Non-English language
      • 2=Ineligible country (only including US, UK, Canada, New Zealand, Australia)
      • 3=Ineligible outcome
      • 4=Ineligible intervention (i.e., broadly focused public health interventions implemented among populations, etc.)
      • 5=Study does not evaluate interventions
      • 6=Ineligible publication type (e.g., letter, editorial, publication available only as abstract, non-systematic review, etc.)
      • 7=Ineligible systematic review due to limitations in quality
      • 8=Nonsystematic regulatory agency analysis
      • 9=Non-RCT study design
  • Full-text coding to be completed in the format of a label affixed to each publication in the format shown below. Reviewer 1 will circle relevant characteristics and inclusion decision, and list an exclusion code when applicable. Reviewer 2 will verify Reviewer 1's decisions and circle Agree or Disagree. All disagreements will be resolved using a consensus process and consensus decisions recorded.

Pop: Vet-Mil / Non-Vet-Mil

Intervention: Meds / Thpy / Ref-FU / NA

Design: SR / CT / Obs / Other

Rev1: Include / Exclude – Code: ____

Rev2: Agree / Disagree Consensus: ____

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.7M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...