U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Micronutrients. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001.

Cover of Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc

Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc.

Show details

IIron Intakes and Estimated Percentiles of the Distribution of Iron Requirements from the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII), 1994–1996

TABLE I-1Iron Content of Foods Consumed by Infants 7 to 12 Months of Age, CSFII (1994–1996)

FoodsIron Content (mg/ 100 kcal)Absorption (%)Amount of IronaEstimate of Iron Absorbed (mg)Weighted Mean Absorption (%)b
Human breast milkc0.04500.180.090.65
Meat and poultry1.2200.360.070.52
Fruits0.450.270.130.10
Vegetables1.250.560.030.20
Cerealsd8.75612.10.735.24
Noodles0.650.380.020.14
Total13.851.076.85
a

Based on a total daily energy intake of 845 kcal (Fomon SJ, Anderson TA. 1974. Infant Nutrition, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. Pp. 104–111).

b

Calculation based on the proportion of iron in each of the six food groups.

c

Assumes an intake of 670 ml/day.

d

Refers to iron-fortified infant cereals containing 35 mg iron/100 g of dry cereal.

TABLE I-2Contribution of Iron from the 14 Food Groups for Children Aged 1 to 3 and 4 to 8 Years, CSFII (1994–1996)

Food GroupIron Content (mg/100 kcal)aAmount of Iron (mg), 1–3 ybAmount of Iron (mg), 4–8 yc
Meat1.191.572.17
Fruits0.360.230.25
Vegetables1.221.141.87
Cereals2.658.6411.98
Vegetables plus meat0.70.170.18
Grain plus meat0.781.121.53
Cheese0.150.040.05
Eggs0.90.220.19
Ice cream, yogurt, etc.0.130.060.01
Fats, candy0.050.030.05
Milk0.080.180.15
Formula1.80.180.00
Juices0.440.340.22
Other beverages0.110.070.12
Total14.2718.77
a

Source: Whitney EN, Rolfes SR. 1996. Understanding Nutrition, 7th ed. St. Paul: West Publishing; Pennington JAT. 1998. Bowes and Church's Food Values of Portions Commonly Used, 17th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

b

The CSFII database provides total food energy (average of 2 days) and the proportion of energy from each of 14 food groups. The iron content of each food was determined from appropriate references (expressed as iron content per 100 kcal), thus the iron content of each food was calculated. The results are based on a total daily energy intake of 1,345 kcal (n = 1,868) as reported in CSFII.

c

Calculated as shown above. Based on a total daily energy intake of 1,665 kcal (n = 1,711) as reported in CSFII. According to the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the median intake of iron by infants is 15.5 mg/day; the iron mainly comes from fortified formulas and cereals, with smaller amounts from vegetables, pureed meats and poultry. It is estimated that the absorption of iron from fortified cereals is in the range of 6 percent, from breast milk 50 percent, and from meat, 20 percent.

TABLE I-3Estimated Percentiles of the Distribution of Iron Requirements (mg/d) in Young Children and Adolescent and Adult Males, CSFII (1994–1996)

Estimated Percentiles of RequirementsYoung Children, Both SexesaMale Adolescents and Adults
0.5–1 yb1–3 yc4–8 yc9–13 yc14–18 ycAdultc
2.53.011.011.333.915.063.98
53.631.241.644.235.424.29
104.351.542.054.595.854.64
205.231.962.635.036.435.09
305.872.323.135.366.895.44
406.392.663.625.647.295.74
50d6.903.014.115.897.696.03
607.413.394.656.158.086.32
707.933.825.276.438.516.65
808.574.396.086.769.037.04
909.445.267.317.219.747.69
9510.156.068.457.5810.328.06
97.5e10.786.819.527.9110.838.49
a

Based on pooled estimates of requirement components (see Table 9-6); presented Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) based on the higher estimates obtained for males.

b

Based on 10 percent bioavailability.

c

Based on 18 percent bioavailability.

d

Fiftieth percentile = EAR.

e

Ninety-seven and one-half percentile = RDA.

