U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Polychlorinated Dibenzo-para-dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1997. (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 69.)

Cover of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-para-dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans

Polychlorinated Dibenzo-para-dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans.

Show details

APPENDIX 1TABLES ON OCCURRENCE (PCDDs)

Table 1Concentrations of PCDDs in air

ReferenceOrigin; sample
description (and no.)
Coll. periodSamp. meth.
Anal. meth.
PCDD concentration (pg/m3)
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Australia
Taucher et al. (1992)Sydney; ambient air(8)10/90G/P/X
BSI
No information0.016–0.062
Austria
Moche & Thanner (1996a)Mostly urban
 Ambient, winter
 Ambient, summer
(41)
(43)
92/93G/P
BN
No information0.050–0.222
0.022–0.041
Moche & Thanner (1996b)Graz; ambient air, winter
Linz; ambient air, winter
(20)

(15)
93/94

94/95
G/P
BN
No information0.07–0.42

< 0.01–0.18
Christmann et al. (1989b)Brixlegg; ∼ 280 m
from Cu reclamation plant
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
2/88
5/88
6/88
7/88
G/P
CSI
0.1
0.07
0.03
ND
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
ND
ND
0.04
ND
ND
0.2
0.08
ND
ND
ND
0.05
ND
2.1
1.2
0.4
0.5
2.7
2.1
0.5
1.0
2.3a
1.9a
1.2a
1.5a
Belgium
Wevers et al. (1992)Antwerp
Tunnel air

(1)
(3)
91G/P
BSN

0.017

0.0126

0.0025

0.0042
No information

0.0030

0.0047

0.0022


0.080
(0.030– 0.116)
Ambient air(4)No information0.035
(0.021–0.055)
Wevers et al. (1993)Near emission sources(20)92G/P
BSN
No information0.165
(0.018–0.379)
Canada
Reiner et al. (1995)Close to cement
kiln; ambient air
(6)6/89G/P
B/
No information0.015–0.035
Toronto Island;
ambient air
(6)9/88–
7/89
CSONo information0.063
Steer et al. (1990a)SW Ontario;
burning tyre dump
2/90G/P
CSO
   1 km downwind
   3 km downwind
(5)
(4)
I-TEQ (PCDD only), 0.01–0.34
I-TEQ (PCDD only), 0.014–0.039
0.02–2.5
0.046–0.27
Germany
Bruckmann & Hackbe (1987)Hamburg; dump site
(1)
2/85G/P/Si
BSI

< 0.02

< 0,03

< 0.02

< 0.02

ND

ND

0.27

0a
Dump site, oil(1)4/85< 0.11.11.00.038a
Residential, west of
dump
(2)4/85
3/86
< 0.1–0.020.060.050.220.091.51.2–4.20.032–0.072a
Residential
highway, dump,
industrial
(5)85–87< 0.02–0. 11< 0.01–0.600.06–1.00.08–2.20.07–5.22.15–15.41.1–400.164–2.186a
Close to copper
industry
(2)1&2/87< 0.010.040.03–0.040.06–0.120.06–0.092.15–3.690.65–0.70.093–0.206a
Industry, highway(2)1&10/860.02–0.200.04–0.220.19–0.260.60–0.71< 0.17–0.364.8–537.4–9.40.525–0.612a
Industry, 2 MWI(2)85–86< 0.01–0.0850.1–0.052< 0.09–0.19< 0.09–0.90< 0.09–0.381.5–7.73.7–7.70.156–1.081a
Highway tunnel(2)1/86< 0.01–0.060.28–0.31< 0.17–0370.66–1.19< 0.17–0.443.46.3–6.40.457–0.569a
Suburb, highway(1)9/86< 0.02< 0.040.060.09< 0.042.312.90.085a
Suburb (North)(1)8/86< 0.02< 0.03< 0.030.070.061.231.00.032a
Suburb (13 km SE)(1)4/860.02< 0.02< 0.080.23< 0.080.600.370.084a
Forest (20 km N)(1)4/86< 0.02< 0.03< 0.03< 0.03< 0.030.280.370.001a
Kirschmer (1987)Rhine-Ruhr; Mean
of 11 sites/wide
range of uses
(33)85–86G/P
CSI
ND0.020.030.060.031.140.98
Christmann et al. (1989b)Ambient air;
Berlin-Dahlem

