NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Americans are accustomed to anecdotal evidence of the health care crisis. Yet, personal or local stories do not provide a comprehensive nationwide picture of our access to health care. Now, this book offers the long-awaited health equivalent of national economic indicators.
This useful volume defines a set of national objectives and identifies indicators--measures of utilization and outcome--that can "sense" when and where problems occur in accessing specific health care services. Using the indicators, the committee presents significant conclusions about the situation today, examining the relationships between access to care and factors such as income, race, ethnic origin, and location.
The committee offers recommendations to federal, state, and local agencies for improving data collection and monitoring.
This highly readable and well-organized volume will be essential for policymakers, public health officials, insurance companies, hospitals, physicians and nurses, and interested individuals.
Contents
- Committee on Monitoring Access to Personal Health Care Services
- Summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. A Model for Monitoring Access
- 3. Using Indicators to Monitor National Objectives for Health Care
- Objective 1: Promoting Successful Birth Outcomes
- Objective 2: Reducing the Incidence of Vaccine-Preventable Childhood Diseases
- Objective 3: Early Detection and Diagnosis of Treatable Diseases
- Objective 4: Reducing the Effects of Chronic Diseases and Prolonging Life
- Objective 5: Reducing Morbidity and Pain through Timely and Appropriate Treatment
- References
- 4. Future Indicators
- 5. Recommendations
- Appendixes
- A Developing Indicators of Access to Care: The Case for HIV Disease
- B Developing Indicators of Access to Care: Waiting Lists for Drug Abuse Treatment
- C Developing Indicators of Access to Care: The Case for Migrants and the Homeless
- D "Ambulatory-Care-Sensitive" Conditions and "Referral-Sensitive" Surgeries
This project was supported by the Kellogg Endowment Fund, the Johnson & Johnson Foundation, the Baxter Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant #18455), the Health Care Services Administration (Contract #75-05-0080), Department of Health and Human Services, and Institute of Medicine internal funds.
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
The Institute of Medicine was chartered in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to enlist distinguished members of the appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. In this, the Institute acts under both the Academy's 1863 congressional charter responsibility to be an advisor to the federal government and its own initiative in identifying issues of medical care, research, and education.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Refinement of the HCUP Quality Indicators[ 2001]Review Refinement of the HCUP Quality IndicatorsDavies SM, Geppert J, McClellan M, McDonald KM, Romano PS, Shojania KG. 2001 May
- Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.[Pediatrics. 2005]Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.Sayeed SA. Pediatrics. 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85.
- Review Schools & Health: Our Nation's Investment[ 1997]Review Schools & Health: Our Nation's InvestmentInstitute of Medicine (US) Committee on Comprehensive School Health Programs in Grades K-12, Allensworth D, Lawson E, Nicholson L, Wyche J. 1997
- [Points of view: the role of quality measurement from the Federal Joint Committee's perspective].[Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwe...][Points of view: the role of quality measurement from the Federal Joint Committee's perspective].Klakow-Franck R. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014; 108(8-9):456-64. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
- Inter-state disparities in health care and financial burden on the poor in India.[J Health Soc Policy. 2004]Inter-state disparities in health care and financial burden on the poor in India.Purohit BC. J Health Soc Policy. 2004; 18(3):37-60.
- Access to Health Care in AmericaAccess to Health Care in America
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...