U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Selected Immune Disorders and Disability. Selected Immune Disorders and Disability. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2022 May 24.

Cover of Selected Immune Disorders and Disability

Selected Immune Disorders and Disability.

Show details

6Inflammatory Arthritis

Inflammatory arthritis is a broad term for a group of chronic autoimmune diseases characterized by joint pain, swelling, warmth, and tenderness in joints along with stiffness that lasts for an hour or more. Most inflammatory forms of arthritis include systemic effects such as skin rashes, eye inflammation, hair loss, and dry mouth. The types of inflammatory arthritis include immune-related arthritis and crystal-induced arthritis. Immune-related arthritis is a category that includes rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and spondylitis as well as some of the diseases covered in other chapters—systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis, Sjögren’s syndrome, and systemic sclerosis. Crystal-induced arthritis includes gout and pseudogout (Zamora and Naik, 2022). Unlike the more common osteoarthritis, or arthritis that is caused by the physical wear and tear of a joint over time, inflammatory forms of arthritis present in children as well as in adults. In 2019 inflammatory arthritis accounted for 60 percent of all Social Security disability beneficiaries receiving benefits for immune system disorders, not including HIV (Communication with Social Security Administration, April 14, 2021). This chapter will cover the clinical features, classification, disease course, and treatments of RA, PsA, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The chapter does not include spondyloarthritis, nor does it include a discussion of microcrystalline diseases, as they were not specified in the committee’s statement of task.

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Disease Course

Clinical Features

RA is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease that predominantly affects the joints. However, given its systemic nature, it may also cause fever, weight loss, marked fatigue, and muscle atrophy (Wasserman, 2011) as well as other organ-specific features, including scleritis, accelerated cardiovascular disease, and interstitial lung disease (NICE, 2018). The lifetime risk of RA is two to three times higher among women than among men (Crowson et al., 2011). The onset of RA peaks between the ages of 30 and 50 years, although it may occur at any age (Tehlirian and Bathon, 2008). Risk factors include older age, a family history of RA, and current or prior cigarette smoking (Costenbader et al., 2006). Mortality in RA is 1.5–2-fold higher than in age- and gender-matched non-RA controls (Liao, 2017) predominantly due to accelerated cardiovascular disease and interstitial lung disease.

The arthritis of RA, as with any inflammatory arthritis, typically presents with joint pain and swelling as well as prolonged stiffness in the early morning. Early RA may present in a single joint (monoarthritis) or in a few joints (oligoarthritis) but characteristically tends to evolve into a symmetrical polyarthritis of small and large joints which, if left untreated or inadequately treated, will cause damage to articular structures and disability. RA-associated interstitial lung disease may cause severe respiratory impairment leading to the need for transplant or death, although the musculoskeletal impairments associated with RA are more commonly the most disabling and the major source of functional limitations for individuals with this condition. This section focuses on those impairments, although the committee acknowledges that RA may also influence global functioning through other mechanisms such as fatigue (Filipovic et al., 2011). The common pathophysiology underlying musculoskeletal impairments in RA is inflammation of the synovium (Scott et al., 2010).

Clinical Diagnosis and Professionally Accepted Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis

The diagnosis of RA is based on a patient’s clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory findings. Although there are no validated or universally accepted diagnostic criteria for RA, the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria for RA inform generally accepted diagnostic criteria for the condition. It is important to remember that these classification criteria were developed for research studies to allow for the identification of individuals with early-stage RA and were not intended for clinical practice. The criteria are outlined in Table 6-1 and are intended to be applied to individuals for whom there is clinical suspicion of RA based on definite synovitis in at least one joint, as determined by physical exam, that is not better explained by a different condition.

TABLE 6-1. Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

TABLE 6-1

Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Patients with a score of at least 6 out of 10 are considered to have “definite RA.” The 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria were designed to identify patients with recent-onset and active RA; however, adults with longstanding or inactive disease also may be diagnosed with RA if there is documentation indicating that they have previously fulfilled those criteria. Adults with inflammatory arthritis but who lack both rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibody on laboratory testing might not satisfy the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (Humphreys and Symmons, 2013), but may still be diagnosed with (seronegative) RA if their clinical findings are otherwise characteristic of the disease and if alternative diagnoses are excluded. In those cases, radiographic findings of bone erosions, which are characteristic of RA, may help support the diagnosis, although radiography is generally not required to establish a diagnosis (Scott et al., 2010).

Disease Course, Outcomes, and Variability

While patients with RA exhibit considerable heterogeneity in terms of their disease course, the severity of the disease, and their response to various therapies, it is clear that untreated RA inexorably leads to progressive joint damage and disability, sarcopenia, weight loss, and premature mortality. This trajectory is largely preventable with early and aggressive treatment with the goal of achieving and sustaining a state of disease remission or at least of low disease activity throughout the course of the disease.

ACR and EULAR guidelines for the treatment of RA advise measurement of disease activity every 2 to 4 months and adjustment of the therapy if there is neither remission nor low disease activity (Fraenkel et al., 2021; Smolen et al., 2020). These outcomes (remission and low disease activity) are defined for each specific disease activity measure, and the clinician can determine whether the patient is at goal at the time of the visit.

The principal outcome measures used to assess response to treatment for RA are composite, multidimensional outcome measures that use the same elements that make up the disease activity scores. These include clinical data (i.e., the physical examination, laboratory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] and C-reactive protein [CRP], and a physician’s assessment), functional assessment, patient-reported symptoms, and patient-reported global assessment (Felson and LaValley, 2014). Because of the heterogeneity of RA and its impact on multiple organ systems, improvement cannot be accurately determined based on a single domain (e.g., laboratory markers); accordingly, the use of composite outcome measures reflecting multiple disease domains has become the norm (Aletaha et al., 2008). Notably and of key importance, the routine assessment of physical functioning is strongly recommended as part of any treatment strategy for RA, and reduced physical functioning is more widespread in RA than in many less painful but equally disabling medical conditions (Singh et al., 2016). We review the major measures used to assess treatment response below, noting that while these measures are widely used in research and clinical trials, their application in routine clinical practice by U.S. rheumatologists is highly variable (Anderson et al., 2011).

For patients with RA, the ACR has developed several definitions of a response to therapy, including the ACR20, the ACR50, and the ACR70, which indicate an improvement of at least 20 percent, 50 percent, or 70 percent, respectively, on a set of core outcome measures (Felson and LaValley, 2014). These core measures include the swollen joint count, the tender joint count, and three out of the following five measures: pain visual analog scale (patient-reported pain symptom scale), patient global assessment, physician global assessment, inflammatory marker levels (either ESR or CRP), and a measure of physical functioning (commonly the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] Disability Index or one of the newer modifications of the HAQ, described above). Of these, the ACR20 is the most widely used, and it has been recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a preferred outcome measure in studies of new drugs for RA; accordingly it has been commonly used as the primary outcome in clinical trials of RA therapies (Aletaha et al., 2008; Felson and LaValley, 2014) although more stringent outcomes (ACR50 or ACR70) have been increasingly used in the last decade.

However, the ACR 20/50/70 responses are not recommended for monitoring treatment response in clinical practice. Rather, an assessment and calculation of the level of disease activity at each visit is strongly recommended, using one or more of the above scales, as these are more feasible to implement in clinical settings (Greenberg et al., 2009). There are defined ranges for high, moderate, and low disease activity levels as well as for remission for the commonly used measures of disease activity (DAS28,1 the Clinical Disease Activity Index, the Simple Disease Activity Index). The goal in clinical practice is the achievement of remission. However, remission is not feasible or attainable in some patients with RA; in this case the goal should be attainment of low disease activity. Examples of patients in whom remission may not be attainable include but are not limited to: (1) those who have failed multiple other RA therapies and have few options left, (2) those whose disease activity is driven largely by pain while all other measures of disease activity suggest remission, (3) comorbid illnesses and associated therapies that limit safe options for tight control of the RA.

There are no professionally accepted definitions of “severe” RA, and the severity of the disease is generally determined at a particular point in time by the validated measures of disease activity, including those described above, while cumulative severity is generally reflected by a measure of function or by assessment of articular damage demonstrated on radiographs, or both. Specifically, ACR-endorsed instruments to measure RA disease activity and to define remission include: DAS and its variants such as DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR, the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), the Patient Activity Scale (PAS), the PASII, and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID-3), (Johnson et al., 2020). All scales are multidimensional, composite measures and most draw on data from several different domains (e.g., physical exam, laboratory markers, functional measures, pain symptoms, physician- and patient-reported global assessments), although some are completely based on patient self-report (e.g., PAS). All are sensitive in discriminating between different levels of disease activity (Johnson et al., 2020). These measures are commonly reported as secondary outcomes in clinical trials of drugs for RA, and they are recommended for routine assessments in clinical practice (Anderson et al., 2011; Greenberg et al., 2009).

Disease activity scores correlate closely with the concurrent degree of functional impairment related to RA, and, indeed, several of the aforementioned scores are based in part on functional assessments (Carvalho et al., 2019). However, because RA causes cumulative joint damage and deformity, functional impairment is possible among individuals whose disease is quiescent if there has been significant previous damage (Ishida et al., 2018; Norton et al., 2014).

RA-associated damage to the joints is reflected on plain radiographs by new or worsening erosions in articular bone or by new or worsening joint space narrowing, which is an indirect reflection of cartilage erosion. Generally, hand and foot radiographs are used for this purpose, as they provide a multitude of joints for examination. Erosions and joint space narrowing reflect damage rather than disease activity, and thus they do not correlate tightly with symptoms. Radiographic damage may or may not correlate with functional scores/measures, depending on the extent and severity of damage. For example, severe damage in a single knee or ankle may be far more disabling than extensive joint damage in the hands because of the weight-bearing nature of the lower extremity joints.

Although RA is a chronic disease with daily discomfort, patients also frequently experience disease flares. During disease flares, worsening inflammation results in an exacerbation of joint pain and swelling and the potential for new joint damage. In patients with longstanding and severe disease, persistent synovial inflammation will result in the erosion of cartilage and bone, leading to joint destruction and deformities, which in turn cause chronic pain and functional limitations (Sokka and Pincus, 2001).

Treatment and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis

The goal of RA treatment is to attain and maintain control of disease activity in an effort to reduce the symptoms of joint pain and swelling, prevent deformity, maintain quality of life and function, and limit extra-articular disease manifestations (Wasserman, 2011). Pharmacologic treatments, specifically disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), are the mainstay of therapy (Singh et al., 2016) as they limit progressive joint damage and improve function (Scott et al., 2010). DMARDs are typically prescribed under the supervision of a rheumatologist. Care by a rheumatologist is associated with an earlier initiation of DMARD therapy (Rat and Boissier, 2004; Widdifield et al., 2011) and improved treatment response (Criswell et al., 1997), resulting in less joint destruction (van der Linden et al., 2010), less functional impairment (Ward, 1997), and a lower likelihood of requiring orthopedic surgery (Feldman et al., 2013). Table 6-2 summarizes the types of medications used to treat RA as well as some examples of drugs in each category. All of the targeted biologic medications can be administered subcutaneously by the patient at home, except infliximab and rituximab, which require intravenous infusion.

TABLE 6-2. Medications Used to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis.

TABLE 6-2

Medications Used to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Evidence-based treatment guidelines for the pharmacologic management of RA include the 2021 ACR guidelines and the 2019 EULAR guidelines (Smolen et al., 2020). Both the ACR and EULAR guidelines primarily focus on the pharmacologic management of RA. Patients who are not in clinical remission and who have any degree of disease activity as measured using validated scales are considered candidates for therapy; indeed, it is recommended that therapy for RA be initiated as soon as possible after the diagnosis is established, as there is evidence that earlier DMARD therapy is associated with better outcomes. The specific agents recommended are determined by the degree of disease activity, the prior treatments used, the treatment response and toxicities, and the patients’ comorbidities (Anderson et al., 2000; Nell et al., 2004; Smolen et al., 2016). The goal of therapy is sustained clinical remission or low disease activity (Ramiro et al., 2014).

Under the 2021 ACR guidelines, monotherapy with methotrexate is recommended as the first-line initial treatment for RA patients with moderate to high disease activity, and hydroxychloroquine is recommended for those with low disease activity. For patients who do not improve sufficiently with methotrexate monotherapy (i.e., the RA disease activity remains moderate to high), the addition of a biologic DMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD is recommended in preference to a combination of conventional DMARDs. If treatment targets are not achieved with combination therapy, it is recommended that the biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD be switched to an agent with a different class (mechanism) rather than to a second agent within the same class. Glucocorticoid treatment is discouraged for the treatment of RA at any point in the course of RA due to toxicity concerns; however, if its use is believed to be necessary, it should be given at the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration possible. Once remission or low disease activity is achieved on a specific DMARD regimen, continuation of that regimen is recommended because discontinuation of DMARDs is associated with a high risk of relapse and the need to resume DMARD therapy. For patients in remission or who have experienced low disease activity for at least 6 months, the gradual tapering of one of the DMARD therapies can be considered, but maintenance of at least one DMARD is recommended. Again, the guidelines recommend against discontinuing all therapy due to the risk of relapse.

The 2019 EULAR recommendations for RA treatment are largely similar to the 2021 ACR guidelines: notably, conventional DMARDs (and specifically methotrexate) are recommended as the initial therapy for RA; the addition of, or switch to, an alternate DMARD is recommended if improvement is not achieved, and if patients do not respond to a biologic DMARD, the guidelines recommend switching to a different biologic DMARD or tofacitinib. There are, however, several distinctions between the ACR and EULAR guidelines worth noting. First, the EULAR guidelines recommend that short-term glucocorticoid therapy be considered when initiating or changing DMARDs, whereas the ACR guidelines caution against any use of glucocorticoids if possible. Second, for patients who do not respond to an initial monotherapy with a conventional DMARD, the EULAR guidelines recommend that the choice of the subsequent agent be based on prognostic factors; specifically, for patients with “unfavorable” prognostic indicators (i.e., the presence of autoantibodies especially at high levels, high disease activity, early erosions, or no response to two traditional DMARDs), a biologic DMARD or janus kinase (JAK)-inhibitor is recommended. For patients in whom such findings are absent, the guidelines recommend adding or changing to a different conventional DMARD. In contrast, the ACR guidelines do not discuss the role of prognostic factors in treatment selection.

The ACR and EULAR guidelines are based on comprehensive and systematic reviews of the evidence on RA treatment; however, they have several limitations in the context of this document. First, the guidelines do not discuss non-pharmacologic treatments for RA or the optimal combination of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies. Randomized controlled trials support the use of physical exercise as a strategy to improve muscle strength and quality of life (Baillet et al., 2009; Brodin et al., 2008), whereas complementary therapies such as acupuncture and dietary changes have not been found to provide benefit (Hagen et al., 2009; Kelley et al., 2009; Smedslund et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2008). Second, neither guideline explicitly discusses the impact of DMARDs on work-related functional capacity (Nam et al., 2017), which is the outcome of principal interest to the committee because it is especially relevant to the Social Security Administration (SSA) disability population. Many of the individual studies on which the guidelines are based do assess the impact of DMARDs on measures of physical functioning, but there are limitations in extrapolating from those scales in order to estimate impacts on actual work capacity.

Beyond the ACR and EULAR guidelines, an important limitation of the RA treatment literature more broadly is the limited evidence that is available to guide the management of patients with refractory RA (Singh et al., 2016). While there is no universally accepted definition of refractory RA, the term is often used to refer to patients who have not responded to at least two different targeted DMARDs or to two different targeted biologic DMARDs with different mechanisms of action (Buch, 2018; de Hair et al., 2018; Kearsley-Fleet et al., 2018; Roodenrijs et al., 2018). The prevalence of refractory RA is not well established; the only published national registry study to date is from the United Kingdom, and it estimated that at least 6 percent of patients with RA have been exposed to at least three DMARDs, which is suggestive of difficult-to-treat disease (Kearsley-Fleet et al., 2018). It is not known what share of SSA beneficiaries with RA satisfy this definition of refractory disease, but because those patients have a lower chance of clinical remission, it is likely that they are disproportionately represented in the SSA population. At present, there is limited evidence to inform the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with refractory RA. Baracitinib was efficacious in a study population in which the majority of patients had refractory disease (i.e., had previously tried at least two different biologic DMARDs without success), so it may provide an alternative for those patients (Genovese et al., 2016). Other novel therapies are currently under investigation (Aletaha and Smolen, 2018; Cheung and McInnes, 2017).

Likelihood of Improvement Given Treatment

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose glucocorticoids can provide symptom relief within days. With DMARDs, clinical improvement is typically expected within 1–3 months of starting therapy, although a substantial number of patients might not achieve full response until months 3–6 (Kavanaugh, 2010; Kavanaugh et al., 2008). Accordingly, many clinical trials of RA therapeutics now assess treatment response at both 3 and 6 months, and the EULAR treatment guidelines for RA recommend changing therapy if no improvement is seen after 3–6 months (Ramiro et al., 2014).

