U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Popay J, Whitehead M, Carr-Hill R, et al. The impact on health inequalities of approaches to community engagement in the New Deal for Communities regeneration initiative: a mixed-methods evaluation. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015 Sep. (Public Health Research, No. 3.12.)

Cover of The impact on health inequalities of approaches to community engagement in the New Deal for Communities regeneration initiative: a mixed-methods evaluation

The impact on health inequalities of approaches to community engagement in the New Deal for Communities regeneration initiative: a mixed-methods evaluation.

Show details

References

1.
Popay J, Dibben C, Halliday E, Nazroo J, Povall S, Stafford M, et al. Evaluating the impact of New Deal for Communities on Health Inequalities: Phase 2. No. PR-IP-0509–0180063. London: HMSO; 2015. URL: www​.prpccf.org.uk/PRPFiles​/SFR_April_2015​/PRP%20funded%20projects​%20Summary%20final​%20reports%20-%20April%202015.pdf (accessed September 2015).
2.
Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Tackling Inequalities in Health: What can we Learn from What has Been Tried? Working paper prepared for The King’s Fund International Seminar on Tackling Inequalities in Health, Ditchley Park, Oxfordshire, September 1993. London, King’s Fund. In Dahlgren G, Whitehead M, editors. European Strategies for Tackling Social Inequities in Health: Levelling Up Part 2. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2007. pp. 20–32.
3.
House of Commons Health Committee. Health Inequalities. Third Report of Session 2008–9. Volume 1. HC286–1. London: The Stationery Office; 2009.
4.
Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S, Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet 2008;372:1661–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6. [PubMed: 18994664] [CrossRef]
5.
Popay J, Whitehead M, Hunter D. Injustice is killing people on a large scale – but what is to be done about it? J Public Health 2010;32:148–9. 10.1093/pubmed/fdq029. [PubMed: 20423920] [CrossRef]
6.
Phelan JC, Link BG, Tehranifar P. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: theory, evidence, and policy implications. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51:S28–40. 10.1177/0022146510383498. [PubMed: 20943581] [CrossRef]
7.
White M, Adams J, Heywood P. How and Why do Interventions that Increase Health Overall Widen Inequalities within Populations. In Babones S, editor. Social Inequality and Public Health. Bristol: Policy Press; 2009. pp. 65–82. 10.1332/policypress/9781847423207.003.0005. [CrossRef]
8.
Graham H, Britain G. When Life’s a Drag: Women, Smoking and Disadvantage. Norwich: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1993.
9.
Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Boyce T, McNeish D, Grady M, et al. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post-2010. London, The Marmot Review; 2010.
10.
Bartley M, Blane D. Inequality and Social Class. In Scambler G, editor. Sociology as Applied to Medicine. Saunder: Elsvier; 2003. pp. 115–32.
11.
Popay J. Community Empowerment and Health improvement: The English Experience. In Morgan A, Davies M, Ziglio E, editors. Health Assets in a Global Context Theory, Methods, Action. New York, NY: Springer; 2010. pp. 183–95. 10.1007/978-1-4419-5921-8_10. [CrossRef]
12.
Popay J, Finegan H. Learning about Effective Community Engagement from Selected National Initiatives. NCCCE Working Paper 5. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2005.
13.
Karasek RA Jr. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Q 1979;24:285–308. 10.2307/2392498. [CrossRef]
14.
Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996;1:27–41. 10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27. [PubMed: 9547031] [CrossRef]
15.
Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam AS, Alexander SH. The Social Cure: Identity, Health and Well-Being. Hove: Psychology Press; 2012.
16.
Carr-Hill R, Street A. Economic analysis of cost-effectiveness of community engagement to improve health. CHE research paper 33. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 2007.
17.
Mason AR, Carr-Hill R, Myers LA, Street AD. Establishing the economics of engaging communities in health promotion: what is desirable, what is feasible? Crit Pub Health 2008;18:285–97. 10.1080/09581590802277366. [CrossRef]
18.
Popay J, Attree P, Hornby D, Milton B, Whitehead M, French B, et al. Community Engagement to Address the Wider Social Determinants of Health: a Review of Evidence. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2007.
19.
Narayan D. Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: A Sourcebook. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2002.
20.
Cairncross L, Morrell C, Darke J, Brownhill S. Tenants Managing – An Evaluation of Tenant Management Organisations in England. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; 2002.
21.