TABLE I-4Estimated Percentiles of the Distribution of Iron Requirements (mg/d) for Female Adolescents and Adults, CSFII (1994–1996)

Estimated Percentile of RequirementGroup
9–13 y14–18 yOral Contraceptive User,a AdolescentMixed Adolescent PopulationbMenstruating AdultOral Contraceptive User,a AdultMixed Adult PopulationbPost Menopause
2.53.244.634.114.494.423.634.182.73
53.605.064.494.924.884.004.633.04
104.045.614.975.455.454.455.193.43
204.596.315.576.146.225.065.943.93
304.986.876.056.696.875.526.554.30
405.337.396.487.217.465.947.134.64
50c5.667.916.897.718.076.357.734.97
606.008.437.348.258.766.798.395.30
706.369.157.848.929.637.279.215.68
806.7810.038.479.7710.827.9110.366.14
907.3811.549.4711.2113.058.9112.496.80
957.8813.0810.4212.7415.499.9014.857.36
97.5d8.3414.8011.4414.3918.2310.9417.517.88
a

Based on 60 percent reduction in menstrual blood loss.

b

Mixed population assumes 17 percent oral contraceptive users, 83 percent nonusers, all menstruating.

c

Fiftieth percentile = Estimated Average Requirement.

d

Ninety-seven and one-half percentile = Recommended Dietary Allowance.

TABLE I-5Probabilities of Inadequate Iron Intakesa and Associated Ranges of Usual Intake for Infants and Children 1 through 8 Years, CSFII (1994–1996)

Probability of InadequacyAssociated Range of Usual Intakes (mg/d)
Infants 8–12 moChildren 1–3 yChildren 4–8 y
1.0b< 3.01< 1.0< 1.33
0.963.02–3.631.1–1.241.34–1.64
0.933.64–4.351.25–1.541.65–2.05
0.854.36–5.231.55–1.962.07–2.63
0.755.24–5.871.97–2.322.64–3.13
0.655.88–6.392.33–2.663.14–3.62
0.556.40–6.902.67–3.013.63–4.11
0.456.91–7.413.02–3.394.12–4.64
0.357.42–7.933.40–3.824.65–5.27
0.257.94–8.573.83–4.385.28–6.08
0.158.58–9.444.39–5.256.09–7.31
0.089.45–10.175.26–6.067.32–8.45
0.0410.18–10.786.07–6.818.46–9.52
0b> 10.78> 6.81> 9.52
a

Probability of inadequate intake = probability that requirement is greater than the usual intake. Derived from Table I-3.

b

For population assessment purposes, a probability of 1 has been assigned to all usual intakes falling below the two and one-half percentile of requirement and a probability of 0 has been assigned to all usual intakes falling above the ninety-seven and one-half percentile of requirement. This enables the assessment of population risk where precise estimates are impractical and effectively without impact.

TABLE I-6Probabilities of Inadequate Iron Intakesa (mg/d) and Associated Ranges of Usual Intake in Adolescent Males and in Girls Using or Not Using Oral Contraceptives (OC), CSFII (1994–1996)

Probability of Inadequacy9–13 y14–18 y
Female
MaleFemaleMaleNon-OC UsersOC UsersbMixed Populationc
1.0d< 3.91< 3.24< 5.06< 4.63< 4.11< 4.49
0.963.91–4.233.24–3.605.06–5.424.64–5.064.11–4.494.49–4.92
0.934.24–4.593.61–4.045.43–5.855.07–5.614.50–4.974.93–5.45
0.854.60–5.034.05–4.595.86–6.435.62–6.314.98–5.575.46–6.14
0.755.04–5.364.60–4.986.44–6.896.32–6.875.58–6.056.15–6.69
0.655.37–5.644.99–5.336.90–7.296.88–7.396.06–6.486.70–7.21
0.555.65–5.895.34–5.667.80–7.697.40–7.916.49–6.897.22–7.71
0.455.90–6.155.67–6.007.70–8.087.92–8.486.90–7.347.72–8.25
0.356.16–6.436.01–6.368.09–8.518.49–9.157.35–7.848.26–8.92
0.256.44–6.766.37–6.788.52–9.039.16–10.037.85–8.478.93–9.77
0.156.77–7.216.79–7.389.04–9.7410.04–11.548.48–9.479.78–11.21
0.087.22–7.587.39–7.889.75–10.3211.55–13.089.48–10.4211.22–12.74
0.047.59–7.917.89–8.3410.33–10.8313.09–14.8010.43–11.4412.75–14.39
0d> 7.91> 8.34> 10.83> 14.80> 11.44> 14.39
a