The likelihood of improvement depends on the severity of the disease. A EULAR task force (Smolen et al., 2020) suggests the following factors as predictive of poor prognosis:

  • Persistently moderate or high disease activity despite conventional synthetic DMARD therapy according to composite measures including joint counts
  • Failure of two or more conventional DMARDs
  • High acute-phase reactant levels
  • High swollen joint count
  • Presence of a rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA), especially at high levels
  • Presence of early erosions

The task force notes that there is no evidence for differential response that can be attributed solely to disease duration. However, disease duration can be associated with more radiographic damage, especially if the initiation of disease modifying therapy is delayed (Smolen et al., 2020).

Secondary Impairments from Treatment

While pharmacologic treatments for RA can substantially improve symptoms, they also have associated toxicities that are important to consider (Aletaha and Smolen, 2018; Graham, 2006; Harirforoosh et al., 2013; Huscher et al., 2009; Kamata and Tada, 2020; Nash et al., 2013; Rindfleisch and Muller, 2005; Saag and Cowdery, 1994; Sostres et al., 2010). Serious infections are among the most concerning potential adverse effects of biologic DMARDs and glucocorticoids because of their immunosuppressive properties. The toxicities of medications may limit their use in specific patients depending on comorbidities (particularly patients with liver, renal, or cardiovascular disease) and may prompt patients to discontinue or switch medications (Choquette et al., 2019).

Table 6-3 provides a summary of the toxicities of RA therapies, which also apply to PsA.

TABLE 6-3. Toxicities of Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

TABLE 6-3

Toxicities of Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

Select Treatments Currently in Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are currently in progress for novel therapeutic interventions for inflammatory arthritis. A search on the ClinicalTrials.gov website for actively recruiting clinical studies in RA and PsA was performed, yielding 376 and 33 listings, respectively. Given the large number of ongoing clinical trials for drugs that treat inflammatory arthritis, the list was further restricted to multicenter, multinational, double-blind randomized trials of novel agents not currently FDA-approved. The final list is shown below in Table 6-4.

TABLE 6-4. Novel Agents in Clinical Trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

TABLE 6-4

Novel Agents in Clinical Trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

Disease-Specific Functional Limitations

People with RA often have functional impairments that lead to difficulties in physical functioning. In a study looking at a wide range of valued life activities (VLAs), ranging from self-care to household chores, social activities, and recreation, half of a large cohort of people with RA were unable to perform one or more VLA (Katz et al., 2006). Disease activity accounted for a large portion of activity impairment. Accommodations to address limitations are widely used, including limiting the frequency or time in activities and taking more time for activities (Katz et al., 2007).

Pain, limited joint mobility, impaired muscle strength, decreased aerobic capacity, fatigue, and low levels of physical activity have been identified as contributing factors to lower physical function in patients with RA (Baker et al., 2017; Hanaoka et al., 2019; Piva et al., 2010; Roubenoff et al., 1992). Hand and foot involvement are present in the vast majority of people with RA, and each can lead to significantly reduced function (Alkabeya et al., 2019; Gijon-Nogueron et al., 2018; Glinatsi et al., 2020; Stolt et al., 2017). Escalante and colleagues demonstrated two distinct impairments in RA—joint inflammation and joint deformity—that contribute to functional limitations (Escalante et al., 2005). While treatments for RA have improved and led to reduced levels of disease activity and improved quality of life, a systematic review concluded that similar improvements in pain, fatigue, and functional disability have not been realized (Carpenter et al., 2020).

Work limitations are common even among people who remain employed, and the rates of work disability are higher in RA than in the general population (Uhlig et al., 2014). In studies from the late 1980s and 1990s, 30–50 percent of people with RA who were employed developed permanent work disability after 10 years of RA (Burton et al., 2006; Verstappen et al., 2004). The risks of permanent work loss were higher among older people with RA and among those with less formal education and more physically demanding jobs. In spite of improvements in medications and treat to target approaches, the rate of work loss did not decrease between 1999 and 2015 (Ward et al., 2022; Wolfe et al., 2007). Disease-related factors, demographics, and education influence work status. Older workers appear to be the most susceptible to loss of work, which may reflect the accrual of disease damage prior to the availability of newer treatments (Ward et al., 2022). A Swedish study comparing traditional DMARDs to combination therapy with infliximab and methotrexate for RA found no differences between the treatment arms in the number of workdays lost (Eriksson et al., 2016).

In the absence of direct evidence concerning the impact of specific RA treatments on work outcomes, the committee reviewed evidence on the impact of RA treatments on measures of physical functioning, specifically the HAQ. HAQ scores are predictive of work disability, and the HAQ is commonly used as a secondary outcome measure in clinical trials testing RA therapies. Among pharmacologic agents, a range of medications including conventional synthetic DMARDs (e.g., methotrexate, leflunomide) (Scott et al., 2010) and targeted DMARDs (e.g., tumor necrosis factor [TNF] inhibitors, anti-IL-6R antibodies, inhibitors of T-cell activation, B-cell depleting agents, and JAK inhibitors) have all been demonstrated to improve functional status in RA as measured using the HAQ (Bingham et al., 2014; Burmester et al., 2014; Dougados et al., 2013; Emery et al., 2017; Genovese et al., 2015, 2018; Keystone et al., 2017; Rigby et al., 2011; Strand et al., 2015a,b; Takeuchi et al., 2018; Taylor et al., 2016). Comparative effectiveness analyses and active comparator trials have generally not identified significant differences between targeted DMARDs in their impact on HAQ scores in RA (Jansen et al., 2014; Strand et al., 2016), with the exception of two recent trials that found sarilumab to be superior to adalimumab in its impact on physical functioning as measured using the HAQ (Strand et al., 2018).

A key limitation of those data is that most studies do not focus specifically on patients with severe or refractory RA, who might be more likely to participate in SSA programs (Kilcher et al., 2018), so it is unclear whether the aforementioned therapies would meaningfully improve work-related functional capacity within the population of interest to SSA. Of the evidence the committee reviewed, the studies that most closely reflected the population of interest (i.e., adults with severe RA resulting in functional limitations that significantly restrict work) were those evaluating the impacts of specific treatments in patients who had not responded to at least one biologic DMARD. In RA, sarilumab (Fleischmann et al., 2017), filgotinib (Genovese et al., 2018), baricitinib (Genovese et al., 2016; Smolen et al., 2016), and tofacitinib (Strand et al., 2015b) have all been demonstrated to improve HAQ scores in patients with an inadequate response to at least one anti-TNF DMARD.

Although HAQ is the most widely used measure of functional capacity in RA, newer measures of functional status have been introduced to address some of the weaknesses of the HAQ, most notably the significant floor effects. Newer measures include the HAQ-II, the Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and physical function measures from the NIH Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information System (PROMIS), all of which were recently recommended for use by ACR (Barber et al., 2019).

Several other instruments that aim to more specifically measure work-related functioning have been validated for the inflammatory arthropathies, including the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (Tucker et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2010), the Work Instability Scale (Revicki et al., 2015), and the Work Productivity Survey (Osterhaus and Purcaru, 2014). At present, such instruments are not widely used in either research or clinical practice, although they may hold promise.

PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Disease Course

Clinical Features

PsA is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints, spine, and entheses. It may affect other tissues as well (e.g., dactylitis, nail involvement, sacroiliitis, enthesitis) and most commonly occurs in association with psoriasis, an autoimmune skin disease manifested by erythematous plaques covered by silvery scales (Coates and Helliwell, 2017). Skin manifestations commonly precede the arthritis; however, in some patients the skin and joint symptoms present simultaneously, and in 10–15 percent of patients the arthritis presents first. PsA is a heterogeneous condition with five recognized subtypes, though it is increasingly acknowledged that patients may have any combination of these features (Moll and Wright, 1973; Ogdie and Weiss, 2015): (1) mono- or oligo-arthritis (involving up to four joints, typically asymmetric); (2) polyarthritis (involving five or more joints, typically symmetric); (3) distal-interphalangeal-joint predominant disease; (4) psoriatic spondylitis/sacroiliitis; and (5) arthritis mutilans. Peripheral oligoarticular or polyarticular disease is most common; arthritis mutilans, which is the most severe and deforming disease manifestation, is rare (Haddad and Chandran, 2013).

Clinical Diagnosis and Professionally Accepted Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis

The diagnosis of PsA is based on the clinical history, a physical examination, laboratory findings, and radiography. The most widely used classification criteria for PsA are the Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis criteria (Taylor et al., 2006), which are highly sensitive and specific across varied clinical settings (Chandran et al., 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2009; Leung et al., 2010; van den Berg et al., 2012). The criteria, which are outlined in Table 6-5, are intended to be applied to individuals for whom there is a clinical suspicion of PsA based on inflammatory disease of the joints, spine, or entheses. Patients with a score of at least 3 points are considered to have PsA. Laboratory markers are less helpful in affirmatively establishing the diagnosis of PsA than they are in excluding other inflammatory arthropathies (Gladman et al., 1987).

TABLE 6-5. Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis.

TABLE 6-5

Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis.

PsA affects men and women equally (Brockbank and Gladman, 2002). The average age at diagnosis is typically between 40 and 50 (Kerschbaumer et al., 2016). Obesity has been identified as a risk factor for the development of PsA (Kerschbaumer et al., 2016; Ogdie and Weiss, 2015).

Disease Course, Outcomes, and Variability

As with RA, PsA has heterogeneous clinical manifestations so that improvement cannot be accurately determined by considering only unidimensional measures, such as laboratory markers. The principal measures used to assess response to treatment and remission for PsA are currently the same as those used for RA, and they represent composite, multidimensional outcome measures incorporating clinical data, functional assessment, patient-reported symptoms, and global assessment (Felson and LaValley, 2014). We review the major measures used to assess treatment response below, noting that these measures were primarily developed for research and clinical trials and hence their application in routine clinical practice by U.S. rheumatologists is unclear. More specific outcome and disease activity measures for PsA are currently under development by the Group for Research and Assessment in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology groups.

The ACR20, developed for RA and described above, is also frequently used in clinical trials of medications for PsA. Other treatment response criteria developed specifically for PsA include the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) and the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) criteria. The PsARC defines treatment response as achieving two of the following: tender and swollen joint count improvement by at least 30 percent (Mease et al., 2005), patient global improvement by one point on a five-point Likert scale, or physician global improvement by the same amount. The MDA criteria are achieved when low scores are obtained in five of the following seven domains: tender joint count, swollen joint count, body surface area affected by psoriasis, pain symptoms, patient-reported global disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, and tender entheseal points count (Wong et al., 2012).

RA disease activity measures such as the DAS have also been used in PsA clinical trials, though it has been noted that because of differences in the clinical presentation of RA and PsA, some of the RA-specific measures may be less accurate when applied to PsA. The DAS, for example, may not be appropriate for patients who have predominantly lower extremity or distal interphalangeal joint disease since these joints are not included as part of the standard DAS 28-joint count. Measures of disease activity that have been developed and validated specifically for PsA include the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis, the Psoriatic Arthritis Joint Activity Index, the Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index, and the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (Gladman, 2010; Mease et al., 2005; Ogdie et al., 2020; Schoels et al., 2016; Wong et al., 2012). All are composite measures based on data drawn from multiple domains (e.g., the physical examination, laboratory markers, pain symptoms, patient- or physician-reported global assessments, functional measures, and health-related quality of life) (Helliwell and Waxman, 2018; Wong et al., 2012).

As with RA, PsA disease activity scores correlate closely with the degree of functional impairment, and several of these scores are based in part on functional assessments. Functional impairment is still possible, however, among individuals with previously active disease that is now quiescent if accumulated joint damage and deformity have occurred (Kerschbaumer et al., 2016).

The HAQ, developed for RA and described above, is also commonly included as an outcome measure in PsA clinical trials (Mease et al., 2005; Ogdie and Weiss, 2015).

Treatment and Management of Psoriatic Arthritis

As with RA, the goals of treatment for PsA include controlling symptoms, preventing structural damage and deformity, and improving physical functioning and quality of life (Gossec et al., 2016). DMARDs are the mainstay of treatment because they are effective in limiting progressive joint damage, and they are prescribed under the supervision of a rheumatologist. As shown in Table 6-6, there is considerable overlap between the DMARDs recommended for PsA and those recommended for RA, but there are also some notable differences in the specific drug classes used. Agents that are specifically used in PsA but not RA are apremilast and inhibitors of IL-12/23, IL-23 and IL-17. Conventional DMARDs are orally administered, while the IL–12/23, IL-23, and IL–17 inhibitors are available in prefilled syringes that can be injected subcutaneously by patients at home. There may be a role for NSAIDs and glucocorticoids in short-term symptom relief. Non-pharmacologic treatment options are similar to those for RA (Singh et al., 2019). Patients with PsA commonly experience pain; adjunctive therapies targeting pain symptoms are discussed in detail in Chapter 2. The indications for surgical intervention are the same as in RA patients.

TABLE 6-6. Medications Used to Treat Psoriatic Arthritis.

TABLE 6-6

Medications Used to Treat Psoriatic Arthritis.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Receiving Treatments

Evidence-based treatment guidelines for the pharmacologic management of PsA include the 2018 ACR/National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) guideline (Singh et al., 2019), the 2015 EULAR recommendations, and the 2015 GRAPPA recommendations (Coates et al., 2016; Gossec et al., 2016). Under all sets of guidelines, the goal of therapy is clinical remission or minimal to low disease activity (Gossec et al., 2016). The preferred treatment may be influenced by the disease severity, medication toxicities, and comorbidities (e.g., heart failure) and by specific PsA disease manifestations (e.g., severe skin disease, axial disease, enthesitis, uveitis [Singh et al., 2019]). Notably, the evidence base underlying the PsA treatment guidelines is more limited than that underlying the RA treatment guidelines reviewed in the previous section, and there are some notable differences between the major guidelines.

Under the 2018 ACR/NPF guideline (Singh et al., 2019), the options for the initial treatment of active PsA in descending order of preference are: a TNF inhibitor, a conventional synthetic DMARD, an IL-17 inhibitor, and an IL-12/23 inhibitor. For treatment-naïve patients with less active disease, NSAIDs may be considered. For patients who have not responded to initial therapy, regardless of the initial treatment strategy used, the subsequent treatment options in descending order of preference are: a TNF inhibitor, an IL-17 inhibitor, an IL-12/23 inhibitor, and abatacept or tofacitinib. Among patients who have not responded to therapy with a TNF inhibitor, switching to a different TNF inhibitor is preferred over using other biologic DMARDs. For patients who have not responded to a conventional DMARD and are either not candidates for biologic DMARDs or do not wish to take them, the options include adding apremilast to the current conventional DMARD or switching to a new conventional DMARD (except apremilast). Among patients with active PsA and psoriatic spondylitis/axial disease who have not responded to NSAIDs, TNF inhibitors are preferred, followed by IL-17 inhibitors. For patients with active PsA in whom enthesitis is the predominant manifestation, NSAIDs, TNF inhibitors, and tofacitinib are preferred over conventional DMARDs.

The 2019 EULAR recommendations differ somewhat from the 2018 ACR/NPF guidelines (Gossec et al., 2020). First, in the EULAR recommendations, conventional DMARDs are preferred as the first-line therapy over biologic DMARDs for PsA patients with polyarthritis or with monoarthritis/oligoarthritis and poor prognostic factors; when skin involvement is also present, methotrexate is preferred. Second, when there is an inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs, a biologic DMARD is recommended; however, there is no order of preference except when there is concomitant skin involvement, in which case an IL-17 or IL-12/23 inhibitor may be preferred over other biologics. Third, in patients with inadequate responses to both a conventional and a synthetic DMARD, a JAK inhibitor may be considered. Fourth, for enthesitis or axial disease that is not responsive to conventional DMARDs, a biologic DMARD is recommended; usually this will be a TNF inhibitor, but an IL-17 may be used if there is also skin involvement. Finally, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors are reserved for patients with mild disease who have had an inadequate response to one or more conventional DMARDs and for whom a biologic DMARD or a JAK inhibitor is not appropriate.

The 2015 GRAPPA recommendations are similar to the 2015 EULAR recommendations for the management of peripheral arthritis, axial disease, and enthesitis (Coates et al., 2016).

The ACR/NPF, EULAR, and GRAPPA guidelines were all based on systematic reviews of the evidence on PsA treatment together with expert opinion. Similar to the RA treatment guidelines previously reviewed, one limitation of the guidelines—in the context of this study—is that they do not explicitly discuss the impact of pharmacologic treatments on work-related functional capacity, which is the outcome of principal interest to the committee. A challenge in the PsA treatment literature more broadly is the limited evidence available to guide the management of patients with PsA and, in particular, those with arthritis mutilans or other forms of severe or treatment-resistant disease who may be disproportionately represented in the SSA population (Ureyen et al., 2018). Ixekizumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab were efficacious for patients who had inadequate responses to TNF inhibitors, so they may provide an alternative for these patients (Merola et al., 2017; Nash et al., 2017; Raychaudhuri et al., 2017; Ritchlin et al., 2014). Several other novel therapies are currently under investigation (Chiricozzi et al., 2019).

