U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Paynter R, Bañez LL, Berliner E, et al. EPC Methods: An Exploration of the Use of Text-Mining Software in Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Apr.

Cover of EPC Methods: An Exploration of the Use of Text-Mining Software in Systematic Reviews

EPC Methods: An Exploration of the Use of Text-Mining Software in Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Show details

References

1.
Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. [2016 Mar 24]. http://handbook​.cochrane.org/
2.
Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews; Institute of MedicineEden J, Levit L, Berg A, et al., editors. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; Mar 23, 2011. [PubMed: 24983062]
3.
Hartling L, Guise JM, Kato E, et al. Research White Paper. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); Feb, 2015. EPC methods: An exploration of methods and context for the production of rapid reviews. (Prepared by the Scientific Resource Center under Contract No. 290-2012-00004-C.) AHRQ Publication No. 15-EHC008-EF. [PubMed: 25654160]
4.
Hempel S, Shetty KD, Shekelle PG, et al. Machine learning methods in systematic reviews: identifying quality improvement intervention evaluations. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); Sep, 2012. (Prepared by the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10062-I) 55 p. [PubMed: 23101052]
5.
Dalal SR, Shekelle PG, Hempel S, et al. A pilot study using machine learning and domain knowledge to facilitate comparative effectiveness review updating. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); Sep, 2012. (Prepared by the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10062-I) 50 p. [PubMed: 23057094]
6.
Thomas J, McNaught J, Ananiadou S. Applications of text mining within systematic reviews. Res Synth Meth. 2011 Mar;2(1):1–14. [PubMed: 26061596]
7.
Miner G, Elder J IV, Hill T, et al. Practical text mining and statistical analysis for non-structured text data applications. Waltham (MA): Elsevier Inc.; Jan 25, 2012. 1000 p.
8.
Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); Jan, 2014. AHRQ Publication No. 10(14)-EHC063-EF.
9.
Campbell Collaboration. Campbell Collaboration Systematic Reviews: policies and guidelines. Version 1.1. Norway: Campbell Collaboration; Jan 14, 2015. 47 p. (Campbell Systematic Reviews, Supplement 1)
10.
Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre. EPPI-Centre Methods for Conducting Systematic Reviews. London (UK): Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2010.
11.
Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer's manual: 2014 edition. Adelaide, South Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2014. 197 p.
12.
European Network for Health Technology Assessment. HTA Core Model® version 2.1. European Network Health Technology Assessment; 2015. [2015 Aug 04]. EUnetHTA Joint Action 2, Work Package 8. [453 p] http://www​.corehta.info/BrowseModel.aspx.
13.
European Network for Health Technology Assessment. Process of information retrieval for systematic reviews and health technology assessments on clinical effectiveness. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Network for Health Technology Assessment; Jul, 2015. 70 p.
14.
O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, et al. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev. 2015;4:5. [PMC free article: PMC4320539] [PubMed: 25588314]
15.
Jonnalagadda SR, Goyal P, Huffman MD. Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;4(1):78. [PMC free article: PMC4514954] [PubMed: 26073888]
16.
Fleuren WW, Alkema W. Application of text mining in the biomedical domain. Methods. 2015 Mar;74:97–106. [PubMed: 25641519]
17.
Charmaz K. Reconstructing grounded theory. In: Alasuutari P, Bickman L, Brannen J, editors. SAGE handbook of social research methods. London: Sage; 2008. pp. 461–79.
18.
OBrien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245–51. [PubMed: 24979285]
19.
Saldana J. Descriptive coding. In: Saldana J, editor. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2013. pp. 87–91.
20.
Taylor B. Grounded theory. In: Taylor BJ, Francis K, editors. Qualitative research in the health sciences: methodologies, methods, and processes. New York: Routledge; 2013. pp. 30–55.
21.
Qualitative Solutions and Research (QSR). NVivo 10 for Windows: qualitative data analysis software. Melbourne (Australia): QSR International; 2015. [2015 Aug 12]. http://www​.qsrinternational​.com/products_nvivo.aspx.
22.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. [PMC free article: PMC2714672] [PubMed: 19622552]
23.
Calders T, Esposito F, Hullermeier E, et al. Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases; Proceedings, Part III. Springer Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London. European Conference, ECML PKDD 2014; September 15-19, 2014; Nancy, France. 2014.
24.