Findlay E. Review of the Impact of Community Engagement within Regeneration. Edinburgh: Social Research, Scottish Government; 2010.
22.
Pratchett L, Durose C, Lowndes V, Smith G, Stoker G, Wales C. Empowering Communities to Influence Local Decision Making: Systematic Review of the Evidence. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2009.
23.
Chandler M, Lalonde E. Cultural Continuity as a Moderator of Suicide Risk among Canada’s First Nations. In Kirmayer L, Valaskakis G, editors. The Mental Health of Canadian Aboriginal Peoples: Transformations, Identity, and Community. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press; 2009. pp. 221–47.
24.
Chandler MJ, Lalonde C. Cultural continuity as a hedge against suicide in Canada’s First Nations. Transcult Psychiatry 1998;35:191–219. 10.1177/136346159803500202. [CrossRef]
25.
Coote A, Angel J. NEF working paper. Solidarity: Why it Matters for a New Social Settlement. London: New Economics Foundation; 2014.
26.
Popay J, Bennett S, Thomas C, Williams G, Gatrell A, Bostock L. Beyond ‘beer, fags, egg and chips’? Exploring lay understandings of social inequalities in health. Sociol Health Illn 2003;25:1–23. 10.1111/1467-9566.t01-1-00322. [PubMed: 14498942] [CrossRef]
27.
Elliot E, Popay J, Williams G. Knowledge of the Everyday: Confronting the Causes of Health Inequalities. In Smith K, Bambra C, Hill S, editors. Health Inequalities: Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; In press 2015.
28.
Pickin C, Popay J, Staley K, Bruce N, Jones C, Gowman N. Developing a model to enhance the capacity of statutory organisations to engage with lay communities. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:34–42. 10.1258/1355819021927656. [PubMed: 11822259] [CrossRef]
29.
Bridge Consortium. The Evaluation of the Big Lottery Fund Healthy Living Centres. Third Annual Report of the Bridge Consortium. London: Big Lottery Fund; 2005.
30.
Barnes M, Newman J, Sullivan H. Discursive arenas: deliberation and the constitution of identity in public participation at a local level. Soc Mov Stud 2006;5:193–207. 10.1080/14742830600991487. [CrossRef]
31.
Barnes M, Sullivan H, Matka E. The Development of Collaborative Capacity in Health Action Zones. A Final Report from the National Evaluation. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 2003.
32.
Myers P, Barnes J, Brodie I. Sure Start National Evaluation. Partnership Working in Sure Start Local Programmes. A Synthesis of Early Findings from Local Programme Evaluations. London: Birkbeck University of London; 2004.
33.
Woods SE, Lake JR, Springett J. Tackling health inequalities and the HAZ Smoking Cessation Programme: the perfect match? Crit Pub Health 2003;13:61–76. 10.1080/0958159031000100233. [CrossRef]
34.
Sullivan H, Judge K, Sewel K. ‘In the eye of the beholder’: perceptions of local impact in English Health Action Zones. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1603–12. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.013. [PubMed: 15279919] [CrossRef]
35.
Crawshaw P, Bunton R, Gillen K. Health Action Zones and the problem of community. Health Soc Care Community 2003;11:36–44. 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00397.x. [PubMed: 14629231] [CrossRef]
36.
Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research. New Deal for Communities: The National Evaluation. The Programme Wide Annual Report 2003/04. Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University; 2004.
37.
Cropper S, Goodwin M. Policy Experiments: Policy Making, Implementation and Learning. In Cropper S, Porter A, Williams G, Carlisle S, Moore R, et al. , editors. Community Health and Wellbeing: Action Research on Health, Inequalities. Bristol: Polity Press; 2007. pp. 23–47.
38.
Ball M. Sure Start National Evaluation. Getting Sure Start Started. Nottingham: Department for Education and Science Publications; 2002.
39.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Community Engagement to Improve Health. Public Health Guidance 9. London: NICE; 2008.
40.
Chen H. Theory-Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
41.
Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
42.
Weiss CH. Theory-Based Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future. In Rog D, Fournier D, editors. Progress and Future Directions In Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory, Practice and Methods. San Jose, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1997. pp. 41–55. 10.1002/ev.1086. [CrossRef]
43.
Wholey JS. Evaluation and Effective Public Management. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1983.
44.
Weiss CH. Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute; 1995. pp. 65–92.
45.
Goodman R, Wandersman A, Chinman M, Imm P, Morrissey E. An ecological assessment of community-based interventions for prevention and health promotion: approaches to measuring community coalitions. Am J Community Psychol 1996;24:33–61. 10.1007/BF02511882. [PubMed: 8712187] [CrossRef]
46.