As with RA, NSAIDs and low-dose glucocorticoids can provide symptom relief within days for PsA. With DMARDs, clinical improvement is typically expected within 1–3 months of starting therapy, though some patients might not respond until months 3–6 (Schoels et al., 2018). Accordingly, as with RA, many clinical trials of PsA therapeutics assess treatment response at both 3 and 6 months, and the EULAR treatment guidelines for PsA recommend changing therapy if no improvement is seen after 3–6 months (Gossec et al., 2016).

Secondary Impairments from Treatment

The pharmacologic treatments for PsA overlap substantially with those used for RA, and therefore so do their toxicities (see Table 6-3).

Select Treatments Currently in Clinical Trials

Several novel agents are currently under investigation for PsA in randomized clinical trials, most notably Tyk-2 and IL-23 inhibitors (see Table 6-4).

Disease-Specific Functional Limitations

As with RA, few studies have directly and rigorously assessed the impact of PsA treatments on work outcomes. Certolizumab was found to significantly decrease absenteeism and presenteeism relative to placebo in an employed sample (Kavanaugh et al., 2015); infliximab was found to improve patient-reported work productivity, but with no significant impact on employment status (Kavanaugh et al., 2006).

Given the limited direct evidence on the impact of specific PsA treatments on work outcomes, the committee reviewed evidence of the impact of PsA treatments on measures of physical functioning, specifically evidence that used the HAQ, which is predictive of work disability. For PsA, a number of different biologic DMARDs have been found to achieve clinically meaningful improvements in HAQ scores (e.g., apremilast, certolizumab, tofacitinib, golimumab, certolizumab, adalimumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab) (Edwards et al., 2016; Gladman et al., 2014, 2017; Kavanaugh et al., 2017; Mease, 2014; Mease et al., 2017a; Rahman et al., 2016). Abatacept is an exception (Mease et al., 2017b). Evidence of the effect of other DMARDs on physical functioning in PsA as measured with the HAQ is limited. Of note, a clinical trial of methotrexate for PsA found no significant improvement in HAQ scores (Kingsley et al., 2012).

As with RA, a key limitation of the PsA literature from the perspective of this report is that most studies do not focus specifically on patients with severe or refractory disease who might be more likely to participate in SSA programs, and it is therefore unclear whether the aforementioned therapies would meaningfully improve work-related functional capacity within our population of interest. Of the evidence we reviewed, the studies that most closely reflected our population of interest (i.e., adults with severe PsA resulting in functional limitations that significantly restrict work) were those evaluating the impacts of specific treatments in patients who had not responded to at least one biologic DMARD. In PsA, tofacitinib has been found to improve HAQ scores among adults who have not responded to at least one anti-TNF biologic (Gladman et al., 2017). Ustekinumab has also been evaluated in this population, but it did not achieve a clinically meaningful impact on physical functioning (Rahman et al., 2016).

JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS

JIA, formerly known as juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), is an umbrella term for several types of inflammatory arthritis in childhood. JIA excludes arthritis that is part of a larger systemic illness, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The subtypes of JIA share the common features of joint pain and inflammation with the adult inflammatory arthropathies discussed above. By convention, JIA pertains to children less than 16 years of age, and joint inflammation needs to be present for 6 continuous weeks. JIA is the most common chronic rheumatic disease of childhood, and it affects approximately 300,000 children in the United States (Helmick et al., 2008). Typically, once an individual has been diagnosed with JIA, the diagnosis remains for the full extent of disease throughout the individual’s lifespan. Hence there are individuals of all ages that may carry the diagnosis of JIA. JIA is a heterogenous group of diseases with different features, treatments, and outcomes.

Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Disease Course

The diagnosis of JIA is made clinically with supporting laboratory and imaging studies. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR, formerly the International League Against Rheumatism) criteria are used for diagnostic and classification purposes (Petty, 2001). The ILAR criteria separate JIA into 7 subgroups: persistent or extended oligoarticular, rheumatoid factor + (RF+) polyarticular JIA, RF-polyarticular JIA, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic JIA, systemic JIA, and undifferentiated. An international effort is under way to revamp the current guidelines as there are some areas that lack precision (Onel et al., 2021). As these different groups are often treated differently—for example, systemic JIA does not respond to usual treatments for polyarticular JIA—proper grouping is important. As several of the groups resemble a type of adult inflammatory arthritis, many think that the age cutoff should be removed and childhood arthritis described as per adult designations. Age cutoffs imply a biologic relevance that is not existent—i.e., many children do not “outgrow” JIA (Glerup et al., 2020).

Descriptions of the current subtypes are offered in the following subsections.

Oligoarticular JIA (Persistent or Extended)

Oligoarticular JIA involves less than 5 joints at onset, per ILAR criteria (Petty, 2001) and is most common in young girls (with rates five times higher in females than males) with typical involvement of large lower extremity joints such as knees (Ringold et al., 2019). The peak age of onset is 2–3 years. Oligoarticular JIA is further separated into persistent or extended disease (involvement of more than five joints, 6 or more months after onset). Of all categories, persistent oligoarticular JIA is the most likely to remit over time (Glerup et al., 2020). Oligoarticular JIA is often painless. Children may present with a loss of motor milestones or flexion contractures. Due to open epiphyses, leg length discrepancies can occur, with the involved side becoming longer, which can then lead to a compensatory scoliosis. Hips are almost never involved. Inflammatory markers are frequently normal. Previously some considered older teenagers with isolated joint swelling as a subgroup of oligoarticular JIA; however, this has fallen out of favor since the prognosis is very different.

Oligoarticular JIA can be complicated by uveitis of the anterior chamber. Uveitis is generally painless, and for that reason frequent screening is recommended. If uveitis is not treated promptly, scarring and vision problems can develop, including glaucoma, cataracts, and eventually loss of vision. Uveitis can occur during or after JIA and even after the disease has resolved into adulthood. Uveitis is most common in very young children who are positive for antinuclear antibodies, and they should be screened every 3 months after diagnosis.

Polyarticular JIA (RF- and RF+)

Polyarticular JIA involves more than five joints at the onset and is separated into two subclassifications by the presence or absence of RF (Rosenberg, 2020). For the diagnosis of RF-positive polyarticular JIA, RF should be positive on two occasions at least 3 months apart. Polyarticular JIA is three times more common in girls than boys and has bimodal peaks of presentation (at 1–3 and 9–14 years). RF-positive polyarticular JIA has a course most similar to RA and is highly unlikely to permanently remit over time. Typically, RF-positive disease is a symmetric polyarthritis involving the small bones of the hands and feet with erosions early in the course of disease. RF-negative polyarticular JIA has a much more variable course. Large and small joints may both be affected. Uveitis may occur but is less common than in oligoarticular JIA. Frequent involvement of the temporomandibular joint can lead to mandibular hypoplasia and micrognathia, a major source of morbidity. Systemic inflammation may or may not be present. Extra-synovial manifestations of RF-positive JIA are similar to those seen in adult-type RA, including interstitial lung disease and nodulosis.

Enthesitis-Related Arthritis and Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis

Enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) is a form of juvenile spondyloarthritis (Weiss and Colbert, 2018). To fulfill the criteria for the diagnosis of ERA, children must have arthritis plus enthesitis or arthritis plus at least two of the following: presence of or a history of sacroiliac joint tenderness and/or inflammatory lumbosacral pain; presence of HLA-B27 antigen; onset of arthritis in a male over 6 years of age; acute (symptomatic) anterior uveitis; or history of ERA, sacroiliitis with IBD, reactive arthritis, or acute anterior uveitis in a first-degree relative. ERA is often associated with axial disease and enthesitis or inflammation at the insertion sites of tendons, ligaments, fascia, or capsule into bone. However, younger children more often present initially with asymmetric lower limb large joint involvement. ERA is more common in boys than in girls and typically presents from 10 to 13 years of age. Hips may be involved early in the disease course. There is considerable overlap with the arthritis seen to accompany IBD.

Juvenile psoriatic arthritis (PsJIA) generally presents in a bimodal distribution, with younger patients resembling oligoarticular JIA and older patients presenting with disease reminiscent of adult psoriatic arthritis (Stoll et al., 2006). Dactylitis is commonly seen. A diagnosis of PsJIA may be made in the absence of psoriasis if typical features are present and there is a first-degree family member with psoriasis. PsJIA that presents in middle to older childhood exhibits a sex ratio of 1:1.

ERA and PsJIA presenting late in childhood are also unlikely to permanently remit. Studies have suggested that children with ERA and PsJIA experience worse quality of life, function, and pain than children with other JIA categories, resulting in significant morbidity over time (Weiss et al., 2014).

Systemic JIA

Systemic JIA (sJIA) is distinct from other types of JIA, and many would characterize it as an autoinflammatory disorder. Although the ILAR criteria require the presence of synovitis for a diagnosis, synovitis may present years after systemic symptoms (Petty, 2001). ILAR criteria include presence of quotidian fever (daily return to normal) for 2 weeks (documented for at least 3 days) with 6 weeks of arthritis and one of the following: evanescent rash, serositis, organomegaly, or lymphadenopathy. sJIA remains a clinical diagnosis of exclusion. Other causes of fever, including infections, malignancy, and other autoinflammatory syndromes must be excluded prior to treatment. Disease occurs equally in boys and girls. sJIA may occur at any age and is distinguished from adult-onset Stills’ disease (AOSD) by an arbitrary age cutoff of 16 years, although the two diseases are essentially equivalent (Colafrancesco et al., 2019). Notably, the Yamaguchi criteria used to diagnose AOSD do not require arthritis if other clinical features are present. Up to 40 percent of cases of sJIA are associated with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a secondary hemophagocytic syndrome. MAS can be life-threatening, requiring urgent recognition and treatment (Minoia et al, 2014). MAS can present at any time during sJIA, including when patients are on treatment and the disease is otherwise quiescent and is frequently triggered by infection.

Extra-articular manifestations are common and include: high quotidian fevers, evanescent macular rash, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, pericardial effusion, peritonitis, arthritis, sore throat, and pharyngitis. The initial treatment is tailored to the severity of systemic, arthritic, or MAS features. Early aggressive and targeted therapy is favored, given a postulated “window of opportunity” (Nigrovic, 2014). A biphasic model of sJIA has been proposed with a preponderance of innate and systemic features in the initial phase, which, if not controlled, then transitions to an adaptive phase dominated by chronic arthritis. Prior to the establishment of current treatment practices, many sJIA patients had to be treated with chronic glucocorticoids, sometimes for years, which caused many side effects, most notably growth failure. Hip replacements were not uncommon.

Disease Activity Measures and Treat to Target

Validated disease activity measures are being used more often to guide treatment. Several validated disease activity measures for childhood arthritis exist (Trincianti and Consolaro, 2020). There is a lack of evidence that any specific measures are superior to others, and undoubtably future changes in these measures will occur. Measures that can be considered include ACR provisional criteria for inactive disease (Wallace Criteria), the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS), and clinical cJADAS, among others (Ravelli et al., 2018).

In recent years the paradigm of explicitly defining a treatment target and applying tight control with necessary therapeutic adjustments to reach the target has been incorporated into “treat to target” (T2T) recommendations for adult RA. Much work has been done to define these targets for children with JIA.

The HAQ assesses four outcome dimensions: disability, discomfort and pain, drug side effects, and dollar costs. The questionnaire has been adapted for children (CHAQ), and this version focuses on disability, discomfort, and pain (Greer and Iverson, 2020). Disability is measured in the categories of dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, grip, and activities. Discomfort is determined by the presence of pain and its severity. The CHAQ is either parent- or self-administered. Studies have shown that parents are reliable proxy-reporters for their children’s functional status. The major drawback to the CHAQ is a ceiling effect that enables minor disabilities to be missed (Greer and Iverson, 2020).

The JADAS-71, a composite activity measure, uses (1) the Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) (range 0–10), (2) the Patient Global Assessment (range 0–10), (3) active joint count assessed in 71 joints, and (4) ESR (normalized to 0–10) (Consolaro et al., 2008). The cutoff value for inactive disease is 1. The JADAS has been adapted for sJIA by adding a fifth metric—the Systemic Manifestation Score (SMS). The SMS uses seven clinical and laboratory features to quantify the systemic manifestations of JIA: fever, rash, generalized lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly, serositis, anemia, and platelet and ferritin levels (Tibaldi et al., 2020). The clinical JADAS requires no laboratory studies.

The ACR provisional criteria for clinical inactive disease include the following: (1) no active joints; (2) no fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA; (3) no active uveitis; (4) normal ESR and/or CRP level; (5) a PhGA that indicates no disease activity; and (6) duration of morning stiffness of no more than 15 minutes (Wallace et al., 2004). For complete remission of medication, the criteria for inactive disease on medication has to be fulfilled for a minimum of 6 continuous months. To be in complete remission, patients must have had inactive disease for a continuous period of at least 12 months during which they do not receive any antiarthritis or antiuveitis medication.

Articular damage and extra-articular damage may be scored according to the two parts of the Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index (JADI): the JADI articular (JADI-A) and JADI extra-articular (JADI-E) scores (Viola et al., 2005). For the JADI-A, the score for articular damage ranges from 0 to 72. The JADI-E encompasses ocular complications, non-articular musculoskeletal damage, cutaneous features, endocrine abnormalities, malignancies, and secondary amyloidosis (ranges 0 to 17).

A JIA task force has defined remission as the treatment target on which to base future research studies of polyarticular JIA (Ravelli et al., 2018). In a pilot study, Klein et al. (2020) evaluated 63 children with active JIA who had been treated using T2T methods and found that T2T greatly improved the likelihood of achieving remission or low disease activity. Buckley et al. (2020) reported similar excellent results by standardizing point-of-care disease activity monitoring and implementing clinical decision support to reduce treatment variation. More work is needed to understand the feasibility of T2T methods within usual clinical management.

T2T approaches have also shown to be effective in sJIA. In 2019 ter Haar et al. used a dose escalation strategy for anakinra for new-onset sJIA with a dose taper and discontinuation at 3 months if the target of inactive disease was achieved. Seventy-six percent and 96 percent achieved inactive disease at 1 and 5 years, respectively, with 52 percent and 75 percent being off medication. Damage (articular/extra-articular) was noted in less than 5 percent, and the majority (67 percent) of patients did not need steroids. Defining targets in certain other of the subtypes, such as ERA, has proven to be challenging and is actively under investigation.

Prognosis

In the short term, remission on medication has proven to be an attainable goal. Remission off medications has been more challenging. Quartier (2020) evaluated tapering strategies for canakinumab withdrawal for children with sJIA. Patients in remission on canakinumab monotherapy were randomized to either taper by dose reduction or prolongation of interval. Seventy-one percent of those with dose reduction taper versus 84 percent of those on prolongation of interval taper for canakinumab maintained clinical remission for 24 weeks, and 33 percent overall discontinued canakinumab. Studies of TNF inhibitor (TNFi) withdrawal for children with polyarticular JIA have been relatively unsuccessful (Lovell et al., 2018; Simonini et al., 2018). Children with polyarticular JIA in longstanding remission on TNFi have been shown to have high rates of flare within the first 1–2 years after medication withdrawal. This is especially true for children with RF-positive polyarticular JIA. Of particular interest is one study that demonstrated an almost 20 percent flare rate within the 6 months prior to medication withdrawal in patients who were thought to be in remission on medication and who were seen more frequently than usual because they were enrolled in a trial (Lovell et al., 2018). A Canadian study found that over a 5-year time period, almost 50 percent of the total population was able to come off medication; however, many children came in and out of remission several times over the period of follow-up (Guzman et al., 2016). In fact, many children with JIA have active disease long into adulthood. Glerup et al. (2020) recently published 18 years of follow-up for the Population-Based Nordic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Cohort. From an original group of over 500 children treated for JIA in the post-biologic era, 44 percent still had signs of active disease 18 years later. Children with persistent oligoarthritis and sJIA were the most likely to be in remission, whereas children with ERA were the least likely. Functional outcomes were generally good, although many patients had permanent articular and extra-articular damage.

Not all children will be able to attain complete remission with medication, and many will require multiple different medications to get there, accruing damage during periods of active disease. More than half of JIA children with polyarthritis in the United States require a switch in biologic treatment over the first 10 years of treatment, and many require more than two biologics (Mannion et al., 2021). Almost 50 percent have active disease despite treatment with two or more biologics, and 20 percent are treated with unapproved therapies for JIA (Brunner et al., 2020). New medications are clearly needed for children with JIA.

