U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Lumbar Sympathetic Block

; ; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: August 23, 2023.

Continuing Education Activity

The autonomic nervous system consists of the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions. As the name implies, the lumbar sympathetic block can be utilized to disrupt the nerve supply from the sympathetic chain to the lower extremities. This is useful in treating sympathetic mediators of pain. This activity reviews the indications, contraindications of lumbar sympathetic block and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in the management of patients with chronic pain syndrome.

Objectives:

  • Describe the indications of a lumbar sympathetic block.
  • Review the technique of a lumbar sympathetic block.
  • Summarize the complications of a lumbar sympathetic block.
  • Outline the importance of improving care coordination among interprofessional team members to improve outcomes for patients undergoing a lumbar sympathetic block.
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

The autonomic nervous system consists of the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions. As the name implies, the lumbar sympathetic block can be utilized to disrupt the nerve supply from the sympathetic chain to the lower extremities. This is useful in treating sympathetic mediators of pain. Specifically, lumbar sympathetic blocks can be used for the treatment of painful conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome, phantom limb pain, hyperhidrosis, painful vascular insufficiencies, and pain from herpes zoster/shingles.[1][2]

Anatomy and Physiology

The sympathetic trunk is comprised of a nerve bundle that runs from the skull base to the coccyx. Its main function is to mediate the body's "fight or flight" response, and it also plays an integral role in maintaining homeostasis in conjunction with the parasympathetic nervous system. The lumbar sympathetic trunk is located along the anterolateral aspect of the first through fourth lumbar vertebra. The preganglionic neurons exit the spinal cord via white rami of the ventral roots of spinal nerves L1 to L4 and then synapse at the appropriate lumbar sympathetic ganglion. From there, the postganglionic neurons extend distally and innervate specific sites. The densest portion of lumbar sympathetic ganglia resides in L2 and L3, therefore, lumbar sympathetic blocks are most commonly performed along with the lower third of L2 or the upper third of L3 levels.[3][4]

Indications

According to the practice guidelines for chronic pain management by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, lumbar sympathetic blocks are indicated for the treatment of a multitude of sympathetic-mediated pain disorders.

  • Complex regional pain syndrome, formerly referred to as reflex sympathetic dystrophy, is characterized by dysregulation of the central and autonomic nervous system causing unregulated pain and temperature control on the affected extremity.[5] It is most commonly seen in patients who sustain an injury to the soft tissue or peripheral nerves of an extremity. Clinical features include vasomotor dysfunction, swelling, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. Affected limbs are often swollen, edematous, and may display trophic changes of the skin due to aberrant vasomotor activity.[6][7]
  • Lower limb painful ischemia - The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence states that approximately 20% of the patients with painful ischemia of the lower limbs secondary to vascular disease are not candidates for surgical intervention due to either the pattern of their disease or medical co-morbidities. In these patients, lumbar sympathetic blocks may be utilized to reduce pain, improve wound healing, and potentially delay or avoid limb amputation. In these cases, the lumbar sympathetic block serves to disrupt the sympathetic innervation to the vascular supply of the lower extremity, thus causing vasodilation and subsequently improved blood flow to the limb.[8][9]
  • Phantom limb pain - A phenomenon in which pain is perceived from a limb that is no longer present. Although the mechanism is poorly understood, studies report an incidence of phantom limb pain in amputee patients between 42% to 78%. Case studies have found lumbar sympathetic blocks to be safe and effective for the alleviation of phantom limb pain.[10][11][12]
  • Neuropathic pain - sustained pain relief in a patient with intractable diabetic neuropathy.[1][13][14]
  • Postherpetic neuralgia secondary to zoster. There is improvement in pain, function, and quality of life after lumbar sympathetic block in patients with postherpetic neuralgia secondary to zoster (Shingles).[15][16][17]
  • Hyperhidrosis[18][19][20]
  • Raynaud disease [21][22]
  • Cancer pain[23]

Contraindications

  • Anticoagulant therapy that can not be stopped
  • Conditions with altered coagulation parameters
  • Allergies to any of the medications that are injected
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Poorly controlled heart disease
  • Patient refusal

Equipment

Required equipment includes a mobile fluoroscopic C-arm x-ray. Additionally, the physician will need epidural spinal needles, sterile gloves, medications, contrast, sterile drapes, and betadine solution. Cardiac monitors and pulse oximeters are needed to monitor the patient's vitals.