Probability of inadequate intake = probability that requirement is greater than the usual intake. May be used in simple computer programs to evaluate adjusted distributions of usual intakes. See Institute of Medicine. 2000. Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, for method of adjusting observed intake distributions. Not to be applied in the assessment of individuals. Derived from Tables I-3 and I-4.

b

Assumes 60 percent reduction in menstrual iron loss.

c

Mixed population represents 17 percent oral contraceptive users and 83 percent nonoral contraceptive users (Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LS, Piccinino LJ. 1997. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: New data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23:1–114).

d

For population assessment purposes, a probability of 1 has been assigned to all usual intakes falling below the two and one-half percentile of requirement and a probability of 0 has been assigned to all usual intakes falling above the ninety-seven and one-half percentile of requirement. This enables the assessment of population risk where precise estimates are impractical and effectively without impact.

TABLE I-7Probabilities of Inadequate Iron Intakesa (mg/d) and Associated Ranges of Usual Intake in Adult Men and Women Using and Not Using Oral Contraceptives (OC), CSFII (1994–1996)

Probability of InadequacyAdult MenMenstruating WomenPostmenopausal Women
Non-OC UsersOC UsersbMixed Populationc
1.0d< 3.98< 4.42< 3.63< 4.18< 2.73
0.963.98–4.294.42–4.883.63–4.004.18–4.632.73–3.04
0.934.30–4.644.89–5.454.01–4.454.64–5.193.05–3.43
0.854.65–5.095.46–6.224.46–5.065.20–5.943.44–3.93
0.755.10–5.446.23–6.875.07–5.525.95–6.553.94–4.30
0.655.45–5.746.88–7.465.53–5.946.56–7.134.31–4.64
0.555.75–6.037.47–8.075.95–6.357.14–7.734.65–4.97
0.456.04–6.328.08–8.766.36–6.797.74–8.394.98–5.30
0.356.33–6.658.77–9.636.80–7.278.40–9.215.31–5.68
0.256.66–7.049.64–10.827.28–7.919.22–10.365.69–6.14
0.157.05–7.6910.83–13.057.92–8.9110.37–12.496.15–6.80
0.087.70–8.0613.06–15.498.92–9.9012.50–14.856.81–7.36
0.048.07–8.4915.50–18.239.91–10.9414.86–17.517.37–7.88
0d > 8.49> 18.23> 10.94> 17.51> 7.88
a

Probability of inadequate intake = probability that requirement is greater than the usual intake. May be used in simple computer programs to evaluate adjusted distributions of usual intakes. See Institute of Medicine. 2000. Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, for method of adjusting observed intake distributions. Not to be applied in the assessment of individuals. Derived from Tables I-3 and I-4.

b

Assumes 60 percent reduction in menstrual iron loss.

c

Mixed population represents 17 percent oral contraceptive users and 83 percent nonoral contraceptive users (Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LS, Piccinino LJ. 1997. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: New data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23:1–114).

d

For population assessment purposes, a probability of 1 has been assigned to all usual intakes falling below the two and one-half percentile of requirement and a probability of 0 has been assigned to all usual intakes falling above the ninety-seven and one-half percentile of requirement. This enables the assessment of population risk where precise estimates are impractical and effectively without impact.

Copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Bookshelf ID: NBK222300

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (12M)
  • Disable Glossary Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...