- 1.
- 2.
Darzi
A. High Quality Care For All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2008.
- 3.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2001. [
PubMed: 25057539]
- 4.
- 5.
Llanwarne
NR, Abel
GA, Elliott
MN, Paddison
CA, Lyratzopoulos
G, Campbell
JL, Roland
M. Relationship between clinical quality and patient experience: analysis of data from the English quality and outcomes framework and the National GP Patient Survey. Ann Fam Med
2013;11:467–72. 10.1370/afm.1514 [
PMC free article: PMC3767716] [
PubMed: 24019279] [
CrossRef]
- 6.
Manary
MP, Boulding
W, Staelin
R, Glickman
SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med
2013;368:201–3. 10.1056/NEJMp1211775 [
PubMed: 23268647] [
CrossRef]
- 7.
Francis
R. Independent Inquiry into Care Provided by Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005–March 2009. London: The Stationery Office; 2010.
- 8.
Keogh
B. Review into the Quality of Care and Treatment Provided by 14 Hospital Trusts in England: Overview Report. Ashton-under-Lyne: Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; 2013.
- 9.
Berwick
DM. A Promise to Learn – A Commitment to Act: Improving the Safety of Patients in England. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2013.
- 10.
Adams
SA. Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: the reflexive patient and ‘share-your-experience’ websites. Soc Sci Med
2011;72:1069–76. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.001 [
PubMed: 21414701] [
CrossRef]
- 11.
Emmert
M, Sander
U, Esslinger
AS, Maryschok
M, Schöffski
O. Public reporting in Germany: the content of physician rating websites. Methods Inf Med
2012;51:112–20. 10.3414/ME11-01-0045 [
PubMed: 22101427] [
CrossRef]
- 12.
- 13.
Fox
S. After Dr Google: peer-to-peer health care. Pediatrics
2013;131(Suppl. 4):224–5. 10.1542/peds.2012-3786K [
PubMed: 23729765] [
CrossRef]
- 14.
Fox
S, Duggan
M. Health Online 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2013.
- 15.
Lagu
T, Hannon
NS, Rothberg
MB, Lindenauer
PK. Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. J Gen Intern Med
2010;25:942–6. 10.1007/s11606-010-1383-0 [
PMC free article: PMC2917672] [
PubMed: 20464523] [
CrossRef]
- 16.
Trigg
L. Patients’ opinions of health care providers for supporting choice and quality improvement. J Health Serv Res Policy
2011;16:102–7. 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.010010 [
PubMed: 20870690] [
CrossRef]
- 17.
- 18.
Anderson
C. The Impact of Social Media on Lodging Performance. New York, NY: Cornell University School of Hotel Administration; 2012.
- 19.
Melián-González
S, Bulchand-Gidumal
J, González López-Valcárcel
B. Online customer reviews of hotels: as participation increases, better evaluation is obtained. Cornell Hosp Q
2013;54:274–83. 10.1177/1938965513481498 [
CrossRef]
- 20.
- 21.
Adams
S. Post-panoptic surveillance through healthcare rating sites: who’s watching whom?
Inform Commun Soc
2013;16:215–35. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.701657 [
CrossRef]
- 22.
Hardey
M. Public health and web 2.0. J R Soc Promot Health
2008;128:181–9. 10.1177/1466424008092228 [
PubMed: 18678114] [
CrossRef]
- 23.
Mazanderani
F, O’Neill
B, Powell
J. ‘People power’ or ‘pester power’? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy. Patient Educ Couns
2013;93:420–5. 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.006 [
PMC free article: PMC3863946] [
PubMed: 23830239] [
CrossRef]
- 24.
Powell
JA, Boden
S. Greater choice and control? Health policy in England and the online health consumer. Policy Internet
2012;4:1–23. 10.1515/1944-2866.1180 [
CrossRef]
- 25.
Ziebland
S. The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. Soc Sci Med
2004;59:1783–93. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.019 [
PubMed: 15312914] [
CrossRef]
- 26.
Gao
GG, McCullough
JS, Agarwal
R, Jha
AK. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients’ online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J Med Internet Res
2012;14:e38. 10.2196/jmir.2003 [
PMC free article: PMC3374528] [
PubMed: 22366336] [
CrossRef]
- 27.
- 28.
Emmert
M, Meier
F, Pisch
F, Sander
U. Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res
2013;15:e187. 10.2196/jmir.2702 [
PMC free article: PMC3758064] [
PubMed: 23985220] [
CrossRef]
- 29.