(10)

1/87
G/P
CSI

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

6.6

8.5

0.1
(0.02–0.4)a
Bad-Kreuzberg(1)2/88NDNDNDNDND1.32.20.07a
Gelsenkirchen(5)87/88NDNDNDNDND3.28.50.1
(0.03–0.3)a
Recklinghausen(3)5–9/87NDND–0.5NDNDNDND–1.76.10.2
(0.1–0.3)a
Indoor air; PCP application(1)NDNDND6.2ND63.31032.6a
Päpke et al. (1989a)Indoor air; PCP application
(kindergartens)
(1)
(15)
86G/P
BSI
NDND0.040.92
No information
0.1177.0131.52.46a
0.696
(0.018–2.46)a
König et al. (1993)Hessen; ambient air90G/P
BSI
   Rural(21)0.0020.0090.0130.0260.0240.2673.180.048
   Rural/industry(21)0.0040.0200.0250.0520.0440.6296.440.087
   Rural industry(21)0.0030.0210.0190.0480.0360.5275.800.079
   Industry(21)0.0050.0290.0340.0710.0610.5708.770.146
   Industry(21)0.0040.0220.0240.0530.0440.6036.770.110
   Traffic(21)0.0020.0180.0170.0420.0360.4355.140.078
Wallenhorst et al. (1995)Baden-Württemberg;
ambient ain
   Rural
92G/P
BSI


No information


0.021
(0.008–0.054)
   Rural with
   special exposure
No information0.018
(0.005–0.049)
   SuburbanNo information0.056
(0.009–0.098)
   UrbanNo information0.083
(0.021–0.217)
   MultitypeNo information0.062 (0.014–0.130)
Hiester et al. (1995)Ambient air;
Essen, mostly
93–94G/P
CSI

No information

0.076
residential
Duisburg, industrial

No information

0.124
Dortmund,
downtown
No information0.120
Cologne, mostly residentialNo information0.040
Hippelein et al. (1996)Augsburg; ambient air (means)G/X
BSI
   March–April(6)92< 0.00350.0086< 0.0130.0210.0210.2700.7200.040
   April–May(6)92< 0.00170.0039< 0.0049< 0.0081< 0.00740.0870.2800.019
   June–July(6)92< 0.00120.0024< 0.0043< 0.0058< 0.00460.0890.3200.014
   July–September(6)92< 0.0014< 0.0022< 0.0061< 0.0078< 0.00620.1200.4300.015
   Sept–October(6)92< 0.0030< 0.0076< 0.015< 0.0210.0210.3100.7500.042
   Oct.–November(6)920.00370.012< 0.0190.0300.0300.5101.3000.060
   Nov.–January(6)92–930.00690.0270.0340.0630.0630.8302.0000.120
   Jan.–February(6)93< 0.00360.0180.0270.0450.0440.5301.2000.087
   Mean of mean(48)92–930.00310.0100.0150.0300.0240.3400.8700.049
Rabl et al. (1996)Bavaria; ambient airG/P
BSI
13 km E of MWI(1)96No information0.034
2.0 km NE of MWI(2)95–96No information0.055–0.064
3.3 km NNE of
MWI
(2)95–96No information0.034–0.062
Päpke et al. (1994a)Workplace ain
Plant 1

(4)
93G/P/Ps
BSI

No information

0.70–3.79
Plant 2(3)No information0.06–0.18
Plant 3(5)No information0.06–0.60
Plant 1(3)G/PNo information0.15–1.90
Plant 2(5)BSINo information0.08–0.15
Plant 3(5)No information0.07–0.54
Menzel et al. (1996)Workplace air;
Welding, MWI1
boiler pipes

(1)
95G/P/Ps
N

Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 541

56
Welding, MWI2
waste chute
(2)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 204–105811–44
Milling MWI1
boiler pipes
(1)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 97587
Fitting, MWI1
waste chute
(2)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 20 038–21 6781830–2430
Fitting, MWI2
waste chute
(2)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 794–268030–140
Air burning, MWI2
waste chute
(2)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 354–691120–80
Cutting/welding,
wood chip dryer
(1)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 612
Menzel et al. (1996) (contd)Open-air burning,
power plant demol.
(2)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 20–39358–459
Open-air burning,
metal reclamation 1
(2)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 227–126698–858
Open-air burning,
metal reclamation 2
(2)Total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 95–300348–1183
Japan
Sugita et al. (1993)Urban area
   Ambient air,
   mean summer

