NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
National Cancer Policy Forum; Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Assessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast Images: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015 Oct 23.
Assessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast Images: Workshop Summary.
Show details- Adcock KA. Initiative to improve mammogram interpretation. Permanente Journal. 2004;8(2):12–18. [PMC free article: PMC4690712] [PubMed: 26704912]
- Bassett L, Hendrick R, Bassford T. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research; 1994. Clinical practice guideline number 13: Quality determinants of mammography. AHCPR publication 95-0632. (Public Health Service 83).
- Bassett LW, Hollatz-Brown AJ, Bastani R, Pearce JG, Hirji K, Chen L. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms. Radiology. 1995;194(1):189–192. [PubMed: 7997550]
- Bassett LW, Monsees BS, Smith RA, Wang L, Hooshi P, Farria DM, Sayre JW, Feig SA, Jackson VP. Survey of radiology residents: Breast imaging training and attitudes. Radiology. 2003;227(3):862–869. [PubMed: 12728182]
- Baxi SS, Liberman L, Lee C, Elkin EB. Breast imaging fellowships in the United States: Who, what, and where? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2009;192(2):403–407. [PMC free article: PMC3647339] [PubMed: 19155402]
- Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299(18):2151–2163. [PMC free article: PMC2718688] [PubMed: 18477782]
- Berg WA, D'Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, Bassett LW, Beam CA, Lewis RS, Crewson PE. Does training in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology. 2002;224(3):871–880. [PubMed: 12202727]
- Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, Jong RA, Pisano ED, Barr RG, Böhm-Vélez M, Mahoney MC, Evans WP, Larsen LH. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2012;307(13):1394–1404. [PMC free article: PMC3891886] [PubMed: 22474203]
- Blanks R, Wallis M, Moss S. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: Results from the uk national health service breast screening programme. Journal of Medical Screening. 1998;5(4):195–201. [PubMed: 9934650]
- Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology. 2011;259(1):72–84. [PMC free article: PMC3064821] [PubMed: 21343539]
- Buist DS, Anderson ML, Smith RA, Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Monsees BS, Sickles EA, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC. Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance. Radiology. 2014;273(2):351–364. [PMC free article: PMC4334307] [PubMed: 24960110]
- Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE. Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;179(5):1173–1177. [PubMed: 12388494]
- Burnside ES, Lin Y, Munoz Del Rio A, Pickhardt PJ, Wu Y, Strigel RM, Elezaby MA, Kerr EA, Miglioretti DL. Addressing the challenge of assessing physician-level screening performance: Mammography as an example. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e89418. [PMC free article: PMC3931752] [PubMed: 24586763]
- Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Brenner RJ, Feig SA, Smith RA, Rosenberg RD, Bogart TA, Browning S. Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology. 2010;255(2):354–361. [PMC free article: PMC2858814] [PubMed: 20413750]
- Carney PA, Abraham L, Cook A, Feig SA, Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG. Impact of an educational intervention designed to reduce unnecessary recall during screening mammography. Academic Radiology. 2012;19(9):1114–1120. [PMC free article: PMC3638784] [PubMed: 22727623]
- Carney PA, Bogart A, Sickles EA, Smith R, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Miglioretti DL, Rosenberg R, Yankaskas BC. Feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomized clinical trial designed to improve interpretation of screening mammography. Academic Radiology. 2013;20(11):1389–1398. [PMC free article: PMC4152937] [PubMed: 24119351]
- Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (storm): A prospective comparison study. The Lancet Oncology. 2013;14(7):583–589. [PubMed: 23623721]
- Cook AJ, Elmore JG, Zhu W, Jackson SL, Carney PA, Flowers C, Onega T, Geller B, Rosenberg RD, Miglioretti DL. Mammographic interpretation: Radiologists' ability to accurately estimate their performance and compare it with that of their peers. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;199(3):695–702. [PMC free article: PMC3691059] [PubMed: 22915414]
- DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2014;64(1):52–62. [PubMed: 24114568]
- Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Rosenberg RD. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology. 2009;253(3):641–651. [PMC free article: PMC2786197] [PubMed: 19864507]
- Elmore JG, Longton GM, Carney PA, Geller BM, Onega T, Tosteson AN, Nelson HD, Pepe MS, Allison KH, Schnitt SJ. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA. 2015;313(11):1122–1132. [PMC free article: PMC4516388] [PubMed: 25781441]