Personnel

Staff typically consists of a nurse or assistant, a fluoroscopic C-arm operator, and a physician.

Preparation

A time-out should be performed at which time the staff identify the patient, discuss which procedure will be performed, and verify the side of the body to be treated. The patient should be placed on the fluoroscopy table in the prone position. Some clinicians choose to provide the patient with intravenous sedation at this time. Once the target area has been identified, the area should be cleaned thoroughly with a betadine solution and then covered with a sterile draping. After the patient has been positioned appropriately and the skin has been sterilized, the clinician may proceed.

Technique or Treatment

The fluoroscope's C-arm imaging projector should be positioned such that the L2 and L3 vertebrae are easily visualized, and the superior endplates are aligned. Occasionally, the procedure is done under computed tomography guidance. The C-arm is placed in the oblique plane until the end of the transverse process is aligned with the anterior aspect of the vertebral body to avoid the transverse process during the insertion of the needle. The needle should be aimed towards the anterior aspect of the vertebral bodies of L2 or L3.[23] Sometimes, the block is done at both levels. Local anesthesia is injected at the planned entry point. Once the trajectory has been confirmed, the C-arm should be returned to an anteroposterior view. From here, the needle is introduced and advanced. It should approach the target vertebral body in the mid pedicular position. The needle should be in contact with the vertebra and "walked along" the vertebral body to ensure correct placement. The great vessels are located ventral to the vertebral bodies. A lateral image should be obtained to verify the depth of the needle. The needle should be adjusted so that it is three to five millimeters dorsal to the most ventral portion of the vertebral body.

Once in the correct position, and aspiration was negative for air, blood, or cerebrospinal fluid, 1 mL of contrast is injected to ensure adequate flow and proper location. The clinician should be able to visualize the contrast covering the anterior portion of the vertebral body with an inferior and superior spread at L1 to L3. After adequate location and craniocaudal spread, the medication (anesthetic bupivacaine 0.5%, ethanol 96%, or botulinum toxin) is injected to complete the lumbar sympathetic blockade. The needle is removed and pressure is applied on the entry point and then covered with a bandage. The greatest indication of a successful lumbar sympathetic block is a two-three degree Celcius rise in the temperature of the affected limb. The patient might also note that the skin of the extremity on the injected side will become flushed as a result of blood vessel dilation.

Complications

The most common complications include bleeding, bruising, swelling, and soreness at the site of injection. This is usually self-limited and resolves within hours to days of having the procedure. Some patients have also reported dizziness, headache, and transient numbness, and weakness of the leg on the side that was injected.[24][25][26][27] More serious complications include infection, visceral injury, intravascular injection, intralymphatic injection, ureter injury, kidney injury, Horner's syndrome, an allergic reaction to the medication, although these occurrences are exceedingly rare.[28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Anterior thigh pain, presumably from damage to the genitofemoral nerve and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, may occur in some patients.[24][35]

Clinical Significance

Overall, the lumbar sympathetic block is a safe and effective procedure that can be used to alleviate pain in the appropriate patient population. This includes people with vascular insufficiency of the lower extremities, complex regional pain syndrome, phantom limb pain, postherpetic neuralgia, and other neuropathic pain syndromes that are refractory to medical management.[36][37]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The nurse and physician performing the procedure must be aware of the most common complications include bleeding, bruising, swelling, and soreness at the site of injection. The agent is usually prepared by the pharmacy; dosing and proper formulation fall to them to perform correctly and discuss any potential adverse effects with the team. The nurse must provide monitoring and report untoward events such as dizziness and transient numbness and weakness of the leg on the side that was injected. More serious complications including infection, intravascular injection, and allergic reaction to the medication may occur and the interprofessional healthcare team should be prepared to work together to respond. [Level 5] The collaboration of the interdisciplinary team helps to ensure good pain-free results and improve outcomes.