(2)
92G/P
BSI

0.007

0.087

0.180

0.274

0.191

2.375

4.624

0.469–1.427b
   Ambient air,
   mean winter
(2)0.0400.1930.3760.6830.5554.21310.3580.294–2.990b
Kurokawa et al. (1994)Site A
   Ambient air,
   particle phase
< 94G/P
BSO

No information

Summer
Winter

0.025
0.291
   Ambient air,
   vapour phase
No informationSummer
Winter
0.035
0.012
Site B
   Ambient air,
   particle phase
No informationSummer
Winter
0.184
0.310
   Ambient air,
   vapour phase
No informationSummer
Winter
0.407
0.046
Site C
   Ambient air,
   particle phase
No informationSummer
Winter
0.273
0.614
   Ambient air,
   vapour phase
No informationSummer
Winter
0.218
0.072
Norway
Oehme et al. (1991)Tunnel air;
Northbound
89G/P
CSI
   Intlet, weekday(1)0.020.0210.0280.0490.0410.291.50.097c
   Outlet, weekday(1)0.040.200.0840.340.291.71.60.98c
   Inlet, weekend(1)< 0.010.0180.0180.0910.0290.362.30.089c
   Outlet, weekend
Southbound
(1)0.030.0540.0500.120.090.522.80.55c
   Inlet, weekday(1)0.010.0420.0130.0660.0370.321.90.131c
   Outlet, weekday(1)0.020.0150.0220.0920.0280.382.20.230c
   Inlet, weekend(1)< 0.010.0210.0860.0630.0240.181.10.101c
   Outlet, weekend(1)0.010.0310.0480.0280.241.70.134c
Central Oslo;
ambient air
No information0.040c
Schlabach et al. (1996)Spitbergen, arctic;
ambient air
(1)
(1)
5/95
8/95
G/P
BSI
0.0002
0.0001
0.0005
0.0002
0.0009
0.0001
0.0013
0.0003
0.0002
0.0002

0.0016

0.0044
0.0023
0.0011
Poland
Grochowalski et al. (1995)Cracow centre;
market square

(1)
3/95G/C
CSI

0.15

0.18

0.21

0.2

0.16

2.7

10.4

0.95
Mateczny crossroad(1)11.152.1531.055528011.95
Russian Federation
Kruglov et al. (1996)Oil fire; residential
area
96BSO
   100 m downwind(1)0.560.850.321.840.527.7762.451.72
   100 m upwind(1)0.170.120.090.120.084.2639.30.5
Slovakia
Holoubek et al. (1991)Ambient ain
   Urban/industrial
90P
N

No information

NP-6.3
   RuralNo information0.0002–4.9
   Rural/industrialNo information3.0–6.0
   SuburbanNo information0.0035–2.9
   Resid./industrialNo information0.23–5.5
   Urban/industrialNo information2.0–3.0
Spain
Abad et al. (1996)Catatonia (ambient
air); urban, traffic

(8)
93–95G/P
BSI

0.026

0.031

0.029

0.064

0.076

0.385

1.110

0.28
(0.05–0.62)
Rural, near MWI(12)0.0060.0090.0080.0230.0310.2181.2860.05
(0.01–0.5)
Urban(3)0.0030.0100.0130.0270.0430.2770.8030.13
(0.11–0.15)
Urban(3)0.0070.0140.0150.0200.0330.2231.2370.20
(0.07–0.43)
MWI influence(2)0.0100.0500.0600.1550.2101.7205.6950.55
(0.15–0.95)
Industrial, MWJ
influence, traffic
MWI
(3)

