Continuing Education Activity

Hyperacusis is a rare hearing disorder characterized by a decreased tolerance to sound where patients report excessive loudness or pain, often leading to sound avoidant behavior. This activity reviews the background, evaluation, and treatment of hyperacusis, and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in providing optimal care for patients with this condition.

Objectives:

• Outline the current understanding of the etiology and pathophysiology of hyperacusis.
• Identify and describe the typical presentation of a patient with hyperacusis.
• Describe the most appropriate treatment options for individual patients with hyperacusis.
• Explain the importance of improving care coordination amongst the interprofessional team to improve outcomes for patients affected by hyperacusis.

Introduction

Hyperacusis is a rare disorder of loudness perception, where sounds that are ordinarily considered innocuous become intolerable.[1] Patients may perceive this sensation as painful, frightening, unpleasant, or excessively loud.[2] Hyperacusis often co-exists with tinnitus and can cause significant distress, with patients regularly reporting impairment in their social, occupational, and recreational activities.[3] Avoiding sound sources and seeking medical attention are common behaviors.[4] The terms phonophobia (fear of sound) and misophonia (dislike of sound) can be associated with intolerance to specific sounds and may have an emotional component with the former mostly associated with migraine.

Although a definitive cure is yet to be identified, research in this field is accelerating, and there has been a 10-fold increase in the number of peer-reviewed studies on the condition in the past four decades.[5]

Etiology

Although there are many associations, a direct underlying cause for hyperacusis is rarely found.[1] The most common cause of hyperacusis is high noise exposure. The association between hyperacusis and hearing loss is complicated. Occupational and recreational noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss are commonly cited as major risk factors.[2] Indeed, studies show that professional musicians are more likely to suffer from hyperacusis, especially those playing pop/rock music and exposing themselves to prolonged periods of amplified sound.[2][6][7] However, in a multivariate analysis of 850 participants, no significant correlation was reported between hearing threshold loss and hyperacusis.[8] We can reasonably conclude from this that hyperacusis often occurs in conjunction with hearing loss, but it is not essential in the development of the condition.

Those that suffer from hyperacusis are more likely to be comorbid. Psychiatric conditions, functional diseases (i.e. fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome), and joint and back disorders are particularly common.[4] Fifty-six percent of patients referred to secondary care for hyperacusis met the criteria for at least one psychiatric illness, with 47% having an anxiety disorder.[9] Concurrently suffering from tinnitus is remarkably common, with rates reported to be as high as 86%.[10] Migraine, post-traumatic stress disorder, Lyme disease, and Williams syndrome are also implicated in the etiology of the disease, with up to 90% of those with Williams syndrome reporting hyperacusis symptoms.[11][12]

Epidemiology

The prevalence of hyperacusis amongst children and adolescents is estimated to be between 3.2% to 17.1%, with the large variability accounted for by differences in age and hearing status.[13] In adults, studies have demonstrated prevalence rates of between 8% to 15.2%.[4][14] There is a suggestion that the prevalence of hyperacusis increases with advancing age and in females with higher educational attainment.[4]

Fully understanding the prevalence of hyperacusis is challenging. The presentation is highly subjective and therefore relies upon a carefully defined set of screening questions.[5] As with tinnitus, the limited research that does exist has considerable inconsistencies in study design and methodology, making comparisons across studies difficult.[15]

Pathophysiology

Measured in decibels (dB), loudness discomfort level (LDL) describes the point at which a subject perceives a sound as being uncomfortably loud. In patients with hyperacusis, LDL is decreased by 16–18 dB compared to the general population, in whom the average LDL is around 100 dB.[10][16][17] Regardless of the degree of hearing loss, LDL in hyperacusis is decreased across the whole frequency spectrum, suggesting an increase in auditory gain as the underlying mechanism.[18] Supported by experimental studies, the central auditory gain model proposes that a reduction in auditory input can lead to a dysfunctional increase in neuronal gain, leading to over-amplification of sound and the symptoms of hyperacusis.[18][19] This mechanism is also demonstrated through studies that induce temporary auditory deprivation through wearing earplugs. Even if only worn in one ear, there is a bilateral increase in perceived loudness.[20] The plasticity of the central auditory system is, therefore, implicated in using sound therapy as a potential treatment for hyperacusis.

