Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Headline
The study found that incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy and breastfeeding provided with other tailored intervention components show promise but that reach is a concern.
Abstract
Background:
Smoking in pregnancy and/or not breastfeeding have considerable negative health outcomes for mother and baby.
Aim:
To understand incentive mechanisms of action for smoking cessation in pregnancy and breastfeeding, develop a taxonomy and identify promising, acceptable and feasible interventions to inform trial design.
Design:
Evidence syntheses, primary qualitative survey, and discrete choice experiment (DCE) research using multidisciplinary, mixed methods. Two mother-and-baby groups in disadvantaged areas collaborated throughout.
Setting:
UK.
Participants:
The qualitative study included 88 pregnant women/recent mothers/partners, 53 service providers, 24 experts/decision-makers and 63 conference attendees. The surveys included 1144 members of the general public and 497 health professionals. The DCE study included 320 women with a history of smoking.
Methods:
(1) Evidence syntheses: incentive effectiveness (including meta-analysis and effect size estimates), delivery processes, barriers to and facilitators of smoking cessation in pregnancy and/or breastfeeding, scoping review of incentives for lifestyle behaviours; (2) qualitative research: grounded theory to understand incentive mechanisms of action and a framework approach for trial design; (3) survey: multivariable ordered logit models; (4) DCE: conditional logit regression and the log-likelihood ratio test.
Results:
Out of 1469 smoking cessation and 5408 breastfeeding multicomponent studies identified, 23 smoking cessation and 19 breastfeeding studies were included in the review. Vouchers contingent on biochemically proven smoking cessation in pregnancy were effective, with a relative risk of 2.58 (95% confidence interval 1.63 to 4.07) compared with non-contingent incentives for participation (four studies, 344 participants). Effects continued until 3 months post partum. Inconclusive effects were found for breastfeeding incentives compared with no/smaller incentives (13 studies) but provider commitment contracts for breastfeeding show promise. Intervention intensity is a possible confounder. The acceptability of seven promising incentives was mixed. Women (for vouchers) and those with a lower level of education (except for breastfeeding incentives) were more likely to disagree. Those aged ≤ 44 years and ethnic minority groups were more likely to agree. Agreement was greatest for a free breast pump and least for vouchers for breastfeeding. Universal incentives were preferred to those targeting low-income women. Initial daily text/telephone support, a quitting pal, vouchers for > £20.00 per month and values up to £80.00 increase the likelihood of smoking cessation. Doctors disagreed with provider incentives. A ‘ladder’ logic model emerged through data synthesis and had face validity with service users. It combined an incentive typology and behaviour change taxonomy. Autonomy and well-being matter. Personal difficulties, emotions, socialising and attitudes of others are challenges to climbing a metaphorical ‘ladder’ towards smoking cessation and breastfeeding. Incentive interventions provide opportunity ‘rungs’ to help, including regular skilled flexible support, a pal, setting goals, monitoring and outcome verification. Individually tailored and non-judgemental continuity of care can bolster women’s capabilities to succeed. Rigid, prescriptive interventions placing the onus on women to behave ‘healthily’ risk them feeling pressurised and failing. To avoid ‘losing face’, women may disengage.
Limitations:
Included studies were heterogeneous and of variable quality, limiting the assessment of incentive effectiveness. No cost-effectiveness data were reported. In surveys, selection bias and confounding are possible. The validity and utility of the ladder logic model requires evaluation with more diverse samples of the target population.
Conclusions:
Incentives provided with other tailored components show promise but reach is a concern. Formal evaluation is recommended. Collaborative service-user involvement is important.
Study registration:
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012001980.
Funding:
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Contents
- Plain English summary
- Scientific summary
- Chapter 1. Background
- What are incentives and how do they work?
