U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Turner J, Siriwardena AN, Coster J, et al. Developing new ways of measuring the quality and impact of ambulance service care: the PhOEBE mixed-methods research programme. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Apr. (Programme Grants for Applied Research, No. 7.3.)

Cover of Developing new ways of measuring the quality and impact of ambulance service care: the PhOEBE mixed-methods research programme

Developing new ways of measuring the quality and impact of ambulance service care: the PhOEBE mixed-methods research programme.

Show details

References

1.
NHS England. Ambulance Quality Indicators 2016/17. Leeds: NHS England; 2017. URL: www​.england.nhs.uk/statistics​/statistical-work-areas​/ambulance-quality-indicators​/ambulance-quality-indicators-data-2016-17/ (accessed 30 July 2018).
2.
Department of Health and Social Care. Taking Healthcare to the Patient: Transforming NHS Ambulance Services. London: The Stationery Office; 2005. URL: www​.nwas.nhs.uk/media​/79142/taking_healthcare​_to_the_patient_1.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019).
3.
Turner J, Nicholl J, Webber L, Cleary K. A preliminary analysis of the nature and management of category C calls (abstract). Pre-hospital Immediate care 1999;3:177.
4.
NHS England. High Quality Care for All, Now and for Future Generations: Transforming Urgent and Emergency Care Services in England – Urgent and Emergency Care Review End of Phase 1 Report. Leeds: NHS England; 2013. URL: www​.england.nhs.uk/wp-content​/uploads/2013​/06/urg-emerg-care-ev-bse.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019).
5.
Department of Health and Social Care. High Quality Care for All – NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. London: Department of Health and Social Care; July 2008. URL: https://assets​.publishing​.service.gov.uk​/government/uploads/system​/uploads/attachment_data​/file/228836/7432.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019).
6.
Office of Public Sector Information. Health Act 2009 (C21). Quality & Delivery of NHS Services in England. Chapter 2 Quality Accounts. London; 2009. URL: www​.opsi.gov.uk/acts​/acts2009/ukpga_20090021_en_1 (accessed 30 July 2018).
7.
Office of the Strategic Health Authorities. Emergency Services Review – A Comparative Review of Ambulance Service International Best Practice. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2009. URL: www​.nhsimas.nhs.uk/fileadmin​/Files/IST/ESR​_A_comparative_review​_of_international​_Ambulance_Service_best_practice.pdf (accessed 30 July 2018).
8.
O’Keeffe C, Nicholl J, Turner J, Goodacre S. Role of ambulance response times in the survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Emerg Med J 2011;28:703–6. 10.1136/emj.2009.086363 [PubMed: 20798090] [CrossRef]
9.
Turner J, Jacques R, Crum A, Coster J, Stone T, Nicholl J. Ambulance Response Programme: Evaluation of Phase 1 and Phase 2. Sheffield: Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research, University of Sheffield; 2017. URL: www​.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1​.715849!​/file/ARPReport_Final.pdf (accessed 30 July 2018).
10.
Turner J, O’Keeffe C, Dixon S, Warren K, Nicholl J. The Costs and Benefits of Changing Ambulance Service Response Time Performance Standards. Sheffield: Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield; 2006. URL: www​.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1​.44084!​/file/MCRU-ambrespperf-2006.pdf (accessed 12 March 2019).
11.
Pons PT, Haukoos JS, Bludworth W, Cribley T, Pons KA, Markovchick VJ. Paramedic response time: does it affect patient survival? Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:594–600. 10.1197/j.aem.2005.02.013 [PubMed: 15995089] [CrossRef]
12.
Blackwell TH, Kline JA, Willis JJ, Hicks GM. Lack of association between pre-hospital response times and patient outcomes. Prehosp Emeg Care 2009;13:444–450. 10.1080/10903120902935363 [PubMed: 19731155] [CrossRef]
13.
Snooks H, Evans A, Wells B, Peconi J, Thomas M, Woollard M, et al. What are the highest priorities for research in emergency prehospital care? Emerg Med J 2009;26:549–50. 10.1136/emj.2008.065862 [PubMed: 19625545] [CrossRef]
14.
Turner J. Building the Evidence Base in Pre-hospital Emergency and Urgent Care: A Review of Research Evidence and Priorities for Future Research. University of Sheffield, Medical Care Research Unit. Department of Health and Social Care; 2010. URL: https://assets​.publishing​.service.gov.uk​/government/uploads/system​/uploads/attachment_data​/file/216064/dh_117198.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019).