Fatigue is common in children and young adults with JIA (Arnstad et al., 2021). High levels of fatigue are strongly associated with disease activity and severity, and they contribute to regular school absences. Approximately 20 percent of JIA patients have persistent school absences as long as 8 years after diagnosis. Children with JIA experience barriers at school, especially physical challenges, with a need for accommodations (Chomistek et al., 2019). Decreased participation and increased social anxiety are key barriers. Similar to children with other chronic illnesses, higher levels of anxiety and depression are found in children with JIA than in healthy controls (Fair et al., 2019). A German registry study showed that persons with JIA have significantly lower educational achievements than the general population (Schlichtiger et al., 2017). Missing school leads to decreased independence and job attainment.

Work is similarly affected. Approximately 20 percent of individuals with JIA in Germany lost a significant number of workdays; adults with JIA who lost work had an average of 34 days of lost work per year (Schlichtiger et al., 2017). A higher level of unemployment was also seen, especially in those with long disease duration who were still under treatment. In the Nordic Cohort, the same percentage of work disability was present; 18 years later, 20 percent had either limited or no work experience (Glerup et al., 2020). Direct costs (health care and non-health care costs) and indirect costs (productivity loss due to sick leave and work disability) remain high into adulthood. The mean total cost of late JIA (active and inactive) was estimated to be 3,500 (range 1,500–17,000) euros per patient per year, of which the direct cost contributed more than half (Minden et al., 2004). This number is likely to be at least two-fold higher in the United States, given relative health care costs.

Transition remains a major problem in most health care systems. In the Nordic study, notably, only 42 percent of the participants were followed up by a physician or rheumatologist even though approximately 46 percent had active disease at the last follow-up visit, indicating that some of the participants might have been lost to follow-up after transfer to adult care even in government-funded health care systems with minimal out-of-pocket copayments (Glerup et al., 2020). Thirty-seven percent of the participants with active disease did not receive any systemic treatment.

In general, damage from JIA is similar to that seen from arthritis affecting adults. Although in younger children erosions may not be seen on plain x-rays until late in disease, MRI studies demonstrate significant joint perturbations. In addition, growing children may develop specific secondary impairments, including leg length discrepancies and micrognathia. Intraarticular corticosteroid injections are thought to decrease the likelihood of excessive growth in the involved limb, although the literature is mixed (Jennings et al., 2014). Secondary scoliosis is a potential consequence. Micrognathia secondary to mandibular hypoplasia from temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement remains a problem and is associated with obstructive sleep apnea and difficulty eating (de Carvalho et al., 2012). A fusion of the cervical spine may be seen, leading to decrease mobility (Espada et al., 1988). Early-onset subclinical cardiovascular damage is more likely in children with JIA than in healthy controls (Bohr et al., 2016). Exercise tolerance is impaired as well. Individuals with JIA are at an increased global risk of serious infection and cancers, irrespective of treatment (Beukelman et al., 2012; Hurd and Beukelman, 2013).

The treatment of JIA-related eye disease has improved since the introduction of conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Methotrexate is the first choice DMARD recommended (Cuchacovich, et al. 2012). Recent JIA cohorts confirm an annual incidence of uveitis of 2–4 percent in the first years after the onset of arthritis and an estimated cumulative incidence of 10–20 percent (Heiligenhaus et al, 2019). Among JIA patients with uveitis, approximately 20 percent will not achieve quiescent disease with current treatments for uveitis. In addition, of those attaining an inactive disease state, almost 33 percent will flare within the next 2 years, irrespective of articular activity. Damage including cataracts, glaucoma, band keratopathy and synechiae are seen commonly (Foeldvari et al., 2019). Because outcomes can be difficult to predict, frequent screening exams are required, and these are a major source of missed school and work for children with JIA. As with articular disease, uveitis may persist into adulthood.

The treatments for JIA carry their own risk factors. Although corticosteroids are used much less often in children than in adults, effects on growth and lipid balance remain a problem. Especially for children with refractory sJIA, the combination of aggressive hip synovitis and avascular necrosis can result in damage that necessitates total joint replacements. Although total arthroplasty done for JIA has decreased in the United States, the rate remains approximately 0.13 total arthroplasties per 100,000 people per year, with most occurring after attainment of adult age (Mertelsmann-Voss et al., 2014).

Long-term registries are critical. A highly fatal lung disease has recently been observed in some children with sJIA, most of whom were treated with bDMARDs (Saper et al., 2019). The observed risk factors include younger children with MAS, children with a history of reactions to tocilizumab, and those with trisomy 21. The exact etiology for sJIA-associated lung disease is not known at this time, although an association with common HLA-DRB1*15 haplotypes has been suggested (Saper et al., 2022).

Immunomodulatory medications present a particular challenge for children who often spend time in such congregate settings as day care, summer camp, and school (K–12, college). Young children may need to be treated with immunosuppressive medications prior to receiving their primary immunizations, making them particularly vulnerable to common infections such as varicella (CDC, 2021). The ability to respond to inactivated or mRNA vaccines such as COVID-19 depends on one’s level of immunosuppression and the specific treatments undergone and is hard to predict (Boyarsky et al., 2021; Ruddy et al., 2021). This may also play a role in school absences and social isolation.

Treatment and Management

ACR has published several guidelines for the treatment of JIA. Originally published in 2011/2013, these guidelines have been under revision since 2017. The first part, including recommendations for the treatment of polyarthritis, enthesitis, sacroiliitis, and uveitis, has been published (Angeles-Han et al., 2019; Ringold et al., 2019). A second part, including recommendations for oligoarthritis, TMJ arthritis, and systemic JIA with and without MAS, was recently accepted for publication (Onel et al., 2021). The guidelines are notable for the decreased reliance on NSAIDs and glucocorticoids and the early use of DMARDs. Treatment choice varies not only by subgroup but by severity as well. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) has developed consensus treatment plans for several subtypes of newly diagnosed JIA in order to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different treatment modalities as they become available (DeWitt et al., 2012; Ringold et al., 2014). However, high-quality evidence to aid in decision making is rare because of the lower numbers of involved individuals, variability between subtypes, poor diagnostic criteria, and limited research funding. Hopefully, the rise of research networks such as CARRA and PRINTO (Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization) will aid in the development of needed research. Treatment options for children with JIA are frequently limited by FDA restrictions because of the children’s age despite the fact that the children have clinical phenotypes that are similar to the way in which the disease presents in adulthood.

Although treatment algorithms are similar between subtypes, there are a few key differences. Some agents used in adults have demonstrated efficacy and safety and are commonly used by pediatric rheumatologists but have only recently been approved by FDA for use in children. NSAIDs and joint injections may be used as needed. Corticosteroids should be minimized unless MAS is present. Drug approvals for children with JIA have continued to increase. The approval of tofacitinib for polyarticular JIA in 2020 represented access to a new class of medications. At the recent scientific meeting of ACR, Brunner and colleagues (2020) presented the results of the JUNIPERA trial (NCT03031782), a phase 3 trial of secukinumab, which demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of ERA and psoriatic type JIA. FDA granted approval for this drug in late December 2021.

The optimal sequence and timing of csDMARD and bDMARD administration in JIA remains unclear. Start Time Optimization of Biologics in Polyarticular JIA (STOP-JIA) was a prospective, observational CARRA registry study comparing the effectiveness of: (1) Step Up, or initial csDMARD monotherapy, adding biologic if needed; (2) Early Combination, or csDMARD and bDMARD started together; and (3) Biologic First, or bDMARD monotherapy (Kimura et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2021). The achievement of a clinically inactive disease off steroids did not significantly differ between groups at 12 months. There was a statistically significant higher likelihood of achieving a clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score–10 joints (cJADAS10), low disease activity, and pediatric ACR70 in the early combination group, and these results require further exploration (Ong et al., 2021).

SUMMARY

Inflammatory arthritis is a broad term for a group of chronic autoimmune diseases characterized by joint pain, swelling, warmth, and tenderness in joints along with stiffness that lasts for an hour or more. Most inflammatory forms of arthritis include systemic effects such as skin rashes, eye inflammation, hair loss, and dry mouth. Unlike the more common osteoarthritis, or arthritis that is caused by physical wear and tear of a joint over time, inflammatory forms of arthritis present in children as well as adults. In 2019, inflammatory arthritis accounted for 60 percent of all Social Security disability beneficiaries who were receiving benefits for immune system disorders, not including HIV.

RA is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease that predominantly affects the joints. However, given its systemic nature, it may also cause fever, weight loss, marked fatigue, and muscle atrophy as well as other organ-specific features including scleritis, accelerated cardiovascular disease, and interstitial lung disease. The lifetime risk of RA is two to three times higher among women than men. The onset of RA peaks between the ages of 30 and 50 years, although it may occur at any age. Risk factors include older age, a family history of RA, and current or prior cigarette smoking. Mortality in people with RA is 1.5 to 2 times higher than in age- and gender-matched non-RA controls, a difference that is due predominantly to accelerated cardiovascular disease and interstitial lung disease.

The arthritis of RA, as with any inflammatory arthritis, typically presents with joint pain and swelling along with prolonged stiffness in the early morning. Early RA may present in a single joint (monoarthritis) or a few joints (oligoarthritis) but characteristically tends to evolve into a symmetrical polyarthritis of small and large joints which, if left untreated or inadequately treated, will cause damage to articular structures and, ultimately, disability. RA-associated interstitial lung disease may cause severe respiratory impairment leading to the need for a transplant or, sometimes, death; however, the musculoskeletal impairments associated with RA are more commonly the most disabling and the major source of functional limitations for individuals with this condition. This chapter focuses on those impairments, although the committee acknowledges that RA may also influence global functioning through other mechanisms such as fatigue. The common pathophysiology underlying musculoskeletal impairments in RA is inflammation of the synovium.

Although RA is a chronic disease with daily discomfort, patients also frequently have disease flares. During disease flares, patients experience worsening inflammation, which results in an exacerbation of joint pain and swelling and the potential for new joint damage. In patients with longstanding and severe disease, persistent synovial inflammation will result in the erosion of cartilage and bone, leading to joint destruction and deformities, which in turn cause chronic pain and functional limitations. The goal of RA treatment is to attain and maintain control of disease activity in an effort to reduce symptoms of joint pain and swelling, prevent deformity, maintain quality of life and function, and limit extra-articular disease manifestations. Pharmacologic treatments, specifically DMARDs, are the mainstay of therapy as they limit progressive joint damage and improve function.

PsA is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints, spine, and entheses. It may affect other tissues as well (e.g., dactylitis, nail involvement, sacroiliitis, enthesitis) and most commonly occurs in association with psoriasis, an autoimmune skin disease manifested by erythematous plaques covered by silvery scales. Skin manifestations commonly precede the arthritis; however, in some patients the skin and joint symptoms present simultaneously, and in 10–15 percent of patients the arthritis presents first.

The diagnosis of PsA is based on the patient’s clinical history, a physical examination, laboratory findings, and radiography. PsA has heterogeneous clinical manifestations so that improvement cannot be accurately determined by considering only unidimensional measures, such as laboratory markers. The principal measures used to assess response to treatment and remission for PsA are currently the same as those used for RA and represent composite, multidimensional outcome measures incorporating clinical data, functional assessment, patient-reported symptoms, and global assessment. PsA affects men and women equally, with an average age at diagnosis between 40 and 50. Obesity has been identified as a risk factor for the development of PsA.

JIA, formerly known as JRA, is an umbrella term for several types of inflammatory arthritis in childhood. The subtypes of JIA share the common features of joint pain and inflammation with the adult inflammatory arthropathies. By convention, JIA pertains to children less than 16 years of age with joint inflammation present for 6 continuous weeks. JIA is the most common chronic rheumatic disease of childhood, and it affects approximately 300,000 children in the United States. Once an individual has been diagnosed with JIA, the diagnosis remains for the full extent of disease throughout the individual’s lifespan.

