U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). Relationship between volume of services and quality of treatment outcome for complex oesophageal interventions: IQWiG Reports – Commission No. V19-04 [Internet]. Cologne (Germany): Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG); 2020 Jul 8.

Cover of Relationship between volume of services and quality of treatment outcome for complex oesophageal interventions

Relationship between volume of services and quality of treatment outcome for complex oesophageal interventions: IQWiG Reports – Commission No. V19-04 [Internet].

Show details

References for English extract

Please see full rapid report for full reference list.

1.
Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? N Engl J Med 1979; 301(25): 1364-1369. [PubMed: 503167]
2.
Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg 2007; 94(2): 145-161. [PubMed: 17256810]
3.
Loberiza FR Jr, Zhang MJ, Lee SJ, Klein JP, LeMaistre CF, Serna DS, et al. Association of transplant center and physician factors on mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the United States. Blood 2005; 105(7): 2979-2987. [PubMed: 15598815]
4.
Gandjour A, Bannenberg A, Lauterbach KW. Threshold volumes associated with higher survival in health care: a systematic review. Med Care 2003; 41(10): 1129-1141. [PubMed: 14515109]
5.
Killeen SD, O’Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg 2005; 92(4): 389-402. [PubMed: 15786424]
6.
Matthias K, Gruber S, Pietsch B. Evidenz von Volume-Outcome-Beziehungen und Mindestmengen: Diskussion in der aktuellen Literatur. Gesundheits- und Sozialpolitik 2014; (3): 23-30.
7.
Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Regelungen des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses gemäß § 136b Absatz 1 Satz 1 Nummer 2 SGB V für nach § 108 SGB V zugelassene Krankenhäuser (Mindestmengenregelungen, Mm-R) [online]. 05.12.2018 [Zugriff: 28.01.2019]. URL: https://www​.g-ba.de/downloads​/62-492-1740​/Mm-R_2018-12-05_iK-2019-01-01.pdf.
8.
Klauber J, Geraedts M, Friedrich J, Wasem J. (Ed). Krankenhaus-Report 2017; Schwerpunkt: Zukunft gestalten. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2017. URL: https://www​.wido.de/fileadmin​/Dateien/Dokumente​/Publikationen_Produkte​/Buchreihen​/Krankenhausreport/2017​/Kapitel%20mit%20Deckblatt​/wido_khr2017_gesamt.pdf.
9.
Nimptsch U, Haist T, Krautz C, Grützmann R, Mansky T, Lorenz D. Hospital volume, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue in esophageal surgery: an analysis of German hospital discharge data. Dtsch Arztebl 2018; 115(47): 793-800. [PMC free article: PMC6334224] [PubMed: 30636674]
10.
Swisher SG, DeFord L, Merriman KW, Walsh GL, Smythe R, Vaporicyan A, et al. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119(6): 1126-1134. [PubMed: 10838528]
11.
Apaydin AZ, Islamoglu F, Posacioglu H, Yagdi T, Atay Y, Calkavur T, et al. Clinical outcomes in “complex” thoracic aortic surgery. Tex Heart Inst J 2007; 34(3): 301-304. [PMC free article: PMC1995060] [PubMed: 17948079]
12.
Finnesgard EJ, Pandian TK, Kendrick ML, Farley DR. Do not break up the surgical team! Familiarity and expertise affect operative time in complex surgery. Am J Surg 2018; 215(3): 447-449. [PubMed: 29174774]
13.
Howie DW, Beck M, Costi K, Pannach SM, Ganz R. Mentoring in complex surgery: minimising the learning curve complications from peri-acetabular osteotomy. Int Orthop 2012; 36(5): 921-925. [PMC free article: PMC3337117] [PubMed: 21898037]
14.
Jaramillo-Reta KY, Velázquez-Dohorn ME, Medina-Franco H. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as predictor of surgical mortality and survival in complex surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Rev Inves Clin 2015; 67(2): 117-121. [PubMed: 25938845]
15.
Kurlansky PA, Argenziano M, Dunton R, Lancey R, Nast E, Stewart A, et al. Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143(2): 287-293. [PubMed: 22104669]
16.
Nissen NN, Menon V, Williams J, Berci G. Video-microscopy for use in microsurgical aspects of complex hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a preliminary report. HPB (Oxford) 2011; 13(10): 753-756. [PMC free article: PMC3210978] [PubMed: 21929677]
17.