Felizardo KR, Nakagawa EY, Feitosa D, et al. An approach based on visual text mining to support categorization and classification in the systematic mapping; Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'10); British Computer Society; Swinton (UK). 2010. pp. 34–43.
25.
Felizardo KR, Macdonell SG, Mendes E, et al. A systematic mapping on the use of visual data mining to support the conduct of systematic literature reviews. J Software. 2012;7(2):450–61.
26.
Hotho A, Nurnberger A, Paaß G. A brief survey of text mining. 2005 May 13
27.
Kao A, Poteet SR, editors. Natural language processing and text mining. London (UK): Springer-Verlag; 2007.
28.
Sizov G. Extraction-based automatic summarization. Theoretical and empirical investigation of summarization techniques. Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Jan, 2010.
29.
Zhang Q, Segall R. Review of data, text and web mining software. Kybernetes. 2010;39(4):625–55.
30.
Hausner E, Waffenschmidt S, Kaiser T, et al. Routine development of objectively derived search strategies. Syst Rev. 2012;1:19. [PMC free article: PMC3351720] [PubMed: 22587829]
31.
O'Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid D, et al. Techniques for identifying cross-disciplinary and ‘hard-to-detect’ evidence for systematic review. Res Synth Meth. 2014 Mar;5(1):50–9. [PubMed: 26054025]
32.
Simon M, Hausner E, Klaus SF, et al. Identifying nurse staffing research in Medline: development and testing of empirically derived search strategies with the PubMed interface. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:76. [PMC free article: PMC2936389] [PubMed: 20731858]
33.
Tanon AA, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos AP, et al. Patient safety and systematic reviews: finding papers indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):452–61. [PubMed: 20457733]
34.
Balan PF, Gerits A, Vanduffel W. A practical application of text mining to literature on cognitive rehabilitation and enhancement through neurostimulation. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:182. [PMC free article: PMC4176459] [PubMed: 25309356]
35.
Kok R, Verbeek JA, Faber B, et al. A search strategy to identify studies on the prognosis of work disability: a diagnostic test framework. BMJ Open. 2015;5(5):e006315. [PMC free article: PMC4442145] [PubMed: 25991444]
36.
Petrova M, Sutcliffe P, Fulford KW, et al. Search terms and a validated brief search filter to retrieve publications on health-related values in Medline: a word frequency analysis study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(3):479–88. [PMC free article: PMC3341778] [PubMed: 21846778]
37.
Damarell RA, Tieman J, Sladek RM, et al. Development of a heart failure filter for Medline: an objective approach using evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as an alternative to hand searching. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:12. [PMC free article: PMC3037346] [PubMed: 21272371]
38.
Li J, Lu Z. Developing topic-specific search filters for PubMed with click-through data. Methods Inf Med. 2013;52(5):395–402. [PMC free article: PMC3744813] [PubMed: 23666447]
39.
Iansavichus AV, Hilderbrand AM, Haynes RB, et al. High performance information search filters for CKD content in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(1):26–32. [PubMed: 25059221]
40.
Shemilt I, Simon A, Hollands GJ, et al. Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews. Res Synth Meth. 2014 Mar;5(1):31–49. [PubMed: 26054024]
41.
Thompson J, Davis J, Mazerolle L. A systematic method for search term selection in systematic reviews. Res Synth Meth. 2014;5(2):87–97. [PubMed: 26052649]
42.
Slater L. Product review: PubMed PubReMiner. J Canadian Health Libr Assoc. 2012;33(2):106–7.
43.
Poultor GL, Rubin DL, Altman RB, et al. MScanner: a classifier for retrieving Medline citations. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:108. [PMC free article: PMC2263023] [PubMed: 18284683]
44.
Macdonald EM, Carroll A, Albiston D, et al. Social relationships in early psychosis: clinical data-mining for practice-based evidence. J Soc Work Res Eval. 2005 Fall-Winter;6(2):155–66.
45.
Choong MK, Galgani F, Dunn AG, et al. Automatic evidence retrieval for systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(10):e223. [PMC free article: PMC4211030] [PubMed: 25274020]
46.
Hausner E, Guddat C, Hermanns T, et al. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: validation showed the noninferiority of the objective approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):191–9. [PubMed: 25464826]
47.
Franzi K, Ananiadou S, Mima H. Automatic recognition of multi-word terms: the C-value/NC-value method. Int J Digit Libr. 2000;3(2):115–30.
48.