REFERENCES

  • Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: A review. JAMA. 2018;320(13):1360–1372. [PubMed: 30285183]
  • Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T, Bathon J, Boers M, Bombardier C, Bombardieri S, Choi H, Combe B, Dougados M, Emery P, Gomez-Reino J, Keystone E, Koch G, Kvien TK, Martin-Mola E, Matucci-Cerinic M, Michaud K, O’Dell J, Paulus H, Pincus T, Richards P, Simon L, Siegel J, Smolen JS, Sokka T, Strand V, Tugwell P, van der Heijde D, van Riel P, Vlad S, van Vollenhoven R, Ward M, Weinblatt M, Wells G, White B, Wolfe F, Zhang B, Zink A, Felson D. Reporting disease activity in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: EULAR/ACR collaborative recommendations. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2008;67(10):1360–1364. [PubMed: 18791055]
  • Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, O. Bingham C 3rd, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Hobbs K, Huizinga TW, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien TK, Laing T, Mease P, Menard HA, Moreland LW, Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS, Vencovsky J, Wolfe F, Hawker G. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis &Rheumatology. 2010;62(9):2569–2581. [PubMed: 20872595]
  • Alkabeya HA, Hughes A-M, Adams J. Factors associated with hand and upper arm functional disability in people with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review. Arthritis Care & Research. 2019;71:1473–1481. [PubMed: 30320976]
  • Anderson JJ, Wells G, Verhoeven AC, Felson DT. Factors predicting response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: The importance of disease duration. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2000;43(1):22–29. [PubMed: 10643696]
  • Anderson JK, Zimmerman L, Caplan L, Michaud K. Measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: Patient (PtGA) and Provider (PrGA) Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Disease Activity Score (DAS) and Disease Activity Score with 28-Joint Counts (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Patient Activity Score (PAS) and Patient Activity Score-II (PASII), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID), Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index-5 (RADAI-5), Chronic Arthritis Systemic Index (CASI), Patient-Based Disease Activity Score with ESR (PDAS1) and Patient-Based Disease Activity Score without ESR (PDAS2), and Mean Overall Index for Rheumatoid Arthritis (MOI-RA). Arthritis Care & Research. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S14–S36. [PubMed: 22588741]
  • Angeles-Han ST, Ringold S, Beukelman T, Lovell D, Cuello CA, Becker ML, Colbert RA, Feldman BM, Holland GN, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Horonjeff J, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Passo MH, Stoll ML, Rabinovich CE, Sen HN, Schneider R, Halyabar O, Hays K, Shah AA, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Turgunbaev M, Turner A, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the screening, monitoring, and treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis–associated uveitis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2019;71(6):864–877. [PMC free article: PMC6788287] [PubMed: 31021511]
  • Arnstad ED, Glerup M, Rypdal V, Peltoniemi S, Fasth A, Nielsen S, Zak M, Aalto K, Berntson L, Nordal E, Herlin T, Romundstad PR, Rygg M, Marhaug G, AndersonGäre B, Pedersen FK, Lahdenne P, Pelkonen P., on behalf of the Nordic Study Group of Pediatric Rheumatology. Fatigue in young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis 18 years after disease onset: Data from the prospective Nordic JIA cohort. Pediatric Rheumatology. 2021;19(1):33. [PMC free article: PMC7976696] [PubMed: 33736650]
  • Baillet A, Payraud E, Niderprim VA, Nissen MJ, Allenet B, François P, Grange L, Casez P, Juvin R, Gaudin P. A dynamic exercise programme to improve patients’ disability in rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology. 2009;48(4):410–415. [PubMed: 19211654]
  • Baker J, Giles J, Weber D, Leonard MB, Zemel BS, Long J, Ibrahim S, Katz PP. Assessment of muscle mass relative to fat mass and associations with physical functioning in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2017;56:981–988. [PMC free article: PMC6075553] [PubMed: 28340012]
  • Barber CEH, Zell J, Yazdany J, Davis AM, Cappelli L, Ehrlich-Jones L, Everix D, Thorne JC, Bohm V, Suter L, Limanni A, Michaud K. 2019 American College of Rheumatology recommended patient-reported functional status assessment measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care and Research. 2019;71(12):1531–1539. [PMC free article: PMC6884654] [PubMed: 31709771]
  • Beukelman T, Xie F, Chen L, Baddley JW, Delzell E, Grijalva CG, Lewis JD, Ouellet-Hellstrom R, Patkar NM, Saag KG, Winthrop KL, Curtis JR. Rates of hospitalized bacterial infection associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and its treatment. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2012;64(8):2773–2780. [PMC free article: PMC3409300] [PubMed: 22569881]
  • Bingham III CO, Weinblatt M, Han C, Gathany TA, Kim L, Lo KH, Baker D, Mendelsohn A, Westhovens R. The effect of intravenous golimumab on health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results of the phase III go-further trial. Journal of Rheumatology. 2014;41(6):1067–1076. [PubMed: 24786931]
  • Bohr AH, Fuhlbrigge RC, Pedersen FK, de Ferranti SD, Müller K. Premature subclinical atherosclerosis in children and young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. A review considering preventive measures. Pediatric Rheumatology. 2016;14(1) [PMC free article: PMC4704268] [PubMed: 26738563]
  • Boyarsky BJ, Ruddy JA, Connolly CM, Ou MT, Werbel WA, Garonzik-Wang JM, Segev DL, Paik JJ. Antibody response to a single dose of SARS-COV-2 mRNA vaccine in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2021;80(8):1098–1099. [PMC free article: PMC8822300] [PubMed: 33757968]
  • Brockbank J, Gladman D. Diagnosis and management of psoriatic arthritis. Drugs. 2002;62(17):2447–2457. [PubMed: 12421102]
  • Brodin N, Eurenius E, Jensen I, Nisell R, Opava CH, Algebrandt M, Almin I, Andersson B, Bertholds G, Forsberg C, Haglund E, Holmén-Andersson AM, Hultman A, Lennartsson C, Norman E. Coaching patients with early rheumatoid arthritis to healthy physical activity: A multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Arthritis Care and Research. 2008;59(3):325–331. [PubMed: 18311770]
  • Brunner HI, Schanberg LE, Kimura Y, Dennos A, Co DO, Colbert RA, Fuhlbrigge RC, Goldmuntz E, Kingsbury DJ, Patty-Resk C, Mintz S, Onel K, Rider LG, Schneider R, Watts A, von Scheven E, Lovell DJ, Beukelman T., PRCSG Advisory Council, and the CARRA Registry Investigators. New medications are needed for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatology. 2020;72(11):1945–1951. [PMC free article: PMC7722045] [PubMed: 32524767]
  • Buch MH. Defining refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2018;77(7):966–969. [PubMed: 29588276]
  • Buckley L, Ware E, Kreher G, Wiater L, Mehta J, Burnham JM. Outcome monitoring and clinical decision support in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2020;47(2):273–281. [PubMed: 31308202]
  • Burton W, Morrison A, Maclean R, Ruderman E. Systematic review of studies of productivity loss due to rheumatoid arthritis. Occupational Medicine (London). 2006;56:18–27. [PubMed: 16286432]
  • Burmester GR, Feist E, Dörner T. Emerging cell and cytokine targets in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2014;10(2):77–88. [PubMed: 24217582]
  • Carpenter L, Barnett R, Mahendran P, Nikiphorou E, Gwinnutt J, Verstappen S, Scott DL, Norton S. Secular changes in functional disability, pain, fatigue and mental well-being in early rheumatoid arthritis: A longitudinal meta-analysis. Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2020;50:209–219. [PubMed: 31521376]
  • Carvalho PD, Ferreira RJO, Landewé R, Vega-Morales D, Salomon-Escoto K, Veale DJ, Chopra A, da Silva JAP, Machado PM. Association of seventeen definitions of remission with functional status in a large clinical practice cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2019;47(1):20–27. [PubMed: 31043552]
  • CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Science brief: COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. 2021. [August 9, 2021]. https://www​.cdc.gov/coronavirus​/2019-ncov​/science/science-briefs​/fully-vaccinated-people.html .
  • Chandran V, Schentag CT, Gladman DD. Sensitivity and specificity of the CASPAR criteria for psoriatic arthritis in a family medicine clinic setting. Journal of Rheumatology. 2008;35(10):2069–2070. [PubMed: 18843760]
  • Cheung TT, McInnes IB. Future therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis? Seminars in Immunopathology. 2017;39(4):487–500. [PMC free article: PMC5486796] [PubMed: 28451787]
  • Chiricozzi A, Antonioli L, Panduri S, Fornai M, Romanelli M, Blandizzi C. Risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. 2019;19(1):1–8. [PubMed: 30462554]
  • Chomistek K, Johnson N, Stevenson R, Luca N, Miettunen P, Benseler SM, Veeramreddy D, Schmeling H. Patient-reported barriers at school for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. ACR Open Rheumatology. 2019;1(3):182–187. [PMC free article: PMC6858049] [PubMed: 31777793]
  • Choquette D, Bessette L, Alemao E, Haraoui B, Postema R, Raynauld JP, Coupal L. Persistence rates of abatacept and TNF inhibitors used as first or second biologic DMARDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 9 years of experience from the Rhumadata® clinical database and registry. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2019;21(1):138. [PMC free article: PMC6555030] [PubMed: 31171024]
  • Coates LC, Helliwell PS. Psoriatic arthritis: State of the art review. Clinical Medicine. 2017;17(1):65–70. [PMC free article: PMC6297592] [PubMed: 28148584]
  • Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, Soriano ER, Laura Acosta-Felquer M, Armstrong AW, Bautista-Molano W, Boehncke WH, Campbell W, Cauli A, Espinoza LR, Fitzgerald O, Gladman DD, Gottlieb A, Helliwell PS, Husni ME, Love TJ, Lubrano E, McHugh N, Nash P, Ogdie A, Orbai AM, Parkinson A, O’Sullivan D, Rosen CF, Schwartzman S, Siegel EL, Toloza S, Tuong W, Ritchlin CT. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2016;68(5):1060–1071. [PubMed: 26749174]
  • Colafrancesco S, Manara M, Bortoluzzi A, Serban T, Bianchi G, Cantarini L, Ciccia F, Dagna L, Govoni M, Montecucco C, Priori R, Ravelli A, Sfriso P, Sinigaglia L. Management of adult-onset Still’s disease with interleukin-1 inhibitors: Evidence- and consensus-based statements by a panel of Italian experts. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2019;21(1):275. [PMC free article: PMC6907145] [PubMed: 31829244]
  • Consolaro A, Ruperto N, Bazso A, Magni-Manzoni S, Pelagatti MA, Pistorio A, Magnani A, Malattia C, D’Agostino I, Filocamo G, Martini A, Ravelli A. Final validation of a new composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: The juvenile arthritis disease activity score (JADAS). Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal. 2008;6(Suppl 1):P115.
  • Costenbader KH, Feskanich D, Mandl LA, Karlson EW. Smoking intensity, duration, and cessation, and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women. American Journal of Medicine. 2006;119(6):e501–e509. [PubMed: 16750964]
  • Criswell LA, Such CL, Yelin EH. Differences in the use of second-line agents and prednisone for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists. Journal of Rheumatology. 1997;24(12):2283–2290. [PubMed: 9415629]
  • Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Myasoedova E, Michet CJ, Ernste FC, Warrington KJ, M. Davis J 3rd, Hunder GG, Therneau TM, Gabriel SE. The lifetime risk of adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2011;63(3):633–639. [PMC free article: PMC3078757] [PubMed: 21360492]
  • Cuchacovich R, Perez-Alamino R, Garcia-Valladares I, Espinoza LR. Steps in the management of psoriatic arthritis: A guide for clinicians. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease. 2012;3(6):259–269. [PMC free article: PMC3539260] [PubMed: 23342240]
  • D’Angelo S, Mennillo GA, Cutro MS, Leccese P, Nigro A, Padula A, Olivieri I. Sensitivity of the classification of psoriatic arthritis criteria in early psoriatic arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2009;36(2):368–370. [PubMed: 19208566]
  • de Carvalho RT, Braga FSFF, Brito F, Junior JC, Figueredo CM, Sztajnbok FR. Temporomandibular joint alterations and their orofacial repercussions in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia. 2012;52(6):907–911. [PubMed: 23223701]
  • de Hair MJH, Jacobs JWG, Schoneveld JLM, van Laar JM. Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: An area of unmet clinical need. Rheumatology (United Kingdom). 2018;57(7):1135–1144. [PubMed: 29029308]
  • DeWitt EM, Kimura Y, Beukelman T, Nigrovic PA, Onel K, Prahalad S, Schneider R, Stoll ML, Angeles-Han S, Milojevic D, Schikler KN, Vehe RK, Weiss JE, Weiss P, Ilowite NT, Wallace CA. Consensus treatment plans for new-onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2012;64(7):1001–1010. [PMC free article: PMC3368104] [PubMed: 22290637]
  • Dougados M, Nataf H, Steinberg G, Rouanet S, Falissard B. Relative importance of doctor-reported outcomes vs patient-reported outcomes in DMARD intensification for rheumatoid arthritis: The DUO study. Rheumatology (United Kingdom). 2013;52(2):391–399. [PubMed: 23104976]
  • Edwards CJ, Blanco FJ, Crowley J, Birbara CA, Jaworski J, Aelion J, Stevens RM, Vessey A, Zhan X, Bird P. Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with psoriatic arthritis and current skin involvement: A phase III, randomised, controlled trial (palace 3). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2016;75(6):1065–1073. [PMC free article: PMC4893110] [PubMed: 26792812]
  • Emery P, Blanco R, Maldonado Cocco J, Chen YC, Gaich CL, Delozier AM, de Bono S, Liu J, Rooney T, Chang CHC, Dougados M. Patient-reported outcomes from a phase III study of baricitinib in patients with conventional synthetic DMARD-refractory rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2017;3(1):e000410. [PMC free article: PMC5372156] [PubMed: 28405473]
  • Eriksson JK, Wallman JK, Miller H, Petersson IF, Ernestam S, Vivar N, van Vollenhoven RF, Neovius M. Infliximab versus conventional combination treatment and seven-year work loss in early rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a randomized Swedish trial. Arthritis Care & Research. 2016;68(12):1758–1766. [PMC free article: PMC6767553] [PubMed: 27015295]
  • Escalante A, Haas R, del Rincon I. A model of impairment and functional limitation in rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2005;6:16. [PMC free article: PMC555596] [PubMed: 15769287]
  • Espada G, Babini JC, Maldonado-Cocco J, García-Morteo O. Radiologic review: The cervical spine in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatology. 1988;17(3):185–195. [PubMed: 3072679]
  • Fair DC, Rodriguez M, Knight AM, Rubinstein TB. Depression and anxiety in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Current insights and impact on quality of life, a systematic review. Open Access Rheumatology: Research and Reviews. 2019;11:237–252. [PMC free article: PMC6830373] [PubMed: 31807093]
  • Feldman DE, Bernatsky S, Houde M, Beauchamp ME, Abrahamowicz M. Early consultation with a rheumatologist for RA: Does it reduce subsequent use of orthopaedic surgery? Rheumatology (United Kingdom). 2013;52(3):452–459. [PubMed: 22949726]
  • Felson DT, LaValley MP. The ACR20 and defining a threshold for response in rheumatic diseases: Too much of a good thing. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2014;16(1):101. [PMC free article: PMC3978644] [PubMed: 24387346]
  • Filipovic I, Walker D, Forster F, Curry AS. Quantifying the economic burden of productivity loss in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(6):1083–1090. [PubMed: 21245074]
  • Fleischmann R, van Adelsberg J, Lin Y, Castelar-Pinheiro GDR, Brzezicki J, Hrycaj P, Graham NMH, van Hoogstraten H, Bauer D, Burmester GR. Sarilumab and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2017;69(2):277–290. [PMC free article: PMC6207906] [PubMed: 27860410]
  • Foeldvari I, Klotsche J, Simonini G, Edelsten C, Angeles-Han ST, Bangsgaard R, De Boer J, Brumm G, Torrent RB, Constantin T, Delibero C, Diaz J, Gerloni VM, Guedes M, Heiligenhaus A, Kotaniemi K, Leinonen S, Minden K, Miranda V, Miserocchi E, Nielsen S, Niewerth M, Pontikaki I, De Vicuna CG, Zilhao C, Yeh S, Anton J, Calzada J. Proposal for a definition for response to treatment, inactive disease and damage for JIA associated uveitis based on the validation of a uveitis related JIA outcome measures from the Multinational Interdisciplinary Working Group for Uveitis in Childhood (MIWGUC). Pediatric Rheumatology. 2019;17(1):66. [PMC free article: PMC6774210] [PubMed: 31575380]
  • Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, Clair EWSt, Arayssi T, Carandang K, Deane KD, Genovese M, Huston KK, Kerr G, Kremer J, Nakamura MC, Russell LA, Singh JA, Smith BJ, Sparks JA, Venkatachalam S, Weinblatt ME, Al-Gibbawi M, Baker JF, Barbour KE, Barton JL, Cappelli L, Chamseddine F, George M, Johnson SR, Kahale L, Karam BS, Khamis AM, Navarro-Millán I, Mirza R, Schwab P, Singh N, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Yaacoub S, Akl EA. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2021;73(7):1108–1123. [PubMed: 34101376]
  • Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz AJ, Rell-Bakalarska M, Martincova R, Fiore S, Rohane P, van Hoogstraten H, Garg A, Fan C, van Adelsberg J, Weinstein SP, Graham NMH, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Huizinga TWJ, van der Heijde D. Sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: Results of a phase III study. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2015;67(6):1424–1437. [PubMed: 25733246]
  • Genovese MC, Kremer J, Zamani O, Ludivico C, Krogulec M, Xie L, Beattie SD, Koch AE, Cardillo TE, Rooney TP, Macias WL, De Bono S, Schlichting DE, Smolen JS. Baricitinib in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(13):1243–1252. [PubMed: 27028914]
  • Genovese M, Westhovens R, Meuleners L, Van der Aa A, Harrison P, Tasset C, Kavanaugh A. Effect of filgotinib, a selective JAK 1 inhibitor, with and without methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Patient-reported outcomes. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2018;20(1):57. [PMC free article: PMC5865354] [PubMed: 29566740]
  • Gijon-Nogueron G, Ramos-Petersen L, Ortega-Avila A, Morales-Asencio J, Garcia-Mayor S. Effectiveness of foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis related to disability and pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research. 2018;27:3059–3069. [PubMed: 29922913]
  • Gladman DD. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2008. Journal of Rheumatology. 2010;37(2):446–447. [PubMed: 20147479]
  • Gladman DD, Shuckett R, Russell ML, Thorne JC, Schachter RK. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA)—An analysis of 220 patients. Quarterly Journal of Medicine. 1987;62(238):127–141. [PubMed: 3659255]
  • Gladman D, Fleischmann R, Coteur G, Woltering F, Mease PJ. Effect of certolizumab pegol on multiple facets of psoriatic arthritis as reported by patients: 24-week patient-reported outcome results of a phase III, multicenter study. Arthritis Care and Research. 2014;66(7):1085–1092. [PMC free article: PMC4171746] [PubMed: 24339179]
  • Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF, Behrens F, Blanco R, Kaszuba A, Kudlacz E, Wang C, Menon S, Hendrikx T, Kanik KS. Tofacitinib for psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(16):1525–1536. [PubMed: 29045207]
  • Glerup M, Rypdal V, Arnstad ED, Ekelund M, Peltoniemi S, Aalto K, Rygg M, Toftedal P, Nielsen S, Fasth A, Berntson L, Nordal E, Herlin T., and the Nordic Study Group of Pediatric Rheumatology. Long-term outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Eighteen years of follow-up in the population-based Nordic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Cohort. Arthritis Care & Research. 2020;72(4):507–516. [PubMed: 30762291]
  • Glinatsi D, Brahe C, Hetland M, Ørnbjerg L, Krabbe S, Baker JF, Boesen M, Rastiemadabadi Z, Morsel-Carlsen L, Røgind H, Hansen A, Nørregaard J, Jacobsen S, Terslev L, Huynh TK, Manilo N, Jensen DV, Møller JM, Krogh NS, Østergaard M. Association between MRI findings and patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission and at relapse. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. 2020;23:488–498. [PubMed: 31994328]
  • Gossec L, Smolen JS, Ramiro S, de Wit M, Cutolo M, Dougados M, Emery P, Landewé R, Oliver S, Aletaha D, Betteridge N, Braun J, Burmester G, Cañete JD, Damjanov N, FitzGerald O, Haglund E, Helliwell P, Kvien TK, Lories R, Luger T, Maccarone M, Marzo-Ortega H, McGonagle D, McInnes IB, Olivieri I, Pavelka K, Schett G, Sieper J, van den Bosch F, Veale DJ, Wollenhaupt J, Zink A, van der Heijde D. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2016;75(3):499–510. [PubMed: 26644232]
  • Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, De Wit M, McInnes I, Dougados M, Primdahl J, McGonagle DG, Aletaha D, Balanescu A, Balint PV, Bertheussen H, Boehncke WH, Burmester GR, Canete JD, Damjanov NS, Kragstrup TW, Kvien TK, Landewé RBM, Lories RJU, Marzo-Ortega H, Poddubnyy D, Rodrigues Manica SA, Schett G, Veale DJ, van den Bosch FE, van der Heijde D, Smolen JS. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2020;79(6):S700–S712. [PMC free article: PMC7286048] [PubMed: 32434812]
  • Graham DJ. Cox-2 inhibitors, other NSAIDs, and cardiovascular risk: The seduction of common sense. JAMA. 2006;296(13):1653–1656. [PubMed: 16968830]
  • Greenberg JD, Harrold LR, Bentley MJ, Kremer J, Reed G, Strand V. Evaluation of composite measures of treatment response without acute-phase reactants in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2009;48(6):686–690. [PMC free article: PMC2722796] [PubMed: 19395544]
  • Greer AE, Iversen MD. Measures of pediatric function and physical activity in arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2020;72(S10):499–521. [PubMed: 33091268]
  • Guzman J, Oen K, Huber AM, Duffy KW, Boire G, Shiff N, Berard RA, Levy DM, Stringer E, Scuccimarri R, Morishita K, Johnson N, Cabral DA, Rosenberg AM, Larché M, Dancey P, Petty RE, Laxer RM, Silverman E, Miettunen P, Chetaille AL, Haddad E, Houghton K, Spiegel L, Turvey SE, Schmeling H, Lang B, Ellsworth J, Ramsey SE, Bruns A, Roth J, Campillo S, Benseler S, Chédeville G, Schneider R, Tse SML, Bolaria R, Gross K, Feldman B, Feldman D, Cameron B, Jurencak R, Dorval J, LeBlanc C, St Cyr C, Gibbon M, Yeung RSM, Duffy CM, Tucker LB., the ReACCh-Out investigators. The risk and nature of flares in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Results from the ReACCh-Out cohort. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2016;75(6):1092–1098. [PubMed: 25985972]
  • Haddad A, Chandran V. Arthritis mutilans. Current Rheumatology Reports. 2013;15(4):321. [PubMed: 23430715]
  • Hagen KB, Byfuglien MG, Falzon L, Olsen SU, Smedslund G. Dietary interventions for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;2001(1):CD006400. [PubMed: 19160281]
  • Hanaoka B, Ithurburn M, Rigsbee C, Bridges SL Jr, Moellering DR, Gower B, Bamman M. Chronic inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis and mediators of skeletal muscle pathology and physical impairment: A review. Arthritis Care & Research. 2019;71:173–177. [PMC free article: PMC6353677] [PubMed: 30295435]
  • Harirforoosh S, Asghar W, Jamali F. Adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: An update of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and renal complications. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013;16(5):821–847. [PubMed: 24393558]
  • Heiligenhaus A, Minden K, Tappeiner C, Baus H, Bertram B, Deuter C, Foeldvari I, Föll D, Frosch M, Ganser G, Gaubitz M, Günther A, Heinz C, Horneff G, Huemer C, Kopp I, Lommatzsch C, Lutz T, Michels H, Neß T, Neudorf U, Pleyer U, Schneider M, Schulze-Koops H, Thurau S, Zierhut M, Lehmann HW. Update of the evidence based, interdisciplinary guideline for anti-inflammatory treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2019;49(1):43–55. [PubMed: 30595409]
  • Helliwell PS, Waxman R. Modification of the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2018;77(3):467–468. [PubMed: 28232318]
  • Helmick CG, Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Kwoh CK, Liang MH, Kremers HM, Mayes MD, Merkel PA, Pillemer SR, Reveille JD, Stone JH. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part I. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2008;58(1):15–25. [PubMed: 18163481]
  • Humphreys JH, Symmons DPM. Postpublication validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Where do we stand? Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2013;25(2):157–163. [PubMed: 23274519]
  • Hurd A, Beukelman T. Infectious complications in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Current Rheumatology Reports. 2013;15(5):327. [PubMed: 23529583]
  • Huscher D, Thiele K, Gromnica-Ihle E, Hein G, Demary W, Dreher R, Zink A, Buttgereit F. Dose-related patterns of glucocorticoid-induced side effects. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2009;68(7):1119–1124. [PubMed: 18684744]
  • Ishida M, Kuroiwa Y, Yoshida E, Sato M, Krupa D, Henry N, Ikeda K, Kaneko Y. Residual symptoms and disease burden among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission or low disease activity: A systematic literature review. Modern Rheumatology. 2018;28(5):789–799. [PubMed: 29251034]
  • Jansen JP, Buckley F, Dejonckheere F, Ogale S. Comparative efficacy of biologics as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs—A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):102. [PMC free article: PMC4101713] [PubMed: 24988902]
  • Jennings H, Hennessy K, Hendry GJ. The clinical effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids for arthritis of the lower limb in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review. Pediatric Rheumatology. 2014;12(1):23. [PMC free article: PMC4066295] [PubMed: 24959104]
  • Johnson TM, Michaud K, England BR. Measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Arthritis Care & Research. 2020;72(S10):4–26. [PubMed: 33091244]
  • Kamata M, Tada Y. Efficacy and safety of biologics for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and their impact on comorbidities: A literature review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(5):251–333. [PMC free article: PMC7084606] [PubMed: 32121574]
  • Katz P, Morris A, Yelin E. Prevalence and predictors of disability in valued life activities among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2006;65:763–769. [PMC free article: PMC1798183] [PubMed: 16249225]
  • Katz P, Morris A, Trupin L, Yazdany J, Yelin E. Use of accommodations for valued life activities: Prevalence and effects on disability scores. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2007;57(5):730–737. [PMC free article: PMC2875140] [PubMed: 17530671]
  • Kavanaugh A. Rheumatoid arthritis: Guidelines for RA therapy-avoiding hamartia. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2010;6(9):505–506. [PubMed: 20808307]
  • Kavanaugh A, Antoni C, Mease P, Gladman D, Yan S, Bala M, Zhou B, Dooley LT, Beutler A, Guzzo C, Krueger GG. Effect of infliximab therapy on employment, time lost from work, and productivity in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2006;33(11):2254–2259. [PubMed: 16960923]
  • Kavanaugh A, Firestein GS, Boyle D. Biomarkers in rheumatology: Promise and pitfalls. Future Rheumatology. 2008;3(4):303–305.
  • Kavanaugh A, Gladman D, Van Der Heijde D, Purcaru O, Mease P. Improvements in productivity at paid work and within the household, and increased participation in daily activities after 24 weeks of certolizumab pegol treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis: Results of a phase 3 double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2015;74(1):44–51. [PMC free article: PMC4283690] [PubMed: 24942382]
  • Kavanaugh A, Husni ME, Harrison DD, Kim L, Lo KH, Leu JH, Hsia EC. Safety and efficacy of intravenous golimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2017;69(11):2151–2161. [PMC free article: PMC5765449] [PubMed: 28805045]
  • Kearsley-Fleet L, Davies R, De Cock D, Watson KD, Lunt M, Buch MH, Isaacs JD, Hyrich KL., the BSRBR-RA Contributors Group. Biologic refractory disease in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2018;77(10):1405–1412. [PMC free article: PMC6161665] [PubMed: 29980575]
  • Kelley DS, Siegel D, Fedor DM, Adkins Y, Mackey BE. DHA supplementation decreases serum C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in hypertriglyceridemic men. Journal of Nutrition. 2009;139(3):495–501. [PMC free article: PMC2646223] [PubMed: 19158225]
  • Kerschbaumer A, Fenzl KH, Erlacher L, Aletaha D. An overview of psoriatic arthritis—Epidemiology, clinical features, pathophysiology and novel treatment targets. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. 2016;128(21–22):791–795. [PMC free article: PMC5104808] [PubMed: 27822746]
  • Keystone EC, Taylor PC, Tanaka Y, Gaich C, Delozier AM, Dudek A, Zamora JV, Cobos JAC, Rooney T, Bono SD, Arora V, Linetzky B, Weinblatt ME. Patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3 study of baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Secondary analyses from the RA-BEAM study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2017;76(11):1853–1861. [PMC free article: PMC5705852] [PubMed: 28798049]
  • Kilcher G, Hummel N, Didden EM, Egger M, Reichenbach S., the GetReal Work Package 4. Rheumatoid arthritis patients treated in trial and real world settings: Comparison of randomized trials with registries. Rheumatology (United Kingdom). 2018;57(2):354–369. [PubMed: 29149289]
  • Kimura Y, Schanberg LE, Tomlinson GA, Riordan ME, Dennos AC, Del Gaizo V, Murphy KL, Weiss PF, Natter MD, Feldman BM, Ringold S, the CARRA STOP-JIA investigators. R , Agbayani, Akoghlanian S, Anderson E, Andrew M, Baszis K, Becker M, Bell-Brunson H, Benham H, Benseler S, Beukelman T, Brunner H, Bryson A, Bukulmez H, Chalom E, Chang J, Charron N, Chauhan V, Chowdhury N, Cooper S, Davis T, Dean J, Dedeoglu F, Dempsey V, Dionizovik-Dimanovski M, Dowling J, Drew J, Evans K, Falcon M, Feldman B, Ferguson P, Ferreira B, Fleming C, Franco L, Goh I, Goldsmith D, Gottlieb B, Graham T, Griffin T, Guevara M, Hance M, Hay A, Hillyer S, Hollander M, Hsu J, Huber A, Hung C, Huttenlocher A, Imundo L, Inman C, Jaquith J, Jared S, Jennings K, Jerath R, Jones J, Jones S, Kahn P, Klein K, Klein-Gitelman M, Kingsbury D, Kramer S, Lapidus S, Linehan S, Malla B, Mason T, Martyniuk A, McCallum B, McConnell K, McCurdy D, McKibben K, Misajon E, Moahn S, Moore K, Muscal E, Nahal B, O’Neil K, Onel K, Parsons A, Phillippi K, Ponder L, Prahalad S, Rabinovich C, Ringold S, Riordan ME, Ritter M, Robinson A, Rosenkranz M, Rosolowski B, Ruth N, Schikler K, Sepulveda A, Smith C, Stapp H, Stewart K, Strelow J, Sumner J, Syed R, Taxter A, Terry M, Tesher M, Thatayatikom A, Vannoy L, Vehe R, von Scheven E, Wahezi D, Wang C, Watson M, Watts A, Weiss J, Weiss P, Wolverton A, Woo J, Zeft A, Zemel L, Zhu A, Adams A, Agbayani R, Akoghlanian S, Allenspach E, Ambler W, Anderson E, Ardoin S, Armendariz S, Balboni I, Balevic S, Ballenger L, Ballinger S, Balmuri N, Barbar-Smiley F, Basiaga M, Baszis K, Becker M, Bell-Brunson H, Benham H, Bernal W, Beukelman T, Bigley T, Binstadt B, Blakley M, Bohnsack J, Brown A, Brunner H, Buckley M, Bullock D, Cameron B, Canna S, Cannon L, Cartwright V, Cassidy E, Chalom E, Chang I, Chang J, Chauhan V, Chinn T, Chira P, Co D, Cooper A, Cooper J, Correll C, Cron R, Curiel-Duran L, Curry M, Dalrymple A, Davis A, Davis T, De Ranieri D, Dean J, Dedeoglu F, DeGuzman M, Dempsey V, DeSantis E, Dingle J, Dowling J, Drew J, Driest K, Du Q, Durkee D, Dvergsten J, Eberhard A, Eckert M, Edens C, Elder M, Fadrhonc S, Favier L, Feldman B, Fennell J, Ferguson P, Fields K, Fleming C, Fogel L, Fox E, Fuhlbrigge R, Fuller J, Gerstbacher D, Gillispie-Taylor M, Goh I, Gotte A, Gottlieb B, Graham T, Grevich S, Griffin T, Grom A, Guevara M, Guittar P, Guzman M, Hager M, Halyabar O, Hance M, Haro S, Harris J, Hausmann J, Hayward K, Heiart J, Henderson L, Henrickson M, Hersh A, Hiraki L, Hiskey M, Hobday P, Hoffart C, Holland M, Hollander M, Hong S, Horwitz M, Hsu J, Huber A, Huggins J, Hui-Yuen J, Huttenlocher A, Ibarra M, Inman C, Jackson H, Jackson S, James K, Janow G, Jaquith J, Jared S, Johnson N, Jones J, Jones K, Jones S, Joshi S, Justice C, Kaufman K, Khalsa U, Kienzle B, Kim S, Kimura Y, Kingsbury D, Kitcharoensakkul M, Klausmeier T, Klein K, Klein-Gitelman M, Kramer S, Kremer C, Lai J, Lang B, Lapidus S, Lasky A, Lawson E, Laxer R, Lee P, Lee P, Lee T, Lerman M, Levy D, Li S, Lieberman S, Lin C, Ling N, Lo M, Lovell D, Luca N, Malla B, Maller J, Mannion M, Martyniuk A, Mason T, McAllister K, McAllister L, McConnell K, McHale I, Meidan E, Mellins E, Miettunen P, Miller M, Mitchell M, Modica R, Moore K, Morgan Dewitt E, Moussa T, Mruk V, Muscal E, Nanda K, Nassi L, Nativ S, Neely J, Nelson B, Newhall L, Nigrovic P, Nolan B, Oberle E, Okeke O, Oliver M, O’Neil K, Onel K, Orandi A, Orlando M, Oz R, Pagano E, Paller A, Pan N, Patel J, Pepmueller P, Pooni R, Protopapas S, Puplava B, Quach J, Rabinovich C, Radhakrishna S, Ramsey S, Randell R, Reed A, Reed A, Reid H, Richmond A, Ringold S, Riordan M, Riskalla M, Ritter M, Rodriquez M, Rojas K, Rosenkranz M, Rubinstein T, Saad N, Sadun R, Sandborg C, Schanberg L, Schikler K, Schmeling H, Schmidt K, Schmitt E, Schneider R, Schulert G, Seay T, Seper C, Shalen J, Sheets R, Shenoi S, Shirley J, Silverman E, Sivaraman V, Smith C, Smith J, Smitherman E, Soep J, Son M, Spence S, Spiegel L, Spitznagle J, Stapp H, Steigerwald K, Stern S, Stevens A, Stevens B, Stevenson R, Stewart K, Stingl C, Stoll M, Stringer E, Sumner J, Sundel R, Sutter M, Syed R, Syed R, Taber S, Tanner T, Tarshish G, Tarvin S, Taylor J, Tesher M, Thatayatikom A, Thomas B, Ting T, Torok K, Toruner C, Tse S, Twilt M, Valcarcel T, Van Mater H, Vasquez N, Vehe R, Veiga K, Velez J, Volpe N, von Scheven E, Vora S, Wagner-Weiner L, Wahezi D, Walters H, Waterfield M, Watts A, Weiser P, Weiss J, Weiss P, White A, Woolnough L, Wright T, Yee M, Yeung R, Yomogida K, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Zhu A. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 10. Vol. 73. 2021. Optimizing the start time of biologics in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A comparative effectiveness study of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance consensus treatment plans; pp. 1898–1909. [PMC free article: PMC8518909] [PubMed: 34105312]
