U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Tarrant C, Angell E, Baker R, et al. Responsiveness of primary care services: development of a patient-report measure – qualitative study and initial quantitative pilot testing. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Nov. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 2.46.)

Cover of Responsiveness of primary care services: development of a patient-report measure – qualitative study and initial quantitative pilot testing

Responsiveness of primary care services: development of a patient-report measure – qualitative study and initial quantitative pilot testing.

Show details

Appendix 6Summary framework from patient focus groups (stage 1)

QuestionPeople with disabilitiesMembers of a PPG at a practice in a deprived area (some disabilities and chronic conditions)Non-English speaking
Q1: Does the practice make it easy for you to contact them to arrange to see a doctor or nurse?Phone is engaged (have to phone again, cost); phone stacking (no indication of where you are in the queue); holding on (cost); competition with others who are physically at the practice – all the appointments are gone; different receptionists: ask personal questions; confidentiality in a crowded waiting room; walk-in clinics are good; booking online might be helpful; parking charges, so make appointment on phone not in person, or don’t live near enough; can’t see GP of choice. Question wording: ‘. . . to see any doctor . . .’Some answered Q2 within Q1, i.e. can be a long wait to see your own GP, easier to see any GP (but they can’t always handle complex cases); hanging on the phone then no appointments left; costly (repeated) phone calls (is this why people don’t bother to cancel appointments and there are so many DNAs?); can come in to make appointment but sometimes too ill; administrative errors (duplicate appointments); practice are bound to a telephone contract (0845 number); repeated phone calls then not enough appointments; season and day dependent. Question wording: some answers encompassed Q2, need to separate these more obviously. Suggestion: do the communication systems enable you to get through?Long time to answer phone; costly (0845); easier to get an appointment in person (Q2?); appointments too far in advance (Q2); one problem per appointment (Q2); no triage, all appointments are 15–20 days in advance (Q2); difficult for working people; fully booked, even for emergencies (Q2); hard to see own doctor – continuity of care. Question wording: surgery not practice; can be interpreted as clinical; need to make it more obvious that it’s not about making the appointment but just getting in contact; suggestion: remove the latter part of the question so it ends at ‘. . . contact them?’
Q2: Does the practice make it easy for you to get an appointment that suits you?Once you get through, it’s moderately easy; receptionist-dependent; GP might be on annual leave; depends if you have a preference for a particular GP (which depends on the ailment: continuity vs. emergency). Question wording: ‘. . . that suits your needs’. Need extra option of ‘moderately easy’See Q1 above. There were no additional points to be made by the time we got onto Q2Can sometimes get appointments, it’s a lottery; receptionists don’t explain why there are no appointments; telephone consultations not face to face, just give prescriptions; one appointment, one problem, so have to make another appointment; sometimes told to ring back in case a cancellation becomes available; have to keep phoning back; fully booked, 2–4 week wait, ‘it’s not my fault’; refused an emergency appointment; daytime appointments not good for children at school; no problems for some people, especially in single-handed practices; continuity of care is a problem; so many new doctors, don’t know their names; if not urgent, some patients happy to wait; trial and error medication (clinical). Question wording: surgery not practice, otherwise worked well apart from the odd clinical need creeping in
Q3: Does the practice make it easy for you to get into the building and use the facilities?Automatic doors; slopes for wheelchairs; disabled toilets; car parking (need one, need a bigger one, need more disabled spaces, if can’t get a spot then have to park on street which can mean a long walk in the rain, or the snow, which is tricky for people with mobility issues); need wider doors inside the surgery (auto door to get in, but not wide enough inside for large scooter or wheelchair). Question wording: separate into external and internalWelcoming; slope up to door is too steep and no handrail; facilities inside are clearly visible; good signage; pharmacy on site; comfortable seating (but not for everyone, some get backache); lighting not good for people with sight problems and the call screen is too small – could use a verbal call from the receptionist for people whose notes are flagged; car park is quite a long walk from the front door; there can be long queues at reception (back problems); disabled parking spaces are misused (want blue badge spaces). Question wording: ‘your personal needs’ instead of ‘for you’; make it clear it’s for your personal situation rather than generic; most didn’t think about parking; most thought of inside the buildingNo bus, difficult to walk with mobility problems; doctors are upstairs, no lift; difficult to park at busy times; automatic doors; parking too far from surgery; seating, cleanliness, toilets, disabled access, lift. Question wording: need two questions, one for getting to the building and one for inside the building
Q4: Do receptionists try to be helpful?Receptionist-dependent; depends on how busy they are; helps to be recognised and have a good relationship (more helpful); sometimes feel rushed – tricky when you need time to think; can feel like a number. Question wording: fine as is, three options are fineDepends on the receptionist – some are very helpful, others are very rude; depends on how busy they are; they can assume too much knowledge (don’t explain); [appointment systems, continuity of care]; you need to be assertive to get what you want; rule-driven, lack of flexibility and communication; perhaps lack of training?; don’t smile enough. Question wording: ‘. . . helpful to you?’Sometimes busy in morning so have to phone again the afternoon (Q1); they do sometimes try to give you an appointment (Q2?); don’t answer phone if busy (Q1); face to face is more helpful than over the phone; if fully booked then have to phone again tomorrow, can’t help, no reassurance; don’t try to understand; depends on receptionist/their mood/the surgery; face to face is easier as you have body language to help; respect (Q5), listen, give you what you want; good customer service, polite; Gujariti-speaking (Q7?); no interpreters available, tried to help but was not satisfactory (Q7?); depends on expectation. Question wording: what kinds of things do people need help with, give examples, e.g. appointments, hospital reports, prescriptions, medical advice; perhaps two questions: one for face to face and one for over the phone