(2)
0.007

0.005
0.020

0.010
0.040

0.010
0.103

0.015
0.150

0.020
0.867

0.135
2.313

0.770
0.28
(0.20–0.36)
0.08
(0.01–0.05)
Heavy industry(2)0.0400.0450.1000.1500.1401.0352.9200.52
(0.16–0.88)
Sweden
Rappe et al. (1989a)Rörvik; ambient airG
BSI
   Wind WSW(1)9/85< 0.0010.003< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.057d0.050
(1)1/86< 0.0010.005< 0.0010.0040.0050.140d0.064
   Wind W, N & E(1)1/860.0020.0090.0020.0050.0060.210d0.160
   Wind E & N(1)1/860.0050.0350.0070.0140.0321.00d0.540
   Wind SE(1)2/86< 0.0010.004< 0.0010.0020.0040.110d
   Wind NE
Gothenburg;
ambient air
(1)2/86< 0.0010.0070.0030.0050.0060.270d0.160
   Wind W, N & E(1)1/860.0030.0170.0030.0110.0060.380d0.290
   Wind E & N(1)1/860.0090.0660.0190.0460.0922.900d1.900
   Wind SE(1)2/86< 0.0010.0060.0020.0040.0070.230d1.040
Antonsson et al. (1989)Workplace ain
(steelmills); close to furnace
88G/X
BSI

No information

0.80–6.4c
Overhead craneNo information1.8–14c
Crane cabinNo information2.8–5.6c
United Kingdom
Clayton et al. (1993)Ambient ain
   Cardiff

(42)

1/91–
9/92
N
B

Mean (range) total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 2.3 (ND-66)

0.100
(ND-0.86)
   Manchester(43)3/91–
9/92
Mean (range) total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 2.1 (ND-46)0.102
(0.001–1.81)
   London(43)1/91–
11/92
Mean (range) total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 2.2 (ND-17)0.06
(ND-0.65)
   Stevenage(43)1/91–
4/92
Mean (range) total 2,3,7,8-isomers, 1.7 (ND-9)0.039
(ND-0.80)
Dyke & Coleman (1995)Ambient ain
   Before bonfire
   During bonfire
   After bonfire

(1)
(1)
(1)
11/94GP
CSI

No information
No information
No information

0.12–0.15
0.62–0.65
0.14–0.17
United States
Eitzer & Hites (1989)Bloomington;
ambient, municipal
(55)85–87G/P
CSN
No further isomers reported0.89
Trout Lake;
ambient, rural
(2)No further isomers reported0.16
Smith et al. (1989)Niagara Falls;
ambient air
G/P
CSI
   Downwind from(1)11/86NDND0.050.060.110.551.59
   industry(1)11/86ND0.490.641.06ND5.438.88
(1)1/86NDND0.040.050.07ND1.83
   Upwind from(1)11/86NDNDNDNDND0.341.40
   industry(1)1/87NDNDND0.030.030.371.36
(1)2/87NDNDNDNDND0.515.79
Edgerton et al. (1989)Akron; 2 km from
MWI
87G/P
BSN
< 0.20
< 0.16
< 0.01
< 0.27
< 0.11
< 0.03
0.035
0.055
0.032
0.052
0.053
0.053
0.050
0.026
0.017
0.52
0.53
0.57
1.00
1.20
1.20
Columbus;
3/4 km from RDF< 0.82< 0.06< 0.028< 0.028< 0.0280.260.51
1/4 km from SSI< 0.24< 0.05< 0.0390.0780.0640.521.10
Highway< 0.15< 0.08< 0.032< 0.032< 0.0320.320.96
Waldo; Background< 0.06< 0.030.0310.0250.0250.240.50
Hahn et al. (1989)Workplace air;
bottom ash
1/88G/P/X
N

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.431

2.141
conveyor
Feed table floor

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.039

1.012

9.494
Tiernan et al. (1989)Dayton, OH;
ambient air, near
MWI
88NND0.570.631.190.916.028.26
Kominsky & Kwoka (1989)Boston
   Office building
   Ambient air