Aletti GD, Podratz KC, Moriarty JP, Cliby WA, Hall Long K. Aggressive and complex surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: an economic analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112(1): 16-21. [PubMed: 19027146]
18.
Bolliger M, Kroehnert JA, Molineus F, Kandioler D, Schindl M, Riss P. Experiences with the standardized classification of surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo) in general surgery patients. Eur Surg 2018; 50(6): 256–261. [PMC free article: PMC6267508] [PubMed: 30546385]
19.
Lacour-Gayet F, Clarke D, Jacobs J, Comas J, Daebritz S, Daenen W, et al. The Aristotle score: a complexity-adjusted method to evaluate surgical results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25(6): 911–924. [PubMed: 15144988]
20.
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie für die Früherkennung, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms: Langversion 4.1 [online]. 09.2018 [Zugriff: 07.08.2019]. URL: https://www​.awmf.org​/uploads/tx_szleitlinien​/032-045OLl_S3_Mammakarzinom​_2018-09.pdf.
21.
dkg-web. Speiseröhrenkrebs, Ösophaguskarzinom: Anatomie und Funktion [online]. 06.11.2017 [Zugriff: 05.09.2019]. URL: https://www​.krebsgesellschaft​.de/onko-internetportal​/basis-informationen-krebs​/krebsarten​/weitere-krebsarten​/speiseroehrenkrebs​/anatomie-und-funktion.html.
22.
Angele MK, Pratschke S, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ. Komplikationsmanagement nach Ösophagusresektion: Prävention, Diagnostik und Management postoperativer Komplikationen. Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie up2date 2013; 7(2): 123-135.
23.
Hoeppner J, Marjanovic G, Glatz T, Kulemann B, Hopt UT. Laparoskopisch-thorakotomische Ösophagusresektion mit intrathorakaler Ösophagusgastrostomie als Hybridverfahren. Chirurg 2014; 85(7): 628-635. [PubMed: 25000930]
24.
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus: Langversion 2.0 [online]. 12.2018 [Zugriff: 05.09.2019]. URL: https://www​.awmf.org​/uploads/tx_szleitlinien​/021-023OLl_Plattenepithel​_Adenokarzinom​_Oesophagus_2019-01.pdf.
25.
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. S3-Leitlinie: Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus; Langversion 2.0 [online]. 12.2018 [Zugriff: 24.03.2020]. URL: https://www​.awmf.org​/uploads/tx_szleitlinien​/021-023OLl_Plattenepithel​_Adenokarzinom​_Oesophagus_2019-01.pdf.
26.
Van Workum F, Van den Wildenberg FJ, Polat F, De Wilt JH, Rosman C. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis. Dig Surg 2014; 31(2): 95-103. [PubMed: 24776753]
27.
ICH Expert Working Group. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline: structure and content of clinical study reports; E3; current step 4 version [online]. 30.11.1995 [Zugriff: 05.09.2018]. URL: http://www​.ich.org/fileadmin​/Public_Web_Site​/ICH_Products/Guidelines​/Efficacy/E3/E3_Guideline.pdf.
28.
Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 2004; 94(3): 361-366. [PMC free article: PMC1448256] [PubMed: 14998794]
29.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147(8): 573-577. [PubMed: 17938396]
30.
Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. General methods: version 5.0 [online]. 10.07.2017 [Zugriff: 06.06.2018]. URL: https://www​.iqwig.de​/download/General-Methods_Version-5-0​.pdf.
31.
Bender R, Grouven U. Possibilities and limitations of statistical regression models for the calculation of threshold values for minimum provider volumes. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2006; 100(2): 93-98. [PubMed: 16686442]
32.
Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Entwicklung und Anwendung von Modellen zur Berechnung von Schwellenwerten bei Mindestmengen für die Koronarchirurgie: Vorbericht; Auftrag B05/01b [online]. 24.04.2006 [Zugriff: 11.03.2013]. URL: http://www​.iqwig.de/download​/B05-01B_Vorbericht​_Entwicklung_und​_Anwendung_von_Modellen​_zur_Berechnung​_von_Schwellenwerten​_bei_Mindestmengen_fuer​_die_Koronarchirurgie.pdf.
33.
Wetzel H. Definition of low threshold volumes for quality assurance: conceptual and methodological issues involved in the definition and evaluation of thresholds for volume outcome relations in clinical care. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2006; 100(2): 99-106. [PubMed: 16686443]