Q5: Do practice staff treat you with respect?Staff try to use first names; it helps to be known; can feel hurried and rushed (it can be a waste of time if you have to come back for another appointment, and this is expensive – taxi fares). Question wording: what does ‘practice staff’ mean? Everyone, everyone except the doctors, everyone except the receptionists? Could say ‘. . . everyone at the practice, e.g . . .’Once you get an appointment, respect is fine (appointment system is the hurdle; continuity of care); lack of dignity in care (clinical); depends on what you want, e.g. follow-up appointments are difficult to book, staff (reception and GPs) can be rushed at the end of the day and try to push you out. Question wording: who are the practice staff: receptionists, everybody, GPs, physios, nurses, district nurses – list who we meanHow they talk to you has improved (used to be bad but more polite now); good systems for prescriptions (Q4); receptionists informing patients that there will be delay in patient’s appointment time (Q4); respectful face to face but not over the phone – they don’t try to understand; polite, always get a good answer (full answer, well explained); smile. Question wording: surgery not practice; do we mean receptionists or everybody; perhaps two questions, one for clinical and one for non-clinical
Q6: Does the practice try to support your individual needs?This was interpreted as a clinical question initially; depends on expectations; depends on the type of need; have to ask/not proactive; had to tell them carer status and disabled status many times (now computerised in notes); communication/continuity/having to start again each visit; plain English; GP-dependent/continuity of care. Question wording: ‘. . . practice staff, e.g. . . .’Lack of or conflicting information between primary and secondary care; not working with parents to make (clinical) decisions; GPs don’t admit lack of (clinical) knowledge; patients are prescribed generic medication that can have side-effects (e.g. castor oil) so should be informed of changes (clinical); lack of privacy in pharmacy; [lack of continuity of care]. Question wording: this question was generally interpreted as clinicalReminders (Q7); make blood test appointments automatically and just phone back to confirm (Q7/8); one GP refused to write a letter to confirm mobility problems prevented a patient from getting a discount on a piece of equipment; supports clinical needs (clinical); one problem, one appointment, not enough time in appointment; provides support (appointments) but not at patient’s convenience (Q2); support with prescriptions (Q7); refused a home visit for an elderly (96 years) parent; no after-clinic appointments (Q2). Question wording: surgery not practice; interpreted as clinical (doctor), or just receptionists, or everybody (need clarity). Answers didn’t really reflect what we were trying to get at. Needs work
Q7: Does the practice make it easy for you to keep up to date with your care and treatment?Have to ask/not proactive (this sums it up); would be helpful to receive a letter that an appointment is due; don’t tell you that checks are necessary, they just give you a repeat prescription and then use ad hoc opportunities to do checks, e.g. when you go in for something else; underuse of IT (e.g. e-mails); text reminders would be helpful. Question wording: more options neededSome interpreted as clinical (GP answers questions); reminders; fast track urgent test results; automatic checks for 70+ years; younger people must instigate any contact; repeat prescriptions are fine, they can provide in < 48 hours if urgent; can deliver medicines. Question wording: need to make it clear it’s non-clinicalGood proactive communication from doctor (clinical); can be interpreted as clinical; doctor saying (and sometimes phoning to say) need a blood test (clinical); have to ask and be proactive; reminders for blood tests and text reminders for appointments; expectations: been here longer, know how the system works and know what you need, if been here only a short time, tend to be more satisfied; referral to optician (Q8); one practice used to have reminders but not any more – ‘it’s your responsibility to remember’ with no explanation as to why the change happened. Question wording: surgery not practice; hard to answer if haven’t been registered for long or if don’t visit the surgery often; include a not applicable option?
Q8: Does the practice make it easy for you to access other health-care services that you need?What’s available? How do you access it? Word of mouth; fragmentation; need a ‘care officer’ to manage pathways; too many forms to complete (duplication, hard work); isolation/abandonment/vulnerability/voice not heard (even if you had a voice, which you don’t at that time of shock); lack of knowledge about benefits; have to ask/not proactive. Question wording: fine as isAccess is okay but the communication from secondary care back to primary care is not good (takes ages); some GPs are not referring to specialists; lack of knowledge about what services are available. Question wording: should we include a list of possible services?Can get referral letter for hospital; there is a diabetes nurse at the surgery; it’s easier nowadays; the surgery arranges everything; there are now more facilities on site, e.g. for blood tests, previously had to make appointment elsewhere for 3 weeks’ time; GPs repeat previous prescriptions without examining or listening to you (clinical). Question wording: surgery rather than practice; what does ‘access’ mean; give examples of other health-care services; this question is hard to answer if you don’t need other services; include a not applicable option
Other: Is there anything else that’s important for you when you use your GP practice that we haven’t included in our questions?Length of appointment (one appointment, one problem); length of wait after appointment time – not knowing where you are in the queue or how many people are in front of youThe practice provides a good service, especially the nurses; one patient said that respect wasn’t covered (even though it was), so it couldn’t have registered with herNo indication of when the GP will phone back – tied to the phone; if there were phone queuing systems, people would hang up of they were 15th in the queue; busy phone lines 8–9:30 a.m., have to phone later; when visiting walk-in centre or hospital, need medical card or passport; information provision, e.g. leaflets put forward by interpreter but not an issue for the participants

DNA, did not attend.

Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2014. This work was produced by Tarrant et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

Bookshelf ID: NBK263670

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (256M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...