(12)
(4)
9/86G/Si
CN

< 0.3–< 1.4
< 0.4–< 0.6

< 0.2–< 1.1
< 0.5–< 1.6

< 0.25–< 0.95
< 0.27–< 0.51

< 0.66–2.0
< 1.2–1.6

3.2–7.6
3.5–5.6
Harless et al. (1990)Green Bay, WI;
ambient air
(4)89G/P
BSI
< 0.01–< 0.04< 0.02–< 0.08< 0.01–0.010.01–0.03< 0.01–0.020.1–0.20.3–0.4
Hunt & Maisel (1990)Bridgeport, CT;
ambient air
(29)87–88G/P
BSI
0.0120.0240.0300.0430.0750.4772.10
Maisel (1990)Bridgeport MWI;
ambient preoperational
(22)87–88G/P
BSI
< 0.0100.0210.0300.0460.0800.47
Maisel & Hunt (1990)Los Angeles, CA;
ambient air
(1)W/87G/P
BSI
< 0.010< 0.039< 0.076< 0.083< 0.0860.251.9
Hunt & Maisel (1992)S. California;
Session I

(6)

12/87
G/P
BSI

< 0.020

< 0.136

< 0.196

< 0.410

< 0.392

2.02

2,46
Session II(2)12/87< 0.006< 0.014< 0.010< 0.008< 0.0100.2301.25
Session III(5)7/88< 0.026< 0.060< 0.086< 0.082< 0.104< 1.7963.18
Session IV(6)7/88< 0.034< 0.056< 0.082< 0.076< 0.150< 3.525.26
Session V(7)9/88< 0.024< 0.026< 0.032< 0.050< 0.0280.3771.13
Session VI(1)11/88< 0.012< 0.022< 0.036< 0.054< 0.0500.2270.437
Session VII(6)3/89< 0.024< 0.186< 0.026< 0.026< 0.0300.2482.05
Mean, all sessions(33)< 0.024< 0.088< 0.076< 0.118< 0.128< 2.02< 5.60
Schecter & Charles (1991)Binghamton;
transformer incident

81–82
N
No information

352e
site89–90No information74e
Upper floors81–82No information202e
89–90No information2.9e
Lorber et at. (1996a)Columbus, OH;
running MWI

(6)

3/94
N
No information

0.067
(6)4/94No information0.118
Shut down MWI(7)6/95No information0.049
Columbus high;
running MWI

(2)

94

No information

0.26
Shut down MWI(2)95No information0.09
Columbus low;
running MWI

(2)

94

No information

0.03
Shut down MWING95No information0.02
Riggs et al. (1996)Edgemont, OH;
2.4 km N of MWI
(6)9/95G/P
CSO
No information0.206
Kettering;
1.6 km N of MWI
(6)No information0.057
Site 8; 0.5 km
SW of MWI
(6)No information0.045
Miami Villa;
1.4 km SW of MWI
(6)No information0.016
Background;
15 km N of Dayton
(1)No information0.006.

Analytical methods: All analyses use high-resolution gas chromatography; B, high-resolution mass spectrometry; C, low-resolution mass spectrometry; I, isomer-speciflc; O, others; N, no information; S, sophisticated clean-up; R, reduced clean-up; W, WHO-accepted laboratory

Sampling methods: G, glass fibre filter; P, polyurethane foam; X, XAD; C, carbon; Si, silica; Ps, personal sampling

ND, not detected; HWI, hospital waste incinerator; MWI, municipal waste incinerator; SSI, sewage sludge incinerator; RDF, refuse-derived fuel incinerator; W, winter

Data presented are means. Figures in parentheses are ranges. Levels of congeners not detected at known detection limits (for examples, 0.02 pg/m3) are presented as < 0.02

a

German TEQ

b

Including PCBs contribution

c

Nordic TEQ

d

Contains non-toxic isomers

e

Eadon-TEQ

Table 2Concentrations of PCDDs in water

ReferenceOrigin; sample
description (and no.)
Coll. periodAnal. meth.PCDD concentration (pg/L; ppt)
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Canada
Jobb et al. (1990)Ontario;
Amherstburg;
drinking water,
raw

5

85–86

AB/CS







20–115
Cayuga; drinking
water, raw
18742
Lambton Area;
drinking water,
raw
28613–38
Mitchell's Bay;
drinking water,
raw
485–8624–140
South Peel Area;
drinking water,
raw
18330
St. Catharines;
drinking water,
raw
383–8639–90
Stoney Point;
drinking water,
raw
485–8624–120
Wallaceburg;
drinking water,
raw
285–8612–175
Wallaceburg;
drinking water,
treated
18619
Canada (contd)
Jobb et al. (1990) (contd)Walpole Island;
drinking water,
treated
286AB/CS28–41
Walpole Island;
drinking water,
raw
2869–35
Welland river;
drinking water,
raw
18625
Windsor; drinking
water, raw
885–8622–63
Windsor; drinking
water, treated
18646
Germany
Götz et al.(1994)River Elbe;
   Bunthaus d
   and PB