Powers DM. Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-factor to ROC, informedness, markedness & correlation. Adelaide (South Australia): Flinders University of South Australia; Dec, 2007. 24 p. (Technical report; no.SIE-07-001)
49.
Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, et al. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:55. [PMC free article: PMC2824679] [PubMed: 20102628]
50.
Wallace BC, Small K, Brodley CE, et al. Modeling annotation time to reduce workload in comparative effectiveness reviews; Conference Proceedings. 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium, IHI '10; November 11-12, 2010; pp. 28–35.
51.
Wallace BC, Small K, Brodley CE, et al. Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center: abstrackr; Proceedings of the ACM International Health Informatics Symposium (IHI); 2012. pp. 819–24.
52.
Rathbone J, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers. Syst Rev. 2015;4:80. Also available: http://dx​.doi.org/10​.1186/s13643-015-0067-6. [PMC free article: PMC4472176] [PubMed: 26073974]
53.
Marshall IJ, Kuiper J, Wallace BC. RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jun 22 Epub ahead of print. [PMC free article: PMC4713900] [PubMed: 26104742]
54.
Hsu W, Speier W, Taira RK. Automated extraction of reported statistical analyses: towards a logical representation of clinical trial literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012:350–9. [PMC free article: PMC3540551] [PubMed: 23304305]
55.
Shao W, Adams CE, Cohen AM, et al. Aggregator: a machine learning approach to identifying MEDLINE articles that derive from the same underlying clinical trial. Methods. 2015 Mar 1;74:65–70. [PMC free article: PMC4339517] [PubMed: 25461812]
56.
Cohen AM, Smalheiser NR, McDonagh MS, et al. Automated confidence ranked classification of randomized controlled trial articles: an aid to evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 May;22(3):707–17. [PMC free article: PMC4457112] [PubMed: 25656516]
57.
Cohen AM, Ambert K, McDonagh M. Studying the potential impact of automated document classification on scheduling a systematic review update. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Apr 19;12(1):33. [PMC free article: PMC3420236] [PubMed: 22515596]
58.
Cohen AM. Optimizing feature representation for automated systematic review work prioritization. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008:121–5. [PMC free article: PMC2656096] [PubMed: 18998798]
59.
Dalal SR, Shekelle PG, Hempel S, et al. A pilot study using machine learning and domain knowledge to facilitate comparative effectiveness review updating. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(3):343–55. [PubMed: 22961102]
60.
Cunningham H, Tablan V, Roberts A, et al. Getting more out of biomedical documents with GATE's full lifecycle open source text analytics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(2):e1002854. [PMC free article: PMC3567135] [PubMed: 23408875]
61.
Turner MD, Chakrabarti C, Jones TB, et al. Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:240. [PMC free article: PMC3864256] [PubMed: 24409112]
62.
Williams SA, Porter V, Zarotsky V, et al. An evaluation of literature on discontinuation rates of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis [abstract] Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Oct;64(S10):483.
63.
McKenzie K, Scott DA, Campbell MA, et al. The use of narrative text for injury surveillance research: a systematic review. Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):354–63. [PubMed: 20159054]
64.
Smalheiser NR, Zhou W, Torvik VI. Anne O'Tate: A tool to support user-driven summarization, drill-down and browsing of PubMed search results. J Biomed Discov Collab. 2008;3:2. [PMC free article: PMC2276193] [PubMed: 18279519]
65.
Wojtusiak J, Michalski RS, Simanivanh T, et al. Towards application of rule learning to the meta-analysis of clinical data: an example of the metabolic syndrome. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(12):e104–e111. [PubMed: 19464941]
66.
Fontelo P, Liu F, Ackerman M. askMEDLINE: a free-text, natural language query tool for MEDLINE/PubMed. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:5. [PMC free article: PMC1079856] [PubMed: 15760470]
67.
Kossenkov A, Manion FJ, Korotkov E, et al. ASAP: automated sequence annotation pipeline for web-based updating of sequence information with a local dynamic database. Bioinformatics. 2003 Mar 22;19(5):675–6. [PubMed: 12651736]
68.
Divoli A, Attwood TK. BioIE: extracting informative sentences from the biomedical literature. Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):2138–9. [PubMed: 15691860]
69.
Papanikolaou N, Pavlopoulos GA, Pafilis E, et al. BioTextQuest(+): a knowledge integration platform for literature mining and concept discovery. Bioinformatics. 2014 Nov 15;30(22):3249–56. [PubMed: 25100685]
70.