- 30.
Allsop
J, Jones
K. Withering the citizen, managing the consumer: complaints in healthcare settings. Soc Policy Soc
2008;7:233–43. 10.1017/S1474746407004186 [
CrossRef]
- 31.
McCartney
M. Will doctor rating sites improve the quality of care? No. BMJ
2009;338:b1033. 10.1136/bmj.b1033 [
PubMed: 19293224] [
CrossRef]
- 32.
Mays
N, Roberts
E, Popay
J. Synthesising Research Evidence in Methods for Studying the Delivery and Organisation of Health Services. In Fulop
N, Allen
P, Clarke
A, Black
N, editors. Methods for Studying the Delivery and Organisation of Health Services. London: Routledge; 2001. pp. 188–220.
- 33.
Arksey
H, O’Malley
L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol
2005;8:19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 [
CrossRef]
- 34.
Bardach
NS, Asteria-Peñaloza
R, Boscardin
WJ, Dudley
RA. The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA. BMJ Qual Saf
2013;22:194–202. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001360 [
PMC free article: PMC4074426] [
PubMed: 23178860] [
CrossRef]
- 35.
Black
EW, Thompson
LA, Saliba
H, Dawson
K, Black
NM. An analysis of healthcare providers’ online ratings. Inform Prim Care
2009;17:249–53. 10.14236/jhi.v17i4.744 [
PubMed: 20359403] [
CrossRef]
- 36.
- 37.
Frost
C, Mesfin
A. Online reviews of orthopedic surgeons: an emerging trend. Orthopedics
2015;38:e257–62. 10.3928/01477447-20150402-52 [
PubMed: 25901617] [
CrossRef]
- 38.
Gao
GD, Greenwood
BN, Agarwal
R, McCullough
JS. Vocal minority and silent majority: how do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality. Mis Quart
2015;39:565. 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.3.03 [
CrossRef]
- 39.
Gilbert
K, Hawkins
CM, Hughes
DR, Patel
K, Gogia
N, Sekhar
A, Duszak
R. Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?
J Am Coll Radiol
2015;12:867–71. 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.039 [
PubMed: 26250980] [
CrossRef]
- 40.
Glover
M, Khalilzadeh
O, Choy
G, Prabhakar
AM, Pandharipande
PV, Gazelle
GS. Hospital evaluations by social media: a comparative analysis of Facebook ratings among performance outliers. J Gen Intern Med
2015;30:1440–6. 10.1007/s11606-015-3236-3 [
PMC free article: PMC4579224] [
PubMed: 25749881] [
CrossRef]
- 41.
Gray
BM, Vandergrift
JL, Gao
GG, McCullough
JS, Lipner
RS. Website ratings of physicians and their quality of care. JAMA Intern Med
2015;175:291–3. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6291 [
PubMed: 25437252] [
CrossRef]
- 42.
Hanauer
DA, Zheng
K, Singer
DC, Gebremariam
A, Davis
MM. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA
2014;311:734–5. 10.1001/jama.2013.283194 [
PubMed: 24549555] [
CrossRef]
- 43.
Johnson
C. Survey finds physicians very wary of doctor ratings. Physician Exec
2013;39:–, 10, 12. [
PubMed: 23437751]
- 44.
Kadry
B, Chu
LF, Kadry
B, Gammas
D, Macario
A. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. J Med Internet Res
2011;13:e95. 10.2196/jmir.1960 [
PMC free article: PMC3222200] [
PubMed: 22088924] [
CrossRef]
- 45.
Kinast
RM, Barker
GT, Day
SH, Gardiner
SK, Mansberger
SL. Factors related to online patient satisfaction with ophthalmologists. Ophthalmology
2014;121:1843–5.e1. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.009 [
PubMed: 24856505] [
CrossRef]
- 46.
McCaughey
D, Baumgardner
C, Gaudes
A, LaRochelle
D, Wu
KJ, Raichura
T. Best practices in social media: utilizing a value matrix to assess social media’s impact on health care. Soc Sci Comput Rev
2014;32:575–89. 10.1177/0894439314525332 [
CrossRef]
- 47.
Merrell
JG, Levy
BH, Johnson
DA. Patient assessments and online ratings of quality care: a ‘wake-up call’ for providers. Am J Gastroenterol
2013;108:1676–85. 10.1038/ajg.2013.112 [
PubMed: 24192941] [
CrossRef]
- 48.