34.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 2000.
35.
Hentschker C, Mennicken R, Reifferscheid A, Wasem J, Wübker A. Volume-outcome relationship and minimum volume regulations in the German hospital sector: evidence from nationwide administrative hospital data for the years 2005-2007. Health Econ Rev 2018; 8(1): 25. [PMC free article: PMC6755587] [PubMed: 30259207]
36.
Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Feinglass JM, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Talamonti MS, et al. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26(28): 4626-4633. [PubMed: 18574159]
37.
Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(15): 1128-1137. [PubMed: 11948273]
38.
Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349(22): 2117-2127. [PubMed: 14645640]
39.
Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg 2003; 138(7): 721-725. [PubMed: 12860752]
40.
Hollenbeck BK, Hong J, Zaojun Y, Birkmeyer JD. Misclassification of hospital volume with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare data. Surg Innov 2007; 14(3): 192-198. [PubMed: 17928618]
41.
Kuo EY, Chang Y, Wright CD. Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72(4): 1118-1124. [PubMed: 11603422]
42.
Urbach DR, Baxter NN. Does it matter what a hospital is “high volume” for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data. BMJ 2004; 328(7442): 737-740. [PMC free article: PMC381322] [PubMed: 15020356]
43.
Wenner J, Zilling T, Bladström A, Alvegard TA. The influence of surgical volume on hospital mortality and 5-year survival for carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Anticancer Res 2005; 25(1B): 419-424. [PubMed: 15816605]
44.
Allareddy V, Ward MM, Allareddy V, Konety BR. Effect of meeting leapfrog volume thresholds on complication rates following complex surgical procedures. Ann Surg 2010; 251(2): 377-383. [PubMed: 20054271]
45.
Austin PC, Urbach DR. Using G-computation to estimate the effect of regionalization of surgical services on the absolute reduction in the occurrence of adverse patient outcomes. Med Care 2013; 51(9): 797-805. [PMC free article: PMC4617829] [PubMed: 23774518]
46.
Avritscher EBC, Cooksley CD, Rolston KV, Swint JM, Delclos GL, Franzini L, et al. Serious postoperative infections following resection of common solid tumors: outcomes, costs, and impact of hospital surgical volume. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22(2): 527-535. [PubMed: 24141699]
47.
Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Goldfaden A, Birkmeyer NJ, Stukel TA. Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer 2006; 106(11): 2476-2481. [PubMed: 16634089]
48.
Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2007; 245(5): 777-783. [PMC free article: PMC1877074] [PubMed: 17457171]
49.
Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Betensky RA, Daley J, Zinner MJ. The leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers. Ann Surg 2003; 238(4): 447-455. [PMC free article: PMC1360105] [PubMed: 14530717]
50.
Clark JM, Cooke DT, Hashimi H, Chin D, Utter GH, Brown LM, et al. Do the 2018 Leapfrog Group minimal hospital and surgeon volume thresholds for esophagectomy favor specific patient demographics? Ann Surg 13.08.2019 [Epub ahead of print]. [PubMed: 31425294]
51.
Derogar M, Sadr-Azodi O, Johar A, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. Hospital and surgeon volume in relation to survival after esophageal cancer surgery in a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(5): 551-557. [PubMed: 23295792]
52.
Dikken JL, Wouters MW, Lemmens VE, Putter H, Van der Geest LG, Verheij M, et al. Influence of hospital type on outcomes after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2012; 99(7): 954-963. [PubMed: 22569956]
53.
El Amrani M, Lenne X, Clement G, Delpero JR, Theis D, Pruvot FR, et al. Specificity of procedure volume and its association with postoperative mortality in digestive cancer surgery: a nationwide study of 225,752 Patients. Ann Surg 2019; 270(5): 775-782. [PubMed: 31498184]
54.
Ely S, Alabaster A, Ashiku SK, Patel A, Velotta JB. Regionalization of thoracic surgery improves short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11(5): 1867-1878. [PMC free article: PMC6588736] [PubMed: 31285879]
55.
