U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK). Antisocial Personality Disorder: Treatment, Management and Prevention. Leicester (UK): British Psychological Society; 2010. (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 77.)

  • March 2013: Some recommendations in sections 5.3.9, 5.4.9, 5.4.14, 5.4.19, 5.4.24 and 8.2 have been removed from this guideline by NICE. August 2018: Some recommendations have been updated to link to NICE topic pages.

March 2013: Some recommendations in sections 5.3.9, 5.4.9, 5.4.14, 5.4.19, 5.4.24 and 8.2 have been removed from this guideline by NICE. August 2018: Some recommendations have been updated to link to NICE topic pages.

Cover of Antisocial Personality Disorder

Antisocial Personality Disorder: Treatment, Management and Prevention.

Show details

APPENDIX 1SCOPE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CLINICAL GUIDELINE

Final version

14 March 2007

GUIDELINE TITLE

Antisocial personality disorder: treatment, management and prevention

Short title

Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD)21

BACKGROUND

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (‘NICE’ or ‘the Institute’) has commissioned the National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health to develop a clinical guideline on antisocial personality disorder for use in the NHS in England and Wales. This follows referral of the topic by the Department of Health (see Appendix [to the Scope]). The guideline will provide recommendations for good practice that are based on the best available evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness.

The Institute’s clinical guidelines will support the implementation of National Service Frameworks (NSFs) in those aspects of care where a Framework has been published. The statements in each NSF reflect the evidence that was used at the time the Framework was prepared. The clinical guidelines and technology appraisals published by the Institute after an NSF has been issued will have the effect of updating the Framework.

NICE clinical guidelines support the role of healthcare professionals in providing care in partnership with patients, taking account of their individual needs and preferences, and ensuring that patients (and their carers and families, where appropriate) can make informed decisions about their care and treatment.

CLINICAL NEED FOR THE GUIDELINE

Personality disorders are long-standing and maladaptive patterns of perceiving and responding to other people and to stressful circumstances. Antisocial personality disorder is characterised by a gross disparity between behaviour and the prevailing social norms and a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood. It is one of the most common of the personality disorders and is strongly associated with social impairment, offending behaviours and increased risks of both mental and physical health problems, particularly substance misuse (including alcoholism).

General diagnostic criteria for a personality disorder must be met for a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder. There are two main sets of diagnostic criteria in current use, the International Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders 10th Revision (ICD-10) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition (DSM-IV). General criteria for personality disorders are similar in ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Both require an individual to have an enduring pattern of inner experience and behaviour that deviates markedly from the expectations of their culture, is pervasive and inflexible across a range of situations, leads to significant distress or impairment, is stable and of long duration (with onset in childhood, adolescence or early adulthood), and cannot be explained as a manifestation or consequence of other mental disorders, substance use, or organic brain disease, injury or dysfunction.

Diagnostic criteria for antisocial personality disorder are broadly similar in both ICD-10 and DSM-IV, although the latter has a heavy emphasis on criminality. ICD-10 uses the term dissocial personality disorder, which is characterised by at least three of the following features: a disregard for the feelings of others and social norms, rules and obligations; gross and persistent irresponsibility; incapacity to maintain relationships; a low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for aggression and violence; incapacity to experience guilt or learn from experience (including punishment); and a tendency to blame others or offer rational explanations for antisocial behaviour. Additional criteria included in the DSM-IV definition of antisocial personality disorder are repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest, deceitfulness, impulsiveness, and a disregard for the safety of others. DSM-IV criteria do not include lack of concern for the feeling of others and incapacity to maintain relationships or profit from experience.

Antisocial personality disorder can only be diagnosed in adults. In ICD-10 the specific personality disorders come within the overall grouping of disorders of adult personality. In DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder cannot be diagnosed in those under 18 years of age, although a number of juvenile criteria (that is, features present before the age of 15) are specified that must be met in addition to abnormal behaviour in adulthood.

ICD-10 notes that people with personality disorders may have other coexisting or superimposed mental disorders, behavioural syndromes and developmental disorders. In DSM-IV common comorbidities in people with antisocial personality disorder include anxiety and depressive disorders, mood disorders, substance-related disorders, somatisation disorder, pathological gambling and other disorders of impulse control. DSM-IV also notes that while the personality disorders have overlapping features and must be distinguished from one another by their distinguishing features, they can (and often do) co-occur.