Riemer
C, Doctor
M, Dellavalle
RP. Analysis of online ratings of dermatologists. JAMA Dermatol
2016;152:218–19. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.4991 [
PubMed: 26677133] [
CrossRef]
- 49.
Samora
JB, Lifchez
SD, Blazar
PE, American Society for Surgery of the Hand Ethics and Professionalism Committee. Physician-rating web sites: ethical implications. J Hand Surg Am
2016;41:104–10.e1. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.05.034 [
PubMed: 26304734] [
CrossRef]
- 50.
- 51.
Sobin
L, Goyal
P. Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you?
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
2014;140:635–8. 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.818 [
PubMed: 24876073] [
CrossRef]
- 52.
- 53.
Trehan
SK, DeFrancesco
CJ, Nguyen
JT, Charalel
RA, Daluiski
A. Online patient ratings of hand surgeons. J Hand Surg Am
2016;41:98–103. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.10.006 [
PubMed: 26710742] [
CrossRef]
- 54.
Hanauer
DA, Zheng
K, Singer
DC, Gebremariam
A, Davis
MM. Parental awareness and use of online physician rating sites. Pediatrics
2014;134:e966–75. 10.1542/peds.2014-0681 [
PubMed: 25246629] [
CrossRef]
- 55.
- 56.
Li
S, Feng
B, Chen
M, Bell
RA. Physician review websites: effects of the proportion and position of negative reviews on readers’ willingness to choose the doctor. J Health Commun
2015;20:453–61. 10.1080/10810730.2014.977467 [
PubMed: 25749406] [
CrossRef]
- 57.
Yaraghi
N, Wang
W, Gao
GG, Agarwal
R. How online quality ratings influence patients’ choice of medical providers: controlled experimental survey study. J Med Internet Res
2018;20:e99. 10.2196/jmir.8986 [
PMC free article: PMC5891665] [
PubMed: 29581091] [
CrossRef]
- 58.
Brody
S, Elhadad
N. An Unsupervised Aspect-Sentiment Model for Online Reviews. Human Language Technologies. The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2010.
- 59.
Hawkins
JB, Brownstein
JS, Tuli
G, Runels
T, Broecker
K, Nsoesie
EO, et al.
Measuring patient-perceived quality of care in US hospitals using Twitter. BMJ Qual Saf
2016;25:404–13. 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004309 [
PMC free article: PMC4878682] [
PubMed: 26464518] [
CrossRef]
- 60.
Hopper
AM, Uriyo
M. Using sentiment analysis to review patient satisfaction data located on the internet. J Health Organ Manag
2015;29:221–33. 10.1108/JHOM-12-2011-0129 [
PubMed: 25800334] [
CrossRef]
- 61.
- 62.
Ranard
BL, Werner
RM, Antanavicius
T, Schwartz
HA, Smith
RJ, Meisel
ZF, et al.
Yelp reviews of hospital care can supplement and inform traditional surveys of the patient experience of care. Health Aff
2016;35:697–705. 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030 [
PMC free article: PMC4845957] [
PubMed: 27044971] [
CrossRef]
- 63.
- 64.
Wallace
BC, Paul
MJ, Sarkar
U, Trikalinos
TA, Dredze
M. A large-scale quantitative analysis of latent factors and sentiment in online doctor reviews. J Am Med Inform Assoc
2014;21:1098–103. 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002711 [
PMC free article: PMC4215053] [
PubMed: 24918109] [
CrossRef]
- 65.
Ellimoottil
C, Leichtle
SW, Wright
CJ, Fakhro
A, Arrington
AK, Chirichella
TJ, Ward
WH. Online physician reviews: the good, the bad and the ugly. Bull Am Coll Surg
2013;98:34–9. [
PubMed: 24455818]
- 66.
- 67.
Smith
RJ, Lipoff
JB. Evaluation of dermatology practice online reviews: lessons from qualitative analysis. JAMA Dermatol
2016;152:153–7. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3950 [
PubMed: 26606326] [
CrossRef]
- 68.
Bardach
NS, Hibbard
JH, Greaves
F, Dudley
RA. Sources of traffic and visitors’ preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results. J Med Internet Res
2015;17:e102. 10.2196/jmir.3637 [
PMC free article: PMC4468595] [
PubMed: 25934100] [
CrossRef]
- 69.