Bauld L, Judge K. Learning from Health Action Zones. Chichester: Aeneas Press; 2002.
47.
Whitehead M. A typology of actions to tackle social inequalities in health. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:473–8. 10.1136/jech.2005.037242. [PMC free article: PMC2465710] [PubMed: 17496254] [CrossRef]
48.
Social Exclusion Unit. Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.
49.
Barnes M, Newman J, Sullivan H. Power, participation, and political renewal: theoretical perspectives on public participation under New Labour in Britain. Soc Polit 2004;11:267–79. 10.1093/sp/jxh034. [CrossRef]
50.
Wallace A. New neighbourhoods, new citizens? Challenging ‘community’ as a framework for social and moral regeneration under New Labour in the UK. Int J Urban Reg Res 2010;34:805–19. 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00918.x. [CrossRef]
51.
Wright JS, Parry J, Mathers J, Jones S, Orford J. Assessing the participatory potential of Britain’s New Deal for Communities: opportunities for and constraints to ‘bottom-up community participation’. Policy Stud 2006;27:347–61. 10.1080/01442870601010051. [CrossRef]
52.
Lawless P, Pearson S. Outcomes from community engagement in urban regeneration: evidence from England’s New Deal for Communities programme. Plann Theory Pract 2012;13:509–27. 10.1080/14649357.2012.728003. [CrossRef]
53.
Batty E, Beatty C, Foden M, Lawless P, Pearson S, Wilson I. Involving Local People in Regeneration: Evidence from the NDC Programme. The New Deal for Communities National Evaluation: Final Report – Volume 2. Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2010.
54.
Lawless P. Can area-based regeneration programmes ever work? Evidence from England’s New Deal for Communities programme. Policy Stud 2012;33:313–28. 10.1080/01442872.2012.694639. [CrossRef]
55.
INVOLVE. Payment for Involvement: A Guide for Making Payments to Members of the Public Actively Involved in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh: NIHR INVOLVE; 2010.
56.
Russell H. Community Engagement: Some Lessons from the New Deal for Communities Programme. European Institute for Urban Affairs, Liverpool John Moores University. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2008.
57.
Laverack G, Labonte R. A planning framework for community empowerment goals within health promotion. Health Policy Plann 2000;15:255–62. 10.1093/heapol/15.3.255. [PubMed: 11012399] [CrossRef]
58.
Pérez D, Lefèvre P, Romero MI, Sánchez L, De Vos P, Van der Stuyft P. Augmenting frameworks for appraising the practices of community-based health interventions. Health Policy Plann 2009;24:335–41. 10.1093/heapol/czp028. [PubMed: 19549795] [CrossRef]
59.
Draper AK, Hewitt G, Rifkin S. Chasing the dragon: developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes. Soc Sci Med 2010;71:1102–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.016. [PubMed: 20621405] [CrossRef]
60.
Laverack G, Wallerstein N. Measuring community empowerment: a fresh look at organizational domains. Health Promot Int 2001;16:179–85. 10.1093/heapro/16.2.179. [PubMed: 11356756] [CrossRef]
61.
Head BW. Community engagement: participation on whose terms? Aust J Polit Sci 2007;42:441–54. 10.1080/10361140701513570. [CrossRef]
62.
Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners 1969;35:216–24. 10.1080/01944366908977225. [CrossRef]
63.
Preston R, Waugh H, Larkins S, Taylor J. Community participation in rural primary health care: intervention or approach? Aust J Prim Health 2010;16:4–16. 10.1071/PY09053. [PubMed: 21133292] [CrossRef]
64.
Fordham G. The New Deal for Communities Programme: Achieving a Neighbourhood Focus for Regeneration. The New Deal For Communities National Evaluation: Final Report – Volume 1. Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2010.
65.
Batty E, Beatty C, Foden M, Lawless P, Pearson S, Wilson E. Improving Outcomes For People In Deprived Neighbourhoods: Evidence From The New Deal For Communities Programme The New Deal For Communities National Evaluation: Final Report – Volume 4. Centre for Regional and Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2010.
66.
Gambetta D. Can we trust trust? In Gambetta D, editor. Trust: Making And Breaking Cooperative Relations. New York, NY: Blackwell; 1988. pp. 213–37.
67.
Rogers B, Robinson E. The Benefits of Community Engagement. A Review of the Evidence. London: Active Citizenship Centre, Home Office; 2004.
68.
Stafford M, Nazroo J, Popay JM, Whitehead M. Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities initiative. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:298–304. 10.1136/jech.2006.058628. [PubMed: 18339821] [CrossRef]
69.
Batty E, Beatty C, Foden M, Lawless P, Pearson S, Wilson I. The New Deal for Communities Experience: a Final Assessment. The New Deal for Communities Evaluation: Final Report – Volume 7. Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2010.
70.