  • Kingsley GH, Kowalczyk A, Taylor H, Ibrahim F, Packham JC, McHugh NJ, Mulherin DM, Kitas GD, Chakravarty K, Tom BDM, O’Keeffe AG, Maddison PJ, Scott DL. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of methotrexate in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (United Kingdom). 2012;51(8):1368–1377. [PMC free article: PMC3397466] [PubMed: 22344575]
  • Klein A, Minden K, Hospach A, Foeldvari I, Weller-Heinemann F, Trauzeddel R, Huppertz H-I, Horneff G. Treat-to-target study for improved outcome in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2020;79(7):969–974. [PubMed: 32299797]
  • Leung YY, Tam LS, Ho KW, Lau WM, Li TK, Zhu TY, Kun EW, Li EK. Evaluation of the CASPAR criteria for psoriatic arthritis in the Chinese population. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2010;49(1):112–115. [PubMed: 19920096]
  • Liao KP. Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2017;27(2):136–140. [PMC free article: PMC5253086] [PubMed: 27612551]
  • Lovell DJ, Johnson AL, Huang B, Gottlieb BS, Morris PW, Kimura Y, Onel K, Li SC, Grom AA, Taylor J, Brunner HI, Huggins JL, Nocton JJ, Haines KA, Edelheit BS, Shishov M, Jung LK, Williams CB, Tesher MS, Costanzo DM, Zemel LS, Dare JA, Passo MH, Ede KC, Olson JC, Cassidy EA, Griffin TA, Wagner-Weiner L, Weiss JE, Vogler LB, Rouster-Stevens KA, Beukelman T, Cron RQ, Kietz D, Schikler K, Schmidt KM, Mehta J, Wahezi DM, Ting TV, Verbsky JW, Eberhard BA, Spalding S, Chen C, Giannini EH. Risk, timing, and predictors of disease flare after discontinuation of anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in children with polyarticular forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis with clinically inactive disease. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2018;70(9):1508–1518. [PMC free article: PMC6115300] [PubMed: 29604189]
  • Mannion ML, Xie F, Horton DB, Ringold S, Correll CK, Dennos A, Beukelman T. Biologic switching among nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients: A cohort study in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance registry. Journal of Rheumatology. 2021;48(8):1322–1329. [PubMed: 32934124]
  • Mease PJ. Apremilast: A phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology and Therapy. 2014;1(1):1–20. [PMC free article: PMC4883260] [PubMed: 27747762]
  • Mease PJ, Antoni CE, Gladman DD, Taylor WJ. Psoriatic arthritis assessment tools in clinical trials. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii49–ii54. [PMC free article: PMC1766888] [PubMed: 15708937]
  • Mease PJ, Karki C, Palmer JB, Etzel CJ, Kavanaugh A, Ritchlin CT, Malley W, Herrera V, Tran M, Greenberg JD. Clinical characteristics, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis patients with dactylitis or enthesitis: Results from the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis Registry. Arthritis Care & Research. 2017a;69(11):1692–1699. [PubMed: 28376239]
  • Mease PJ, Karki C, Palmer JB, Etzel CJ, Kavanaugh A, Ritchlin CT, Malley W, Herrera V, Tran M, Greenberg JD. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by body surface area affected by psoriasis: Results from the Corrona PsA/Spondyloarthritis Registry. Journal of Rheumatology. 2017b;44(8):1151–1158. [PubMed: 28620063]
  • Mease PJ, Van Der Heijde D, Ritchlin CT, Okada M, Cuchacovich RS, Shuler CL, Lin CY, Braun DK, Lee CH, Gladman DD. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: Results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase III trial SPIRIT-P1. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2017c;76(1):79–87. [PMC free article: PMC5264219] [PubMed: 27553214]
  • Merola JF, Elewski B, Tatulych S, Lan S, Tallman A, Kaur M. Efficacy of tofacitinib for the treatment of nail psoriasis: Two 52-week, randomized, controlled phase 3 studies in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2017;77(1):79–87.e71. [PubMed: 28396102]
  • Mertelsmann-Voss C, Lyman S, Pan TJ, Goodman SM, Figgie MP, Mandl LA. U.S. trends in rates of arthroplasty for inflammatory arthritis including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and spondyloarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2014;66(6):1432–1439. [PMC free article: PMC10202131] [PubMed: 24591462]
  • Minden K, Niewerth M, Listing J, Biedermann T, Schöntube M, Zink A. Burden and cost of illness in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2004;63(7):836–842. [PMC free article: PMC1755057] [PubMed: 15194580]
  • Minoia F, Davì S, Horne A, Demirkaya E, Bovis F, Li C, Lehmberg K, Weitzman S, Insalaco A, Wouters C, Shenoi S, Espada G, Ozen S, Anton J, Khubchandani R, Russo R, Pal P, Kasapcopur O, Miettunen P, Maritsi D, Merino R, Shakoory B, Alessio M, Chasnyk V, Sanner H, Gao YJ, Huasong Z, Kitoh T, Avcin T, Fischbach M, Frosch M, Grom A, Huber A, Jelusic M, Sawhney S, Uziel Y, Ruperto N, Martini A, Cron RQ, Ravelli A. Clinical features, treatment, and outcome of macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A multinational, multicenter study of 362 patients. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2014;66(11):3160–3169. [PubMed: 25077692]
  • Moll JMH, Wright V. Psoriatic arthritis. Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatology. 1973;3(1):55–78. [PubMed: 4581554]
  • Nam JL, Takase-Minegishi K, Ramiro S, Chatzidionysiou K, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Bijlsma JW, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Scholte-Voshaar M, van Vollenhoven R, Landewé R. Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2017;76(6):1113–1136. [PubMed: 28283512]
  • Nash P, Nayiager S, Genovese MC, Kivitz AJ, Oelke K, Ludivico C, Palmer W, Rodriguez C, Delaet I, Elegbe A, Corbo M. Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of abatacept administered subcutaneously with or without background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a phase III, international, multicenter, parallel-arm, open-label study. Arthritis Care & Research. 2013;65(5):718–728. [PubMed: 23097311]
  • Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, Rahman P, Combe B, Burmester GR, Adams DH, Kerr L, Lee C, Shuler CL, Genovese M, the SPIRIT-P2 Study Group. Ahmed K, Alper J, Barkham N, Bennett RE, García FJB, Alonso RB, Blumstein HB, Brooks MS, Burmester GR, Cagnoli P, Caldron PH, Cantagrel A, Chen DY, Churchill MA Jr, Codding CE, Combe B, Deane PMG, Del Giudice J, Deodhar AA, Dhar RK, Dokoupilova E, Egan RM, Everding A, Galíndez E, Genovese M, Goddard DH, Gottlieb A, Goupille P, Griffin RM, Gupta RC, Hall S, Hatti K, Howell MP, Huang YH, Jajoo R, Janssen NM, Kiltz U, Kivitz AJ, Klein SJ, Korkosz MP, Kotha R, Kremer JM, Lue C, de la Fuente JLM, Marzo-Ortega H, Masmitja JG, Mease PJ, Meroni PL, Mueller EC, Nandagudi AC, Nash P, Fernández-Nebro A, Neuwelt CM, Orbai AM, Oza MR, Parks DL, Pattanaik D, Rell-Bakalarska ME, Rosmarin D, Roussou E, Rychlewska-Hanczewksa AI, Sikes DH, Stack MT, Sunkureddi P, Tahir H, Thaçi D, Tsai TF, Turkiewicz AM, Unger L, Cabello RV, Wagner U, Wei CC, Wells AF, Youssef P, Zielinska A. The Lancet. 10086. Vol. 389. 2017. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: Results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial; pp. 2317–2327. [PubMed: 28551073]
  • NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). Rheumatoid arthritis in adults: Management. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2018.
  • Nell VPK, Machold KP, Eberl G, Stamm TA, Uffmann M, Smolen JS. Benefit of very early referral and very early therapy with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2004;43(7):906–914. [PubMed: 15113999]
  • Nigrovic PA. The systemic-onset variant of juvenile idiopathic arthritis needs to be recorded as an autoinflammatory syndrome: Comment on the review by Nigrovic: Reply. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2014;66(9):2645–2646. [PubMed: 24839178]
  • Norton S, Fu B, Scott DL, Deighton C, Symmons DP, Wailoo AJ, Tosh J, Lunt M, Davies R, Young A, Verstappen SM. Health Assessment Questionnaire disability progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic review and analysis of two inception cohorts. Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2014;44(2):131–144. [PMC free article: PMC4282305] [PubMed: 24925692]
  • Ogdie A, Weiss P. The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 2015;41(4):545–568. [PMC free article: PMC4610151] [PubMed: 26476218]
  • Ogdie A, Coates LC, Mease P. Measuring outcomes in psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2020;72(S10):82–109. [PMC free article: PMC8528225] [PubMed: 33091263]
  • Onel K, Rumsey DG, Shenoi S. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatment updates. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 2021;47(4):545–563. [PubMed: 34635291]
  • Ong MS, Ringold S, Kimura Y, Schanberg LE, Tomlinson GA, Natter MD, the CARRA Registry investigators (Abel N, Abulaban K, Adams A, Adams M, Agbayani R, Aiello J, Akoghlanian S, Alejandro C, Allenspach E, Alperin R, Alpizar M, Amarilyo G, Ambler W, Anderson E, Ardoin S, Armendariz S, Baker E, Balboni I, Balevic S, Ballenger L, Ballinger S, Balmuri N, Barbar-Smiley F, Barillas-Arias L, Basiaga M, Baszis K, Becker M, Bell-Brunson H, Beltz E, Benham H, Benseler S, Bernal W, Beukelman T, Bigley T, Binstadt B, Black C, Blakley M, Bohnsack J, Boland J, Boneparth A, Bowman S, Bracaglia C, Brooks E, Brothers M, Brown A, Brunner H, Buckley M, Buckley M, Bukulmez H, Bullock D, Cameron B, Canna S, Cannon L, Carper P, Cartwright V, Cassidy E, Cerracchio L, Chalom E, Chang J, Chang-Hoftman A, Chauhan V, Chira P, Chinn T, Chundru K, Clairman H, Co D, Confair A, Conlon H, Connor R, Cooper A, Cooper J, Cooper S, Correll C, Corvalan R, Costanzo D, Cron R, Curiel-Duran L, Curington T, Curry M, Dalrymple A, Davis A, Davis C, Davis C, Davis T, De Benedetti F, De Ranieri D, Dean J, Dedeoglu F, DeGuzman M, Delnay N, Dempsey V, DeSantis E, Dickson T, Dingle J, Donaldson B, Dorsey E, Dover S, Dowling J, Drew J, Driest K, Du Q, Duarte K, Durkee D, Duverger E, Dvergsten J, Eberhard A, Eckert M, Ede K, Edelheit B, Edens C, Edens C, Edgerly Y, Elder M, Ervin B, Fadrhonc S, Failing C, Fair D, Falcon M, Favier L, Federici S, Feldman B, Fennell J, Ferguson I, Ferguson P, Ferreira B, Ferrucho R, Fields K, Finkel T, Fitzgerald M, Fleming C, Flynn O, Fogel L, Fox E, Fox M, Franco L, Freeman M, Fritz K, Froese S, Fuhlbrigge R, Fuller J, George N, Gerhold K, Gerstbacher D, Gilbert M, Gillispie-Taylor M, Giverc E, Godiwala C, Goh I, Goheer H, Goldsmith D, Gotschlich E, Gotte A, Gottlieb B, Gracia C, Graham T, Grevich S, Griffin T, Griswold J, Grom A, Guevara M, Guittar P, Guzman M, Hager M, Hahn T, Halyabar O, Hammelev E, Hance M, Hanson A, Harel L, Haro S, Harris J, Harry O, Hartigan E, Hausmann J, Hay A, Hayward K, Heiart J, Hekl K, Henderson L, Henrickson M, Hersh A, Hickey K, Hill P, Hillyer S, Hiraki L, Hiskey M, Hobday P, Hoffart C, Holland M, Hollander M, Hong S, Horwitz M, Hsu J, Huber A, Huggins J, Hui-Yuen J, Hung C, Huntington J, Huttenlocher A, Ibarra M, Imundo L, Inman C, Insalaco A, Jackson A, Jackson S, James K, Janow G, Jaquith J, Jared S, Johnson N, Jones J, Jones J, Jones J, Jones K, Jones S, Joshi S, Jung L, Justice C, Justiniano A, Karan N, Kaufman K, Kemp A, Kessler E, Khalsa U, Kienzle B, Kim S, Kimura Y, Kingsbury D, Kitcharoensakkul M, Klausmeier T, Klein K, Klein-Gitelman M, Kompelien B, Kosikowski A, Kovalick L, Kracker J, Kramer S, Kremer C, Lai J, Lam J, Lang B, Lapidus S, Lapin B, Lasky A, Latham D, Lawson E, Laxer R, Lee P, Lee P, Lee T, Lentini L, Lerman M, Levy D, Li S, Lieberman S, Lim L, Lin C, Ling N, Lingis M, Lo M, Lovell D, Lowman D, Luca N, Lvovich S, Madison C, Madison J, Magni Manzoni S, Malla B, Maller J, Malloy M, Mannion M, Manos C, Marques L, Martyniuk A, Mason T, Mathus S, McAllister L, McCarthy K, McConnell K, McCormick E, McCurdy D, McCurdy Stokes P, McGuire S, McHale I, McMonagle A, McMullen-Jackson C, Meidan E, Mellins E, Mendoza E, Mercado R, Merritt A, Michalowski L, Miettunen P, Miller M, Milojevic D, Mirizio E, Misajon E, Mitchell M, Modica R, Mohan S, Moore K, Moorthy L, Morgan S, Morgan Dewitt E, Moss C, Moussa T, Mruk V, Murphy A, Muscal E, Nadler R, Nahal B, Nanda K, Nasah N, Nassi L, Nativ S, Natter M, Neely J, Nelson B, Newhall L, Ng L, Nicholas J, Nicolai R, Nigrovic P, Nocton J, Nolan B, Oberle E, Obispo B, O’Brien B, O’Brien T, Okeke O, Oliver M, Olson J, O’Neil K, Onel K, Orandi A, Orlando M, Osei-Onomah S, Oz R, Pagano E, Paller A, Pan N, Panupattanapong S, Pardeo M, Paredes J, Parsons A, Patel J, Pentakota K, Pepmueller P, Pfeiffer T, Phillippi K, Pires Marafon D, Phillippi K, Ponder L, Pooni R, Prahalad S, Pratt S, Protopapas S, Puplava B, Quach J, Quinlan-Waters M, Rabinovich C, Radhakrishna S, Rafko J, Raisian J, Rakestraw A, Ramirez C, Ramsay E, Ramsey S, Randell R, Reed A, Reed A, Reed A, Reid H, Remmel K, Repp A, Reyes A, Richmond A, Riebschleger M, Ringold S, Riordan M, Riskalla M, Ritter M, Rivas-Chacon R, Robinson A, Rodela E, Rodriquez M, Rojas K, Ronis T, Rosenkranz M, Rosolowski B, Rothermel H, Rothman D, Roth-Wojcicki E, Rouster-Stevens K, Rubinstein T, Ruth N, Saad N, Sabbagh S, Sacco E, Sadun R, Sandborg C, Sanni A, Santiago L, Sarkissian A, Savani S, Scalzi L, Schanberg L, Scharnhorst S, Schikler K, Schlefman A, Schmeling H, Schmidt K, Schmitt E, Schneider R, SchollaertFitch K, Schulert G, Seay T, Seper C, Shalen J, Sheets R, Shelly A, Shenoi S, Shergill K, Shirley J, Shishov M, Shivers C, Silverman E, Singer N, Sivaraman V, Sletten J, Smith A, Smith C, Smith J, Smith J, Smitherman E, Soep J, Son M, Spence S, Spiegel L, Spitznagle J, Sran R, Srinivasalu H, Stapp H, Steigerwald K, Sterba Rakovchik Y, Stern S, Stevens A, Stevens B, Stevenson R, Stewart K, Stingl C, Stokes J, Stoll M, Stringer E, Sule S, Sumner J, Sundel R, Sutter M, Syed R, Syverson G, Szymanski A, Taber S, Tal R, Tambralli A, Taneja A, Tanner T, Tapani S, Tarshish G, Tarvin S, Tate L, Taxter A, Taylor J, Terry M, Tesher M, Thatayatikom A, Thomas B, Tiffany K, Ting T, Tipp A, Toib D, Torok K, Toruner C, Tory H, Toth M, Tse S, Tubwell V, Twilt M, Uriguen S, Valcarcel T, Van Mater H, Vannoy L, Varghese C, Vasquez N, Vazzana K, Vehe R, Veiga K, Velez J, Verbsky J, Vilar G, Volpe N, Vora S, Wagner J, Wagner-Weiner L, Wahezi D, Waite H, Walker J, Walters H, Wampler Muskardin T, Waqar L, Waterfield M, Watson M, Watts A, Weiser P, Weiss J, Weiss P, Wershba E, White A, Williams C, Wise A, Woo J, Woolnough L, Wright T, Wu E, Yalcindag A, Yee M, Yen E, Yeung R, Yomogida K, Yu Q, Zapata R, Zartoshti A, Zeft A, Zeft R, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Zhu A, Zic C. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 10. Vol. 73. 2021. Improved disease course associated with early initiation of biologics in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Trajectory analysis of a Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance consensus treatment plans study; pp. 1910–1920. [PubMed: 34105303]
  • Osterhaus JT, Purcaru O. Discriminant validity, responsiveness and reliability of the arthritis-specific Work Productivity Survey assessing workplace and household productivity in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2014;16(4):R140. [PMC free article: PMC4226958] [PubMed: 24996416]
  • Petty RE. Growing pains: The ILAR classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2001;28(5):927–928. [PubMed: 11361216]
  • Piva S, Almeida G, Wasko MCM. Association of physical function and physical activity in women with rheumatoid athritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2010;62:1144–1151. [PMC free article: PMC2921032] [PubMed: 20235187]
  • Quartier P. Tocilizumab in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. The Lancet Rheumatology. 2020;2(3):e122–e123. [PMC free article: PMC7134526] [PubMed: 32280950]
  • Rahman P, Puig L, Gottlieb AB, Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Ritchlin C, Li S, Wang Y, Song M, Mendelsohn A, Han C., the PSUMMIT 1 and 2 Study Groups. Ustekinumab treatment and improvement of physical function and health-related quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2016;68(12):1812–1822. [PMC free article: PMC5132036] [PubMed: 27483458]
  • Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, Nam JL, Smolen JS, Buch M, Gossec L, Van Der Heijde D, Winthrop K, Landewé R. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: A systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014;73(3):529–535. [PubMed: 24401994]
  • Rat AC, Boissier MC. Rheumatoid arthritis: Direct and indirect costs. Joint Bone Spine. 2004;71(6):518–524. [PubMed: 15589432]
  • Ravelli A, Consolaro A, Horneff G, Laxer RM, Lovell DJ, Wulffraat NM, Akikusa JD, Al-Mayouf SM, Antón J, Avcin T, Berard RA, Beresford MW, Burgos-Vargas R, Cimaz R, De Benedetti F, Demirkaya E, Foell D, Itoh Y, Lahdenne P, Morgan EM, Quartier P, Ruperto N, Russo R, Saad-Magalhães C, Sawhney S, Scott C, Shenoi S, Swart JF, Uziel Y, Vastert SJ, Smolen JS. Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: Recommendations of an international task force. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2018;77(6):819–828. [PubMed: 29643108]
  • Raychaudhuri SP, Wilken R, Sukhov AC, Raychaudhuri SK, Maverakis E. Management of psoriatic arthritis: Early diagnosis, monitoring of disease severity and cutting edge therapies. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2017;76:21–37. [PubMed: 27836567]
  • Revicki D, Ganguli A, Kimel M, Roy S, Chen N, Safikhani S, Cifaldi M. Reliability and validity of the Work Instability Scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Value Health. 2015;18(8):1008–1015. [PubMed: 26686785]
