Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Vakuumversiegelungstherapie von Wunden: Abschlussbericht; Auftrag N04-03 [online]. 13.03.2006 [Accessed: 11.03.2013]. (IQWiG-Berichte; Volume 4). URL: http://www​.iqwig.de/download​/N04-03_Abschlussbericht​_Vakuumversiegelungstherapie​_zur_Behandlung_von_Wunden..pdf.

Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Vakuumversiegelungstherapie von Wunden: Rapid Report; Auftrag N06-02 [online]. 29.01.2007 [Accessed: 11.03.2013]. (IQWiG-Berichte; Volume 16). URL: http://www​.iqwig.de/download​/N06-02_Rapid​_Report_Vakuumversiegelungstherapie​_von_Wunden..pdf.

Seidel D, Mathes T, Lefering R, Storck M, Lawall H, Neugebauer EAM. Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard wound care in chronic diabetic foot wounds: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 334. [PMC free article: PMC4156638] [PubMed: 25158846]

University of Missouri-Columbia. Study to compare negative pressure wound therapy or standard dressings after orthopedic surgery: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 03.04.2017 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02064270.

University of Missouri-Columbia. Study to compare negative pressure wound therapy or standard dressings after orthopedic surgery (PICO): study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 17.04.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02064270.

Northwell Health. A trial to evaluate negative pressure incision management system for groin wounds in vascular surgery patients: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.11.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02399111.

Northwell Health. A trial to evaluate negative pressure incision management system for groin wounds in vascular surgery patients: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.11.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02399111.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Improvement in wound healing with negative pressure wound therapy for postoperative total hip arthroplasty: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 17.04.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02355691.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Improvement in wound healing with negative pressure wound therapy for postoperative total hip arthroplasty: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 17.04.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02355691.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Improvement in wound healing with negative pressure wound therapy for postoperative total hip arthroplasty: study protocol [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 21.01.2015 [Accessed: 10.08.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ProvidedDocs/91​/NCT02355691/Prot_SAP_000.pdf.

Kwon J, Staley C, McCullough M, Goss S, Arosemena M, Abai B, et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating negative pressure therapy to decrease vascular groin incision complications. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68(6): 1744-1752. [PubMed: 30126781]

Thomas Jefferson University. Prevena vascular groin wound study: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 21.10.2015 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02581904.

Gunatilake RP, Swamy GK, Brancazio LR, Smrtka MP, Thompson JL, Gilner JB, et al. Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. AJP Rep 2017; 7(3): e151-e157. [PMC free article: PMC5511052] [PubMed: 28717587]

KCI USA. The use of the Prevena incision management system on post-surgical cesarean section incisions: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 12.07.2017 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01450631.

KCI USA. The use of the Prevena incision management system on post-surgical cesarean section incisions: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 12.07.2017 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01450631.

KCI USA. A prospective, randomized, evaluation of the Prevena Incision Management System on closed incisions in obese subjects undergoing cesarean section surgery: study AHS.2011.Prevena.Heine.03; clincial study report [unpublished]. 2014.

KCI USA. A prospective, randomized, evaluation of the Prevena lncision Management System on closed lncisions in obese subjects undergoing cesarean section surgery: study AHS.2011.Prevena.Heine.03; clinical research protocol; version 5.0 [unpublished]. 2011.

KCI USA. The management of closed surgical incisions resulting from incisional hernia repair and/or functional panniculectomy using the Prevena Customizable dressing: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 09.01.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/NCT02302222.

KCI USA. The management of closed surgical incisions resulting from incisional hernia repair and/or functional panniculectomy using the Prevena Customizable dressing: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 12.12.2018 [Accessed: 14.02.2019]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02302222.

. KCI USA. The management of closed surgical incisions resulting from incisional hernia repair and/or functional panniculectomy using the Prevena Customizable Dressing: study AHS.2012.Customizable.01; abbreviated clinical study report [unpublished]. 2015.

KCI. The management of closed surgical incisions resulting from incisional hernia repair and/or functional panniculectomy using the Prevana Customizable dressing: study AHS.2012.Customizable.01; study protocol; version 8.0 [unpublished]. 2016.

KCI USA. The use of the Prevena Incision Management System (PIMS) on closed incisions in renal transplant subjects (PIMS): full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 02.07.2017 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01341444.

KCI USA. The use of the Prevena Incision Management System (PIMS) on closed incisions in renal transplant subjects (PIMS): study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 02.07.2017 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01341444.

KCI USA. A prospective, randomized, evaluation of the Prevena lncision Management System on closed recipient site incisions in renal transplant subjects: study AHS.2012.Prevena.Cooper.01; clinical study report [unpublished]. 2016.

KCI USA. The use of the Prevena lncision Management System on closed recipient site incisions in renal transplant subjects: study AHS.2012.Prevena.Cooper.01; clinical investigation protocol; version 4.0 [unpublished]. 2012.

KCI. Stellungnahme von KCI zum Vorbericht Vakuumversiegelungstherapie von Wunden mit intendierter primärer Wundheilung N17-01B. [Demnächst verfügbar unter: https://www​.iqwig.de​/de/projekte-ergebnisse​/projekte/nichtmedikamentoese-verfahren​/n-projekte/n17-01b-vakuumversiegelungstherapie-von-wunden-mit-intendierter-primaerer-wundheilung​.9666.html Dokument “Dokumentation der Anhörung zum Vorbericht”].

Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado muticéntrico: complicaciones de herida quirúrgica en pacientes intervenidos de cirugía colorrectal tras aplicación de un apósito quirúrgico convencional frente a terapia de presión negativa de un solo uso en Incisión Quirúrgica Cerrada; study Cantero 2014; study protocol; version 2.0 [unpublished]. 2014.

Newman JM, Siqueira MBP, Klika AK, Molloy RM, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA. Use of closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients at high risk for infection: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty 2018; 34(3): 554-559.e1. [PubMed: 30545653]

The Cleveland Clinic. Evaluation of wound management with negative pressure dressing versus standard dressing after revision arthroplasty: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 26.03.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02127281.

The Cleveland Clinic. Evaluation of wound management with negative pressure dressing versus standard dressing after revision arthroplasty: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 26.03.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02127281.

The Cleveland Clinic. Randomized controlled trial of wound management with negative pressure dressing versus standard dressing after revision arthroplasty: study protocol [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 09.05.2016 [Accessed: 10.08.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ProvidedDocs/81​/NCT02127281/Prot_SAP_000.pdf.

Galiano RD, Hudson D, Shin J, Van der Hulst R, Tanaydin V, Djohan R, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for prevention of wound healing complications following reduction mammaplasty. 2018. (Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; Volume 1). [PMC free article: PMC5811280] [PubMed: 29464150]

Smith & Nephew Wound Management. PICO breast reduction clinical study looking at incision healing complications: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 08.01.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01640366.

Smith & Nephew. A prospective, randomized, intra-patient, comparative, open, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system (PICO) on the prevention of postsurgical incision healing complications in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty: study CE/US/11/01/PIC; clinical evaluation report; volume 3 [unpublished]. 2015.

Smith & Nephew. A prospective, randomized, intra-patient, comparative, open, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system (PICO) on the prevention of postsurgical incision healing complications in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty: study CE/US/11/01/PIC; clinical study protocol [unpublished]. 2012.

Chio EG, Agrawal A. A randomized, prospective, controlled study of forearm donor site healing when using a vacuum dressing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 142(2): 174-178. [PubMed: 20115970]

Crist BD, Oladeji LO, Khazzam M, Della Rocca GJ, Murtha YM, Stannard JP. Role of acute negative pressure wound therapy over primarily closed surgical incisions in acetabular fracture ORIF: a prospective randomized trial. Injury 2017; 48(7): 1518-1521. [PubMed: 28477992]

University of Missouri-Columbia. Role of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) device in postoperative management of pelvic and acetabular fractures: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 28.02.2014 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00635479.