There are several other proposed mechanisms. The prevalence of hyperacusis in those suffering from Williams syndrome led to the theory that 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) dysfunction increases auditory sensitivity, however, the high rate of otitis media in Williams syndrome may be more contributory.[1][21] Stapes hypermobility is also cited as a cause of peripheral hyperacusis, and conditions that involve paralysis of the facial nerve (i.e., Bell palsy, Ramsay-Hunt syndrome, and Lyme disease) are involved in the etiology of the condition.[1] This cohort responds well to oval window reinforcement, which is reported to improve LDL and subjective symptoms.[22] Hyperacusis can also result due to dysfunction of the auditory cortex as a result of increased neural synchrony and reorganization of the tonotopic map. Hyperacusis occurring in autistic spectrum disorder is thought to be associated with subtle cochlear dysfunction and reduced effectiveness of the efferent system.[17]

History and Physical

The subjectivity of hyperacusis has given rise to several definitions in the literature, the simplest of which separates the presentation into four categories: loudness, annoyance, pain, and fear.[2] Loudness hyperacusis is defined as the perception of moderately intense sounds as uncomfortably loud. In annoyance hyperacusis, the chief complaint is that of a negative emotional reaction manifesting as irritability and anxiety. Fear hyperacusis is that which results in avoidance behaviors, and pain hyperacusis can present as a stabbing pain felt in the ear. Hyperacusis is almost exclusively a bilateral phenomenon. In patients with unilateral symptoms, one must consider an alternative cause, such as an acoustic shock leading to tonic tensor tympani syndrome.[2][5]

Phonophobia and misophonia present similarly (and indeed the terms are often used synonymously), however, an important distinction must be made between these conditions. Hyperacusis is sound sensitivity arising from within the auditory system, and therefore can be triggered by any generic, low-intensity sound.[1] Contrarily, phonophobia and misophonia are disorders associated with the limbic system, and there is no abnormality in the peripheral or central auditory system. Phonophobia is a psychiatric disease in which there is a fear of a specific sound, while misophonia is a psychological disease in which a specific sound triggers emotional and physical reactions.[23]

A full neurotological examination is essential in detecting any associated or underlying causes of hyperacusis, some of which are reversible.[24] Otoscopy and pneumatoscopy are important for assessing the mobility of the tympanic membrane, and cranial nerve examination can reveal facial nerve dysfunction.[24] A detailed history will assess for any underlying psychiatric illness and also establish potential risk factors, including noise exposure and acoustic trauma.

Hyperacusis vs. Tinnitus

Hyperacusis is almost exclusively bilateral and rarely intermittent and not commonly associated with somatic modulation. Percept is vivid and salient and the impact of self-help is unknown.

Tinnitus is often unilateral and intermittent and associated with somatic modulation. Percept can be formless or primitive and self-help can be effective.

Evaluation

The diagnosis of hyperacusis usually involves determining LDL using pure-tone audiometry and using questionnaires to determine disease severity.[17] Many questionnaires exist, including the Geräuschüberempfindlichkeit (GÜF) and the Multiple Activity Scale for Hyperacusis (MASH). However, the most widely is the hyperacusis questionnaire (HQ).[5][17] When the result of a test is considered alone, there is no agreed consensus on the diagnostic cut-off values for either the HQ or LDL, however, in combination, the results are more sensitive.[17] Ninety-five percent of patients diagnosed with hyperacusis have LDL ≤ 77 dB (average LDL in non-hyperacusic patients is 100 dB) and an HQ score of ≥ 22.[25] Unfortunately, these cut-offs only inform of the presence or absence of hyperacusis, and not on its impact on a patient’s life.[17] Furthermore, it is important to ensure that the evaluation does not cause undue discomfort for the patient and a subsequent breakdown in clinical rapport.

