U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

McIntosh B, Mierzwinski-Urban M. General Anesthesia and Deep Sedation for Dental Treatments in Children: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2017 Mar 6.

Cover of General Anesthesia and Deep Sedation for Dental Treatments in Children: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

General Anesthesia and Deep Sedation for Dental Treatments in Children: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet].

Show details

Methods

Literature Search Methods

Rapid Response reports are organized so that the evidence for each research question is presented separately.

A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases, Canadian and major international health technology agencies, as well as a focused Internet search. Methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval to health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies, and guidelines. Where possible, retrieval was limited to the human population. The search was also limited to English language documents published between January 1, 2006 and February 3, 2017.

Selection Criteria and Methods

One reviewer screened citations and selected studies. In the first level of screening, titles and abstracts were reviewed and potentially relevant articles were retrieved and assessed for inclusion. The final selection of full-text articles was based on the inclusion criteria presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Selection Criteria.

Table 2

Selection Criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

Articles were excluded if they did not meet the selection criteria outlined in Table 1, they were duplicate publications, or were published prior to 2006.

Critical Appraisal of Individual Studies

The included systematic reviews were critically appraised using the AMSTAR instrument,5 non-randomized studies were critically appraised using the Downs and Black checklist,6 and guidelines were assessed with the AGREE II instrument.7 Summary scores were not calculated for the included studies; rather, a review of the strengths and limitations of each included study were described.

Copyright © 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes only, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH and its licensors.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Bookshelf ID: NBK475604

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (812K)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...