Pearson S, Batty E, Cook B, Foden M, Knight-Fordham R, Peters J. Improving Health Outcomes in Deprived Communities: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2010.
71.
Lawless P, Foden M, Wilson I, Beatty C. Understanding area-based regeneration: the New Deal for Communities programme in England. Urban Stud 2010;47:257–75. 10.1177/0042098009348324. [CrossRef]
72.
Lawless P, Beatty C. Exploring change in local regeneration areas: evidence from the New Deal for Communities programme in England. Urban Stud 2013;50:942–58. 10.1177/0042098012458005. [CrossRef]
73.
Riva M, Curtis SE. Long-term local area employment rates as predictors of individual mortality and morbidity: a prospective study in England, spanning more than two decades. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:919–26. 10.1136/jech-2011-200306. [PubMed: 22473585] [CrossRef]
74.
Office for National Statistics. General Household Survey. London: ONS; 2001.
75.
IPSOS Mori. Public Affairs Monitor. London: IPSOS Mori; 2009.
76.
Okun AM. Equality and Efficiency, The Big Tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1975.
77.
Goulbourne M, Embuldeniya D. Assigning Economic Value to Volunteer Activity: Eight Tools for Efficient Program Management. Toronto, CA: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy; 2002.
78.
Gaskin K. VIVA – the Volunteer Investment and Value Audit. Research Bulletin. Toronto: Institute for Volunteer Research; 2003.
79.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Assessing the Impact of Spatial Interventions. Regeneration, Renewal and Regional Development. ‘The 3Rs guidance’. London: ODPM; 2004.
80.
Gaskin K, Dobson B. The Economic Equation of Volunteering. Social Policy Research 110. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 1997.
81.
Handy F, Srinivasan N. Valuing volunteers: an economic evaluation of the net benefits of hospital volunteers. Nonprof Volunt Sect Q 2004;33:28–54. 10.1177/0899764003260961. [CrossRef]
82.
Beatty C, Brennan A, Foden MI, Lawless P, Tyler P, et al. The News Deal for Communities Programme: Assessing Impact and Value for Money. The New Deal for Communities National Evaluation: Final Report – Volume 6. Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2010. URL: http://extra​.shu.ac.uk​/ndc/downloads/general​/Volume%20six%20-​%20Assessing%20impact​%20and%20value%20for%20money%20.pdf (accessed September 2015).
83.
Foden M, Pearson S. The 2008 Partnership Survey. Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme. Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2009.
84.
McNamara N, Stevenson C, Muldoon OT. Community identity as resource and context: a mixed method investigation of coping and collective action in a disadvantaged community. Eur J Soc Psychol 2013;43:393–403. 10.1002/ejsp.1953. [CrossRef]
85.
Hawe P, Shiell A. Social capital and health promotion: a review. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:871–85. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00067-8. [PubMed: 10972431] [CrossRef]
86.
Wallerstein N. Empowerment to reduce health disparities. Scand J Public Health 2002;30:72–7. 10.1177/14034948020300031201. [PubMed: 12227969] [CrossRef]
87.
Kilpatrick S. Multi-level rural community engagement in health. Aust J Rural Health 2009;17:39–44. 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.01035.x. [PubMed: 19161499] [CrossRef]
88.
Mathers J, Parry J, Jones S. Exploring resident (non-)participation in the UK New Deal for Communities regeneration programme. Urban Stud 2008;45:591–606. 10.1177/0042098007087336. [CrossRef]
89.
Whitehead M, Orton L, Pennington A, Nayak S, King A, Petticrew M, Sowden A, White M. Is Control in the Living Environment Important for Health and Wellbeing, and What are the Implications for Public Health Interventions? Final Report to DH. London: Public Health Research Consortium; 2014.
90.
O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid D, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F. Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. Public Health Res 2013;1(4). [PubMed: 25642563]
91.
Lawson L, Kearns A. Rethinking the purpose of community empowerment in neighbourhood regeneration: the need for policy clarity. Local Econ 2014;29:65–81. 10.1177/0269094213519307. [CrossRef]
92.
Harris J, Springett J, Croot L, Booth A, Campbell F, Thompson J, et al. Community-Based Peer Support: Developing a Model for Promoting Health Literacy. Draft Final Report to the NIHR Public Health Research Programme. Reference no. 09/3008/04. 2014.
93.
Hart C, Jones K, Bains M. Do the people want power? The social responsibilities of empowering communities. In Hoggett P, editor. Contested Communities: Experiences, Struggles, Policies. Bristol: Policy Press; 1997. pp. 180–200.
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2015. This work was produced by Popay et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

Bookshelf ID: NBK321030
Contents

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.3M)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...