- Evidence, complex intervention design and incentives
- Smoking in pregnancy: epidemiology, health impact and intervention effectiveness
- Breastfeeding: epidemiology, health impact and intervention effectiveness
- Smoking and breastfeeding behaviour around childbirth
- Incentives for smoking cessation and breastfeeding: the policy context
- Aims of the Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy study
- Definitions
- Report structure
- Part 1
- Chapter 2. Service-user engagement
- Chapter 3. Review of the benefits of incentives for initiating and continuing smoking cessation in pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Chapter 4. Review of reviews of the barriers and facilitators experienced by women for smoking cessation in pregnancy and breastfeeding
- Chapter 5. How the evidence on incentives for other lifestyle behaviours contributes to the Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy study
- Part 2
- Chapter 6. Primary qualitative study investigating perspectives on incentives
- Chapter 7. Surveys to inform the acceptability of incentive interventions around childbirth
- Chapter 8. Discrete choice experiment of strategies to support smoking cessation in pregnant women
- Chapter 9. Discussion
- What is the evidence for the effectiveness of incentives and their delivery processes in improving smoking cessation in pregnancy or breastfeeding outcomes?
- The incentive ladder logic model
- The development of a shortlist of the most promising incentive strategies
- The acceptability of a shortlist of the most promising incentive strategies
- The most promising incentive trial design: incentives for women to stop smoking in pregnancy
- Breast pumps as a promising incentive strategy
- Incentives for provider organisations to maintain breastfeeding
- Incentives to providers to improve smoking cessation in pregnancy
- Shopping voucher incentives for women to improve breastfeeding outcomes
- Incentives for a smoke-free home after birth
- Overall implications for incentive trial design
- Strengths and limitations
- Chapter 10. Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendix 1 Commissioning brief
- Appendix 2 Intervention vignettes
- Appendix 3 Aberdeen ‘ladders’
- Appendix 4 Aberdeen ‘rungs’
- Appendix 5 Blackpool ‘ladders’
- Appendix 6 PROSPERO acknowledgement of receipt
- Appendix 7 Search strategies
- Appendix 8 Studies included in the smoking cessation review
- Appendix 9 Studies included in the breastfeeding review
- Appendix 10 Grey literature
- Appendix 11 Single electronic mixed-methods data extraction form
- Appendix 12 Critical Appraisal Skills Programme quality assessment tool for qualitative data included in review studies
- Appendix 13 Quality of the studies included in the review of smoking cessation in pregnancy
- Appendix 14 Quality of the studies included in the review of breastfeeding
- Appendix 15 Illustrative topic guide
- Appendix 16 Vignettes for health professionals
- Appendix 17 The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial illustrative topic guide: one-to-one interviews with pregnant women participating in study
- Appendix 18 The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial illustrative topic guide: interviews with professionals with a relevant role (e.g. with pregnant smokers, cessation services and/or the trial)
- Appendix 19 Final framework used in NVivo10
- Appendix 20 Interviews: mothers/partners
- Appendix 21 Focus groups: mothers
- Appendix 22 Interviews: providers/experts
- Appendix 23 Focus groups and interactive discussions: providers/experts
- Appendix 24 Background to Ipsos MORI Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing
- Appendix 25 Ipsos MORI survey of the general public
- Appendix 26 Survey of health professionals
- Appendix 27 Distribution of the health professional survey
- Appendix 28 Detailed results of the Ipsos MORI survey
- Appendix 29 Detailed results of the Ipsos MORI survey: health economics
- Appendix 30 Detailed results of the health professional survey
- Appendix 31 Detailed results of the health professional survey: health economics
- Appendix 32 Framing effects in the Ipsos MORI survey
- Appendix 33 Discrete choice experiment questionnaire
- Appendix 34 Discrete choice experiment technical appendix
- Appendix 35 Discrete choice experiment results tables for subgroup analysis
- List of abbreviations
Article history
The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 10/31/02. The contractual start date was in February 2012. The draft report began editorial review in October 2013 and was accepted for publication in April 2014. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.