Ananiadou S, Rea B, Okazaki N, et al. Supporting systematic reviews using text mining. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2009 Nov;27(4):509–23.
71.
Chen H, Sharp BM. Content-rich biological network constructed by mining PubMed abstracts. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Oct 8;5:147. [PMC free article: PMC528731] [PubMed: 15473905]
72.
Fleuren WW, Verhoeven S, Frijters R, et al. CoPub update: CoPub 5.0 a text mining system to answer biological questions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(Web Server issue):W450–4. [PMC free article: PMC3125746] [PubMed: 21622961]
73.
Yamamoto Y, Yamaguchi A, Yonezawa A. Building linked open data towards integration of biomedical scientific literature with DBpedia. J Biomed Semantics. 2013;4(1):8. [PMC free article: PMC3621846] [PubMed: 23497538]
74.
Errami M, Wren JD, Hicks JM, et al. eTBLAST: a web server to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals and similar publications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W12–5. [PMC free article: PMC1933238] [PubMed: 17452348]
75.
Kiritchenko S, de Bruijn B, Carini S, et al. ExaCT: automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:56. [PMC free article: PMC2954855] [PubMed: 20920176]
76.
Tsuruoka Y, Tsujii J, Ananiadou S. FACTA: a text search engine for finding associated biomedical concept. Bioinformatics. 2008 Nov 1;24(21):2559–60. [PMC free article: PMC2572701] [PubMed: 18772154]
77.
Yu W, Clyne M, Dolan SM, et al. GAPscreener: an automatic tool for screening human genetic association literature in PubMed using the support vector machine technique. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:205. [PMC free article: PMC2387176] [PubMed: 18430222]
78.
Marshall C, Brereton P. Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a mapping study; Conference Proceedings. 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement; October 10, 2013; pp. 296–9.
79.
Doms A, Schroeder M. Go exploring PubMed with the Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W783–6. [PMC free article: PMC1160231] [PubMed: 15980585]
80.
Seo J, Shneiderman B. Knowledge discovery in high-dimensional data: case studies and a user survey for the rank-by-feature framework. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2006 May-Jun;12(3):311–22. [PubMed: 16640245]
81.
Eaton AD. HubMed: a web-based biomedical literature search interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W745–7. [PMC free article: PMC1538859] [PubMed: 16845111]
82.
Giglia E. Quertle and KNALIJ: searching PubMed has never been so easy and effective. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Dec;47(4):687–90. [PubMed: 22222966]
83.
Stansfield C, Thomas J, Kavanagh J. ‘Clustering’ documents automatically to support scoping reviews of research: a case study. Res Synth Meth. 2013 Sep;4(3):230–41. [PubMed: 26053843]
84.
Lin JW, Chang CH, Lin MW, et al. Automating the process of critical appraisal and assessing the strength of evidence with information extraction technology. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):832–8. [PubMed: 21707873]
85.
Sarkar IN, Schenk R, Miller H, et al. LigerCat: using “MeSH Clouds” from journal, article, or gene citations to facilitate the identification of relevant biomedical literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009;2009:563–7. [PMC free article: PMC2815376] [PubMed: 20351918]
86.
Fontaine JF, Barbosa-Silva A, Schaefer M, et al. MedlineRanker: flexible ranking of biomedical literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jul;37(Web Server issue):W141–6. [PMC free article: PMC2703945] [PubMed: 19429696]
87.
Theodosiou T, Vizirianakis IS, Angelis L, et al. MeSHy: mining unanticipated PubMed information using frequencies of occurrences and concurrences of MeSH terms. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(6):919–26. [PubMed: 21684350]
88.
Aronson AR, Lang FM. An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):229–36. [PMC free article: PMC2995713] [PubMed: 20442139]
89.
Tenner H, Thurmayr G, Thurmayr R. Data mining with Meva in MEDLINE. In: Perner P, Brause R, Holzhutter HG, editors. Medical data analysis. Vol. 2868. Springer Berlin; Heidelberg: 2003. pp. 39–46.
90.
States DJ, Ade AS, Wright ZC, et al. MiSearch adaptive pubMed search tool. Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 1;25(7):974–6. [PMC free article: PMC2660869] [PubMed: 18326507]
91.
Salgado D, Krallinger M, Depaule M, et al. MyMiner: a web application for computer-assisted biocuration and text annotation. Bioinformatics. 2012 Sep 1;28(17):2285–7. [PubMed: 22789588]
92.