- 70.
Kilaru
AS, Meisel
ZF, Paciotti
B, Ha
YP, Smith
RJ, Ranard
BL, Merchant
RM. What do patients say about emergency departments in online reviews? A qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf
2016;25:14–24. 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004035 [
PubMed: 26208538] [
CrossRef]
- 71.
Nakhasi
A, Shen
AX, Passarella
RJ, Appel
LJ, Anderson
CA. Online social networks that connect users to physical activity partners: a review and descriptive analysis. J Med Internet Res
2014;16:e153. 10.2196/jmir.2674 [
PMC free article: PMC4090378] [
PubMed: 24936569] [
CrossRef]
- 72.
- 73.
Lewis
P, Kobayashi
E, Gupta
S. An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California. Ann Plast Surg
2015;74(Suppl. 1):66–70. 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000517 [
PubMed: 25875912] [
CrossRef]
- 74.
Timian
A, Rupcic
S, Kachnowski
S, Luisi
P. Do patients ‘like’ good care? Measuring hospital quality via Facebook. Am J Med Qual
2013;28:374–82. 10.1177/1062860612474839 [
PubMed: 23378059] [
CrossRef]
- 75.
Galizzi
MM, Miraldo
M, Stavropoulou
C, Desai
M, Jayatunga
W, Joshi
M, Parikh
S. Who is more likely to use doctor-rating websites, and why? A cross-sectional study in London. BMJ Open
2012;2:e001493. 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001493 [
PMC free article: PMC3532991] [
PubMed: 23148340] [
CrossRef]
- 76.
Greaves
F, Pape
UJ, King
D, Darzi
A, Majeed
A, Wachter
RM, Millett
C. Associations between Internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study. BMJ Qual Saf
2012;21:600–5. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000906 [
PubMed: 22523318] [
CrossRef]
- 77.
van Velthoven
MH, Atherton
H, Powell
J. A cross sectional survey of the UK public to understand use of online ratings and reviews of health services. Patient Educ Couns
2018;101:1690–6. 10.1016/j.pec.2018.04.001 [
PubMed: 29666022] [
CrossRef]
- 78.
- 79.
Greaves
F, Ramirez-Cano
D, Millett
C, Darzi
A, Donaldson
L. Harnessing the cloud of patient experience: using social media to detect poor quality healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf
2013;22:251–5. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001527 [
PubMed: 23349387] [
CrossRef]
- 80.
- 81.
Patel
S, Cain
R, Neailey
K, Hooberman
L. General practitioners’ concerns about online patient feedback: findings from a descriptive exploratory qualitative study in England. J Med Internet Res
2015;17:e276. 10.2196/jmir.4989 [
PMC free article: PMC4704896] [
PubMed: 26681299] [
CrossRef]
- 82.
Patel
S, Cain
R, Neailey
K, Hooberman
L. Exploring patients’ views toward giving web-based feedback and ratings to general practitioners in England: a qualitative descriptive study. J Med Internet Res
2016;18:e217. 10.2196/jmir.5865 [
PMC free article: PMC4992166] [
PubMed: 27496366] [
CrossRef]
- 83.
Shepherd
A, Sanders
C, Doyle
M, Shaw
J. Using social media for support and feedback by mental health service users: thematic analysis of a Twitter conversation. BMC Psychiatry
2015;15:29. 10.1186/s12888-015-0408-y [
PMC free article: PMC4337200] [
PubMed: 25881089] [
CrossRef]
- 84.
Speed
E, Davison
C, Gunnell
C. The anonymity paradox in patient engagement: reputation, risk and web-based public feedback. Med Humanit
2016;42:135–40. 10.1136/medhum-2015-010823 [
PubMed: 26879526] [
CrossRef]
- 85.
Greaves
F, Pape
UJ, King
D, Darzi
A, Majeed
A, Wachter
RM, Millett
C. Associations between web-based patient ratings and objective measures of hospital quality. Arch Intern Med
2012;172:435–6. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1675 [
PubMed: 22331980] [
CrossRef]
- 86.
- 87.
- 88.
Emmert
M, Meszmer
N, Sander
U. Do health care providers use online patient ratings to improve the quality of care? Results from an online-based cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res
2016;18:e254. 10.2196/jmir.5889 [
PMC free article: PMC5048057] [
PubMed: 27644135] [
CrossRef]
- 89.