Based on the history and physical examination, clinicians may decide to undertake further investigations if an alternative underlying cause is suspected, such as serological tests for Lyme disease or high-resolution computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain for those cases with facial paralysis.[24]

For the evaluation of psychological problems in paitnets who present iwht hyperacusis the following questionnaires are recommended[17]:

• Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 item scale (GAD-7)
• Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI)
• Mini-Social Phobia Inventory (Mini-SPIN)
• Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R)
• Penn State Worry Questionnaire-Abbreviated (PSWQ-A)
• Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

Treatment / Management

Treatment for hyperacusis can broadly be categorized into those which target the physical symptoms, and those which aim to reduce the psychological burden of the condition.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most effective components of hyperacusis therapy alongside counseling and education.[3] By providing patients with the techniques required to manage the emotional reaction to sound, CBT has been shown to increase LDL and reduce hyperacusis severity as assessed by the HQ.[26][27] Directive counseling uses a similar approach of identifying and discussing repressed behaviors, although much of the literature is directed towards its use in tinnitus.[24]

Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) involves educating the patient about their condition alongside gradual sound enrichment, and its use in hyperacusis is becoming increasingly popular.[26] Prolonged low-level noise exposure has been shown to have a reversing effect on the enhanced neural gain, which is thought to be the underlying mechanism of hyperacusis.[28] Significant improvements in LDL have been seen after 6 months of sound generator therapy. Increasing the mean level of the acoustic environment (i.e. greater auditory stimulation) has been reported to have a beneficial symptomatic effect.[29][30]

Surgery may be indicated in select cases, including those refractory to the above treatments or in conductive hyperacusis secondary to superior semi-circular canal dehiscence syndrome.[31][32] Round and oval window reinforcement is a simple, reversible procedure that has been shown to have a high success rate and a sustainable reduction in symptoms.[31][32][33]

Alternative treatments often are given special attention for chronic pain and may include supplements and vitamins, acupuncture, exercise, yoga, meditation, massage, relaxation therapy, and hypnosis.

Differential Diagnosis

The main differential diagnoses to consider in a patient presenting with a decreased tolerance to sound are misophonia and phonophobia.

The underlying conditions that need to be excluded are:[1]

• Bell palsy
• Ramsay-Hunt syndrome
• Migraine
• Lyme disease
• Neurosyphilis
• Williams syndrome
• Post-traumatic stress disorder
• Depression
• Superior canal dehiscence syndrome
• Autism
• Cri-du-Chat syndrome
• Tay–Sach disease
• Temporomandibular disorders
• Fibromyalgia

Prognosis

The prognosis ultimately depends upon the etiology. Those that suffer from hyperacusis have varying levels of distress. Patients with hyperacusis are often more impaired than those with tinnitus. Patient forums suggest that for some, hyperacusis is a long-term condition (although it is worth noting that those who no longer suffer are unlikely to continue posting on forums).[2][5] Hyperacusis has profound psychological effects, with 13% of patients expressing suicidal or self-harm ideations, reinforcing the need for the clinician to screen for anxiety and depression.[34] Emerging adults (those between 18 and 29 years of age) are especially at risk of both developing the illness through increased risk-taking behaviors and also suffering from these psychological effects during a particularly stressful period of life.[35]

Complications

In those cases where an underlying cause is identified, complications will depend on the etiology.

Hyperacusis alone will not lead to further physical complications. Nevertheless, the psychological burden can result in significant morbidity.

Some patients communicate suicidal or self-harm ideations.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Education forms a significant part of the treatment plan for hyperacusis. Education can be delivered in isolation, or as part of CBT or TRT. Patients should be informed about their illness and test outcomes, basic physiology, coping strategies, and relaxation techniques.[3][36] Group education sessions may also be constructive, allowing patients to connect and share experiences.[37] Education is as effective as CBT and counseling. In the United Kingdom, up to 96% of tinnitus services routinely offer education to patients.[3]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Hyperacusis is a difficult condition to manage. The lack of formal clinical guidelines reinforces the importance of working closely with the interprofessional team, and clinicians are encouraged to collaborate with researchers to advance the understanding of hyperacusis and improve patient outcomes.

Successful patient outcomes rely on input from a large interprofessional team with an effective professional-patient relationship. Many patients are successfully managed in the community, however, for those with especially troubling symptoms, a referral may be made to an otolaryngologist. The otolaryngologist will be involved in the initial evaluation of the hyperacusic patient and will work closely with several other professionals, including audiologists, specialist nurses, and clinical psychologists. In select cases, radiologists, neurosurgeons, and maxillofacial surgeons may be involved in the care of a patient with hyperacusis. These professionals rely on having an accurate and comprehensive workup by the otolaryngologist. The audiologist is an expert in audiometric testing, namely pure-tone audiometry, which is vital for diagnostic purposes. Specialist nurses are often used for education and information provision, and the clinical psychologist is essential for the delivery of CBT.