Aronson AR, Mork JG, Gay CW, et al. The NLM Indexing Initiative's Medical Text Indexer. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):268–72. [PubMed: 15360816]
93.
Castleberry A. NVivo 10 [software program]. Version 10. QSR International; 2012. Am J Pharm Educ. Feb 12, 2014. p. 25.
94.
Cohen AM, Hersh WR, Peterson K, et al. Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):206–19. [PMC free article: PMC1447545] [PubMed: 16357352]
95.
Raja K, Subramani S, Natarajan J. PPInterFinder--a mining tool for extracting causal relations on human proteins from literature. Database (Oxford). 2013;2013:bas052. [PMC free article: PMC3548331] [PubMed: 23325628]
96.
Malheiros V, Hohn E, Pinho R, et al. A visual text mining approach for systematic reviews; Conference Proceedings. 2007 First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement; September 20, 2007; pp. 245–54.
97.
Plikus MV, Zhang Z, Chuong CM. PubFocus: semantic MEDLINE/PubMed citations analytics through integration of controlled biomedical dictionaries and ranking algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:424. [PMC free article: PMC1618408] [PubMed: 17014720]
98.
Douglas SM, Montelione GT, Gerstein M. PubNet: a flexible system for visualizing literature derived networks. Genome Biol. 2005;6(9):R80. [PMC free article: PMC1242215] [PubMed: 16168087]
99.
Zhang Y, Sarkar IN, Chen ES. PubMedMiner: mining and visualizing MeSH-based associations in PubMed. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014;2014:1990–9. [PMC free article: PMC4419975] [PubMed: 25954472]
100.
Cohen WW, Singer Y. A simple, fast, and effective rule learner. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). 1999:335–42.
101.
Mierswa I, Wurst M, Klinkenberg R, et al. YALE (now RapidMiner): rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks. Proc ACM SIGKDD Int Conf on Knowl Discov Data Mining. 2006
102.
Pafilis E, O'Donoghue SI, Jensen LJ, et al. Reflect: augmented browsing for the life scientist. Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Jun;27(6):508–10. [PubMed: 19513049]
103.
Vazquez M, Carmona-Saez P, Nogales-Cadenas R, et al. SENT: semantic features in text. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jul;37(Web Server issue):W153–9. [PMC free article: PMC2703940] [PubMed: 19458159]
104.
Kuhn M, Campillos M, Letunic I, et al. A side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:343. [PMC free article: PMC2824526] [PubMed: 20087340]
105.
Marshall C, Brereton P, Kitchenham B. Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: a feature analysis; Conference Proceedings. EASE '14: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering; May 13, 2014; London.
106.
Hernandes E, Zamboni A, Fabbri S, Di Thommazo A. Using GQM and TAM to evaluate StArt -- a tool that supports systematic review. CLEI Electron J. 2012 Apr;15(1) paper 2.
107.
Fabbri S, Hernandes E, di Thommazo A, et al. Managing literature reviews information through visualization; Conference Proceedings. 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2012); June 28, 2012; pp. 36–45.
108.
Bowes D, Hall T, Beecham S. SLuRp - a tool to help large complex systematic literature reviews deliver candid and rigorous results; Conference Proceedings. 2nd International Workshop on Evidential Assessment of Software Technologies, EAST 2012; September 22, 2012; pp. 33–6.
109.
Yang JJ, Cohen AM, Cohen A, et al. SYRIAC: The systematic review information automated collection system a data warehouse for facilitating automated biomedical text classification. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008:825–9. [PMC free article: PMC2656099] [PubMed: 18999194]
110.
Feinerer I, Hornik K, Meyer D. Text mining infrastructure in R. J Stat Software. 2008 Mar;25(5):1–54.
111.
Eck N, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38. [PMC free article: PMC2883932] [PubMed: 20585380]
112.
Sarker A, Molla D, Paris C. Automatic evidence quality prediction to support evidence-based decision making. Artif Intell Med. 2015 Jun;64(2):89–103. [PubMed: 25983133]
113.
Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Arregui M, Gaudan S, et al. Text processing through Web services: calling Whatizit. Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 15;24(2):296–8. [PubMed: 18006544]
114.
Perez-Iratxeta C, Perez AJ, Bork P, et al. Update on XplorMed: A web server for exploring scientific literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3866–8. [PMC free article: PMC168945] [PubMed: 12824439]

Views

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...