15.
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives. Measuring Patient Outcomes: Clinical Quality Indicators. London: Association of Ambulance Chief Executives. URL: https://aace​.org.uk/uk-ambulance-service​/national-performance/ (accessed 7 March 2019).
16.
Siriwardena AN, Shaw D, Donohoe R, Black S, Stephenson J, National Ambulance Clinical Audit Steering Group. Development and pilot of clinical performance indicators for English ambulance services. Emerg Med J 2010;27:327–31. 10.1136/emj.2009.072397 [PubMed: 20385697] [CrossRef]
17.
Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA, Flanagan ME. A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma 1989;29:623–9. 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00017 [PubMed: 2657085] [CrossRef]
18.
Harrison DA, Brady AR, Parry GJ, Carpenter JR, Rowan K. Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicentre cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1378–88. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000216702.94014.75 [PubMed: 16557153] [CrossRef]
19.
Department of Health and Social Care. URL: www​.gov.uk/government​/organisations/department-of-health-and-social-care (accessed 7 March 2019).
20.
National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians (NAEMSP). URL: https://naemsp​.org/ (accessed 7 March 2019).
21.
NHS Confederation. URL: www​.nhsconfed.org/ (accessed 7 March 2019).
22.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med 2009;6:e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 [PMC free article: PMC2707599] [PubMed: 19621072] [CrossRef]
23.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. URL: www​.med.unc.edu/pediatrics​/files/2018/01​/crossing-the-quality-chasm.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019). [PubMed: 25057539]
24.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;44:Suppl:166–206. 10.2307/3348969 [PubMed: 5338568] [CrossRef]
25.
Turner J, Coster J, Phung V-H, Booth A, Wilson R, Siriwardena N. Systematic Searches and Review of Related Research Evidence on Ambulance Service Performance and Quality Measurement. Supplemental File to PhOEBE Programme. Sheffield: University of Sheffield; 2018. URL: www​.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr​/sections/hsr/mcru/phoebe/reports (accessed 7 April 2019).
26.
Coster JE, Irving AD, Turner JK, Phung VH, Siriwardena AN. Prioritizing novel and existing ambulance performance measures through expert and lay consensus: a three-stage multimethod consensus study. Health Expect 2018;21:249–60. 10.1111/hex.12610 [PMC free article: PMC5750751] [PubMed: 28841252] [CrossRef]
27.
Irving A, Turner J, Marsh M, Broadway-Parkinson A, Fall D, Coster J, Siriwardena AN. A coproduced patient and public event: an approach to developing and prioritizing ambulance performance measures. Health Expect 2018;21:230–8. 10.1111/hex.12606 [PMC free article: PMC5750774] [PubMed: 28841272] [CrossRef]
28.
Togher FJ, O’Cathain A, Phung VH, Turner J, Siriwardena AN. Reassurance as a key outcome valued by emergency ambulance service users: a qualitative interview study. Health Expect 2014;18:2951–61. 10.1111/hex.12279 [PMC free article: PMC5810705] [PubMed: 25303062] [CrossRef]
29.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) Online Versions. Geneva: World Health Organization. URL: www​.who.int/classifications​/icd/icdonlineversions/en/ (accessed 7 March 2010).
30.
Coleman P, Nicholl J. Consensus methods to identify a set of potential performance indicators for systems of emergency and urgent care. J Health Serv Res Policy 2010;15(Suppl. 2):12–18. 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009096 [PubMed: 20354114] [CrossRef]
31.
NHS England. Ambulance Quality Indicators. URL: www​.england.nhs.uk/statistics​/statistical-work-areas​/ambulance-quality-indicators/ (accessed 7 March 2018).
32.
Bureau of Health Information. Data Matters: Linking Data to Unlock Information. The Use of Linked Data in Healthcare Performance Assessment. Chatswood, NSW: Bureau of Health Information; 2015. URL: www​.bhi.nsw.gov.au/__data​/assets/pdf_file​/0003/290712/DataMatters.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019).
33.
Downing A, Wilson R, Cooke M. Linkage of ambulance service and accident and emergency department data: a study of assault patients in the west midlands region of the UK. Injury 2005;36:738–44. 10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.045 [PubMed: 15910826] [CrossRef]
34.