- Evans KK, Birdwell RL, Wolfe JM. If you don't find it often, you often don't find it: Why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening. Plos ONE. 2013;8(5):e64366. [PMC free article: PMC3667799] [PubMed: 23737980]
- Fenton JJ, Xing G, Elmore JG, Bang H, Chen SL, Lindfors KK, Baldwin L-M. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detectiona population-based study of Medicare enrollees. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2013;158(8):580–587. [PMC free article: PMC3772716] [PubMed: 23588746]
- Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, Durand MA, Plecha DM, Greenberg JS, Hayes MK, Copit DS, Carlson KL, Cink TM. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA. 2014;311(24):2499–2507. [PubMed: 25058084]
- Geller BM, Bogart A, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Smith R, Monsees B, Bassett LW, Buist DM, Kerlikowske K, Onega T. Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014;202(6):W586–W596. [PMC free article: PMC4276372] [PubMed: 24848854]
- Goldman LE, Sebastien J-PH, Miglioretti DL, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Yankaskas B, Smith-Bindman R. An assessment of the quality of mammography care at facilities treating medically vulnerable populations. Medical Care. 2008;46(7):701. [PMC free article: PMC2674332] [PubMed: 18580389]
- Goldman LE, Walker R, Miglioretti DL, Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women. Medical Care. 2011;49(1):67. [PMC free article: PMC3689881] [PubMed: 20966780]
- Gur D, Bandos AI, Cohen CS, Hakim CM, Hardesty LA, Ganott MA, Perrin RL, Poller WR, Shah R, Sumkin JH. The “laboratory” effect: Comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations. Radiology. 2008;249(1):47–53. [PMC free article: PMC2607194] [PubMed: 18682584]
- Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J, Raghu M, Durand M, Philpotts LE. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology. 2013;269(3):694–700. [PubMed: 23901124]
- Haiart D, Henderson J. A comparison of interpretation of screening mammograms by a radiographer, a doctor and a radiologist: Results and implications. British Journal of Clinical Practice. 1990;45(1):43–45. [PubMed: 1931542]
- Haneuse S, Buist DS, Miglioretti DL, Anderson ML, Carney PA, Onega T, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC. Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice. Radiology. 2012;262(1):69–79. [PMC free article: PMC3244665] [PubMed: 22106351]
- Henderson LM, Benefield T, Bowling JM, Durham DD, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Yankaskas BC. Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015a;204(4):903–908. [PMC free article: PMC4465588] [PubMed: 25794085]
- Henderson LM, Benefield T, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Durham DD, Yankaskas BC, Bowling JM. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice. Academic Radiology. 2015b;22(3):278–289. [PMC free article: PMC4324008] [PubMed: 25435185]
- Hofvind S, Vacek PM, Skelly J, Weaver DL, Geller BM. Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in vermont and norway. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2008;100(15):1082–1091. [PMC free article: PMC2720695] [PubMed: 18664650]
- Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening us in patients with mammographically dense breasts: Initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology. 2012;265(1):59–69. [PubMed: 22723501]
- IOM (Institute of Medicine). Improving breast imaging quality standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.
- Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers R-D, Bieling HB. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): First postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection—a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32(22):2304–2310. [PubMed: 24958821]
- Lehman CD, Wellman R, Buist DM, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson AN, Miglioretti DL. JAMA Internal Medicine. Under review. Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection. [PMC free article: PMC4836172] [PubMed: 26414882]
- Linver M, Paster S, Rosenberg R, Key C, Stidley C, King W. Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases. Radiology. 1992;184(1):39–43. [PubMed: 1609100]
- Miglioretti DL, Gard CC, Carney PA, Onega TL, Buist DS, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM. When radiologists perform best: The learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation. Radiology. 2009;253(3):632–640. [PMC free article: PMC2786195] [PubMed: 19789234]
- Miglioretti DL, Ichikawa L, Smith RA, Bassett LW, Feig SA, Monsees B, Parikh JR, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Carney PA. Criteria for identifying radiologists with acceptable screening mammography interpretive performance on basis of multiple performance measures. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015;204(4):W486–W491. [PMC free article: PMC4369798] [PubMed: 25794100]
- Miller JW, King JB, Joseph DA, Richardson LC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast cancer screening among adult women—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2012;61(Suppl):46–50. [PubMed: 22695463]