University of Missouri-Columbia. Role of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) device in postoperative management of pelvic and acetabular fractures: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 28.02.2014 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT00635479.

KCI. Role of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) device in postoperative management of pelvic and acetabular fractures: study IRB 1096320; protocol outline; version 2 [unpublished]. 2010.

Muller-Sloof E, De Laat HEW, Hummelink SLM, Peters JWB, Ulrich DJO. The effect of postoperative closed incision negative pressure therapy on the incidence of donor site wound dehiscence in breast reconstruction patients: dehiscence prevention study (DEPRES), pilot randomized controlled trial. J Tissue Viability 2018; 27(4): 262-266. [PubMed: 30126630]

Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen. The effect of postoperative negative pressure wound therapy on the incidence of wound dehiscence in high risk patients [online]. In: Nederlands Trial Register. 11.03.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: http://www​.trialregister​.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview​.asp?TC=5808.

Engelhardt M, Rashad NA, Willy C, Müller C, Bauer C, Debus S, et al. Closed-incision negative pressure therapy to reduce groin wound infections in vascular surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J 2018; 15(3): 327-332. [PMC free article: PMC7949702] [PubMed: 29527812]

Giannini S, Mazzotti A, Luciani D, Lullini G, Tedesco G, Andreoli I, et al. Postoperative wound management with negative pressure wound therapy in knee and hip surgery: a randomised control trial. J Wound Care 2018; 27(8): 520-525. [PubMed: 30086252]

Gillespie BM, Rickard CM, Thalib L, Kang E, Finigan T, Homer A, et al. Use of negative-pressure wound dressings to prevent surgical site complications after primary hip arthroplasty: a pilot RCT. Surg Innov 2015; 22(5): 488-495. [PubMed: 25733548]

National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing Interventions for Hospitalised Patients. The use of negative wound therapy to treat surgical incisions after hip arthroplasty: a pilot study [online]. In: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. 24.05.2012 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://www​.anzctr.org​.au/ACTRN12612000550808.aspx.

West Virginia University. Prevention of wound complications after cesarean delivery in obese women utilizing negative pressure wound therapy: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.12.2012 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00654641.

West Virginia University. Prevention of wound complications after cesarean delivery in obese women utilizing negative pressure wound therapy: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.12.2012 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT00654641.

Walker ME, Tsay C, Broer PN, Zhu VZ, Sturrock T, Ng R, et al. A prospective, randomized-controlled pilot study comparing closed suction versus negative pressure drains for panniculectomy patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71(3): 438-439. [PubMed: 29289501]

Yale University. Prevention of seroma formation and wound complications using NPWT devices: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 06.12.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02147288.

Yale University. Prevention of seroma formation and wound complications using NPWT devices: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 06.12.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02147288 .

Howell RD, Hadley S, Strauss E, Pelham FR. Blister formation with negative pressure dressings after total knee arthroplasty. Curr Orthop Pract 2011; 22(2): 176-179.

Gombert A, Babilon M, Barbati ME, Keszei A, Von Trotha KT, Jalaie H, et al. Closed incision negative pressure therapy reduces surgical site infections in vascular surgery: a prospective randomised trial (AIMS trial). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 56(3): 442-448. [PubMed: 29970335]

RWTH Aachen University. Reduction of groin wound infections after vascular surgery by using an incision management system (IMS) (IMS): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 27.10.2017 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02395159.

RWTH Aachen. Reduction of groin wound infections after vascular surgery in patients with risk factors by the use a negative pressure wound incision management system (KCI Prevena): study IMS study; clinical study protocol; version 01.1 [unpublished]. 2015.

Svensson-Björk R, Hasselmann J, Acosta S. Evaluation of inguinal vascular surgical scars treated with closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy using three-dimensional digital imaging: a randomized controlled trial on bilateral incisions. Wound Repair Regen 2018; 26(1): 77-86. [PubMed: 29381241]

Hasselmann J, Kuhme T, Björk J, Acosta S. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical site infection after vascular surgery with inguinal incisions: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial (INVIPS-trial). Surgical Science 2015; 6: 562-571.

Skane University Hospital. PICO above incisions after vascular surgery: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 24.10.2018 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01913132.

Javed AA, Teinor J, Wright M, Ding D, Burkhart RA, Hundt J, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical-site infections: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 10.10.2018 [Epub ahead of print]. [PubMed: 31082899]

. Johns Hopkins University. Comparison between wound vacuum dressing and standard closure to reduce rates of surgical site infections: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 29.06.2018 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT03021668.

Karlakki SL, Hamad AK, Whittall C, Graham NM, Banerjee RD, Kuiper JH. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res 2016; 5(8): 328-337. [PMC free article: PMC5013893] [PubMed: 27496913]

Nherera LM, Trueman P, Karlakki SL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) in routine primary hip and knee replacements. Wound Repair Regen 2017; 25(3): 474-482. [PubMed: 28370637]

Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic & District Hospital. Post-operative wound management [online]. In: ISRCTN Registry. 16.04.2018 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: http://isrctn​.com/ISRCTN92903493.

Lee AJ, Sheppard CE, Kent WDT, Mewhort H, Sikdar KC, Fedak PWM. Safety and efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy following open saphenous vein harvest in cardiac surgery: a feasibility study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2017; 24(3): 324-328. [PubMed: 28025309]

University of Calgary. Negative pressure dressing after saphenous vein harvest: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 30.11.2015 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01698372.

Foothills Medical Centre. Negative pressure dressing to decrease the incidence of leg wound complications after CABG: study KCI VAC study; research proposal; version 1.1 [unpublished]. 2012.

KCI Europe Holding. The use of prevenaTM on clean closed sternal midline incisions in subjects at high risk for surgical site occurrences: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 23.05.2017 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02195310.

KCI Europe. The use of Prevena Incision Management System on clean closed sternal midline incisions in subjects at high risk for surgical site occurrences: study KCI.2013.Prevena.01; abbreviated clinical study report [unpublished]. 2017.

KCI Europe. The use of Prevena Incision Management System on clean closed sternal midline incisions in subjects at high risk for surgical site occurrences: study KCI.2013.Prevena.01; clinical research protocol; amendment; version 5.0 [unpublished]. 2016.

Keeney JA, Cook JL, Clawson SW, Aggarwal A, Stannard JP. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy devices improve short-term wound complications, but not long-term infection rate following hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15.12.2018 [Epub ahead of print]. [PubMed: 30612833]

Li PY, Yang D, Liu D, Sun SJ, Zhang LY. Reducing surgical site infection with negative-pressure wound therapy after open abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Scand J Surg 2016; 106(3): 189-195. [PubMed: 27609528]

Traumatology Department of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University. Prevention surgical site infection with using negative pressure wound thearapy in abdominal incision [online]. In: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. 24.05.2015 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: http://www​.chictr.org​.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=11034.

Manoharan V, Grant AL, Harris AC, Hazratwala K, Wilkinson MPR, McEwen PJ. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy vs conventional dry dressings after primary knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(11): 2487-2494. [PubMed: 27341973]

Orthopaedic Research Institute of Queensland. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus conventional wound dressings in total knee arthroplasty [online]. In: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. 31.03.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://www​.anzctr.org​.au/ACTRN12615001350516.aspx.