Review Questions

• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Click here for a simplified version.
• Comment on this article.

References

1.

Baguley DM. Hyperacusis. J R Soc Med. 2003 Dec;96(12):582-5. [PMC free article: PMC539655] [PubMed: 14645606]

2.

Tyler RS, Pienkowski M, Roncancio ER, Jun HJ, Brozoski T, Dauman N, Dauman N, Andersson G, Keiner AJ, Cacace AT, Martin N, Moore BC. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part I. Definitions and manifestations. Am J Audiol. 2014 Dec;23(4):402-19. [PubMed: 25104073]

3.

Aazh H, Moore BC, Lammaing K, Cropley M. Tinnitus and hyperacusis therapy in a UK National Health Service audiology department: Patients' evaluations of the effectiveness of treatments. Int J Audiol. 2016 Sep;55(9):514-22. [PMC free article: PMC4950421] [PubMed: 27195947]

4.

Paulin J, Andersson L, Nordin S. Characteristics of hyperacusis in the general population. Noise Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;18(83):178-84. [PMC free article: PMC5187659] [PubMed: 27569405]

5.

Baguley DM, Hoare DJ. Hyperacusis: major research questions. HNO. 2018 May;66(5):358-363. [PMC free article: PMC5928178] [PubMed: 29392341]

6.

Di Stadio A, Dipietro L, Ricci G, Della Volpe A, Minni A, Greco A, de Vincentiis M, Ralli M. Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, and Diplacusis in Professional Musicians: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 26;15(10) [PMC free article: PMC6209930] [PubMed: 30261653]

7.

Halevi-Katz DN, Yaakobi E, Putter-Katz H. Exposure to music and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) among professional pop/rock/jazz musicians. Noise Health. 2015 May-Jun;17(76):158-64. [PMC free article: PMC4918652] [PubMed: 25913555]

8.

Hannula S, Bloigu R, Majamaa K, Sorri M, Mäki-Torkko E. Self-reported hearing problems among older adults: prevalence and comparison to measured hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Sep;22(8):550-9. [PubMed: 22031679]

9.

Jüris L, Andersson G, Larsen HC, Ekselius L. Psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits in patients with hyperacusis. Int J Audiol. 2013 Apr;52(4):230-5. [PubMed: 23244506]

10.

Anari M, Axelsson A, Eliasson A, Magnusson L. Hypersensitivity to sound--questionnaire data, audiometry and classification. Scand Audiol. 1999;28(4):219-30. [PubMed: 10572967]

11.

Klein AJ, Armstrong BL, Greer MK, Brown FR. Hyperacusis and otitis media in individuals with Williams syndrome. J Speech Hear Disord. 1990 May;55(2):339-44. [PubMed: 2329796]

12.

Katzenell U, Segal S. Hyperacusis: review and clinical guidelines. Otol Neurotol. 2001 May;22(3):321-6; discussion 326-7. [PubMed: 11347634]

13.

Rosing SN, Schmidt JH, Wedderkopp N, Baguley DM. Prevalence of tinnitus and hyperacusis in children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 03;6(6):e010596. [PMC free article: PMC4893873] [PubMed: 27259524]

14.

Andersson G, Lindvall N, Hursti T, Carlbring P. Hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis): a prevalence study conducted via the Internet and post. Int J Audiol. 2002 Dec;41(8):545-54. [PubMed: 12477175]

15.

McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, Hall D. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res. 2016 Jul;337:70-9. [PubMed: 27246985]

16.

Sheldrake J, Diehl PU, Schaette R. Audiometric characteristics of hyperacusis patients. Front Neurol. 2015;6:105. [PMC free article: PMC4432660] [PubMed: 26029161]

17.

Aazh H, Knipper M, Danesh AA, Cavanna AE, Andersson L, Paulin J, Schecklmann M, Heinonen-Guzejev M, Moore BCJ. Insights from the third international conference on hyperacusis: causes, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Noise Health. 2018 Jul-Aug;20(95):162-170. [PMC free article: PMC6122267] [PubMed: 30136676]

18.

Diehl PU, Schaette R. Abnormal Auditory Gain in Hyperacusis: Investigation with a Computational Model. Front Neurol. 2015;6:157. [PMC free article: PMC4502361] [PubMed: 26236277]

19.

