U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Chao YS, Clark M, Carson E, et al. HPV Testing for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019 Mar. (CADTH Optimal Use Report, No. 7.1b.)

Cover of HPV Testing for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment

HPV Testing for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment [Internet].

Show details

Appendix 7Characteristics of Included Primary Studies

Table 42Characteristics of Primary Studies Published After Systematic Reviews

First Author, Year Trial NameCountry, Clinical Setting, Study DesignStudy Population (n)Index TestComparator TestScreening Pathway and IntervalOutcomes of Interest
Randomized Controlled Trials
Lamin, 201742Sweden
  • Established and routinely running organized, large-scale population-based screening program
Women aged 56 to 60 years invited to their last cervical cancer screening appointment (n = 14,763)HPV test (Cobas) with cytology triage of HPV-positive patientsCytology with HPV triage (Cobas) of low-grade cytological abnormalities
  • Abnormal = ASCUS +)
  • Cytology testing
  • HPV testing with cytology triage
Routine screening interval
  • 5 years after age 51
  • Acceptance of screening
  • Referral to colposcopy

Cook, 201643

HPV FOCAL trial, subset of the intervention group

Canada
  • Subanalysis of HPV FOCAL trial
Women aged 25 to 65 years randomized after 2010, HC2 positive and LBC negative at baseline and rescreened after 12 months (n = 3,473)Clinician-collected HPV test (Aptima)Clinician-collected HPV test (HC2)Subset of HPV testing in Ogilvie, 201727
  • DTA
  • Referral to colposcopy
Enerly, 201644Norway
  • Norwegian cervical cancer screening program
Women aged 25 to 69 years who did not regularly attend the national cervical cancer screening program (due for a second reminder, at least four years since last screening) (n = 3,393)Self-collected HPV test (CLART and HC2) at homeClinician-collected LBC test
  • Cytology testing
    • No triage or colposcopy specified
  • HPV testing with cytology triage
    • No colposcopy specified
Routine screening interval
  • 3 years
Acceptance of screening
Racey, 201645Canada
  • Cervical cancer screening by family health team in Ontario
Women aged 30 to 70 years who were overdue for cervical cancer screening, at least three years since last screening (n = 818)Self-collected HPV test at home
  • Reminder letter for Pap test
  • Standard of care opportunistic screening
  • Cytology
  • Self-collected HPV
Routine screening interval
  • Every 2 to 3 years
Acceptance of screening/ compliance

Sultana, 201646

iPap Trial

Australia
  • Established routine cervical cancer screening program
Women aged 30 to 69 years who were under- or never screened for cervical cancer, not screened in the past five years (n = 16,320)Self-collected HPV test (Cobas)Clinician-collected Pap test
  • Abnormal = not mentioned
  • Cytology
  • HPV self-collected sample
    • HPV 16/18+ with colposcopy
Routine screening interval
  • Receive reminders every 27 months after last negative test
Acceptance of screening
Williams, 201647US
  • Patients recruited from medically underserved and low-income neighbourhoods
Women aged 21 years or greater who lived in identified areas or were previous participants of the screening program and were due for a screening test (n = 120)Self-collected HPV test with tampons (Cobas)Clinic administered Pap test, HPV test, and pelvic exam
  • HPV self-collected sample followed by invite to cytology, clinician-collected HPV test, and pelvic exam
Routine screening interval
  • Cytology = 3 years
  • HPV = 5 years
Acceptance of screening/ compliance
Zehbe, 201648Canada
  • Cervical cancer screening in First Nations communities in Northwest Ontario

Women aged 25 to 69 years living in 11 First Nations communities eligible for cervical cancer screening (randomized by community) (n = 834)

Self-collected HPV testClinician-collected Pap test
  • Abnormal not defined
  • Cytology
    • Per Ontario screening program
  • HPV self-collected sample
    • Cytology triage for high-risk positive sample
Routine screening interval
  • 3 years
Acceptance of screening
Cadman, 201549UK
  • Newcastle upon Tyne
Women aged 25 to 65 years who had failed to attend cervical cancer screening after at least two invitations, at least 46 weeks since initial invitation (n = 6,000)Self-collected HPV test (HC2)Physician-collected cytology test
  • Abnormal not defined
  • Two groups were sent up to two reminders for screening within 46 weeks
Acceptance of screening
Rossi, 201550Italy
  • Organized screening program
Women aged 30 to 64 years non-responding to screening invitation three months ago (n = 14,041)
  • Self-collected HPV test (HC2) at home
  • Self-collected HPV test in pharmacy
  • Pap test at clinic
    • Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • Physician-collected HPV test (HC2) at clinic
  • HPV with cytology triage
    • ≥ ASCUS to colposcopy
      OR
    • HPV+ straight to colposcopy and cytology
Routine screening interval
  • Cytology = 3 years
  • HPV = 5 years
Acceptance of screening
Co-testing Studies
Jin, 201619US
  • Primary cervical cancer screening in an integrated health system
  • Retrospective cohort
Women aged 30 years and older undergoing cervical cancer screening with HPV test and cytology co-testing (n = 99,549)Clinician-collected HPV test (HC2)Cytology from co-testing
  • Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • Cytology
    • Negative to routine screening
    • ASCUS to HPV triage with HPV+ with colposcopy
    • ≥ ASC-H to colposcopy
  • HPV with cytology triage
  • Co-testing
    • > ASCUS or = ASCUS and HPV+ to colposcopy
Routine screening interval
  • 3 years
DTA