Mendame Ehya RE, Zhao Y, Zheng X, Yi W, Bounda GA, Li Z, et al. Comparative effectiveness study between negative pressure wound therapy and conventional wound dressing on perforator flap at the Chinese tertiary referral teaching hospital. J Tissue Viability 2017; 26(4): 282-288. [PubMed: 28734659]

Chadi SA, Vogt KN, Knowles S, Murphy PB, Van Koughnett JA, Brackstone M, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy use to decrease surgical nosocomial events in colorectal resections (NEPTUNE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16: 322. [PMC free article: PMC4518608] [PubMed: 26223227]

Murphy PB, Knowles S, Chadi SA, Vogt K, Brackstone M, Van Koughnett JA, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy use to decrease surgical nosocomial events in colorectal resections (NEPTUNE): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 29.11.2018 [Epub ahead of print]. [PubMed: 30499799]

Lawson Health Research Institute. Negative pressure wound therapy use to decrease surgical nosocomial events in colorectal resections (NEPTUNE): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 19.10.2018 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02007018.

KCI. Negative pressure wound therapy use to decrease surgical nosocomial events in colorectal resections (NEPTUNE): a randomized controlled trial; study NEPTUNE; trial protocol [unpublished]. 2014.

Nordmeyer M, Pauser J, Biber R, Jantsch J, Lehrl S, Kopschina C, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for seroma prevention and surgical incision treatment in spinal fracture care. Int Wound J 2015; 13(6): 1176-1179. [PMC free article: PMC7949832] [PubMed: 25932993]

Nordmeyer M. Negative pressure wound therapy zur Vermeidung von Serombildung nach chirurgischer Versorgung von Wirbelsaulenfrakturen [Dissertation]. Erlangen: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität; 2016.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Negative pressure wound therapy in cesarean section (NPWTCS): full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 27.01.2017 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02289157.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Negative pressure wound therapy in cesarean section (NPWTCS): study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 02.07.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02289157.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Negative pressure wound therapy in high risk patients undergoing cesarean section: study STU 042014-047; study protocol; version 1 [unpublished]. 2014.

Pachowsky M, Gusinde J, Klein A, Lehrl S, Schulz-Drost S, Schlechtweg P, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy to prevent seromas and treat surgical incisions after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2011; 36(4): 19-22. [PMC free article: PMC3311811] [PubMed: 21761149]

Pauser J, Nordmeyer M, Biber R, Jantsch J, Kopschina C, Bail HJ, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: reduction of wound complications. Int Wound J 2016; 13(5): 663-667. [PMC free article: PMC7949884] [PubMed: 25125244]

Peter Suh HS, Hong JP. Effects of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy on primary closed defects after superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap harvest: randomized controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138(6): 1333-1340. [PubMed: 27879604]

Yu P, Yang X, Qi Z. Effects of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy on primary closed defects after superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap harvest: randomized controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140(1): 237e-238e. [PubMed: 28489630]

Zielinski E, Galiano RD. Discussion: effects of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy on primary closed defects after superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap harvest; randomized controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138(6): 1341-1343. [PubMed: 27879605]

O’Leary DP, Peirce C, Anglim B, Carter M, Hickey K, Coffey JC. Prophylactic negative pressure dressing use in closed laparotomy wounds following abdominal operations: a randomized, controlled, open-label trial; the P.I.C.O. trial. Ann Surg 2016; 265(6): 10821096. [PubMed: 27926575]

University Hospital of Limerick. Prophylactic negative pressure dressings for closed laparotomy wounds: a randomised, controlled, open label trial; full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 26.11.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02780453.

Pleger SP, Nink N, Elzien M, Kunold A, Koshty A, Boning A. Reduction of groin wound complications in vascular surgery patients using closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT): a prospective, randomised, single-institution study. Int Wound J 2018; 15(1): 75-83. [PMC free article: PMC7950196] [PubMed: 29068153]

Ruhstaller K, Downes KL, Chandrasekaran S, Srinivas S, Durnwald C. Prophylactic wound vacuum therapy after cesarean section to prevent wound complications in the obese population: a randomized controlled trial (the ProVac study). Am J Perinatol 2017; 34(11): 1125-1130. [PMC free article: PMC5983905] [PubMed: 28704847]

University of Pennsylvania. Prophylactic wound vacuum therapy to decrease rates of cesarean section in the obese population (PROVAC): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 13.10.2017 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/NCT02128997.

University of Pennsylvania. Prophylactic wound vacuum therapy to decrease rates of cesarean section in the obese population (PROVAC): study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 13.10.2017 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02128997.

University of Pennsylvania. Prophylactic wound vacuum therapy to decrease rates of cesearean section in the obese population (PROVAC): study PROVAC; study protocol [unpublished]. 2015.

Duke University. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 30.06.2015 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01759381.

Duke University. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 30.06.2015 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01759381.

Nagata T, Miura K, Homma Y, Fukamizu H. Comparison between negative-pressure fixation and film dressing in wound management after tissue expansion: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142(1): 37-41. [PubMed: 29952886]

Chang EI. Discussion: comparison between negative-pressure fixation and film dressing in wound management after tissue expansion; a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142(1): 42-43. [PubMed: 29952887]

Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Hamamatsu university school of medicine. Comparison between negative pressure fixation and film dressing in wound management after tissue expansion: a prospective, open-label, randomized, single-center study [online]. In: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry. 03.07.2017 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https://upload​.umin.ac​.ip/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view​.cgi?recptno=R000016785.

Murphy P, Lee K, Dubois L, DeRose G, Forbes T, Power A. Negative pressure wound therapy for high-risk wounds in lower extremity revascularization: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16: 504. [PMC free article: PMC4634141] [PubMed: 26537879]

Lee K, Murphy PB, Ingves MV, Duncan A, DeRose G, Dubois L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of negative pressure wound therapy for high-risk groin wounds in lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66(6): 1814-1819. [PubMed: 28865981]

Western University, Canada. Negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection following lower limb revascularization: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 30.07.2015 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02084017.

London Health Sciences Centre. Single center prospective randomized control trial on negative pressure wound therapy for primarily closed groin incisions following lower-limb revascularization to reduce surgical site infection: study RRG-104871; study protocol [unpublished].

Hyldig N, Joergensen JS, Wu C, Bille C, Vinter CA, Sorensen JA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care after caesarean section in obese women: a trial-based economic evaluation. BJOG 03.12.2018 [Epub ahead of print]. [PubMed: 30507022]

Hyldig N, Vinter CA, Kruse M, Mogensen O, Bille C, Sorensen JA, et al. Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. BJOG 01.08.2018 [Epub ahead of print]. [PMC free article: PMC6586160] [PubMed: 30066454]

Odense University Hospital. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for prevention of postoperative infections following caesarean section: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 31.01.2017 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01890720.

Johns Hopkins University. Surgical application of vac dressings in obese patients to reduce wound complications: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 29.08.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02461433.

Johns Hopkins University. Surgical application of vac dressings in obese patients to reduce wound complications (SAVIOR): study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 12.02.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02461433.

KCI. JHM IRB: eForm; study IRB00030337; study protocol; version 3 [unpublished]. 2014.

Shen P, Blackham AU, Lewis S, Clark CJ, Howerton R, Mogal HD, et al. Phase II randomized trial of negative-pressure wound therapy to decrease surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy for gastrointestinal, pancreatic, and peritoneal surface malignancies. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224(4): 726-737. [PMC free article: PMC5498990] [PubMed: 28088597]

Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Negative pressure therapy in preventing infection after surgery in patients with colon, rectal, pancreatic, or peritoneal surface cancer: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 03.07.2018 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01656044.