Review Questions

References

1.
Abramov R. Lumbar sympathetic treatment in the management of lower limb pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014 Apr;18(4):403. [PubMed: 24643353]
2.
Awal S, Madabushi R, Agarwal A, Singla V. CRPS: Early Lumbar Sympathetic Block is Better Compared to Other Interventions. Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E363. [PubMed: 26815268]
3.
Feigl GC, Kastner M, Ulz H, Breschan C, Pixner T, Dreu M, Umschaden HW, Likar R. The lumbar sympathetic trunk: its visibility and distance to two anatomical landmarks. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013 Mar;35(2):99-106. [PubMed: 22983730]
4.
An JW, Koh JC, Sun JM, Park JY, Choi JB, Shin MJ, Lee YW. Clinical Identification of the Vertebral Level at Which the Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglia Aggregate. Korean J Pain. 2016 Apr;29(2):103-9. [PMC free article: PMC4837115] [PubMed: 27103965]
5.
van Eijs F, Stanton-Hicks M, Van Zundert J, Faber CG, Lubenow TR, Mekhail N, van Kleef M, Huygen F. Evidence-based interventional pain medicine according to clinical diagnoses. 16. Complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):70-87. [PubMed: 20807353]
6.
Carroll I, Clark JD, Mackey S. Sympathetic block with botulinum toxin to treat complex regional pain syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2009 Mar;65(3):348-51. [PMC free article: PMC2763598] [PubMed: 19334078]
7.
Meier PM, Zurakowski D, Berde CB, Sethna NF. Lumbar sympathetic blockade in children with complex regional pain syndromes: a double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. Anesthesiology. 2009 Aug;111(2):372-80. [PMC free article: PMC2724014] [PubMed: 19602962]
8.
Barreto Junior EPS, Nascimento JDS, de Castro APCR. [Neurolitic block of the lumbar sympathetic chain improves chronic pain in a patient with critical lower limb ischemia]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;68(1):100-103. [PMC free article: PMC9391669] [PubMed: 26809966]
9.
Manjunath PS, Jayalakshmi TS, Dureja GP, Prevost AT. Management of lower limb complex regional pain syndrome type 1: an evaluation of percutaneous radiofrequency thermal lumbar sympathectomy versus phenol lumbar sympathetic neurolysis--a pilot study. Anesth Analg. 2008 Feb;106(2):647-9, table of contents. [PubMed: 18227328]
10.
McCormick ZL, Hendrix A, Dayanim D, Clay B, Kirsling A, Harden N. Lumbar Sympathetic Plexus Block as a Treatment for Postamputation Pain: Methodology for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Med. 2018 Dec 01;19(12):2496-2503. [PubMed: 29528455]
11.
Bornemann-Cimenti H, Dorn C, Rumpold-Seitlinger G. Early Onset and Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain Following Surgical Amputation. Pain Med. 2017 Dec 01;18(12):2510-2512. [PubMed: 28475751]
12.
Richardson C, Glenn S, Nurmikko T, Horgan M. Incidence of phantom phenomena including phantom limb pain 6 months after major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin J Pain. 2006 May;22(4):353-8. [PubMed: 16691088]
13.
Cheng J, Daftari A, Zhou L. Sympathetic blocks provided sustained pain relief in a patient with refractory painful diabetic neuropathy. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2012;2012:285328. [PMC free article: PMC3350298] [PubMed: 22606406]
14.
Mashiah A, Soroker D, Pasik S, Mashiah T. Phenol lumbar sympathetic block in diabetic lower limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1995 Oct;2(5):467-9. [PubMed: 8749275]
15.
Yamagami H, Hashizume K, Sha K, Furuya H, Okuda T. [Evaluation of selective lumbar radiculography and radicular block]. Masui. 1994 Feb;43(2):253-7. [PubMed: 8164333]
16.
Kageshima K, Wakasugi B, Shiotani M, Ooseto K, Yuda Y, Karasawa H, Ohno K. [Thoracic and lumbar sympathetic ganglion block for post herpetic neuralgia]. Masui. 1992 Jan;41(1):106-10. [PubMed: 1545488]
17.
Malec-Milewska M, Sękowska A, Kolęda I, Horosz B, Guć M, Jastrzębski J. Sympathetic nerve blocks for the management of postherpetic neuralgia - 19 years of pain clinic experience. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014 Sep-Oct;46(4):255-61. [PubMed: 25293476]
18.
Kim WO, Yoon KB, Kil HK, Yoon DM. Chemical lumbar sympathetic block in the treatment of plantar hyperhidrosis: a study of 69 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Oct;34(10):1340-5. [PubMed: 18616535]