Crilly JL, O’Dwyer JA, O’Dwyer MA, Lind JF, Peters JA, Tippett VC, et al. Linking ambulance, emergency department and hospital admissions data: understanding the emergency journey. Med J Aust 2011;194:S34–7. [PubMed: 21401486]
35.
Office for National Statistics. URL: www​.ons.gov.uk/ (accessed 7 March 2019).
36.
Health Research Authority. Principles of Advice. Bristol: Health Research Authority; 2015. URL: www​.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2015/03/195369​.pdf (accessed 9 August 2016).
37.
Great Britain. Data Protection Act 1998. London: The Stationery Office; 1998. URL: www​.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29 (accessed 7 March 2019).
38.
Oderkirk J, Ronchi E, Klazinga N. International comparisons of health system performance among OECD countries: opportunities and data privacy protection challenges. Health Policy 2013;112:9–18. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.06.006 [PubMed: 23870099] [CrossRef]
39.
Dusetzina SB, Tyree S, Meyer AM, Meyer A, Green L, Carpenter WR. Linking Data for Health Services Research: A Framework and Instructional Guide. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014. URL: https:​//effectivehealthcare​.ahrq.gov/sites​/default/files/pdf​/registries-linking-records-methods​_research.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019). [PubMed: 25392892]
40.
Nicholl J, Coleman P, Jenkins J, Knowles E, O’Cathain A, Turner J. The Emergency and Urgent Care System. Final report to the Department of Health and Social Care. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, Medical Care Research Unit; 2011.
41.
O’Keeffe C, Mason S, Jacques R, Nicholl J. Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): a retrospective analysis of routine ED data. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0192855. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855 [PMC free article: PMC5825051] [PubMed: 29474392] [CrossRef]
42.
Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016;353:i2139. 10.1136/bmj.i2139 [PubMed: 27143499] [CrossRef]
43.
Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA 2001;286:415–20. 10.1001/jama.286.4.415 [PubMed: 11466119] [CrossRef]
44.
Briant R, Buchanan J, Lay-Yee R, Davis P. Representative case series from New Zealand public hospital admissions in 1998 – III: adverse events and death. N Z Med J 2006;119:U1909. [PubMed: 16582971]
45.
Shojania KG, Dixon-Woods M. Estimating deaths due to medical error: the ongoing controversy and why it matters. BMJ Qual Saf 2017;26:423–8. 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006144 [PubMed: 27733444] [CrossRef]
46.
Royal College of Physicians. National Mortality Case Record Review Programme Resources. London: Royal College of Physicians; URL: www​.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects​/outputs/national-mortality-case-record-review-nmcrr-programme-resources (accessed 30 July 2018).
47.
Hogan H, Healey F, Neale G, Thomson R, Black N, Vincent C. Learning from preventable deaths: exploring case record reviewers’ narratives using change analysis. J R Soc Med 2014;107:365–75. 10.1177/0141076814532394 [PMC free article: PMC4206622] [PubMed: 24781159] [CrossRef]
48.
Hutchinson A. Using the Structured Judgement Review Method. A Guide for Reviewers (England). In National Mortality Case Record Review Programme. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016. URL: www​.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites​/default/files/media​/Documents/NMCRR​%20guide%20England_0.pdf (accessed 6 April 2019).
49.
National Institute for Health Research. Why Research Matters. Southampton: National Institute for Health Research; URL: www​.nihr.ac.uk/patients-and-public​/why-join-in​/why-research-matters.htm (accessed 7 March 2019).
50.
Cornwall A, Gaventa J, From users and choosers to makers and shapers: repositioning participation in social policy. IDS Bulletin 2000;31:50–61. 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2000.mp31004006.x [CrossRef]
51.
Irving A, Broadway-Parkinson A, Marsh M, Fall D. Who cares about ambulance performance measures?! The role of PPI in developing an animation for dissemination of the PhOEBE programme. Poster presented at the INVOLVE National Conference, London 28 Nov 2017.
52.
Irving A, Broadway-Parkinson A, Marsh M, Fall D. Revolution in PPI or revolt? A meeting of minds or a clash of opinions. Emerg Med J 2015;32:e15. Poster presented at the 999 EMS Research Forum Conference, Sheffield, 19 February 2014, and the INVOLVE Conference, National Exhibition Centre, Birmingham 26–27 November 2014.
53.