Wright, 201560

ATHENA Study

US
  • Routine cervical cancer screening
  • Prospective cohort study
  • Co-testing study
Women aged 25 years and older attending routine cervical cancer screening with HPV test and cytology co-testing (n = 41,955)Clinician-collected HPV test (Cobas)LBC
  • Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • Co-testing
    • All those with abnormal cytology and HPV+ and a subset of those with negative results went to colposcopy
Routine screening interval
  • Not specified
  • Three-year follow-up within the study
DTA
Non-Randomized Studies

Chatzistamatiou, 201751

PIPAVIR study

Greece and Germany
  • Routine cervical cancer screening in primary care
  • Prospective cohort study
Women aged 30 to 60 visiting primary care clinics for cervical cancer screening (n = 1,723)Clinician-collected HPV test (Multiplex Genotyping)LBC
  • Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • Co-testing
    • Negative on both tests returns to routine screening
    • HPV+, cytology-positive, or HPV and cytology-positive referred to colposcopy
Routine screening interval
  • Not reported
  • DTA
  • Referral to colposcopy
Granados, 201752Spain
  • Opportunistic screening program
Women aged 25 to 65 visiting primary care physicians for cervical cancer screening (n = 5,063)HPV co-testing (Aptima and Pap test)Analysis of Pap results only Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • Co-testing
    • ASCUS+ reviewed by cytotechnologist
    • Cytology HSIL directly with colposcopy
    • HPV+ offered colposcopy
Routine screening interval not specified
  • Acceptance of screening
  • Referral to colposcopy

Kocsis, 201753

TRACE trial

Hungary
  • Outpatient clinic-based cervical cancer screening
  • Prospective multi-centre cohort study
Women aged 18 to 65 years presenting for cervical cancer screening (n = 6,761)HPV test (CONFIDENCE assay)
  • HPV test (Cobas and Full Spectrum HPV test)
  • LBC
    • Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • Cross-sectional co-testing
DTA
Altobelli, 201654Italy
  • Comparing organized and spontaneous cervical cancer screening
Women aged 25 to 64 years undergoing cervical cancer screening after invitation or attending spontaneously (n = 38,348)HPV test (HC2)Conventional cytology
  • Abnormal = ASCUS
  • Cytology
    • Negative returns to routine screening
  • HPV test with cytology triage
    • Cytology-positive on triage to colposcopy
Routine screening interval = 3 years
Acceptance of screening
Ilangovan, 201655US
  • “Safety net clinics” for uninsured and low-income patients
Haitian and Latina women aged 30 to 65 years with no Pap smear in the past 3 years (n = 180)Self-collected HPV test (Aptima and Cervista Invader)Clinician-collected Pap test
  • Abnormal not specified
  • HPV+ were referred to clinicians for further follow-up
Routine screening interval not specified
Acceptance of screening

Agorastos, 201556

HERMES Study

Greece
  • Established cervical cancer screening program
  • Ongoing prospective observational study
Women aged 25 to 55 years attending routine cervical cancer screening with co-testing (n = 4,009)HPV test (Cobas)LBC
  • Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • Co-testing
    • Negative on both tests returns to usual screening
    • Positive on cytology and/or HPV to colposcopy
Routine screening interval = 3 years
DTA
Chiappetta, 201557Italy
  • Assessment of a new cervical cancer screening program
Women aged 25 to 64 due for routine cervical cancer screening (n = 25,210)HPV test (HC2) with LBC triage
  • women aged 35 to 64
  • HPV-positive = ≥ 1 RLU
Cytology test
  • Only women aged 25 to 34
  • Cytology
    • Negative to routine screening
    • ASCUS to HPV triage
    • LSIL+ to colposcopy
  • HPV test
    • Negative to routine screening
    • Positive to cytology triage
Routine screening interval = 3 years
  • Acceptance of screening
  • Referral to colposcopy
Iftner, 201558Germany
  • Established cervical cancer screening program
  • Prospective observational study
Women aged 30 to 60 years undergoing routine cervical cancer screening with co-testing (n = 10,040)HPV test (Aptima and HC2)LBC Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • Co-testing
    • All negative tests return to routine screening
    • Some participants from the single and double positive groups went to colposcopy
Routine screening interval not specified
DTA
Pasquale, 201559Italy
  • Established screening program switching from Pap testing to HPV testing for cervical cancer screening
Women aged 25 to 64 years eligible for a new round of cervical cancer screening within an established screening program (n = 18,728)Co-testing (HC2 and cytology)
  • HC2 positive = ≥ 1 RLU
Midwife-collected cytology test
  • Abnormal = ASCUS+
  • HPV and cytology-positive to colposcopy
Routine screening interval = 3 years
Acceptance of screening

+ = or more advanced pathological findings; ASC-H = atypical squamous cells – cannot exclude HSIL; ASCUS = atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; DTA = diagnostic test accuracy; HC2 = Hybrid Capture 2; FOCAL = FOr CervicAL cancer; HSIL = high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LBC = liquid-based cytology; LSIL = low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; Pap = Papanicolaou test; PIPAVIR = Detection of persistent infections by human papillomaviruses; RLU = relative light unit; SR = systematic review; TRACE = Triage and Risk Assessment of Cervical Precancer by Epigenetic Biomarker; VIA = visual inspection with acetic acid.

Copyright © 2019 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes only, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH and its licensors.

Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Bookshelf ID: NBK543104

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (8.2M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...