Terlutter
R, Bidmon
S, Röttl
J. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites. J Med Internet Res
2014;16:e97. 10.2196/jmir.3145 [
PMC free article: PMC4004145] [
PubMed: 24686918] [
CrossRef]
- 90.
Emmert
M, Meier
F, Heider
AK, Dürr
C, Sander
U. What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website. Health Policy
2014;118:66–73. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.015 [
PubMed: 24836021] [
CrossRef]
- 91.
- 92.
Jans
LC, Kranzbühler
AM. The influence of rating volume in the effects of expert versus patient online ratings. Acta Orthop Belg
2015;81:662–7. [
PubMed: 26790788]
- 93.
van de Belt
TH, Engelen
LJ, Verhoef
LM, van der Weide
MJ, Schoonhoven
L, Kool
RB. Using patient experiences on Dutch social media to supervise health care services: exploratory study. J Med Internet Res
2015;17:e7. 10.2196/jmir.3906 [
PMC free article: PMC4319082] [
PubMed: 25592481] [
CrossRef]
- 94.
- 95.
Zhang
W, Deng
Z, Hong
Z, Evans
R, Ma
J, Zhang
H. Unhappy patients are not alike: content analysis of the negative comments from China’s good doctor website. J Med Internet Res
2018;20:e35. 10.2196/jmir.8223 [
PMC free article: PMC5806007] [
PubMed: 29371176] [
CrossRef]
- 96.
- 97.
- 98.
Macdonald
ME, Beaudin
A, Pineda
C. What do patients think about dental services in Quebec? Analysis of a dentist rating website. J Can Dent Assoc
2015;81:f3. [
PubMed: 26030597]
- 99.
Rothenfluh
F, Germeni
E, Schulz
PJ. Consumer decision-making based on review websites: are there differences between choosing a hotel and choosing a physician?
J Med Internet Res
2016;18:e129. 10.2196/jmir.5580 [
PMC free article: PMC4929347] [
PubMed: 27311623] [
CrossRef]
- 100.
Lagu
T, Goff
SL, Hannon
NS, Shatz
A, Lindenauer
PK. A mixed-methods analysis of patient reviews of hospital care in England: implications for public reporting of health care quality data in the United States. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf
2013;39:7–15. 10.1016/S1553-7250(13)39003-5 [
PubMed: 23367647] [
CrossRef]
- 101.
Reimann
S, Strech
D. The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites. BMC Health Serv Res
2010;10:332. 10.1186/1472-6963-10-332 [
PMC free article: PMC3017530] [
PubMed: 21138579] [
CrossRef]
- 102.
- 103.
Emmert
M, Adelhardt
T, Sander
U, Wambach
V, Lindenthal
J. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites. BMC Health Serv Res
2015;15:414. 10.1186/s12913-015-1051-5 [
PMC free article: PMC4582723] [
PubMed: 26404452] [
CrossRef]
- 104.
Greaves
F, Pape
UJ, Lee
H, Smith
DM, Darzi
A, Majeed
A, Millett
C. Patients’ ratings of family physician practices on the internet: usage and associations with conventional measures of quality in the English National Health Service. J Med Internet Res
2012;14:e146. 10.2196/jmir.2280 [
PMC free article: PMC3517341] [
PubMed: 23076301] [
CrossRef]
- 105.
Lewis
S. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd edition. Health Promot Pract
2015;16:473–5. 10.1177/1524839915580941 [
CrossRef]
- 106.
Kleefstra
SM, Zandbelt
LC, Borghans
I, de Haes
HJ, Kool
RB. Investigating the potential contribution of patient rating sites to hospital supervision: exploratory results from an interview study in the Netherlands. J Med Internet Res
2016;18:e201. 10.2196/jmir.5552 [
PMC free article: PMC4972989] [
PubMed: 27439392] [
CrossRef]
- 107.
Verhoef
LM, Van de Belt
TH, Engelen
LJ, Schoonhoven
L, Kool
RB. Social media and rating sites as tools to understanding quality of care: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res
2014;16:e56. 10.2196/jmir.3024 [
PMC free article: PMC3961699] [
PubMed: 24566844] [
CrossRef]
- 108.
Patel
S, Cain
R, Neailey
K, Hooberman
L. Public Awareness, usage, and predictors for the use of doctor rating websites: cross-sectional study in England. J Med Internet Res
2018;20:e243. 10.2196/jmir.9523 [
PMC free article: PMC6083046] [
PubMed: 30045831] [
CrossRef]
- 109.