University of Sheffield. Ambulance Research: The PhOEBE Project. [YouTube]. 28 November 2017. URL: www​.youtube.com/watch?v​=g2saLhBv9-U&feature=youtu.be (accessed 6 April 2019).
54.
Pringle M, Wilson T, Grol R. Measuring ‘goodness’ in individuals and healthcare systems. BMJ 2002;325:704–7. 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.704 [PMC free article: PMC1124227] [PubMed: 12351367] [CrossRef]
55.
Audit Commission for Local Authorities in England and Wales. Target: The Practice of Performance Indicators. London: Audit Commission; 2000.
56.
Bird SM, Cox Sir D, Farwell VT, Goldstein H, Holt T, Smith PC. Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly. J R Statist Soc 2005;168(part1):1–27.
57.
Pencheon D. The Good Indicators Guide: Understanding How to Use and Choose Indicators. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. URL: www​.england.nhs.uk/improvement-hub​/wp-content​/uploads/sites/44​/2017/11/The-Good-Indicators-Guide.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019).
58.
Jones P, Shepherd M, Wells S, Le Fevre J, Ameratunga S. Review article: what makes a good healthcare quality indicator? A systematic review and validation study. Emerg Med Australas 2014;26:113–24. 10.1111/1742-6723.12195 [PubMed: 24707999] [CrossRef]
59.
Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). NHS Reference Costs 2015–16. London: DHSC; 2016.
60.
Mahalanobis PC. Analysis of race mixture in Bengal. J Asiatic Soc Bengal 1927;23:301–33.
61.
Langton JM, Goldsbury D, Srasuebkul P, Ingham JM, O’Connell DL, Pearson SA. Insights from linking routinely collected data across Australian health jurisdictions: a case study of end-of-life health service use. Public Health Res Pract 2018;28:e2811806. 10.17061/phrp2811806 [PubMed: 29582040] [CrossRef]
62.
NHS National Services Scotland. Unscheduled Care Data Mart. Information Services Division. URL: www​.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics​/Emergency-Care​/Patient-Pathways​/UrgentCareDataMartBackgroundPaper​_20171002.pdf (accessed 27 July 2018).
63.
Murphy A, Wakai A, Walsh C, Cummins F, O’Sullivan R. Development of key performance indicators for prehospital emergency care. Emerg Med J 2016;33:286–92. 10.1136/emermed-2015-204793 [PubMed: 26796739] [CrossRef]
64.
Spaite DW, Maio R, Garrison HG, Desmond JS, Gregor MA, Stiell IG, et al. Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project (EMSOP) II: developing the foundation and conceptual models for out-of-hospital outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:657–63. 10.1067/mem.2001.115215 [PubMed: 11385338] [CrossRef]
65.
NHS England. Five Year Forward View. London: NHS England; 2014. URL: www​.england.nhs.uk/wp-content​/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf (accessed 30 July 2018).
66.
NHS Digital. NHS Digital Data and Information Strategy. Leeds: NHS Digital; 2016. URL: https://digital​.nhs.uk​/data-and-information​/nhs-digital-data-and-information-strategy (accessed 30 July 2018).
67.
Ray D, Roebuck C, Smith O. Delivering Linked Datasets to Support Health and Care Delivery and Research. Leeds: NHS Digital; 2018. URL: https://digital​.nhs.uk​/services/data-access-request-service-dars​/linked-datasets-supporting-health-and-care-delivery-and-research (accessed 27 July 2018).
68.
Heitmueller A, Henderson S, Warburton W, Elmagarmid A, Pentland AS, Darzi A. Developing public policy to advance the use of big data in health care. Health Aff 2014;33:1523–30. 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0771 [PubMed: 25201656] [CrossRef]
69.
NHS England. Ambulance Quality Indicators Data 2018/19. London: NHS England. URL: www​.england.nhs.uk/statistics​/statistical-work-areas​/ambulance-quality-indicators​/ambulance-quality-indicators-data-2018-19/ (accessed 27 July 2018).
70.
NHS England. Transforming urgent and emergency care services in England. Urgent and emergency care review. End of phase 1 report. Leeds: NHS England; 2013. URL: www​.nhs.uk/NHSEngland​/keogh-review/Documents/UECR​.Ph1Report.FV.pdf (accessed 6 April 2019).
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2019. This work was produced by Turner et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.
Bookshelf ID: NBK540538

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (2.4M)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...