8/90
ABSIW
0.220

0.409

0.732

1.120

1.936

15.065

64.6

3.15
   Blankenese d
   and PB
8/900.0900.1070.3220.3510.8143.20912.81.21
Japan
Hashimoto et al. (1995a)Matsuyama
   Coastal
   seawater, d

1a
8/90ACIS
ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
   Coastal
  seawater, PB
1bNDNDNDNDND0.0682.5
Hashimoto et al. (1995a)
(contd)
Misaki
   Coastal
   seawater, d

1a
8/90ACIS
ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.10
   Coastal
   seawater, PB
1bNDNDNDNDNDND1.1
Matsumara
et al. (1994)
Coastal seawater1NGABIS0.0200.0140.0400.0700.0880.2500.340
Miyata et al. (1992, 93)Nagahama
   Wellwater, S

1a
10–
11/91
ABIS
ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.19
   Wellwater,
   PB
1bNDNDNDNDND0.6211.73
   Home tap
   water, S
1aNDNDNDNDNDND0.29
   Home tap
   water, PB
1bNDNDNDNDNDND0.24
Hirakata
   Home tap
   water, S

2a
10–
11/91

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.72–
0.88
   Home tap
   water, PB
2bNDNDNDNDNDND0.51–
0.79
Osaka
   Home tap
   water, S

2a
10–
11/91

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.09–0.14

0.85–
1.33
   Home tap
   water, PB
2bNDNDNDNDNDND0.58–
0.86
Russian Federation
Fedorov (1993)Ufa, north;
drinking water
4/92N27.5
Ufa, south;
drinking water
4/9248.8
Russian Federation (contd)
Fedorov (1993)Ufa, Iziak;
drinking water
4/92167,0
Ufa; Dem;
drinking water
4/92N83.5
Chapaevsk;
Artesian drinking
water
6–
9/92
20.331.318.016,723555.7
Ufa, Chapaevsk;
river water
3–
6/90
25 000760 000
Khamitov & Maystrenko (1995)Ufa; drinking
water
90NNo isomer-specific information0.5–1.0
Belaja river; river
water
90No isomer-specific information2.3–5.7
Belaja river/Ufa;
river water
90No isomer-specific information1.7–6.0
Ufa river/w.i.;
river water
90No isomer-specific information0.6–1.0
Inzer river; river
water
90No isomer-specific information1.8
Zilim river; river
water
90No isomer-specific information0.2
Sweden
Rappe et al. (1989b)Bälinge, Uppsala;
   MWTP, in