Shim HS, Choi JS, Kim SW. A role for postoperative negative pressure wound therapy in multitissue hand injuries. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 3629643. [PMC free article: PMC5892250] [PubMed: 29780821]

Tanaydin V, Beugels J, Andriessen A, Sawor JH, Van der Hulst RRWJ. Correction to: randomized controlled study comparing disposable negative-pressure wound therapy with standard care in bilateral breast reduction mammoplasty evaluating surgical site complications and scar quality. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42(4): 1176. [PMC free article: PMC6828042] [PubMed: 29610951]

Tanaydin V, Beugels J, Andriessen A, Sawor JH, Van der Hulst RRWJ. Randomized controlled study comparing disposable negative-pressure woundtherapy with standard care in bilateral breast reduction mammoplasty evaluating surgical site complications and scar quality. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42(4): 927-935. [PMC free article: PMC6097780] [PubMed: 29442143]

Chaboyer W, Anderson V, Webster J, Sneddon A, Thalib L, Gillespie BM. Negative pressure wound therapy on surgical site infections in women undergoing elective caesarean sections: a pilot RCT. Healthcare (Basel) 2014; 2(4): 417-428. [PMC free article: PMC4934567] [PubMed: 27429285]

Heard C, Chaboyer W, Anderson V, Gillespie BM, Whitty JA. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pilot study of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy. J Tissue Viability 2017; 26(1): 79-84. [PubMed: 27320010]

Anderson V, Chaboyer W, Gillespie B, Fenwick J. The use of negative pressure wound therapy dressing in obese women undergoing caesarean section: a pilot study. Evidence Based Midwifery 2014; 12(1): 23-28.

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing Interventions for Hospitalised Patients, Griffith University. Adding negative pressure to improve healing in obese women undergoing caesarean section (the DRESSING trial) [online]. In: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. 26.05.2014 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://www​.anzctr.org​.au/ACTRN12612000171819.aspx.

Uchino M, Hirose K, Bando T, Chohno T, Takesue Y, Ikeuchi H. Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy at ostomy closure for the prevention of delayed wound healing and surgical site infection in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dig Surg 2016; 33(6): 449-454. [PubMed: 27246708]

Hyogo College of Medicine. Examination of efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wound in ostomy closure [online]. In: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry. 22.08.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https://upload​.umin.ac​.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view​.cgi?recptno=R000017354.

Hyogo College of Medicine. Efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy for wound closure at ostomy site [online]. In: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry. 21.02.2017 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https://upload​.umin.ac​.ip/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view​.cgi?recptno=R000017820.

Stannard JP, Robinson JT, Anderson ER, McGwin G Jr, Volgas DA, Alonso JE. Negative pressure wound therapy to treat hematomas and surgical incisions following high-energy trauma. J Trauma 2006; 60(6): 1301-1306. [PubMed: 16766975]

Stannard J. Complex orthopaedic wounds: prevention and treatment with negative pressure wound therapy. Orthop Nurs 2004; 17(Suppl 1): 3-10. [PubMed: 15106367]

University of Alabama at Birmingham. Vacuum assisted closure as a treatment for draining hematomas (VAC-DH): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 01.10.2013 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00582179.

Stannard JP, Volgas DA, McGwin G 3rd, Stewart RL, Obremskey W, Moore T, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy after high-risk lower extremity fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26(1): 37-42. [PubMed: 21804414]

University of Alabama at Birmingham. Vacuum assisted closure as a treatment for soft tissue injuries (VAC-ST): full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.09.2013 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00582998.

Masden D, Goldstein J, Endara M, Xu K, Steinberg J, Attinger C. Negative pressure wound therapy for at-risk surgical closures in patients with multiple comorbidities: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 2012; 255(6): 1043-1047. [PubMed: 22549748]

Georgetown University. VAC NPWT KCI dressing study: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 04.04.2013 [Accessed: 04.06.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01366105.

Wihbey KA, Joyce EM, Spalding ZT, Jones HJ, MacKenzie TA, Evans RH, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy and wound complication after cesarean delivery in women with class II or III obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132(2): 377-384. [PubMed: 29995726]

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Vacuum assisted closure for cesarean section (VACCS): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 22.05.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02390401.

Witt-Majchrzak A, Zelazny P, Snarska J. Preliminary outcome of treatment of postoperative primarily closed sternotomy wounds treated using negative pressure wound therapy. Pol Przegl Chir 2015; 86(10): 456-465. [PubMed: 25720104]

Yu Y, Song Z, Xu Z, Ye X, Xue C, Li J, et al. Bilayered negative-pressure wound therapy preventing leg incision morbidity in coronary artery bypass graft patients: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96(3): e5925. [PMC free article: PMC5279102] [PubMed: 28099357]

Changhai Hospital. Preventing seroma formation after stripping saphenous vein in coronary bypass: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 30.09.2014 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02010996.

Changhai Hospital. Preventing seroma formation after stripping saphenous vein in coronary bypass: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 30.09.2014 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02010996.

Acosta S, Monsen C, Dencker M. Clinical outcome and microvascular blood flow in VAC- and Sorbalgon -treated peri-vascular infected wounds in the groin after vascular surgery: an early interim analysis. Int Wound J 2013; 10(4): 377-382. [PMC free article: PMC7950938] [PubMed: 22672773]

Monsen C, Wann-Hansson C, Wictorsson C, Acosta S. Vacuum-assisted wound closure versus alginate for the treatment of deep perivascular wound infections in the groin after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59(1): 145-151. [PubMed: 24055512]

Monsen C, Acosta S, Mani K, Wann-Hansson C. A randomised study of NPWT closure versus alginate dressings in peri-vascular groin infections: quality of life, pain and cost. J Wound Care 2015; 24(6): 252, 254-256, 258-260. [PubMed: 26075373]

Georgetown University. ActiV.A.C.+ compression therapy versus compression therapy alone for the treatment of chronic venous ulcerations: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 21.12.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01528293.

Georgetown University. ActiV.A.C.+ compression therapy versus compression therapy alone for the treatment of chronic venous ulcerations: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 21.12.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01528293.

Arti H, Khorami M, Ebrahimi-Nejad V. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) & conventional wound dressings in the open fracture wounds. Pak J Med Sci 2016; 32(1): 65-69. [PMC free article: PMC4795891] [PubMed: 27022347]

Vice Chancellor for Research Technology Development, Ahvaz Jondishapur University of Medical Sciences. Comparison of suction sponge and conventional wound dressings in the open fracture wounds [online]. In: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. [Accessed: 28.08.2017]. URL: http://www​.irct.ir/searchresult​.php?id=14190&number​=8.

Ashby RL, Dumville JC, Soares MO, McGinnis E, Stubbs N, Torgerson DJ, et al. A pilot randomised controlled trial of negative pressure wound therapy to treat grade III/IV pressure ulcers [ISRCTN69032034]. Trials 2012; 13: 119. [PMC free article: PMC3533804] [PubMed: 22839453]

University of York. Topical negative pressure (TNP) therapy to treat grade III/IV pressure ulcers [online]. In: ISRCTN Registry. 21.08.2015 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://isrctn​.com/ISRCTN69032034.

Banasiewicz T, Bobkiewicz A, Borejsza-Wysocki M, Biczysko M, Ratajczak A, Malinger S, et al. Portable VAC therapy improve the results of the treatment of the pilonidal sinus: randomized prospective study. Pol Przegl Chir 2013; 85(7): 371-376. [PubMed: 23945113]

Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, Zarzaur BL, Maish GO 3rd, Minard G, et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma 2008; 65(2): 337-344. [PubMed: 18695468]

Biter LU, Beck GMN, Mannaerts GHH, Stok MM, Van der Ham AC, Grotenhuis BA. The use of negative-pressure wound therapy in pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard open wound care after surgical excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57(12): 1406-1411. [PubMed: 25380007]

Joos A. Einsatz der Vakuumtherapie beim Sinus pilonidalis: eine randomisierte kontrollierte Studie zum Vergleich der Unterdruck-Wundtherapie versus Standard-Wundversorgung nach chirurgischer Exzision. Coloproctology 2015; 37(3): 210-212.