- 110.
Atherton
H, Fleming
J, Williams
V, Powell
J. Online patient feedback: a cross-sectional survey of the attitudes and experiences of United Kingdom health care professionals [published online ahead of print June 2 2019]. J Health Serv Res Policy
2019. 10.1177/1355819619844540 [
PMC free article: PMC7307411] [
PubMed: 31154858] [
CrossRef]
- 111.
Eynon
R. Mapping the digital divide in Britain: implications for learning and education. Learn Media Technol
2009;34:277–90. 10.1080/17439880903345874 [
CrossRef]
- 112.
- 113.
Greenhalgh
T, Stramer
K, Bratan
T, Byrne
E, Mohammad
Y, Russell
J. Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory. BMJ
2008;337:a1786. 10.1136/bmj.a1786 [
PMC free article: PMC3269664] [
PubMed: 18948344] [
CrossRef]
- 114.
Greenhalgh
T, Robert
G, Macfarlane
F, Bate
P, Kyriakidou
O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q
2004;82:581–629. 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x [
PMC free article: PMC2690184] [
PubMed: 15595944] [
CrossRef]
- 115.
- 116.
Patient Opinion. The Power of Connection. How Networked Citizen Voice is Changing Health and Social Care. 10th Anniversary Report. Sheffield: Patient Opinion; 2015.
- 117.
Mandeville
KL, Satherley
RM, Hall
JA, Sutaria
S, Willott
C, Yarrow
K, et al.
Political views of doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional study. J Epidemiol Community Health
2018;72:880–7. 10.1136/jech-2018-210801 [
PubMed: 30061096] [
CrossRef]
- 118.
Chatterjee
R, Chapman
T, Brannan
MG, Varney
J. GPs’ knowledge, use, and confidence in national physical activity and health guidelines and tools: a questionnaire-based survey of general practice in England. Br J Gen Pract
2017;67:e668–e675. 10.3399/bjgp17X692513 [
PMC free article: PMC5604830] [
PubMed: 28808077] [
CrossRef]
- 119.
Lavrakas
PJ. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage Group plc; 2008. 10.4135/9781412963947 [
CrossRef]
- 120.
- 121.
Burt
J, Campbell
J, Abel
G, Aboulghate
A, Ahmed
F, Asprey
A, et al.
Improving patient experience in primary care: a multimethod programme of research on the measurement and improvement of patient experience. Programme Grants Appl Res
2017;5(9). 10.3310/pgfar05090 [
PubMed: 28654227] [
CrossRef]
- 122.
Farrington
C, Burt
J, Boiko
O, Campbell
J, Roland
M. Doctors’ engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care: a qualitative study. Health Expect
2017;20:385–94. 10.1111/hex.12465 [
PMC free article: PMC5433536] [
PubMed: 27124310] [
CrossRef]
- 123.
Asprey
A, Campbell
JL, Newbould
J, Cohn
S, Carter
M, Davey
A, Roland
M. Challenges to the credibility of patient feedback in primary healthcare settings: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract
2013;63:e200–8. 10.3399/bjgp13X664252 [
PMC free article: PMC3582979] [
PubMed: 23561787] [
CrossRef]
- 124.
Emmert
M, Sauter
L, Jablonski
L, Sander
U, Taheri-Zadeh
F. Do physicians respond to web-based patient ratings? An analysis of physicians’ responses to more than one million web-based ratings over a six-year period. J Med Internet Res
2017;19:e275. 10.2196/jmir.7538 [
PMC free article: PMC5550732] [
PubMed: 28747292] [
CrossRef]
- 125.
- 126.
Lupton
D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociol Health Illn
2014;36:856–69. 10.1111/1467-9566.12109 [
PubMed: 24443847] [
CrossRef]
- 127.
Coyne
IT. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?
J Adv Nurs
1997;26:623–30. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x [
PubMed: 9378886] [
CrossRef]
- 128.
Morse
JM. ‘Data were saturated . . . ’. Qual Health Res
2015;25:587–8. 10.1177/1049732315576699 [
PubMed: 25829508] [
CrossRef]
- 129.
Gale
NK, Heath
G, Cameron
E, Rashid
S, Redwood
S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol
2013;13:117. 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 [
PMC free article: PMC3848812] [
PubMed: 24047204] [
CrossRef]
- 130.