  • Rigby W, Ferraccioli G, Greenwald M, Zazueta-Montiel B, Fleischmann R, Wassenberg S, Ogale S, Armstrong G, Jahreis A, Burke L, Mela C, Chen A. Effect of rituximab on physical function and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis previously untreated with methotrexate. Arthritis Care & Research. 2011;63(5):711–720. [PubMed: 21557525]
  • Rindfleisch JA, Muller D. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. American Family Physician. 2005;72(6):1037–1047. [PubMed: 16190501]
  • Ringold S, Weiss PF, Colbert RA, Dewitt EM, Lee T, Onel K, Prahalad S, Schneider R, Shenoi S, Vehe RK, Kimura Y. Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance consensus treatment plans for new-onset polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2014;66(7):1063–1072. [PMC free article: PMC4467832] [PubMed: 24339215]
  • Ringold S, Angeles-Han ST, Beukelman T, Lovell D, Cuello CA, Becker ML, Colbert RA, Feldman BM, Ferguson PJ, Gewanter H, Guzman J, Horonjeff J, Nigrovic PA, Ombrello MJ, Passo MH, Stoll ML, Rabinovich CE, Schneider R, Halyabar O, Hays K, Shah AA, Sullivan N, Szymanski AM, Turgunbaev M, Turner A, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Therapeutic approaches for non-systemic polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, and enthesitis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2019;71(6):846–863. [PMC free article: PMC6561114] [PubMed: 31021537]
  • Ritchlin C, Rahman P, Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Puig L, Li S, Wang Y, Shen YK, Doyle MK, Mendelsohn AM, Gottlieb AB., the PSUMMIT 2 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, ustekinumab, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis despite conventional non-biological and biological anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: 6-month and 1-year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised PSUMMIT 2 trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014;73(6):990–999. [PMC free article: PMC4033144] [PubMed: 24482301]
  • Roodenrijs NMT, de Hair MJH, van der Goes MC, Jacobs JWG, Welsing PMJ, van der Heijde D, Aletaha D, Dougados M, Hyrich KL, McInnes IB, Mueller-Ladner U, Senolt L, Szekanecz Z, van Laar JM, Nagy G. Characteristics of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: Results of an international survey. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2018;77(12):1705–1709. [PubMed: 30194273]
  • Rosenberg AM. Do we need a new classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis? Clinical Immunology. 2020;211:108298. [PubMed: 31706029]
  • Roubenoff R, Roubenoff R, Ward L, Holland S, Hellman D. Rheumatoid cachexia: Depletion of lean body mass in rheumatoid arthritis. Possible association with tumor necrosis factor. Journal of Rheumatology. 1992;19:1505–1510. [PubMed: 1464859]
  • Ruddy JA, Connolly CM, Boyarsky BJ, Werbel WA, Christopher-Stine L, Garonzik-Wang J, Segev DL, Paik JJ. High antibody response to two-dose SARSCoV-2 messenger RNA vaccination in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2021;80(10):1351–1352. [PMC free article: PMC8843949] [PubMed: 34031032]
  • Saag KG, Cowdery JS. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Balancing benefits and risks. Spine. 1994;19(13):1530–1534. [PubMed: 7939988]
  • Saper VE, Chen G, Deutsch GH, Guillerman RP, Birgmeier J, Jagadeesh K, Canna S, Schulert G, Deterding R, Xu J, Leung AN, Bouzoubaa L, Abulaban K, Baszis K, Behrens EM, Birmingham J, Casey A, Cidon M, Cron RQ, De A, De Benedetti F, Ferguson I, Fishman MP, Goodman SI, Graham TB, Grom AA, Haines K, Hazen M, Henderson LA, Ho A, Ibarra M, Inman CJ, Jerath R, Khawaja K, Kingsbury DJ, Klein-Gitelman M, Lai K, Lapidus S, Lin C, Lin J, Liptzin DR, Milojevic D, Mombourquette J, Onel K, Ozen S, Perez M, Phillippi K, Prahalad S, Radhakrishna S, Reinhardt A, Riskalla M, Rosenwasser N, Roth J, Schneider R, Schonenberg-Meinema D, Shenoi S, Smith JA, Sönmez HE, Stoll ML, Towe C, Vargas SO, Vehe RK, Young LR, Yang J, Desai T, Balise R, Lu Y, Tian L, Bejerano G, Davis MM, Khatri P, Mellins ED., the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry investigators. systemic juvenile arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 12. Vol. 78. 2019. Emergent high fatality lung disease in; pp. 1722–1731. [PMC free article: PMC7065839] [PubMed: 31562126]
  • Saper VE, Ombrello MJ, Tremoulet AH., the INCHARGE Consortium. Severe delayed hypersensitivity reactions to IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors link to common HLA-DRB1*15 alleles. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2022;81(3):406–415. [PMC free article: PMC10564446] [PubMed: 34789453]
  • Schlichtiger J, Haas JP, Barth S, Bisdorff B, Hager L, Michels H, Hügle B, Radon K. Education and employment in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis—A standardized comparison to the German general population. Pediatric Rheumatology. 2017;15(1):45. [PMC free article: PMC5440947] [PubMed: 28532479]
  • Schoels MM, Aletaha D, Alasti F, Smolen JS. Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA): Defining remission and treatment success using the DAPSA score. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2016;75(5):811–818. [PubMed: 26269398]
  • Schoels MM, Landesmann U, Alasti F, Baker D, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Early response to therapy predicts 6-month and 1-year disease activity outcomes in psoriatic arthritis patients. Rheumatology (United Kingdom). 2018;57(6):969–976. [PubMed: 29481661]
  • Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TWJ. Rheumatoid arthritis. The Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1094–1108. [PubMed: 20870100]
  • Simonini G, Ferrara G, Pontikaki I, Scoccimarro E, Giani T, Taddio A, Meroni PL, Cimaz R. Flares after withdrawal of biologic therapies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Clinical and laboratory correlates of remission duration. Arthritis Care & Research. 2018;70(7):1046–1051. [PubMed: 28973842]
  • Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Vaysbrot E, McNaughton C, Osani M, Shmerling RH, Curtis JR, Furst DE, Parks D, Kavanaugh A, O’Dell J, King C, Leong A, Matteson EL, Schousboe JT, Drevlow B, Ginsberg S, Grober J, Clair EWSt, Tindall E, Miller AS, McAlindon T. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2016;68(1):1–25. [PubMed: 26545825]
  • Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A, Gladman DD, Deal C, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Dunham J, Husni ME, Kenny S, Kwan-Morley J, Lin J, Marchetta P, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Miner J, Ritchlin CT, Siaton B, Smith BJ, Van Voorhees AS, Jonsson AH, Shah AA, Sullivan N, Turgunbaev M, Coates LC, Gottlieb A, Magrey M, Nowell WB, Orbai AM, Reddy SM, Scher JU, Siegel E, Siegel M, Walsh JA, Turner AS, Reston J. Special article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2019;71(1):5–32. [PMC free article: PMC8218333] [PubMed: 30499246]
  • Smedslund G, Byfuglien MG, Olsen SU, Hagen KB. Effectiveness and safety of dietary interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2010;110(5):727–735. [PubMed: 20430134]
  • Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compán MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Östör A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2016;75(1):3–15. [PMC free article: PMC4717393] [PubMed: 25969430]
  • Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A, McInnes IB, Sepriano A, van Vollenhoven RF, de Wit M, Aletaha D, Aringer M, Askling J, Balsa A, Boers M, den Broeder AA, Buch MH, Buttgereit F, Caporali R, Cardiel MH, De Cock D, Codreanu C, Cutolo M, Edwards CJ, van Eijk-Hustings Y, Emery P, Finckh A, Gossec L, Gottenberg JE, Hetland ML, Huizinga TWJ, Koloumas M, Li Z, Mariette X, Müller-Ladner U, Mysler EF, da Silva JAP, Poór G, Pope JE, Rubbert-Roth A, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Saag KG, Strangfeld A, Takeuchi T, Voshaar M, Westhovens R, van der Heijde D. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2020;79(6):S685–S699. [PubMed: 31969328]
  • Sokka T, Pincus T. Markers for work disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2001;28(7):1718–1722. [PubMed: 11469487]
  • Sostres C, Gargallo CJ, Arroyo MT, Lanas A. Adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, aspirin and coxibs) on upper gastrointestinal tract. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology. 2010;24(2):121–132. [PubMed: 20227026]
  • Stoll ML, Zurakowski D, Nigrovic LE, Nichols DP, Sundel RP, Nigrovic PA. Patients with juvenile psoriatic arthritis comprise two distinct populations. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2006;54(11):3564–3572. [PubMed: 17075862]
  • Stolt M, Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H. Foot health in patients with rheumatold arthritis—A scoping review. Rheumatology International. 2017;37:1413–1422. [PubMed: 28324133]
  • Strand V, Burmester GR, Zerbini CAF, Mebus CA, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, Wallenstein GV. Tofacitinib with methotrexate in third-line treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Patient-reported outcomes from a phase III trial. Arthritis Care & Research. 2015a;67(4):475–483. [PubMed: 25186034]
  • Strand V, Kremer J, Wallenstein G, Kanik KS, Connell C, Gruben D, Zwillich SH, Fleischmann R. Effects of tofacitinib monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes in a randomized phase 3 study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate responses to DMARDs. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2015b;17(1):307. [PMC free article: PMC4632359] [PubMed: 26530039]
  • Strand V, Lee EB, Fleischmann R, Alten RE, Koncz T, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, Wilkinson B, Krishnaswami S, Wallenstein G. Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: Patient-reported outcomes from the randomised phase III ORAL Start trial. RMD Open. 2016;2(2):e000308. [PMC free article: PMC5051508] [PubMed: 27752357]
  • Strand V, Gossec L, Proudfoot CWJ, Chen CI, Reaney M, Guillonneau S, Kimura T, van Adelsberg J, Lin Y, Mangan EK, van Hoogstraten H, Burmester GR. Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2018;20(1):129. [PMC free article: PMC6009058] [PubMed: 29921318]
  • Takeuchi H, Fathi A, Thiyanavadivel S, Agid O, Remington G. Can aripiprazole worsen psychosis in schizophrenia? A meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2018;79(2):17r11489. [PubMed: 29570965]
  • Taylor PC, Moore A, Vasilescu R, Alvir J, Tarallo M. A structured literature review of the burden of illness and unmet needs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A current perspective. Rheumatology International. 2016;36(5):685–695. [PMC free article: PMC4839053] [PubMed: 26746843]
  • Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: Development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2006;54(8):2665–2673. [PubMed: 16871531]
  • Tehlirian CV, Bathon JM. Rheumatoid arthritis. In. In: Klippel JH, Stone JH, Crofford LJ, White PH, editors. Primer on the rheumatic diseases. 13th ed. New York: Springer New York; 2008. pp. 114–121.
  • ter Haar NM, van Dijkhuizen EHP, Swart JF, van Royen-Kerkhof A, el Idrissi A, Leek AP, de Jager W, de Groot MCH, Haitjema S, Holzinger D, Foell D, van Loosdregt J, Wulffraat NM, de Roock S, Vastert SJ. Treatment to target using recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist as first-line monotherapy in new-onset systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Results from a five-year follow-up study. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2019;71(7):1163–1173. [PMC free article: PMC6617757] [PubMed: 30848528]
  • Tibaldi J, Pistorio A, Aldera E, Puzone L, El Miedany Y, Pal P, Giri PP, De H, Khubchandani R, Chavan PP, Vilaiyuk S, Lerkvaleekul B, Yamsuwan J, Sabui TK, Datta P, Pardeo M, Bracaglia C, Sawhney S, Mittal S, Hassan WA, Elderiny GF, Abu-Zaid MH, Eissa M, Sztajnbok F, das Neves Sztajnbok FC, Russo R, Katsicas MM, Cimaz R, Marrani E, Alexeeva E, Dvoryakovskaya TM, Alsuweiti MO, Alzyoud RM, Kostik M, Chikova I, Minoia F, Filocamo G, Farag Y, Lotfy H, Nasef SI, Al-Mayouf SM, Maggio MC, Magalhaes CS, Gallizzi R, Conti G, Shimizu M, Civino A, Felici E, Giancane G, Ruperto N, Consolaro A, Ravelli A. Development and initial validation of a composite disease activity score for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (United Kingdom). 2020;59(11):3505–3514. [PubMed: 32829413]
  • Trincianti C, Consolaro A. Outcome measures for juvenile idiopathic arthritis disease activity. Arthritis Care & Research. 2020;72(S10):150–162. [PubMed: 33091249]
  • Tucker LJ, Coates LC, Helliwell PS. Assessing disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: A literature review. Rheumatology and Therapy. 2019;6(1):23–32. [PMC free article: PMC6393266] [PubMed: 30471015]
  • Uhlig T, Moe R, Kvien T. The burden of disease in rheumatoid arthritis. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32:841–851. [PubMed: 24859304]
  • Ureyen SB, Ivory C, Kalyoncu U, Karsh J, Aydin SZ. What does evidence-based medicine tell us about treatments for different subtypes of psoriatic arthritis? A systematic literature review on randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology Advances in Practice. 2018;2(1):1–15. [PMC free article: PMC6649907] [PubMed: 31431950]
  • van den Berg R, Van Gaalen F, van der Helm-van Mil A, Huizinga T, van der Heijde D. Performance of classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis in the Leiden Early Arthritis cohort. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2012;71(8):1366–1369. [PubMed: 22504563]
  • van der Linden MPM, Boja R, Klarenbeek NB, Huizinga TWJ, van der Heijde DM, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Repair of joint erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: Prevalence and patient characteristics in a large inception cohort. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010;69(4):727–729. [PubMed: 19454405]
  • Verstappen S, Bijlsma J, Verkleij H, Buskens E, Blaauw AAM, ter Borg EJ, Jacobs JWG., the Utrecht Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort Study Group. Overview of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients as observed in cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2004;51:488–497. [PubMed: 15188338]
  • Viola S, Felici E, Magni-Manzoni S, Pistorio A, Buoncompagni A, Ruperto N, Rossi F, Bartoli M, Martini A, Ravelli A. Development and validation of a clinical index for assessment of long-term damage in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2005;52(7):2092–2102. [PubMed: 15986372]
  • Wallace CA, Ruperto N, Giannini EH. Preliminary criteria for clinical remission for select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2004;31(11):2290–2294. [PubMed: 15517647]
  • Wang C, De Pablo P, Chen X, Schmid C, McAlindon T. Acupuncture for pain relief in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review. Arthritis Care & Research. 2008;59(9):1249–1256. [PubMed: 18759255]
  • Ward MM. Rheumatology visit frequency and changes in functional disability and pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology. 1997;24(1):35–42. [PubMed: 9002008]
  • Ward M. Arthritis Care & Research. 2022. Trends in permanent work disability associated with rheumatoid arthritis in the United States, 1999–2015. Accepted author manuscript. https://doi​.org/10.1002/acr.24575. [PMC free article: PMC8339151] [PubMed: 33544975]
  • Wasserman AM. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. American Family Physician. 2011;84(11):1245–1252. [PubMed: 22150658]
  • Weiss PF, Colbert RA. Juvenile spondyloarthritis: A distinct form of juvenile arthritis. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2018;65(4):675–690. [PubMed: 30031493]
  • Weiss JE, Luca NJC, Boneparth A, Stinson J. Assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatric Drugs. 2014;16(6):473–481. [PubMed: 25331986]
  • Widdifield J, Bernatsky S, Paterson JM, Thorne JC, Cividino A, Pope J, Gunraj N, Bombardier C. Quality care in seniors with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis: A Canadian perspective. Arthritis Care & Research. 2011;63(1):53–57. [PubMed: 20806274]
  • Wolfe F, Allaire S, Michaud K K. The prevalence and incidence of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis, and the effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor on work disability. Journal of Rheumatology. 2007;34:2211–2217. [PubMed: 17787043]
  • Wong PCH, Leung YY, Li EK, Tam LS. Measuring disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. International Journal of Rheumatology. 2012;2012:839425. [PMC free article: PMC3540792] [PubMed: 23319952]
  • Zamora EA, Naik R. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. [PMC free article: PMC540151] [PubMed: 30986010]
  • Zhang W, Bansback N, Boonen A, Young A, Singh A, Anis AH. Validity of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire–general health version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2010;12(5):R177. [PMC free article: PMC2991008] [PubMed: 20860837]

Footnotes

1

The DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. DAS stands for “disease activity score,” and the number 28 refers to the 28 joints that are examined in this assessment.

Copyright 2022 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Bookshelf ID: NBK584481

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (2.6M)

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...