Braakenburg A, Obdeijn MC, Feitz R, Van Rooij IALM, Van Griethuysen AJ, Klinkenbijl JHG. The clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of the vacuum-assisted closure technique in the management of acute and chronic wounds: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118(2): 390-397. [PubMed: 16874208]

Smith & Nephew. Trial of PICO versus standard care in chronic and sub-acute wounds: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 13.02.2018 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02458859.

Smith & Nephew. A 100 subjects, prospective, randomised, clinical evaluation comparing clinical and health economic outcomes between subjects treated with either PICO (4 weeks treatment then standard care up to 12 weeks total) or standard care dressings over 12 weeks of treatment: study CE/044/PIC; clinical evaluation report; volume 1 [unpublished]. 2016.

Smith & Nephew. A 100 subjects, prospective, randomised, clinical evaluation comparing clinical and health economic outcomes between subjects treated with either PICO (4 weeks treatment then standard care up to 12 weeks total) or standard care dressings over 12 weeks of treatment: study CE/044/PIC; clinical evaluation report; volume 2 [unpublished]. 2016.

Smith & Nephew. A 100 subjects, prospective, randomised, clinical evaluation comparing clinical and health economic outcomes between subjects treated with either PICO (4 weeks treatment then standard care up to 12 weeks total) or standard care dressings over 12 weeks of treatment: study CE/044/PIC; clinical evaluation report; volume 3 [unpublished]. 2016.

Smith & Nephew. A 100 subjects, prospective, randomised, clinical evaluation comparing clinical and health economic outcomes between subjects treated with either PICO (4 weeks treatment then standard care up to 12 weeks total) or standard care dressings over 12 weeks of treatment: study CE/044/PIC; clinical evaluation report; volume 4 [unpublished]. 2016.

Smith & Nephew. A 100 patient, prospective, randomised, clinical evaluatian comparing clinical and health economic outcomes between patients with chronic or sub-acute wounds treated with either PICO or standard care dressings and a qualitative study ta explore the experiences af patients receiving PICO with particular emphasis an concordance: study CE/044/PIC; clinical study protocol; amendement 1, 2, 3, 4 [unpublished]. 2013.

Chiang N, Rodda OA, Sleigh J, Vasudevan T. Effects of topical negative pressure therapy on tissue oxygenation and wound healing in vascular foot wounds. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66(2): 564-571. [PubMed: 28583732]

Correa JC, Mejia DA, Duque N, J MM, Uribe CM.Managing the open abdomen: negative pressure closure versus mesh-mediated fascial traction closure; a randomized trial. Hernia 2016; 20(2): 221-229. [PubMed: 26833235]

Universidad de Antioquia. Open abdomen: vacuum pack versus sylo bag and mesh protocol; full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 26.10.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01864590.

Dalla Paola L, Carone A, Ricci S, Russo A, Caccacci T, Ninkovic S. Use of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds. Journal of Diabetic Foot Complications 2010; 2(2): 33-44.

De Laat EHEW, Van den Boogaard MHWA, Spauwen PHM, Van Kuppevelt DHJM, Van Goor H, Schoonhoven L. Faster wound healing with topical negative pressure therapy in difficult-to-heal wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67(6): 626-631. [PubMed: 21629111]

Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen. Faster wound healing with topical negative pressure therapy in difficult to heal wounds [online]. In: ISRCTN Registry. 24.07.2009 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://isrctn​.com/ISRCTN36051617.

Seidel D, Mathes T, Affupper-Fink M, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM. Studie zum Nutzennachweis der Unterdruck-Wundtherapie: innerhalb des Behandiungskonzeptes der diabetischen FuBwunde im Auftrag der gesetzlichen Krankenkassen. Vasomed 2012; 24(5): 246-251.

University of Witten/Herdecke. Treatment study of negative pressure wound therapy for diabetic foot wounds (DiaFu): full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.08.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01480362.

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke. Randomisiert, kontrollierte klinische Studie zur Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit und des klinischen Nutzens der Unterdruck-Wundtherapie zur Behandlung von diabetischen Fußwunden im Vergleich zur Standardwundtherapie: ein Studienprojekt mit pragmatischem Ansatz zur Evaluation der Unterdruck-Wundtherapie innerhalb der medizinischen Behandlungssektoren in Deutschland [online]. In: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien. 22.11.2011 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://www​.drks.de/DRKS00003347.

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke. Randomisiert, kontrollierte klinische Studie zur Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit und des klinischen Nutzens der Unterdruck-Wundtherapie zur Behandlung von Diabetischen Fußwunden im Vergleich zur Standard-Wundtherapie; study DiaFu; Abschlussbericht [unpublished]. 2018.

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke. Randomisiert, kontrollierte klinische Studie zur Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit und des klinischen Nutzens der Unterdruck-Wundtherapie zur Behandlung von Diabetischen Fußwunden im Vergleich zur Standard-Wundtherapie: study DiaFu; A73-03 Tabellen; Loss to Follow-UP und Begründungen [unpublished]. 2018.

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke. Randomisiert, kontrollierte klinische Studie zur Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit und des klinischen Nutzens der Unterdruck-Wundtherapie zur Behandlung von Diabetischen Fußwunden im Vergleich zur Standardwundtherapie: study Diafu; Studienprotokoll; Version 3.0 [unpublished]. 2013.

Dwivedi MK, Srivastava RN, Bhagat AK, Agarwal R, Baghel K, Jain A, et al. Pressure ulcer management in paraplegic patients with a novel negative pressure device: a randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2016; 25(4): 199-200. [PubMed: 27064369]

Dwivedi MK, Bhagat AK, Srivastava RN, Jain A, Baghel K, Raj S. Expression of MMP-8 in pressure injuries in spinal cord injury patients managed by negative pressure wound therapy or conventional wound care: a randomized controlled trial. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2017; 44(4): 1-7. [PubMed: 28459717]

Council of Science Technology. A 12 week, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial, comparing indigenized negative pressure device (NPD) to standard wound care for the treatment of bedsores in traumatic paraplegia patients [online]. In: Clinical Trials Registry India. 31.05.2014 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://www​.ctri.nic.in​/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2​.php?trialid=9049.

Eginton MT, Brown KR, Seabrook GR, Towne JB, Cambria RA. A prospective randomized evaluation of negative-pressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds. Ann Vasc Surg 2003; 17(6): 645-649. [PubMed: 14534844]

Ford CN, Reinhard ER, Yeh D, Syrek D, De Las Morenas A, Bergman SB, et al. Interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49(1): 55-61. [PubMed: 12142596]

Gupta K, Mundada A, Patil A. Comparison of vacuum assisted closure therapy with standard wound therapy for open musculoskeletal injuries. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science and Technology 2013; 9(2): 168-170.

Hu KX, Zhang HW, Zhou F, Yao G, Shi JP, Cheng Z, et al. Observation on the therapeutic effects of negative-pressure wound therapy on the treatment of complicated and refractory wounds [Chinese]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi 2009; 25(4): 249-252. [PubMed: 19951540]

Huang WS, Hsieh SC, Hsieh CS, Schoung JY, Huang T. Use of vacuum-assisted wound closure to manage limb wounds in patients suffering from acute necrotizing fasciitis. Asian J Surg 2006; 29(3): 135-139. [PubMed: 16877210]

University of Witten/Herdecke. Evaluate the efficacy of the treatment of iatrogenic subcutaneous abdominal wounds (ISAW) after surgery by application of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in comparison to standard conventional wound therapy (SCWT) of the clinical routine (ISAW): full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 17.05.2013 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01611207.