Antisocial, aggressive or criminal behaviour that does not meet the full criteria for antisocial personality disorder is described as adult antisocial behaviour in DSM-IV, with the diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder only applying to those whose antisocial personality traits are inflexible, maladaptive and persistent, and a cause of significant impairment or distress. Antisocial personality disorder is distinguished from criminal behaviour for gain where the characteristic features of antisocial personality disorder are absent.

The aetiology of antisocial personality disorder is uncertain. Antisocial personality disorder may be the consequence of the accumulation and interaction of multiple factors through development, including temperament, childhood and adolescent experiences, and other environmental factors. The risk factor most predictive of adult antisocial personality is the severity and extent of child and adolescent conduct symptoms and a history of childhood or adolescent conduct disorder is common in people with antisocial personality disorder (and is one of the diagnostic criteria in DSM-IV). Other childhood and adolescent risk factors for adult antisocial personality disorder include other psychopathology (particularly depression, oppositional disorder, and substance misuse) and callous temperament.

Childhood and adolescent risk factors associated with the broader category of adult antisocial behaviour include: individual characteristics such as an undercontrolled, impulsive, aggressive or hyperactive temperament, low IQ and poor educational achievement; family factors such as having an antisocial parent, poor supervision, abuse and violence between parents; and wider societal factors such as an antisocial peer group and high levels of delinquency in school. Risk factors for antisocial behaviour are often correlated with one another. A number of childhood factors are protective against the development of later antisocial behaviour, including temperamental characteristics such as shyness and inhibition, intelligence, a close relationship with at least one adult, good school or sporting achievement, and non-antisocial peers.

Neurobiological mechanisms for antisocial personality disorder and antisocial behaviour have also been proposed and there is evidence that there is a genetic component in the development of antisocial behaviour. It has been proposed that a genetic predisposition may increase the likelihood that exposures to adverse environmental influences and life events will lead to the development of antisocial personality disorder.

The personality disorders are associated with a significant burden to the individual, those around them and society as a whole, with the impact of the disorder generally being greatest in early adulthood and diminishing with age. Their families commonly endure episodes of explosive anger and rage, a callous and unemotional behavioural pattern, depression, self-harm, and suicide attempts. Antisocial personality disorder is also associated with significant drug and alcohol misuse, with further attendant costs to the individual, their family and society.

The antisocial, violent and offending behaviour associated with antisocial personality disorder has a negative impact across society and results in a range of costs to society including those to victims of the behaviour (including physical harm and the impact of intimidation and fear), the costs of policing and other national and local measures to curb antisocial behaviour, and general costs to the criminal justice system including the costs of detention and other punitive measures.

People with personality disorders tend to make heavy but dysfunctional demands on services, having frequent contact with mental health and social services, A&E, GPs and the criminal justice system, and may be high-cost, persistent, and intensive users of mental health services.

Some people with antisocial personality disorder will also be categorised as having a dangerous and severe personality disorder (DSPD). DSPD is not a diagnostic category; rather, it is a term used to describe a category of dangerous offenders whose offending is linked to severe personality disorder and who present a very high risk of serious violent and/or sexual offending. People in this category will have committed a violent and/or sexual crime and may have been detained under the criminal justice system or mental health legislation.

The prevalence of antisocial personality disorder in the general population of Great Britain has been estimated at 0.6%, with the rate in men (1%) five times that in women (0.2%). Surveys conducted in other countries report prevalence rates for antisocial personality disorder ranging from 0.2 to 4.1%. Higher prevalence rates for personality disorders appear to be found in urban populations and this may account for some of the range in reported prevalence – the estimate of 0.6% for the prevalence of antisocial personality disorder in Great Britain was based on data gathered from a survey covering a range of locations.

Antisocial personality disorder is common among drug and alcohol misusers in both treatment and custodial settings. The prevalence of personality disorders, and antisocial personality disorder in particular, is particularly high in the prison population. In England and Wales 78% of male remand prisoners, 64% of male sentenced prisoners, and 50% of female prisoners have personality disorders, with the prevalence of antisocial personality disorder being 63% among male remand prisoners (just over half of whom have antisocial personality disorder plus another personality disorder), 49% among sentenced male prisoners (two fifths of whom have antisocial personality disorder plus another personality disorder) and 31% among female prisoners (two thirds of whom have antisocial personality disorder plus another personality disorder).