1

87
ABIS
< 1.2

< 3.6

< 7

< 5

< 5

62

730
   MWTP, out
Henriksdal,
Stockholm;
187< 0.26< 0.77< 2< 1.5< 1.52.814
   MWTP, in187< 1.6< 4.8< 9< 14< 2070620
   MWTP, out187< 0.28< 0.70< 2< 3< 4< 6.139
Rappe et al. (1989b)(contd)Järnsjön; Eman
river
187ABIS< 0.024< 0.0390.0540.1200.0750.3002.000
Fliseryd; Eman
river
187< 0.020< 0.025< 0.014< 0.013< 0.0150.1500.790
Filtered water;
Eman river
187< 0.023< 0.019< 0.027< 0.024< 0.0290.0570.170
Blank; Laboratory187< 0.039< 0.034< 0.045< 0.040< 0.049< 0.0830.180
Rappe et al. (1990a)Ringhals, in;
sea cooling water
189ABIS< 0.005< 0.0030.0110.00470.00540.1100.6200.0083
Ringhals, out;
sea cooling water
189< 0.005< 0.003< 0.0060.0067< 0.0050.0700.2400.0075
Ringhals, in;
sea cooling water
1890.00190.00090.00110.0015< 0.0020.0300.1850.0057
Ringhals, out;
sea cooling water
1890.00260.0004< 0.0020.00230.00120.0310.1540.0063
River Ljusnan3890.001–0.00210.0037–
0.0048
0.0018–
0.0022
0.018–0.0210.0093–
0.017
0.059–0.1100.140–
0.170
0.013–.017
River Ljungan1890.0031< 0.0004< 0.00060.00460.00270.0360.1400.014
Drinking water1890.0005< 0.0005< 0.00080.001< 0.00090.00440.0170.0029
United States
Meyer et al. (1989)Lockport;
Finished water, S
18/86AC/BOS< 1.0< 1.8< 0.9< 0.95.0
Finished water,
PB
1< 0.7< 1,6< 0.6< 0.53.6
Meyer et al. (1989) (contd)Blank; Distilled
water, soluble
19/86< 1.1< 3.9< 1.2< 1.46.5
Distilled water;
PB
1< 1.0< 3.9< 0.9< 0.82.3
Lockport;
Finished water, S
12/88< 3.8< 4.9< 6.3< 12< 23
Finished water,
PB
1< 4.0< 4.8< 6.0< 9.4< 19
Lockport;
Finished water, S
18/88< 3.4< 3.9< 4.7< 6.831
Finished water,
PB
1< 2.6< 3.8< 4.4< 5.415
19 other
locations;
Finished water, S
1986–87ND (0.4–2.6)ND (1.2–7.4)ND (0.4–3.6)ND (0.4–6.1)ND (0.9–15)
Finished water,
PB
19ND (0.3–2.0)ND (1.0–8.9)ND (0.5–4.1)ND (0.4–15.4)ND (0.9–69)

Analytical methods: A, high-resolution gas chromatography; B, high-resolution mass spectrometry; C, low-resolution mass spectrometry; I, isomer-speciflc; O, others; N, no information; S, sophisticated clean-up; R, reduced clean-up; W, WHO-accepted laboratory

ND, not detected; w.i., water intake; NG, not given

Data presented are means. Figures in parentheses are ranges. Levels of congeners not detected at known detection limits (for examples, 0.02 pg/m3) are presented as < 0.02

S, soluble; PB, particle bound; d, water dissolved; MWTP, municipal water treatment plant

Table 3Concentrations of PCDDs in soil

ReferenceOrigin; sample
description (and no.)
Coll. periodAnal. meth.PCDD concentration (ng/kg; ppt)
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Australia
Sund et al. (1993)Melbourne;
Park; urban area

1

90
ABSN
ND

No further isomer-specific information

1200

2.1
Near Tullamarine tip; industrial area190NDNo further isomer-specific information12002.1
Near Maid-road; industrial area190NDNo further isomer-specific information1900.47
Near incinerator; industrial area190NDNo further isomer-specific information2300.09
Park; urban area190NDNo further isomer-specific information29001.8
Gardens; urban area190NDNo further isomer-specific information11 0008.2
Near incinerator; industrial area190NDNo further isomer-specific information10001.0
Werribee farm; land filtration paddock19034No isomer-specific information75 000520
Buckland et al., (1994)300 m fr. road; burnt area194ABSINo isomer-specific information2.2
100 m fr. road; unburnt area194No isomer-specific information3.1
300 m fr. road; burnt area194No isomer-specific information35.1/38.5
5 m fr. road; unburnt area194No isomer-specific information8.7
1 km fr. highway; burnt area194No isomer-specific information3.0
5 m fr. highway; unburnt area194No isomer-specific information10.0
High traffic; unbumt area, Sydney194No isomer-specific information42.6
Austria
Weiss et al. (1993, 1994)Linz area; grassland; depth, 0–5 cm13< 93ABSINo further isomer-specific information[1.6–14.4]
Austria (contd)
Riss et al. (1990)Brixlegg (Tyrol)
   200m downwind

NG

87

No isomer-specific information

420a
   400 m downwindNG87No isomer-specific information170a
   700 m downwindNG87No isomer-specific information46a
Boos et al. (1992)Salzburg;
Meadow; urban emission