Fedeli U, Schievano E, Lisiero M. Mortality after esophageal and gastric cancer resection. World J Surg 2012; 36(11): 2630-2636. [PubMed: 22851145]
56.
Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 2011; 364(22): 2128-2137. [PMC free article: PMC3150488] [PubMed: 21631325]
57.
Finley CJ, Jacks L, Keshavjee S, Darling G. The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92(2): 485-490. [PubMed: 21704974]
58.
Fischer C, Lingsma H, Klazinga N, Hardwick R, Cromwell D, Steyerberg E, et al. Volume-outcome revisited: the effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery. PLoS One 2017; 12(10): e0183955. [PMC free article: PMC5658198] [PubMed: 29073140]
59.
Funk LM, Gawande AA, Semel ME, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, Zinner MJ, et al. Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality. Ann Surg 2011; 253(5): 912-917. [PMC free article: PMC7065506] [PubMed: 21422913]
60.
Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference? A follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg 2009; 250(3): 472-483. [PubMed: 19730178]
61.
Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care 2011; 49(12): 1076-1081. [PubMed: 22002649]
62.
Harrison S, Tangel V, Wu X, Christos P, Gaber-Baylis L, Turnbull Z, et al. Are minimum volume standards appropriate for lung and esophageal surgery? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155(6): 2683-2694.e2681. [PubMed: 29370917]
63.
Henneman D, Dikken JL, Putter H, Lemmens VE, Van der Geest LG, Van Hillegersberg R, et al. Centralization of esophagectomy: how far should we go? Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21(13): 4068-4074. [PubMed: 25005073]
64.
Ho V, Heslin MJ, Yun H, Howard L. Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13(6): 851-858. [PubMed: 16614875]
65.
Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Miller DC, Daignault S, Taub DA, Wei JT. Volume-based referral for cancer surgery: informing the debate. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(1): 91-96. [PubMed: 17194909]
66.
In H, Palis BE, Merkow RP, Posner MC, Ferguson MK, Winchester DP, et al. Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90 days after esophagectomy: a critical measure of outcomes for quality improvement. Ann Surg 2016; 263(2): 286-291. [PubMed: 25915912]
67.
Kim W, Wolff S, Ho V. Measuring the volume-outcome relation for complex hospital surgery. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2016; 14(4): 453-464. [PMC free article: PMC4937076] [PubMed: 27083171]
68.
Kothari AN, Blanco BA, Brownlee SA, Evans AE, Chang VA, Abood GJ, et al. Characterizing the role of a high-volume cancer resection ecosystem on low-volume, high-quality surgical care. Surgery 2016; 160(4): 839-849. [PMC free article: PMC5105905] [PubMed: 27524432]
69.
Kozower BD, Stukenborg GJ. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93(5): 1690-1696. [PubMed: 22541199]
70.
Learn PA, Bach PB. A decade of mortality reductions in major oncologic surgery: the impact of centralization and quality improvement. Med Care 2010; 48(12): 1041-1049. [PubMed: 20966781]
71.
Mamidanna R, Ni Z, Anderson O, Spiegelhalter SD, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Surgeon volume and cancer esophagectomy, gastrectomy, and pancreatectomy: a population-based study in England. Ann Surg 2016; 263(4): 727-732. [PubMed: 26501701]
72.
Modrall JG, Minter RM, Minhajuddin A, Eslava-Schmalbach J, Joshi GP, Patel S, et al. The surgeon volume-outcome relationship: not yet ready for policy. Ann Surg 2018; 267(5): 863-867. [PubMed: 28628561]
73.
Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg 2014; 260(2): 244-251. [PMC free article: PMC4069246] [PubMed: 24368634]
74.
Sahni NR, Dalton M, Cutler DM, Birkmeyer JD, Chandra A. Surgeon specialization and operative mortality in United States: retrospective analysis. BMJ 2016; 354: i3571. [PMC free article: PMC4957587] [PubMed: 27444190]
75.
Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Ghaferi AA. Impact of hospital characteristics on failure to rescue following major surgery. Ann Surg 2016; 263(4): 692-697. [PMC free article: PMC4777662] [PubMed: 26501706]
76.
Simunovic M, Rempel E, Theriault ME, Coates A, Whelan T, Holowaty E, et al. Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Can J Surg 2006; 49(4): 251-258. [PMC free article: PMC3207572] [PubMed: 16948883]
