U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Committee on India-United States Cooperation on Challenges of Emerging Infections and Global Health Safety; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academy of Sciences; Indian National Science Academy. Indo-U.S. Workshop on Challenges of Emerging Infections and Global Health Safety: Summary of a Workshop. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 May 6.

Cover of Indo-U.S. Workshop on Challenges of Emerging Infections and Global Health Safety

Indo-U.S. Workshop on Challenges of Emerging Infections and Global Health Safety: Summary of a Workshop.

Show details

7Collaboration and Going Forward in Partnership

Norman Neureiter began by noting that just prior to the workshop, a Joint Committees Meeting of the Indo-U.S. Science and Technology Forum, which is under the chairmanship of John Holdren and Vijay Raghavan, was held in New Delhi. During the meeting, all of the Forum-sponsored scientific activities between the two countries were reviewed.

The Indo-U.S. Science and Technology Forum1 was established in 2000, at a time when U.S.-Indian relations were not as amicable as they are today. It was created with a small amount of money, which came from the P.L. 480 funds2 that the United States owned in India, equivalent to $7 million. They were deposited in a bank, and those initial funds continue to gather interest, which is matched each year by the Indian government. This generates approximately $1.5 to $2 million dollars annually from which collaborative efforts are sponsored. It is not possible to have a big research program for $2 million a year, but it is possible to bring many people together for workshops and meetings, and to support travel grants, and so forth. Furthermore, a great deal of interest has been generated among people who have contributed funds from other sources. The total amount expended in 2013 was approximately $7.8 million, and a significant portion came from the Department of Science and Technology or from Indian government agencies that wanted to use this instrument to facilitate cooperation.

To sustain these activities, Neureiter noted that a commitment of funds on both sides is required. What the Forum can provide is the ability for people to come together and speak in detail about what sources might be available for further cooperation. Decisions on which proposals to fund have been made jointly and no proposals are funded without approval from both the Indian and U.S. committees.

Discussion

The discussion following Neureiter's presentation focused on the obstacles that prevent young scientists from being able to participate in international collaborative opportunities and ways to correct them.

Indira Nath noted that although discussion of larger issues is excellent and essential, there are smaller issues that can act as obstacles to cooperation, such as difficulties in obtaining visas. Young scientists face this obstacle in particular. This is a sensitive issue: Senior scientists in India have been fighting for government-sponsored travel fellowships for these young scientists so that they can attend international conferences. However, the recipients of these funds are frequently unable to attend because the visa process is incomplete even days before scheduled departure. Since the funds have been allocated for a certain person, they are effectively blocked because they cannot be given to another applicant on the waiting list with only one or two days left before the conference. It is unclear why applicants do not receive a timely decision on their visas. A U.S. participant expressed a common sentiment: it is unacceptable to have young people not be able to attend meetings, because it is one of the more important ways to foster collaboration.

Ganguly then made six general recommendations to advance Indo-U.S. cooperation: (1) improving partnerships by creating a unified action plan that can nurture and advance them; (2) strengthening regulations so that they are properly executed and not abused; (3) strengthening collaborations and partnerships with adequate financial and ethical architectures; (4) facilitating interaction to identify challenges and benefits, such as the MTA and visas; (5) strengthening existing agreements by examining how they worked and did not work; and, (6) creating a system in which all players, the governments, departments, institutes, and the individual scientists, can interact more fully.

Nath also added that the Global Academy of Young Scientists has been promoting young scientist academies in many countries. INSA has undertaken this initiative to establish an Indian Young Scientist Academy, to be formalized in December 2014. Members are elected from among Ph.D. students and scientists in their mid-forties. Grant also noted that in the United States there are elected societies for younger scientists.

Nath added that many of the suggestions raised at the workshop were to train younger people on biosafety or research conduct. If these younger researchers from both countries have a mechanism by which they can meet, the culture will continue to grow. This is much better than just holding training courses in one country or another.

The U.S. Global Health Security Agenda3 was mentioned and some participants pointed out that there are aspects of the agenda that have long been in existence. Nonetheless, the idea of the initiative is to consolidate U.S. activities around global health security and then promote new initiatives. One of the initiatives is to create special partnerships with many countries around activities in global health security. India has taken a global lead in this agenda, and this workshop and the type of collaboration discussed are very consistent with the goals of the program.

CLOSING REMARKS

James LeDuc noted that the vigor of the workshop discussions clearly reflects the interests of experts from both India and the United States and their commitment to strengthening and deepening cooperation. These are important issues, and the only way to make progress is to work together going forward. It is very clear that the tone of the meeting encouraged collaboration, training, and leadership development. The stage is set for real progress in the future.

Raghavendra Gadagkar stated that no one would deny that the bilateral relationships between the United States and India in all spheres, but most certainly in science, hold benefits for all involved. Such positive interaction is never one way.

Diane Griffin's remarks were focused on further concrete steps for cooperation. An INSA-NAS regional meeting, similar to this workshop, is planned for 2016, during which Indian leadership in south Asia will be a focal point for presentations and discussions.

Footnotes

1

For more information, see: http://www​.iusstf.org/; accessed April 10, 2016.

2

Indian currency paid to the United States for purchase of food through a food assistance program.

3
Copyright 2016 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Bookshelf ID: NBK367793

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (5.7M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...