Ziebland
S, McPherson
A. Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). Med Educ
2006;40:405–14. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02467.x [
PubMed: 16635119] [
CrossRef]
- 131.
Ziewitz
M. Experience in action: moderating care in web-based patient feedback. Soc Sci Med
2017;175:99–108. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.028 [
PubMed: 28087997] [
CrossRef]
- 132.
Baines
R, Donovan
J, Regan de Bere
S, Archer
J, Jones
R. Responding effectively to adult mental health patient feedback in an online environment: a coproduced framework. Health Expect
2018;21:887–98. 10.1111/hex.12682 [
PMC free article: PMC6186539] [
PubMed: 29624815] [
CrossRef]
- 133.
Menon
AV. Do online reviews diminish physician authority? The case of cosmetic surgery in the US. Soc Sci Med
2017;181:1–8. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.046 [
PubMed: 28363107] [
CrossRef]
- 134.
Mol
A. The Logic of Care. 1st edn. Oxon: Routledge; 2008. 10.4324/9780203927076 [
CrossRef]
- 135.
Pols
J. Care at a Distance: on the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2012. 10.26530/OAPEN_413032 [
CrossRef]
- 136.
- 137.
Lowe
P, Powell
J, Griffiths
F, Thorogood
M, Locock
L. Making it all normal: the role of the internet in problematic pregnancy. Qual Health Res
2009;19:1476–84. 10.1177/1049732309348368 [
PubMed: 19805809] [
CrossRef]
- 138.
Garfinkel
H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1967.
- 139.
Button
G, Sharrock
W. The organizational accountability of technological work. Soc Stud Sci
1998;28:73–102. 10.1177/030631298028001003 [
CrossRef]
- 140.
Lockyer
S. Coding Qualitative Data. In Lewis-Beck
MS, Bryman
A, Futing Liao
T, editors. The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004. pp. 137–8.
- 141.
Moerman
M. Ethnic identification in a complex civilization: who are the Lue?
Am Anthropol
1965;67:1215–30. 10.1525/aa.1965.67.5.02a00070 [
CrossRef]
- 142.
Coulter
A, Locock
L, Ziebland
S, Calabrese
J. Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care. BMJ
2014;348:g2225. 10.1136/bmj.g2225 [
PubMed: 24671966] [
CrossRef]
- 143.
Sharp
CA, Boaden
R, Dixon
WG, Sanders
C. The Means Not the End: Stakeholder Views of Toolkits Developed from Healthcare Research. Conference presentation at 11th Organizational Behaviour in Health Care (OBHC) Conference ‘Coordinating Care Across Boundaries and Borders’, 13–16 May 2018; Montreal, QC, Canada.
- 144.
Locock
L, Graham
C, King
J, Parkin
S, Chisholm
A, Montgomery
C, et al.
Understanding how frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement – an exploratory case study evaluation. Health Serv Deliv Res
2019; in press. [
PMC free article: PMC7307415] [
PubMed: 32056464]
- 145.
Morgan
DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Methods Res
2007;1:48–76. 10.1177/2345678906292462 [
CrossRef]
- 146.
Dixon-Woods
M, Baker
R, Charles
K, Dawson
J, Jerzembek
G, Martin
G, et al.
Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study. BMJ Qual Saf
2014;23:106–15. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001947 [
PMC free article: PMC3913222] [
PubMed: 24019507] [
CrossRef]
- 147.
- 148.
Martin
GP, Aveling
EL, Campbell
A, Tarrant
C, Pronovost
PJ, Mitchell
I, et al.
Making soft intelligence hard: a multi-site qualitative study of challenges relating to voice about safety concerns. BMJ Qual Saf
2018;27:710–17. 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007579 [
PMC free article: PMC6109252] [
PubMed: 29459365] [
CrossRef]
- 149.
Wise
J. BMJ awards 2019: digital innovation team of the year. BMJ
2019;365:l1519. 10.1136/bmj.l1519 [
PubMed: 30944089] [
CrossRef]
- 150.
Schlesinger
M, Grob
R, Shaller
D, Martino
SC, Parker
AM, Finucane
ML, et al.
Taking patients’ narratives about clinicians from anecdote to science. N Engl J Med
2015;373:675–9. 10.1056/NEJMsb1502361 [
PubMed: 26267629] [
CrossRef]
- 151.