- Onega T, Hubbard R, Hill D, Lee CI, Haas JS, Carlos HA, Alford-Teaster J, Bogart A, DeMartini WB, Kerlikowske K. Geographic access to breast imaging for US women. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2014;11(9):874–882. [PMC free article: PMC4156905] [PubMed: 24889479]
- Onega T, Goldman LE, Walker R, Miglioretti DL, Buist DM, Taplin S, Geller B, Hill D, Smith-Bindman R. Facility mammography volume in relation to breast cancer screening outcomes. Journal of Medical Screening. 2015 Epub ahead of print. [PubMed: 26265482]
- Parris T, Wakefield D, Frimmer H. Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. The Breast Journal. 2013;19(1):64–70. [PubMed: 23240937]
- Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J, Ansell J. Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: An assessment of competence under test and screening conditions. British Journal of Radiology. 1996;69(817):10–14. [PubMed: 8785616]
- Perry N, Broeders M, De Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, Von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis—summary document. Annals of Oncology. 2008;19(4):614–622. [PubMed: 18024988]
- Roberge D. Provider's volume and quality of breast cancer detection and treatment. Breast Cancer Research & Treatment. 2007;105(2):117–132. [PubMed: 17186361]
- Rose SL, Tidwell AL, Bujnoch LJ, Kushwaha AC, Nordmann AS, Sexton R. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: An observational study. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2013;200(6):1401–1408. [PubMed: 23701081]
- Rutter CM, Taplin S. Assessing mammographers' accuracy: A comparison of clinical and test performance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53(5):443–450. [PubMed: 10812315]
- Scott HJ, Gale AG. Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs. British Journal of Radiology. 2006;79(Spec. No. 2):S127–S133. [PubMed: 17209118]
- Scott HJ, Evans A, Gale AG, Murphy A, Reed J. Buena Vista, FL: 2009. [February 7]. The relationship between real life breast screening and an annual self assessment scheme. Paper read at SPIE Medical Imaging.
- Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Izadi M, Jebsen IN, Jahr G, Krager M. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013;267(1):47–56. [PubMed: 23297332]
- Skaane P, Osteras B, Eben E, Gullien R. Paper read at Radiological Society of North America; Chicago, IL: 2014. Comparison of digital mammography (FFDM) and FFDM plus digital breast tomosynthesis in mammography screening for cancer detection according to breast parenchyma density.
- Soh B, Lee W, Kench P, Reed W, McEntee M, Poulos A, Brennan P. Assessing reader performance in radiology, an imperfect science: Lessons from breast screening. Clinical Radiology. 2012;67(7):623–628. [PubMed: 22486992]
- Soh BP, Lee WB, Mello-Thoms C, Tapia K, Ryan J, Hung WT, Thompson G, Heard R, Brennan P. Certain performance values arising from mammographic test set readings correlate well with clinical audit. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 2015;59(4):403–410. [PubMed: 25828554]
- Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter GR, Sickles EA, Elmore JG. Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2008;100(12):876–887. [PMC free article: PMC2430588] [PubMed: 18544742]
- Théberge I, Chang S-L, Vandal N, Daigle J-M, Guertin M-H, Pelletier É, Brisson J. Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a canadian organized screening program. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2014;106(3):djt461. [PubMed: 24598715]
- Timmers J, Verbeek A, Pijnappel R, Broeders M, Den Heeten G. Experiences with a self-test for dutch breast screening radiologists: Lessons learnt. European Radiology. 2014;24(2):294–304. [PubMed: 24057201]
- Urban N, Longton GM, Crowe AD, Drucker MJ, Lehman CD, Peacock S, Lowe KA, Zeliadt SB, Gaul MA. Computer-assisted mammography feedback program (CAMFP): An electronic tool for continuing medical education. Academic Radiology. 2007;14(9):1036–1042. [PMC free article: PMC2096616] [PubMed: 17707310]
- USPSTF (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force). Draft recommendation statement: Breast Cancer: Screening. 2015. [September 3, 2015]. http://www
.uspreventiveservicestaskforce .org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementDraft /breast-cancer-screening1. - van den Biggelaar F, Flobbe K, van Engelshoven J, de Bijl N. Pre-reading mammograms by specialised breast technologists: Legal implications for technologist and radiologist in the netherlands. European Journal of Health Law. 2009;16(3):271–279. [PubMed: 19788004]
- Weigert J, Steenbergen S. The connecticut experiment: The role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. The Breast Journal. 2012;18(6):517–522. [PubMed: 23009208]
- Wivell G, Denton E, Eve C, Inglis J, Harvey I. Can radiographers read screening mammograms? Clinical Radiology. 2003;58(1):63–67. [PubMed: 12565207]
- REFERENCES - Assessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast ImagesREFERENCES - Assessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast Images
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...