U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Perry T, editor. Therapeutics Letter. Vancouver (BC): Therapeutics Initiative; 1994-.

Cover of Therapeutics Letter

Therapeutics Letter.

Show details

Letter 1Treatment of Non-Ulcer Dyspepsia in Adults: Common Questions about H2-blockers

Published: October 1994.

Therapeutics Letter 1 addresses common questions, including dosage, about H2-blockers for treatment of non-ulcer dyspepsia in adults. Other than cost, there is little difference between the four H2-blockers (Cimetidine, Famotidine, Nizatidine, and Ranitidine) available in British Columbia.

Keywords:

Cimetidine, Dyspepsia, Famotidine, Histamine H2 Antagonists, Nizatidine, /Ranitidine

Image tl-001fu1
Complaints referable to the upper gastrointestinal tract are a common presentation to the primary care physician. We are fortunate to have a wide variety of drugs available to manage these conditions including antacids, H2-blockers, sucralfate, misoprostol, and omeprazole. In this letter we will focus on the most widely prescribed drugs, the H2-blockers. The next two letters will concentrate on Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

There are four H2-blockers available for prescription in British Columbia (see Table). These four drugs all act to reduce gastric acid secretion and are similar chemically and pharmacokineticaly; they are all eliminated mostly by the kidney and they have similar half-lives of around 2 hours.1 Despite the short half-life, they are all effective in most patients when given once daily at bed-time.1 Administration of any of the four H2-blockers results in healing after 8 weeks of therapy in 80% of the cases. The approximate clinically equivalent doses are shown in the Table reflecting some difference in potency, which is not of any clinical significance. The safety profile of all four drugs is excellent with a low percentage of patients developing side effects, requiring discontinuing the drug.1

Commonly asked questions

•. What about confusion in the elderly?

The outpatient incidence of CNS reactions including confusion is 0.2% or less. There is no evidence of a higher incidence with one H2-blocker as compared with another.2

•. What about drug interactions?

Cimetidine and to a lesser extent ranitidine have the capacity to inhibit the metabolism of some other drugs to a small usually clinically insignificant degree (10 to 30%). Cimetidine only needs to be avoided in combination with the following three drugs: warfarin, phenytoin, and theophylline.

•. What about gynecomastia?

Cimetidine is associated with a 0.3% overall incidence of gynecomastia; the risk is less with doses less than 1000 mg daily.3

•. Is it possible to switch from one H2-blocker to another?

Patients can be readily switched from one H2-blocker to another in equivalent dose without any risk to the patient.

•. How much should the dose be reduced in the elderly?

In the elderly and other patients with reduced renal function the doses used should be 1/2 to 1/4 of the usual doses.1

•. Is it safe to stop H2-blockers in patients who have been on long term maintenance therapy?

Studies have shown that many patients are inappropriately maintained on H2-blockers.4 Maintenance therapy should be limited to patients with proven recurrent peptic ulcer disease, or severe recurrent dyspepsia. The need for maintenance therapy will be markedly diminished with the appropriate eradication of Helicobacter pylori (see next Therapeutics Letter). It is safe to abruptly stop the drug in such patients. If a patient develops symptoms consistent with rebound hyperacidity the dose of the drug can be tapered over a 2–3 week period and stopped.

•. Is there a significant difference in the cost of H2-blockers?

The relative cost of the average maintenance dose of H2-blockers in comparison to the other drugs used in the management of peptic ulcer disease is shown in the Figure.

Figure

Figure

Daily maintenance cost*

Conclusion

There is little difference between the various H 2 -blockers other than cost.

References

1.
Feldman M., Burton ME. Histamine2 - receptor antagonists. Standard therapy for acid-peptic diseases. New England Journal of Medicine 323:1672–80, 1749–55; 1990 [PubMed: 1978250]
2.
Cantú TG, Korek JS. Central nervous system reactions to histamine-2 receptor blockers. Annals of Internal Medicine 114:1027–34; 1994 [PubMed: 1674198]
3.
Rodriguez LAG, Jick H. Risk of gynecomastia associated with cimetidine, omeprazole, and other antiulcer drugs. British Medical Journal 308: 503–6; 1994 [PMC free article: PMC2542783] [PubMed: 8136667]
4.
Carmichael JM, Zell SC. Survey of ulcer recurrence risk factors associated with long-term cimetidine prescribing. Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy 21: 452–8; 1987 [PubMed: 3582174]

The Therapeutics Initiative is committed to evaluating the effectiveness of all its educational activities using the Pharmacare data base. The data will be in a form such that individual physicians, pharmacies or patients will not be identified. If you do not wish to be part of this evaluation process, please notify us and you will be excluded from the evaluation.

Copyright © 1994 - 2022 Therapeutics Initiative, University of British Columbia.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Bookshelf ID: NBK598481PMID: 38620489

Views

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...