Duschinsky
R, Paddison
C. ‘The final arbiter of everything’: a genealogy of concern with patient experience in Britain. Soc Theory Health
2018;16:94–110. 10.1057/s41285-017-0045-2 [
CrossRef]
- 152.
Gkeredakis
E, Swan
J, Powell
J, Nicolini
D, Scarbrough
H, Roginski
C, et al.
Mind the gap: understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice. J Health Organ Manag
2011;25:298–314. 10.1108/14777261111143545 [
PubMed: 21845984] [
CrossRef]
- 153.
Sheard
L, Peacock
R, Marsh
C, Lawton
R. What’s the problem with patient experience feedback? A macro and micro understanding, based on findings from a three-site UK qualitative study. Health Expect
2019;22:46–53. 10.1111/hex.12829 [
PMC free article: PMC6351417] [
PubMed: 30244499] [
CrossRef]
- 154.
Sheard
L, Marsh
C, O’Hara
J, Armitage
G, Wright
J, Lawton
R. The patient feedback response framework – understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: a qualitative study. Soc Sci Med
2017;178:19–27. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.005 [
PMC free article: PMC5360173] [
PubMed: 28189820] [
CrossRef]
- 155.
Fisher
KA, Smith
KM, Gallagher
TH, Huang
JC, Borton
JC, Mazor
KM. We want to know: patient comfort speaking up about breakdowns in care and patient experience. BMJ Qual Saf
2019;28:190–7. 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008159 [
PMC free article: PMC6449036] [
PubMed: 30269059] [
CrossRef]
- 156.
Lawton
R, O’Hara
JK, Sheard
L, Armitage
G, Cocks
K, Buckley
H, et al.
Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention. BMJ Qual Saf
2017;26:622–31. 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005570 [
PMC free article: PMC5537521] [
PubMed: 28159854] [
CrossRef]
- 157.
Bell
SK, Martinez
W. Every patient should be enabled to stop the line. BMJ Qual Saf
2019;28:172–6. 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008714 [
PubMed: 30467118] [
CrossRef]
- 158.
Carter
W, Bick
D, Mackintosh
N, Sandall
J. A narrative synthesis of factors that affect women speaking up about early warning signs and symptoms of pre-eclampsia and responses of healthcare staff. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
2017;17:63. 10.1186/s12884-017-1245-4 [
PMC free article: PMC5309733] [
PubMed: 28193255] [
CrossRef]
- 159.
Rance
S, McCourt
C, Rayment
J, Mackintosh
N, Carter
W, Watson
K, Sandall
J. Women’s safety alerts in maternity care: is speaking up enough?
BMJ Qual Saf
2013;22:348–55. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001295 [
PubMed: 23417732] [
CrossRef]
- 160.
- 161.
Henwood
F, Wyatt
S, Hart
A, Smith
J. ‘Ignorance is bliss sometimes’: constraints on the emergence of the ‘informed patient’ in the changing landscapes of health information. Sociol Health Illn
2003;25:589–607. 10.1111/1467-9566.00360 [
PubMed: 12919447] [
CrossRef]
- 162.
Broom
A, Tovey
P. The role of the internet in cancer patients’ engagement with complementary and alternative treatments. Health
2008;12:139–55. 10.1177/1363459307086841 [
PubMed: 18400826] [
CrossRef]
- 163.
Fotaki
M. Towards developing new partnerships in public services: users as consumers, citizens and/or co-producers in health and social care in England and Sweden. Public Adm
2011;89:933–55. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01879.x [
PubMed: 22165151] [
CrossRef]
- 164.
- 165.
Lupton
D. The Digitised Healthy Citizen. Digital Health Critical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge; 2018. 10.4324/9781315648835 [
CrossRef]
- 166.
Donetto
S, Tsianakas
V, Robert
G. Using Experience-based Co-design (EBCD) to Improve the Quality of Healthcare: Mapping Where We Are Now and Establishing Future Directions. London: King’s College London; 2014.
- 167.
Locock
L, Robert
G, Boaz
A, Vougioukalou
S, Shuldham
C, Fielden
J, et al.
Testing accelerated experience-based co-design: a qualitative study of using a national archive of patient experience narrative interviews to promote rapid patient-centred service improvement. Health Serv Deliv Res
2014;2(4). 10.3310/hsdr02040 [
PubMed: 25642558] [
CrossRef]