Zeng FG. An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain. Hear Res. 2013 Jan;295:172-9. [PMC free article: PMC3593089] [PubMed: 22641191]

20.

Munro KJ, Turtle C, Schaette R. Plasticity and modified loudness following short-term unilateral deprivation: evidence of multiple gain mechanisms within the auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan;135(1):315-22. [PubMed: 24437771]

21.

Marriage J, Barnes NM. Is central hyperacusis a symptom of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) dysfunction? J Laryngol Otol. 1995 Oct;109(10):915-21. [PubMed: 7499940]

22.

Silverstein H, Smith J, Kellermeyer B. Stapes hypermobility as a possible cause of hyperacusis. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar-Apr;40(2):247-252. [PubMed: 30502003]

23.

Asha'ari ZA, Mat Zain N, Razali A. Phonophobia and hyperacusis: practical points from a case report. Malays J Med Sci. 2010 Jan;17(1):49-51. [PMC free article: PMC3216140] [PubMed: 22135526]

24.

Pienkowski M, Tyler RS, Roncancio ER, Jun HJ, Brozoski T, Dauman N, Coelho CB, Andersson G, Keiner AJ, Cacace AT, Martin N, Moore BC. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part II. Measurement, mechanisms, and treatment. Am J Audiol. 2014 Dec;23(4):420-36. [PubMed: 25478787]

25.

Aazh H, Moore BCJ. Factors related to uncomfortable loudness levels for patients seen in a tinnitus and hyperacusis clinic. Int J Audiol. 2017 Oct;56(10):793-800. [PubMed: 28622055]

26.

Fackrell K, Potgieter I, Shekhawat GS, Baguley DM, Sereda M, Hoare DJ. Clinical Interventions for Hyperacusis in Adults: A Scoping Review to Assess the Current Position and Determine Priorities for Research. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2723715. [PMC free article: PMC5654244] [PubMed: 29312994]

27.

Jüris L, Andersson G, Larsen HC, Ekselius L. Cognitive behaviour therapy for hyperacusis: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Mar;54:30-7. [PubMed: 24508581]

28.

Sheppard A, Stocking C, Ralli M, Salvi R. A review of auditory gain, low-level noise and sound therapy for tinnitus and hyperacusis. Int J Audiol. 2020 Jan;59(1):5-15. [PubMed: 31498009]

29.

Noreña AJ, Chery-Croze S. Enriched acoustic environment rescales auditory sensitivity. Neuroreport. 2007 Aug 06;18(12):1251-5. [PubMed: 17632277]

30.

Park JM, Kim WJ, Ha JB, Han JJ, Park SY, Park SN. Effect of sound generator on tinnitus and hyperacusis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;138(2):135-139. [PubMed: 29043888]

31.

Silverstein H, Wu YH, Hagan S. Round and oval window reinforcement for the treatment of hyperacusis. Am J Otolaryngol. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):158-62. [PubMed: 25456168]

32.

Nikkar-Esfahani A, Whelan D, Banerjee A. Occlusion of the round window: a novel way to treat hyperacusis symptoms in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome. J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Jul;127(7):705-7. [PubMed: 23732001]

33.

Silverstein H, Kellermeyer B, Martinez U. Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of hyperacusis: New technique and long term results. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jan-Feb;41(1):102319. [PubMed: 31727335]

34.

Aazh H, Moore BCJ. Thoughts about Suicide and Self-Harm in Patients with Tinnitus and Hyperacusis. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Mar;29(3):255-261. [PubMed: 29488875]

35.

Yilmaz S, Taş M, Bulut E, Nurçin E. Assessment of Reduced Tolerance to Sound (Hyperacusis) in University Students. Noise Health. 2017 Mar-Apr;19(87):73-78. [PMC free article: PMC5437755] [PubMed: 29192616]

36.

Nolan DR, Gupta R, Huber CG, Schneeberger AR. An Effective Treatment for Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in an Inpatient Setting: A 10-Year Retrospective Outcome Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:25. [PMC free article: PMC7020229] [PubMed: 32116842]

37.

Perreau AE, Tyler RS, Mancini PC, Witt S, Elgandy MS. Establishing a Group Educational Session for Hyperacusis Patients. Am J Audiol. 2019 Jun 10;28(2):245-250. [PubMed: 31095405]

Disclosure: James Coey declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Orlando De Jesus declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.