Copyright Notice
This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be acknowledged.
Bookshelf ID: NBK543443
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Childers CP, Lamaina M, Liu C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Leg Bypass versus Endovascular Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2019 Mar.
Cost-effectiveness of Leg Bypass versus Endovascular Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review [Internet].
Show details| Author Year | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants and personnel | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Other sources of bias |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam, 20052 | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚫ | ⚪* | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ |
⚪ = low risk of bias ⚫ = risk of bias ⯋ = unknown
- *
low risk of bias for primary outcomes (all-cause mortality and amputation-free survival, but high risk of bias for secondary outcomes
- Quality Assessment for Included RCT Study - Cost-effectiveness of Leg Bypass ver...Quality Assessment for Included RCT Study - Cost-effectiveness of Leg Bypass versus Endovascular Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review
- Methods - Cost-effectiveness of Leg Bypass versus Endovascular Therapy for Criti...Methods - Cost-effectiveness of Leg Bypass versus Endovascular Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...