Many clinicians are sceptical about the effectiveness of treatment interventions for personality disorder, and hence often reluctant to accept people with a primary diagnosis of personality disorder for treatment. Established antisocial personality disorder is difficult to treat and evidence on the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions is sparse.

The diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder requires evidence that the features of the disorder onset in childhood or adolescence (ICD-10) or evidence of conduct disorder with onset before age 15 years (DSM-IV) and this, combined with the difficulty of treating adult antisocial personality disorder, has led to a focus on preventative interventions with children and young people at risk of later antisocial personality disorder. Early prevention during childhood may be desirable, but many individuals who go on to develop adult antisocial personality disorder are not identified before adolescence.

It should be noted that a separate guideline on borderline personality disorder is being developed in parallel to the development of the antisocial personality disorder guideline. Beyond the differences in the diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder, there are good grounds for developing two separate guidelines for these disorders, rather than one unified guideline on personality disorders, as there are marked differences in the populations the guidelines will address in terms of their interaction with services. People with borderline personality disorder tend to be treatment seeking and at high risk of self-harm and suicide, whereas people with antisocial personality disorder tend not to seek treatment, are likely to come into contact with services via the criminal justice system and their behaviour is more likely to be a risk to others. Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that people with either of these diagnoses may present with some symptoms and behaviour normally associated with the other diagnosis.

THE GUIDELINE

The guideline development process is described in detail in two publications which are available from the NICE website22 (see ‘About NICE’ » ‘How we work’ » ‘Developing NICE clinical guidelines’ » ‘Clinical guideline development methods’). An overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS (2006 edition) describes how organisations can become involved in the development of a guideline. The guidelines manual (2006 edition) provides advice on the technical aspects of guideline development.

This document is the scope. It defines exactly what this guideline will (and will not) examine, and what the guideline developers will consider. The scope is based on the referral from the Department of Health (see Appendix [to the Scope]). The areas that will be addressed by the guideline are described in the following sections.

POPULATION

Groups that will be covered

The recommendations in this guideline will address the following:

  • The treatment and management of adults with a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder in the NHS and prison system (including dangerous and severe personality disorder).
  • Preventative interventions with children and adolescents at significant risk of developing antisocial personality disorder.
  • The treatment and management of common comorbidities in people with antisocial personality disorder as far as these conditions affect the treatment of antisocial personality disorder.

Groups that will not be covered

The guideline will not cover:

  • The separate management of comorbid conditions.
  • The management of criminal and antisocial behaviour in the absence of a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder.

HEALTHCARE SETTING

The guideline will cover the care provided by primary, community, secondary and specialist healthcare services within the NHS. The guideline will include specifically:

  • Care in general practice and NHS community care, hospital outpatient, day and inpatient care (including secure hospitals and tertiary settings), and the interface between these settings.
  • Care in prisons and young offender institutions, and the transition from prison health services to care in the NHS outside of prison.

This is an NHS guideline. This guideline will comment on the interface with a range of other settings, services and agencies, such as social care services, educational services, the criminal justice system, the police, housing and residential care, and the voluntary sector. The guideline may include recommendations relating to these settings, services and agencies where the recommendations are relevant to the prevention, treatment, care and management of antisocial personality disorder.

CLINICAL MANAGEMENT

Areas that will be covered by the guideline:

  • The assessment of people with antisocial personality disorder both before and after diagnosis and the identification of the threshold for intervention.
  • Identification of risk factors for adult antisocial personality disorder in children and young people, including the early identification of child and adolescent behaviour disorders that are precursors or risk factors for antisocial personality disorder.
  • The full range of treatment and care normally made available by the NHS, including health services in prisons and young offender institutions.
  • The assessment and management of the risk of self-harm and violent and offending behaviour in people with diagnosed antisocial personality disorder.
  • Psychological and psychosocial interventions, including type, format, frequency, duration and intensity. Consideration will be given as to which settings are most appropriate for which intervention. Approaches to be considered will include a broad range of psychological and psychosocial interventions normally provided in the NHS including therapeutic communities.
  • The appropriate use of pharmacological interventions, including initiation and duration of treatment, management of side effects and discontinuation. Note that guideline recommendations will normally fall within licensed indications; exceptionally, and only where clearly supported by evidence, use outside a licensed indication may be recommended. The guideline will assume that prescribers will use a drug’s Summary of Product Characteristics to inform their decisions for individual patients. Nevertheless, where pharmacological interventions are commonly utilised off-licence in treatment strategies for people with antisocial personality disorder in the NHS, the evidence underpinning their usage will be critically evaluated.
  • Combined pharmacological and psychological/psychosocial treatments.
  • The nature of the therapeutic or other environment in which any interventions should be delivered.
  • Support and supervision systems to facilitate the delivery of effective interventions, including team and individual professional functioning and how they are influenced by working with this client group.
  • Sensitivity to different beliefs and attitudes of different races and cultures, and issues of social exclusion.
  • The role of the family or carers in the treatment and support of people with antisocial personality disorder (with consideration of choice, consent and help), and support that may be needed by carers themselves.
  • Preventative/protective measures and interventions with children and young people who are at significant risk of developing adult antisocial personality disorder, in particular those with a diagnosis of conduct disorder and young offenders serving custodial and non-custodial sentences (including educational interventions and interventions with carers/parents).
  • The transition from child and adolescent services to adult services.

The guideline development group will take reasonable steps to identify ineffective interventions and approaches to care. When robust and credible recommendations for re-positioning the intervention for optimal use, or changing the approach to care to make more efficient use of resources, can be made, they will be clearly stated. When the resources released are substantial, consideration will be given to listing such recommendations in the ‘Key priorities for implementation’ section of the guideline.

AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE COVERED BY THE GUIDELINE

  • The guideline will not cover treatments that are not normally available within the NHS or prison health services.

STATUS

Scope

This is the first draft of the scope, which will be reviewed by the Guidelines Review Panel and the Institute’s Guidance Executive.

The guideline will incorporate the following relevant technology appraisal guidance issued by the Institute in collaboration with the Social Care Institute for Excellence: Parent-training/education programmes in the management of children with conduct disorders NICE technology appraisal guidance 102 (Published July 2006).

The guideline will also cross refer to relevant clinical guidance23 issued by the Institute, including:

  • Schizophrenia: core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in primary and secondary care (2002)
  • Depression: the management of depression in primary and secondary care (2004)
  • Anxiety: management of generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder (2004)
  • Self-harm: the short-term physical and psychological management and secondary prevention of self-harm in primary and secondary (2004)
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder: management of PTSD in adults in primary, secondary and community care (2005)
  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder: core interventions in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder (2005)
  • Violence: the short-term management of disturbed/violent behaviour in in-patient psychiatric settings and emergency departments (2005)
  • Bipolar disorder: the management of bipolar disorder in adults, children and adolescents, in primary and secondary care (2006)
  • Drug misuse: opioid detoxification (2007)
  • Drug misuse: psychosocial interventions (2007)
  • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management of ADHD in children, young people and adults (2008)
  • Borderline personality disorder: treatment and management (2009).

GUIDELINE

The development of the guideline recommendations will begin in March 2007.

FURTHER INFORMATION

Information on the guideline development process is provided in:

  • an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS (2006 edition)
  • the guidelines manual (2006 edition)

These booklets are available as PDF files from the NICE website (http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=guidelinesmanual). Information on the progress of the guideline will also be available from the website.

Appendix. Referral from the Department of Health

The Department of Health asked the Institute to consider preventative and treatment interventions for antisocial personality disorder in education, in primary healthcare and in specialist services including prisons for adults and children and adolescents and to consider which treatment settings are most appropriate for which intervention.

Footnotes

21

There were minor changes to the short title in the development period to ‘Antisocial personality disorder’.

22
23

Since the Scope was issued some of the guideline titles had changed during development; the titles have been corrected here to reflect those changes.

Copyright © 2010, The British Psychological Society & The Royal College of Psychiatrists.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Enquiries in this regard should be directed to the British Psychological Society.

Bookshelf ID: NBK55339

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (3.8M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...