NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Headline
This study demonstrated feasibility across most objectives and although recruitment and retention were lower than planned, strategies to improve them in a full trial were identified.
Abstract
Background:
Up to 160,000 people incur traumatic brain injury (TBI) each year in the UK. TBI can have profound effects on many areas of human functioning, including participation in work. There is limited evidence of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation (VR) after injury to promote early return to work (RTW) following TBI.
Objective:
To assess the feasibility of a definitive, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early, specialist VR plus usual care (UC) compared with UC alone on work retention 12 months post TBI.
Design:
A multicentre, feasibility, parallel-group RCT with a feasibility economic evaluation and an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation. Randomisation was by remote computer-generated allocation.
Setting:
Three NHS major trauma centres (MTCs) in England.
Participants:
Adults with TBI admitted for > 48 hours and working or studying prior to injury.
Interventions:
Early specialist TBI VR delivered by occupational therapists (OTs) in the community using a case co-ordination model.
Main outcome measures:
Self-reported RTW 12 months post randomisation, mood, functional ability, participation, work self-efficacy, quality of life and work ability. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates. Follow-up was by postal questionnaires in two centres and face to face in one centre. Those collecting data were blind to treatment allocation.
Results:
Out of 102 target participants, 78 were recruited (39 randomised to each arm), representing 39% of those eligible and 5% of those screened. Approximately 2.2 patients were recruited per site per month. Of those, 56% had mild injuries, 18% had moderate injuries and 26% had severe injuries. A total of 32 out of 45 nominated carers were recruited. A total of 52 out of 78 (67%) TBI participants responded at 12 months (UC, n = 23; intervention, n = 29), completing 90% of the work questions; 21 out of 23 (91%) UC respondents and 20 out of 29 (69%) intervention participants returned to work at 12 months. Two participants disengaged from the intervention. Face-to-face follow-up was no more effective than postal follow-up. RTW was most strongly related to social participation and work self-efficacy. It is feasible to assess the cost-effectiveness of VR. Intervention was delivered as intended and valued by participants. Factors likely to affect a definitive trial include deploying experienced OTs, no clear TBI definition or TBI registers, and repatriation of more severe TBI from MTCs, affecting recruitment of those most likely to benefit/least likely to drop out.
Limitations:
Target recruitment was not reached, but mechanisms to achieve this in future studies were identified. Retention was lower than expected, particularly in UC, potentially biasing estimates of the 12-month RTW rate.
Conclusions:
This study met most feasibility objectives. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity. When objectives were not met, strategies to ensure feasibility of a full trial were identified. Future work should test two-stage recruitment and include resources to recruit from ‘spokes’. A broader measure covering work ability, self-efficacy and participation may be a more sensitive outcome.
Trial registration:
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN38581822.
Funding:
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Contents
- Plain English summary
- Scientific summary
- Chapter 1. Introduction
- Traumatic brain injury
- Return to work following traumatic brain injury
- Vocational rehabilitation
- Evidence for vocational rehabilitation for people with traumatic brain injury
- The effectiveness of neurological rehabilitation in traumatic brain injury on work outcomes
- Limitations of previous studies
- Justification for the current study
- Structure of the Health Technology Assessment monograph
- Chapter 2. Intervention and training package development
- Chapter 3. Feasibility randomised controlled trial
- Chapter 4. The feasibility of conducting an economic evaluation of vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care alone following traumatic brain injury
- Chapter 5. Process evaluation
- Aims and objectives of the process evaluation
- Methodology
- Results
- Did the intervention meet patients’ and employers’ expectations?
- What were the practical difficulties, comprehensibility and emotional load required to complete outcome measures?
- What factors will affect the running of the definitive trial?
- What factors will affect the use of ESTVR in the context of usual NHS rehabilitation?
- To what extent was ESTVR already being delivered in usual care?
- What are the most important primary outcomes of vocational rehabilitation?
- Summary
- Chapter 6. Discussion
- Chapter 7. Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendix 1. Summary of ESTVR
- List of abbreviations
About the Series
Article history
The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 11/66/02. The contractual start date was in March 2013. The draft report began editorial review in February 2017 and was accepted for publication in September 2017. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.
Declared competing interests of authors
Jain Holmes received consultancy fees as an employee of Obair Associates to train and mentor FRESH therapists and was subsequently granted PhD Studentship funding from the University of Nottingham and UK Occupational Therapy Research Foundation to work on this study. She was a paid employee of Obair Associates Ltd during the conduct of the study. Tracey Sach was a member of the Health Technology Assessment Efficient Study Designs Board during the conduct of the trial.
Last reviewed: February 2017; Accepted: September 2017.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Early, specialist vocational rehabilitation to facilitate return to work after t...Early, specialist vocational rehabilitation to facilitate return to work after traumatic brain injury: the FRESH feasibility RCT
- A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial after stroke (AVERT): a Phase III, multicentre...A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial after stroke (AVERT): a Phase III, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
- Surgical Trial In Traumatic intraCerebral Haemorrhage (STITCH): a randomised con...Surgical Trial In Traumatic intraCerebral Haemorrhage (STITCH): a randomised controlled trial of Early Surgery compared with Initial Conservative Treatment
- Enhanced invitation methods and uptake of health checks in primary care: randomi...Enhanced invitation methods and uptake of health checks in primary care: randomised controlled trial and cohort study using electronic health records
- Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of issuing longer versus shorter d...Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of issuing longer versus shorter duration (3-month vs. 28-day) prescriptions in patients with chronic conditions: systematic review and economic modelling
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...