University of Witten/Herdecke. Treatment of iatrogenic subcutaneous abdominal wounds (ISAW) after surgery [online]. In: ISRCTN Registry. 04.08.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://isrctn​.com/ISRCTN44577192.

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke. Randomisiert, kontrollierte klinische Studie zur Untersuchung der Effektivität der Behandlung von Iatrogenen Subkutanen Abdominellen Wundheilungsstörungen (ISAW) nach chirurgischem Eingriff unter Nutzung des Therapieprinzips der Negative Pressure Wound Therapy im Vergleich zur Standard Conventional Wound Therapy der klinischen Routine [online]. In: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien. 27.01.2012 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://www​.drks.de/DRKS00003498.

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke. Randomisiert, kontrollierte klinische Studie zur Untersuchung der Effektivität der Behandlung von iatrogenen subkutanen abdominellen Wundheilungsstörungen nach chirurgischem Eingriff unter Nutzung der Therapieprinzips der Negative Pressure Wound Therapy im Vergleich zur Standard Conventional Wound Therapy der klinischen Routine (ISAW): study ISAW; Abschlussbericht [unpublished]. 2015.

Private Universität Witten/Herdecke. Randomisiert, kontrollierte klinische Studie zur Untersuchung der Effektivität der Behandlung von iatrogenen subkutanen abdominellen Wundheilungsstörungen nach chirurgischem Eingriff unter Nutzung der Therapieprinzips der Negative Pressure Wound Therapy im Vergleich zur Standard Conventional Wound Therapy der klinischen Routine (ISAW): study ISAW; Studienprotokoll; Version 1.0 [unpublished]. 2011.

Jayakumar M, Ajai P. A comparative study between primary vacuum assisted closure and conventional sterile dressing in treatment of soft tissue injuries associated with severe open fractures of both bones leg. Kerala Journal of Orthopaedics 2013; 26(1): 8-12.

Johnson LS, Chaar M, Ball CG, Perez S, Nicholas JM, Wyrzykowski AD, et al. Management of extremity fasciotomy sites prospective randomized evaluation of two techniques. Am J Surg 2018; 216(4): 736-739. [PubMed: 30064725]

Joseph E, Hamori CA, Bergman S, Roaf E, Swann NF, Anastasi GW. A prospective randomized trial of vaccum-assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic nonhealing wounds. Wounds 2000; 12(3): 60-67.

Kakagia D, Karadimas EJ, Drosos G, Ververidis A, Trypsiannis G, Verettas D. Wound closure of leg fasciotomy: comparison of vacuum-assisted closure versus shoelace technique; a randomised study. Injury 2014; 45(5): 890-893. [PubMed: 22377275]

Karatepe O, Eken I, Acet E, Unal O, Mert M, Koc B, et al. Vacuum assisted closure improves the quality of life in patients with diabetic foot. Acta Chir Belg 2011; 111(5): 298302. [PubMed: 22191131]

Keskin M, Karabekmez FE, Yilmaz E, Tosun Z, Savaci N. Vacuum-assisted closure of wounds and anxiety. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2008; 42(4): 202-205. [PubMed: 18763197]

Leclercq A, Labeille B, Perrot JL, Vercherin P, Cambazard F. Skin graft secured by VAC (vacuum-assisted closure) therapy in chronic leg ulcers: a controlled randomized study. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2016; 143(1): 3-8. [PubMed: 26718899]

Liao Q, Xu J, Weng XJ, Zhong D, Liu Z, Wang C. Effectiveness of vacuum sealing drainage combined with anti-taken skin graft for primary closing of open amputation wound [Chinese]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2012; 26(5): 558-562. [PubMed: 22702049]

Llanos S, Danilla S, Barraza C, Armijo E, Pineros JL, Quintas M, et al. Effectiveness of negative pressure closure in the integration of split thickness skin grafts: a randomized, double-masked, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244(5): 700-705. [PMC free article: PMC1856589] [PubMed: 17060762]

Mody GN, Nirmal IA, Duraisamy S, Perakath B. A blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial of topical negative pressure wound closure in India. Ostomy Wound Manage 2008; 54(12): 36-46. [PubMed: 19104122]

Mohsin M, Zargar HR, Wani AH, Zaroo MI, Baba PUF, Bashir SA, et al. Role of customised negative-pressure wound therapy in the integration of split-thickness skin grafts: a randomised control study. Indian J Plast Surg 2017; 50(1): 43-49. [PMC free article: PMC5469234] [PubMed: 28615809]

Moisidis E, Heath T, Boorer C, Ho K, Deva AK. A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114(4): 917-922. [PubMed: 15468399]

Moues CM, Vos MC, Van den Bemd GJCM, Stijnen T, Hovius SER. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Wound Repair Regen 2004; 12(1): 11-17. [PubMed: 14974959]

Moues CM, Van den Bemd GJCM, Heule F, Hovius SER. Comparing conventional gauze therapy to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomised trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60(6): 672-681. [PubMed: 17485058]

Moues CM, Van Toorenenbergen AW, Heule F, Hop WC, Hovius SER. The role of topical negative pressure in wound repair: expression of biochemical markers in wound fluid during wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16(4): 488-494. [PubMed: 18638266]

Nain PS, Uppal SK, Garg R, Bajaj K, Garg S. Role of negative pressure wound therapy in healing of diabetic foot ulcers. J Surg Tech Case Rep 2011; 3(1): 17-22. [PMC free article: PMC3192517] [PubMed: 22022649]

Novinscak T, Zvorc M, Trojko S, Jozinovic E, Filipovic M, Grudic R. Comparison of cost-benefit ofthe three methods of diabetic ulcer treatment: dry, moistand negative pressure [Croatian]. Acta Med Croatica 2010; 64(Suppl 1): 113-115.

Perez D, Bramkamp M, Exe C, Von Ruden C, Ziegler A. Modern wound care for the poor: a randomized clinical trial comparing the vacuum system with conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings. Am J Surg 2010; 199(1): 14-20. [PubMed: 19362288]

Rencuzogullari A, Dalci K, Eray IC, Yalav O, Okoh AK, Akcam T, et al. Comparison of early surgical alternatives in the management of open abdomen: a randomized controlled study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2015; 21(3): 168-174. [PubMed: 26033648]

Riaz MU, Khan MUR, Akbar A. Comparison of vacuum assisted closure versus normal saline dressing in healing diabetic wounds. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences 2010; 4(4): 308-313.

Saaiq M, Hameed-Ud-Din, Khan MI, Chaudhery SM.Vacuum-assisted closure therapy as a pretreatment for split thickness skin grafts. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20(10): 675679. [PubMed: 20943111]

Sadiq M, Khan FH, Ur Rahman SS, Obaid-Ur-Rahman O. Effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure therapy as a pretreatment for split thickness skin grafts. Medical Forum Monthly 2018; 29(9): 14-17.

Sajid MT, Mustafa QUA, Shaheen N, Hussain SM, Shukr I, Ahmed M. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015; 25(11): 789-793. [PubMed: 26577962]

Shen CA, Chai JK, Tuo XY, Cai JH, Li DJ, Zhang L, et al. Efficacy observation on application of negative pressure therapy in the treatment of superficial partial-thickness scald wound in children [Chinese]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi 2013; 29(1): 14-17. [PubMed: 23710718]

Sibin JP, Binoj R, Jose FC. Vacuum assisted closure in grade III open tibial fractures. Indian J Appl Res 2017; 7(4): 254-256.