Declared competing interests of authors
Professor Sniehotta is a co-applicant on a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Career Development Fellowship for Jean Adams, University of Newcastle (title: Financial incentives for health promoting behaviours). Professor Sniehotta is also a co-applicant on a related grant from the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme [title: Parental incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing uptake of immunisations in pre-school children (September 2012–July 2014). J Adams, B Bateman, B Gardner Sood, S Michie, J Shucksmith, FF Sniehotta, T Cresswell, L Ternant. Value: £275,419.00]. Professor Linda Bauld is chief investigator on a NIHR HTA grant [title: Facilitators and barriers to smoking cessation in pregnancy (May 2013–April 2015). Bauld L, Graham H, Sinclair L, Flemming K, Naughton F, Tappin D, Gorman D. Value: £250,753.00]. Professor Bauld is also coprincipal investigator on a study funded by the Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, and the Glasgow Centre for Population Health and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde [title: Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT) (February 2011–December 2013). Tappin D, Bauld L, Briggs A and colleagues. Value: £850,000.00]. Professor David Tappin is co-applicant on a NIHR HTA grant [title: Facilitators and barriers to smoking cessation in pregnancy (May 2013–April 2015). Bauld L, Graham H, Sinclair L, Flemming K, Naughton F, Tappin D, Gorman D. Value: £250,753.00]. Professor Tappin is also coprincipal investigator on a study funded by the Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, and the Glasgow Centre for Population Health and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde [title: Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial: The CPIT (February 2011–December 2013). Tappin D, Bauld L, Briggs A and colleagues. Value: £850,000.00].
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Public acceptability of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy and breast feeding: a survey of the British public.[BMJ Open. 2014]Public acceptability of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy and breast feeding: a survey of the British public.Hoddinott P, Morgan H, MacLennan G, Sewel K, Thomson G, Bauld L, Yi D, Ludbrook A, Campbell MK. BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 18; 4(7):e005524. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
- Incentives for breastfeeding and for smoking cessation in pregnancy: an exploration of types and meanings.[Soc Sci Med. 2015]Incentives for breastfeeding and for smoking cessation in pregnancy: an exploration of types and meanings.Crossland N, Thomson G, Morgan H, Dombrowski SU, Hoddinott P, BIBS study team. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar; 128:10-7. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
- Perspectives on financial incentives to health service providers for increasing breast feeding and smoking quit rates during pregnancy: a mixed methods study.[BMJ Open. 2015]Perspectives on financial incentives to health service providers for increasing breast feeding and smoking quit rates during pregnancy: a mixed methods study.Hoddinott P, Thomson G, Morgan H, Crossland N, MacLennan G, Dykes F, Stewart F, Bauld L, Campbell MK. BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 13; 5(11):e008492. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
- Review Barriers to and facilitators of smoking cessation in pregnancy and following childbirth: literature review and qualitative study.[Health Technol Assess. 2017]Review Barriers to and facilitators of smoking cessation in pregnancy and following childbirth: literature review and qualitative study.Bauld L, Graham H, Sinclair L, Flemming K, Naughton F, Ford A, McKell J, McCaughan D, Hopewell S, Angus K, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jun; 21(36):1-158.
- Review Effectiveness and acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing uptake of vaccinations in preschool children: systematic review, qualitative study and discrete choice experiment.[Health Technol Assess. 2015]Review Effectiveness and acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing uptake of vaccinations in preschool children: systematic review, qualitative study and discrete choice experiment.Adams J, Bateman B, Becker F, Cresswell T, Flynn D, McNaughton R, Oluboyede Y, Robalino S, Ternent L, Sood BG, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov; 19(94):1-176.
- Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy (BIB...Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy (BIBS): a mixed-methods study to inform trial design
- Low-dose oral theophylline combined with inhaled corticosteroids for people with...Low-dose oral theophylline combined with inhaled corticosteroids for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and high risk of exacerbations: a RCT
- Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism sp...Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorder
- The PAndemic INfluenza Triage in the Emergency Department (PAINTED) pilot cohort...The PAndemic INfluenza Triage in the Emergency Department (PAINTED) pilot cohort study
- An Occupational Therapy intervention for residents with stroke-related disabilit...An Occupational Therapy intervention for residents with stroke-related disabilities in UK Care Homes (OTCH): cluster randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...