19.
Yun SW, Kim YS, Lee Y, Lim HJ, Park SI, Jung JP, Park CR. Outcome of Limited Video-Assisted Lumbar Sympathetic Block for Plantar Hyperhidrosis Using Clipping Method. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Jan;27(1):36-42. [PubMed: 27622702]
20.
Aşik ZS, Orbey BC, Aşik I. Sympathetic radiofrequency neurolysis for unilateral lumbar hyperhidrosis: a case report. Agri. 2008 Jul;20(3):37-9. [PubMed: 19085180]
21.
Ellis H. Lumbar sympathectomy. Br J Hosp Med. 1986 Feb;35(2):124-5. [PubMed: 3730665]
22.
Skeehan TM, Cory PC. Neurolytic lumbar sympathetic block in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon. Anesthesiology. 1986 Jan;64(1):119-20. [PubMed: 3942322]
23.
Spiegel MA, Hingula L, Chen GH, Legler A, Puttanniah V, Gulati A. The Use of L2 and L3 Lumbar Sympathetic Blockade for Cancer-Related Pain, an Experience and Recommendation in the Oncologic Population. Pain Med. 2020 Jan 01;21(1):176-184. [PMC free article: PMC7761528] [PubMed: 31274168]
24.
Feigl GC, Dreu M, Ulz H, Breschan C, Maier C, Likar R. Susceptibility of the genitofemoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves to complications from lumbar sympathetic blocks: is there a morphological reason? Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):1098-104. [PubMed: 24554547]
25.
Pennekamp W, Krumova EK, Feigl GP, Frombach E, Nicolas V, Schwarzer A, Maier C. Permanent lesion of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve after low-volume ethanol 96%application on the lumbar sympathetic chain. Pain Physician. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):391-7. [PubMed: 23877455]
26.
Artuso JD, Stevens RA, Lineberry PJ. Post dural puncture headache after lumbar sympathetic block: a report of two cases. Reg Anesth. 1991 Sep-Oct;16(5):288-91. [PubMed: 1958610]
27.
Joshi SM, Hehre FW. Peridural block complicating lumbar sympathetic block. Anesth Analg. 1977 Nov-Dec;56(6):873-4. [PubMed: 22274]
28.
Dirim A, Kumsar S. Iatrogenic ureteral injury due to lumbar sympathetic block. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(5):492-3. [PubMed: 18609289]
29.
Wheatley JK, Motamedi F, Hammonds WD. Page kidney resulting from massive subcapsular hematoma. Complication of lumbar sympathetic nerve block. Urology. 1984 Oct;24(4):361-3. [PubMed: 6485196]
30.
Haynsworth RF, Noe CE, Fassy LR. Intralymphatic injection: another complication of lumbar sympathetic block. Anesthesiology. 1994 Feb;80(2):460-2. [PubMed: 8311326]
31.
EGBERT LD. Horner's syndrome; complication of lumbar sympathetic block. Anesthesiology. 1955 Sep;16(5):811-2. [PubMed: 13249119]
32.
Maranhão-Filho PA, Martins MA, Lopes HF. Horner's syndrome and brachial paresis as a complication of lumbar sympathetic block: a case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1995 Dec;53(4):831-3. [PubMed: 8729783]
33.
SAMUELSSON SM, HOEGSTR-OM S. [RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA FOLLOWING LUMBAR SYMPATHETIC NERVE BLOCK]. Sven Lakartidn. 1964 Sep 30;61:2894-903. [PubMed: 14222119]
34.
Lönnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, Conacher ID. Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995 Sep;50(9):813-5. [PubMed: 7573876]
35.
Sayson SC, Ramamurthy S, Hoffman J. Incidence of genitofemoral nerve block during lumbar sympathetic block: comparison of two lumbar injection sites. Reg Anesth. 1997 Nov-Dec;22(6):569-74. [PubMed: 9425975]
36.
Govedarski V, Petrov I, Zahariev T, Nachev G. [Adjuvant and individual application of lumbar sympathectomy at patient with arterial disease in lower limb]. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2010;(1):19-23. [PubMed: 21972699]
37.
Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Kent J, Mackey SC, Raja SN, Stacey BR, Levy RM, Backonja M, Baron R, Harke H, Loeser JD, Treede RD, Turk DC, Wells CD. Interventional management of neuropathic pain: NeuPSIG recommendations. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2249-2261. [PMC free article: PMC4484720] [PubMed: 23748119]

Disclosure: Christopher Alexander declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Orlando De Jesus declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Matthew Varacallo declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK431107PMID: 28613759

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...