Sinha K, Chauhan VD, Maheshwari R, Chauhan N, Rajan M, Agrawal A. Vacuum assisted closure therapy versus standard wound therapy for open musculoskeletal injuries. Adv Orthop 2013; 2013: 245940. [PMC free article: PMC3710616] [PubMed: 23878741]

Sun JW, Sun JH, Zhang CC. Vacuum assisted closure technique for repairing diabetic foot ulcers: analysis of variance by using a randomized and double-stage crossover design [Chinese]. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research 2007; 11(14): 8908-8911.

Arundel C, Buckley H, Clarke E, Cullum N, Dixon S, Dumville J, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy versus usual care for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial. Trials 2016; 17(1): 535. [PMC free article: PMC5100221] [PubMed: 27821142]

Arundel C, Fairhurst C, Corbacho-Martin B, Buckley H, Clarke E, Cullum N, et al. Pilot feasibility randomized clinical trial of negative-pressure wound therapy versus usual care in patients with surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. BJS Open 2018; 2(3): 99-111. [PMC free article: PMC5989956] [PubMed: 29951633]

Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust. Surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI): a pilot randomised controlled trial comparing negative pressure wound therapy and usual care for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention [online]. In: ISRCTN Registry. 10.11.2016 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: http://isrctn​.com/ISRCTN12761776.

Bloemen MCT, Van der Wal MBA, Verhaegen PD, Nieuwenhuis MK, Van Baar ME, Van Zuijlen PPM, et al. Clinical effectiveness of dermal substitution in burns by topical negative pressure: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Wound Repair Regen 2012; 20(6): 797-805. [PubMed: 23110478]

Hop MJ, Bloemen MCT, Van Baar ME, Nieuwenhuis MK, Van Zuijlen PPM, Polinder S, et al. Cost study of dermal substitutes and topical negative pressure in the surgical treatment of burns. Burns 2014; 40(3): 388-396. [PubMed: 24035577]

Association of Dutch Burn Centres. Dermal substitute and topical negative pressure in burns (VAC-M): full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 23.03.2011 [Accessed: 30.08.2017] . URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00548314.

KCI. A randomized, controoled multicenter trial of vaccuum assisted cloaure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of pressure ulcers: study VAC2001-01; final status report [unpublished]. 2007.

Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Vakuumversiegelungstherapie von Wunden mit intendierter sekundärer Wundheilung: Dokumentation der Anhörung zum Vorbericht; Auftrag N17-01A [online]. 24.01.2019 [Accessed: 01.04.2019]. URL: https://www​.iqwig.de​/download/N17-01A_DA-Vorbericht​_Vakuumversiegelungstherapie-von-Wunden-mit-intendi....pdf.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of pressure ulcers: study VAC2001-01; study protocol amendment no. 1 [unpublished]. 2001.

KCI. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of venous stasis ulcers: study VAC2001-02; final status report [unpublished]. 2005.

KCI. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of venous stasis ulcers: study VAC2001-02; clinical research protocol [unpublished]. 2003.

Stannard JP, Volgas DA, Stewart R, McGwin G Jr, Alonso JE. Negative pressure wound therapy after severe open fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23(8): 552-557. [PubMed: 19704269]

University of Alabama at Birmingham. Vacuum assisted closure as a treatment for open fractures (VAC-OF): full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 05.08.2013 [Accessed: 30.08.2017] . URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00582361.

University of Alabama at Birmingham. Vacuum assisted closure as a treatment for open fractures (VAC-OF): study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 05.08.2013 [Accessed: 30.08.2017] . URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT00582361.

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA. Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366(9498): 1704-1710. [PubMed: 16291063]

Apelqvist J, Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Boulton AJM. Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds. Am J Surg 2008; 195(6): 782-788. [PubMed: 18355797]

Lavery LA, Barnes SA, Keith MS, Seaman JJ, Armstrong DG. Prediction of healing for postoperative diabetic foot wounds based on early wound area progression. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(1): 26-29. [PubMed: 17934156]

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Boulton AJM. Negative pressure wound therapy via vacuum-assisted closure following partial foot amputation: what is the role of wound chronicity? Int Wound J 2007; 4(1): 79-86. [PMC free article: PMC7951344] [PubMed: 17425550]

KCI USA. Trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in amputation wounds of the diabetic foot: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 19.07.2006 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00224796.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of amputation wounds of the diabteic foot: study VAC 2001-07; clinical study report [unpublished]. 2005.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of amputation wounds of the diabetic foot: study VAC2001-07; clinical research protocol; amendment # 2 [unpublished]. 2004.

Driver VR, Blume PA. Evaluation of wound care and health-care use costs in patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy versus advanced moist wound therapy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2014; 104(2): 147-153. [PubMed: 24725034]

Blume PA, Walters J, Payne W, Ayala J, Lantis J. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(4): 631-636. [PubMed: 18162494]

Blume PA. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(10): e77. [PubMed: 18820222]

Hemkens LG, Waltering A. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(10): e76. [PubMed: 18820222]

KCI USA. Randomized, controlled multicenter trial of Vacuum Assisted Closure Therapy in diabetic foot ulcers: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 23.01.2018 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00432965.

KCI USA. Randomized, controlled multicenter trial of Vacuum Assisted Closure Therapy in diabetic foot ulcers: study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 23.01.2018 [Accessed: 06.11.2018]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT00432965.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of diabetic foot ulcers: study VAC 2001-08; clinical study report [unpublished]. 2005.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of diabetic foot ulcers: study VAC2001-08; study protocol amendment no. 1 [unpublished]. 2002.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of open chest wounds: study VAC2002-09; final status report [unpublished]. 2006.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of open chest wounds: study VAC2002-09; study protocol amendment no. 1 [unpublished]. 2002.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of open abdominal wounds: study VAC2002-10; final status report [unpublished]. 2006.

KCI USA. A randomized, controlled multicenter trial of vacuum assisted closure therapy in the treatment and blinded evaluation of open abdominal wounds: study VAC2002-10; study protocol amendment no. 1 [unpublished]. 2002.

KCI USA. A study comparing V.A.C. negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to moist wound therapy (MWT) in the treatment of diabetic foot amputation wounds (VAC 2006-19): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.12.2018 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00837096.

KCI USA. A study comparing V.A.C. negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to moist wound therapy (MWT) in the treatment of diabetic foot amputation wounds (VAC 2006-19): study results [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.12.2018 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//clinicaltrials​.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT00837096.

KCI USA. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, parallel study comparing V.A.C. negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to moist wound therapy (MWT) in the treatment of diabetic foot amputation wounds: study VAC 2006-19; clinical research protocol; version 1.10 [unpublished]. 2007.

Vaidhya N, Panchal A, Anchalia MM. A new cost-effective method of NPWT in diabetic foot wound. Indian J Surg 2015; 77(Suppl 2): S525-S529. [PMC free article: PMC4692901] [PubMed: 26730058]

Vather R, Ker H, Rolfe G, Chen L, Hammodat H, Gale K, et al. Wound outcomes in negative pressure dressings (WOUND) study: a randomised trial in lower limb skin cancer grafts. 2018. (J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; Volume 7). [PubMed: 29793844]

Ker H, Al-Murrani A, Rolfe G, Martin R. WOUND study: a cost-utility analysis of negative pressure wound therapy after split-skin grafting for lower limb skin cancer. J Surg Res 2019; 235: 308-314. [PubMed: 30691811]

Vijayan R, Singh P, Nikkhah D, Walsh K, Dheansa B. Re: wound outcomes in negative pressure dressings (WOUND) study: a randomised trial in lower limb skin cancer grafts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71(12): 1830. [PubMed: 30217441]

Virani SR, Dahapute AA, Bava SS, Muni SR. Impact of negative pressure wound therapy on open diaphyseal tibial fractures: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2016; 7(4): 256-259. [PMC free article: PMC5106468] [PubMed: 27857499]

Vuerstaek JDD, Vainas T, Wuite J, Nelemans P, Neumann MHA, Veraart JCJM. State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44(5): 1029-1037. [PubMed: 17000077]

Ahmed M, Soskova T, Williams DT. Regarding “state-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings”. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46(3): 614-615. [PubMed: 17826260]

Maastricht University Medical Center. A randomised controlled trial comparing vacuum assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings: full text view [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 12.01.2017 [Accessed: 30.08.2017]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT00243620.