77.
Varghese TK Jr, Wood DE, Farjah F, Oelschlager BK, Symons RG, MacLeod KE, et al. Variation in esophagectomy outcomes in hospitals meeting Leapfrog volume outcome standards. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91(4): 1003-1009. [PubMed: 21440116]
78.
Wasif N, Etzioni D, Habermann EB, Mathur A, Chang YH. Contemporary improvements in postoperative mortality after major cancer surgery are associated with weakening of the volume-outcome association. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26(8): 2348-2356. [PubMed: 31065959]
79.
Berchick ER, Hood E, Barnett JC. Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2017 [online]. 12.09.2018 [Zugriff: 24.06.2019]. (Current Population Reports; Band P60-264). URL: https://www​.census.gov​/content/dam/Census​/library/publications​/2018/demo/p60-264.pdf.
80.
Nimptsch U, Haist T, Krautz C, Grutzmann R, Mansky T, Lorenz D. Hospital volume, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue in esophageal surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115(47): 793-800. [PMC free article: PMC6334224] [PubMed: 30636674]
81.
Leapfrog Group. Who we are and our mission [online]. [Zugriff: 14.01.2020]. URL: https://www​.leapfroggroup.org/about.
82.
Bludau M, Holscher AH, Herbold T, Leers JM, Gutschow C, Fuchs H, et al. Management of upper intestinal leaks using an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (E-VAC). Surg Endosc 2014; 28(3): 896-901. [PMC free article: PMC3931933] [PubMed: 24149851]
83.
Heits N, Bernsmeier A, Reichert B, Hauser C, Hendricks A, Seifert D, et al. Long-term quality of life after endovac-therapy in anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10(1): 228-240. [PMC free article: PMC5863161] [PubMed: 29600053]
84.
Newton NJ, Sharrock A, Rickard R, Mughal M. Systematic review of the use of endo-luminal topical negative pressure in oesophageal leaks and perforations. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30(3): 1-5. [PubMed: 27628015]
85.
Kozower BD, Stukenborg GJ. The relationship between hospital lung cancer resection volume and patient mortality risk. Ann Surg 2011; 254(6): 1032-1037. [PubMed: 21562402]
86.
Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014. BMJ Open 2017; 7(9): e016184. [PMC free article: PMC5589035] [PubMed: 28882913]
87.
Neubauer S, Zeidler J, Lange A, Graf von der Schulenburg JM. Prozessorientierter Leitfaden für die Analyse und Nutzung von Routinedaten der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2017.
88.
Swart E, Gothe H, Geyer S, Jaunzeme J, Maier B, Grobe TG, et al. Good practice of secondary data analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations. Third revision; version 2012/2014. Gesundheitswesen 2015; 77(2): 120-126. [PubMed: 25622207]
89.
Busweiler LA, Wijnhoven BP, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Henneman D, Van Grieken NC, Wouters MW, et al. Early outcomes from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. Br J Surg 2016; 103(13): 1855-1863. [PubMed: 27704530]
90.
Kjaer DW, Larsson H, Svendsen LB, Jensen LS. Changes in treatment and outcome of oesophageal cancer in Denmark between 2004 and 2013. Br J Surg 2017; 104(10): 1338-1345. [PubMed: 28718940]
91.
Waffenschmidt S, Groen L. Validation of the “NOTing OUT” Corrao filter strategy in MEDLINE with primary publications included in systematic reviews [poster]. 11th Annual Meeting of Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi): optimizing patient-centered care in an era of economic uncertainty; 13-18062014; Washington, DC, USA.
92.
Wong SSL, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc 2006; 94(4): 451-455. [PMC free article: PMC1629423] [PubMed: 17082841]

The full report (German version) is published under https://www.iqwig.de/en/projects-results/projects/health-care/v19-04-relationship-between-volume-of-services-and-quality-of-treatment-outcome-for-complex-oesophageal-interventions-rapid-report.12444.html.

© IQWiG (Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care)
Bookshelf ID: NBK559730
Contents

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (936K)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...