Wanner MB, Schwarzl F, Strub B, Zaech GA, Pierer G. Vacuum-assisted wound closure for cheaper and more comfortable healing of pressure sores: a prospective study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003; 37(1): 28-33. [PubMed: 12625392]

Costa ML, Achten J, Bruce J, Davis S, Hennings S, Willett K, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings for adults with an open lower limb fracture: the WOLLF RCT. Health Technol Assess 2018; 22(73): 1-162. [PMC free article: PMC6322061] [PubMed: 30573002]

Achten J, Parsons NR, Bruce J, Petrou S, Tutton E, Willett K, et al. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of standard wound management versus negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of adult patients with an open fracture of the lower limb: UK wound management of open lower limb fractures (UK WOLFF). BMJ Open 2015; 5(9): e009087. [PMC free article: PMC4593163] [PubMed: 26395498]

Costa ML, Achten J, Bruce J, Tutton E, Petrou S, Lamb SE, et al. Effect of negative pressure wound therapy vs standard wound management on 12-month disability among adults with severe open fracture of the lower limb: the WOLLF randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018; 319(22): 2280-2288. [PMC free article: PMC6583504] [PubMed: 29896626]

Tutton E, Achten J, Lamb SE, Willett K, Costa ML. Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial. Trials 2018; 19(1): 328. [PMC free article: PMC6019785] [PubMed: 29941030]

University of Warwick. Wound management of open lower limb fractures (WOLLF) [online]. In: ISRCTN Registry. 02.07.2018 [Accessed: 26.07.2018]. URL: http://isrctn​.com/ISRCTN33756652.

Xu XP, Cai XH, Zhang L, Li XH, Liu ZH, Pan Y, et al. Clinical efficacy of vacuumsealing drainage in treatment of fournier’s gangrene [Chinese]. Shi Jie Hua Ren Xiao Hua Za Zhi 2015; 23(2): 348-352.

Zhang X, Wan L, Yang R, Jin P, Xia W, Ye Y, et al. Expression of connective tissue growth factor and periostin of wound tissue in patients with diabetes who had vacuum sealing drainage. Int J Clin Exp Med 2017; 10(8): 12942-12950.

Zhu XH, Chai YM, Ye JZ, Han P, Wen G, Chen P. Vacuum sealing drainage technique versus traditional repair in treatment of diabetic foot [Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2014; 18(34): 5548-5554.

KCI. Rohdaten zur Studie VAC 2001-03 [unpublished].

Lantis JC 2nd. Venous leg ulcer management: treatment options and V.A.C. therapy [Präsentationsfolien]. 2011.

Lantic JCJ, Gendics C. VAC therapy appears to facilitate STSG take when applied to venous leg ulcers [unpublished]. 2004.

Ospedale Misericordia e Dolce. Prevena incision management system vs conventional management for wound healing: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 08.09.2016 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02892435.

Odense University Hospital. Intervention for postpartum infections following caesarean section (APIPICS): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 18.10.2016 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01891006.

St. James Connolly Memorial Hospital. Randomised control study to asses the role of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the management of wound in surgical patient: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 06.01.2015 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02331485.

Washington University School of Medicine. Prophylactic incisional care in obese women at cesarean (PICO-C): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 06.06.2017 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02578745.

Hadassah Medical Organization. Negative pressure wound therapy: PREVENA in prevention of infections after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 21.04.2014 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02118558.

Hadassah Medical Center. Negative pressure wound therapy: PREVENA in prevention of infections after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); randomized controlled study: study PREVENA1; clinical trial protocol; version 2 [unpublished]. 2014.

Yale University. A comparison of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following abdominal surgery: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 16.01.2018 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02534116.

University Hospital Joan XXIII de Tarragona. Negative pressure therapy in large incisional hernia surgery [online]. In: ISRCTN Registry. 28.08.2018 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: http://isrctn​.com/ISRCTN31224450.

University of Maryland. Incisional negative pressure dressing on clean closed groin incisions: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 27.12.2017 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02006511.

Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München. Prävention von Wundheilungsstörungen nach inguinaler Lymphadenektomie bei Patienten mit Peniskarzinom durch epidermale Vakuumtherapie (PräVAC) [online]. In: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien. 29.08.2013 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: http://www​.drks.de/DRKS00005257.

Maurer T, Protzel C, Gschwend JE, Rexer H. Inguinale Lymphadenektomie beim Peniskarzinom: Studie zur Prävention von Wundheilungsstörungen. Urologe A 2014; 53(4): 561-562. [PubMed: 24700190]

Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München. Prävention von Wundheilungsstörungen nach inguinaler Lymphadenektomie bei Patienten mit Peniskarzinom durch epidermale Vakuumtherapie (PräVAC): study PräVAC; study protocol amendment [unpublished]. 2013.

Nova Scotia Health Authority. Effects of preventive negative pressure wound therapy with PICO on surgical wounds of kidney transplant patients: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 24.09.2015 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02558764.

Hospital Dandenong Campus, Monash Health. Do suction assisted negative pressure dressings (NPD) reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after clean/contaminated abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial [online]. In: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. 08.09.2015 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: http://www​.anzctr.org​.au/ACTRN12615000175572.aspx.

Curtin University. Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the prevention of post-operative surgical wound dehiscence in at risk patients following abdominal surgery: a multicentre randomised control trial [online]. In: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. 08.08.2016 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: http://www​.anzctr.org​.au/ACTRN12612001275853.aspx.

Sandy-Hodgetts K, Leslie GD, Parsons R, Zeps N, Carville K. Prevention of postsurgical wound dehiscence after abdominal surgery with NPWT: a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol. J Wound Care 2017; 26(Suppl 2): S23-S26. [PubMed: 28182535]

Dornseifer U. Impact of negative pressure wound therapy on free muscle flaps: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 17.05.2016 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT02526342.

Philipps-Universität Marburg. Evaluation der Unterdruckinzisionstherapie primär verschlossener Operationswunden nach notfallmäßigen gastrointestinalen Operationen zur Reduktion der Wundinfektrate verglichen mit dem konventionellen Pflasterverband: eine prospektive, randomisierte, kontrollierte, multizentrische klinische Studie [online]. In: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien. 30.08.2016 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: http://www​.drks.de/DRKS00011033.

Changhai Hospital. Preventing seroma formation after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer by early vacuum assisted closure: study details [online]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. 22.11.2012 [Accessed: 11.02.2019]. URL: https:​//ClinicalTrials​.gov/show/NCT01731769.

Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (Ed). Qualitätsreport 2015. Berlin: IQTIG; 2016. URL: https://iqtig​.org/downloads​/berichte/2015​/IQTIG-Qualitaetsreport-2015.pdf.

Wong SSL, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc 2006; 94(4): 451-455. [PMC free article: PMC1629423] [PubMed: 17082841]

Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Searching for studies [online]. In: Higgings JPT, Green S. (Ed). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: version 5.1.0. 03.2011 [Accessed: 09.01.2018]. URL: http://handbook-5-1​.cochrane​.org/chapter_6​/6_searching_for_studies.htm.