1

90/91
ACSI
ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

7.3

19.4

2.3
Park; urban emission190/91NDNDNDNDND10.565.01.8
Traffic island; heavy traffic190/91ND4.63.25.61.664.33058.3
Meadow; urban190/91NDND1.53.33.057.78925.2
emission190/91NDNDND1.1ND45.53281.8
190/91ND1.1ND2.4ND38.92703.9
190/91NDND2.03.94.6121.810224.5
Park; urban emission190/91NDNDNDNDND10.640.82.2
Meadow; cable proc. plant190/91NDNDNDNDND17.248.54.0
190/91NDND0.81.81.613.829.46.9
190/91NDNDND1.81.616.257.23.5
Meadow; diffuse190/91NDND1.11.1ND10.819.23.0
emission190/91NDNDNDNDND3.710.10.8
Diffuse emission, highway 100m190/91NDNDNDNDND3.913.20.6
Diffuse emission, highway 200m190/91NDNDNDNDND3.57.50.9
Steel foundry190/91NDNDNDNDND6.317.91.0
Steel foundry190/91NDND0.40.91.15.917.71.8
Industry190/91ND1.9ND2.32.513.628.73.7
Boos et al. (1992) (contd)Meadow; Alpine background190/91NDNDNDNDND1.83.60.1
Urban outsk.;
2ndary Al Smelter
190/91NDND1.11,21.66.624.22.8
2ndary Al Smelter190/91NDND2.02.31.57.023.55.3
Diffuse emission190/91NDND0.61.51.211.426.03.6
Meadow; highway
0.5 m
190/91NDND0.71.92.124.689.13.1
Industrial area; metal smelter190/91NDNDNDNDND92.024111.5
Belgium
Van Cleuvenbergen et al. (1993)Mol; rural
Moerkerke; rural
Berendrecht; harbour
antwerp
Zelzate; industry,
highway
Ham; industry, highway
Vilvoorde; industry,
power plant
92
92
92

92

92

92
ABSINo isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information

No isomer-specific information

No isomer-specific information

No isomer-specific information

No isomer-specific information
2.14
2.27
3.81

8.94

2.72

5.76
Brazil
Krauss et al. (1995)Amazone basin;
rural
Rio de Janeiro;
industrial region
Rio de Janeiro;
recreation areas
Cubatao; heavy
industry
< 95
< 95

< 95

< 95
ABSINo isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information

No isomer-specific information

No isomer-specific information
0.02–0.4
3–654

0.03–1.8

11–341
Canada
McLaughlin et al. (1989)Hamilton, Ontario; vicinity incinerator147/83ACSONo further isomer-specific information50–3 500
Pearson et al. (1990)Hamilton; vicinity incinerator1183No further isomer-specific information663 [ND-3 500]
Scarborough; vicinity incinerator1287No further isomer-specific information570 [ND-1 500]
Ontario; rural soils183No further isomer-specific information810
Rural soils2687No further isomer-specific information30 [ND-100]
Rural soils1588No further isomer-specific information3 [ND-45]
Rural soils188No further isomer-specific informationND
Urban soils283No further isomer-specific information2 070 [940–3 200]
Urban soils1187No further isomer-specific information1461 [ND-11000]
Urban soils1588No further isomer-specific information3 402 [ND-1 600]
Urban soils188No further isomer-specific information220
China
Wu et al. (1995)Ya-Er lake area; 1191–94ACSINDNDNDNDND0.4914.60.11
Ya-Er lake area; 2191–94ACSINDNDNDNDND6.7824.40.15
Czech Republic
Zemek & Kocan (1991)TCP prod, plantb;ACSI
East58610–400No further isomer-specific information
North, intern.b108620–10 800No further isomer-specific information
North, extern,b138620–2 200No further isomer-specific information
Westb1886ND-11800No further isomer-specific information
Southb1486ND-1300No further isomer-specific information
Drum dumpb3386ND-29 800No further isomer-specific information
Finland
Sandell & Tuominen (1993)0–20 cm; Sawmill soil
20–50 cm; Sawmill soil
14
14
NG
ABSINo isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information
1 700–85 000c
100–9 800c
Assmuth & Vartiainen (1995)Sawmill soil;
depth 0–50 cm
10NGABSI84–240NDND130–8 700ND-290110–20 000370–21 000
Germany
Rotard et al. (1987)Soil waste; oil contaminationNGNNDNDNDND300–1 200ND
Schlesing (1989)Herbicide plant;
   Typical
ANSI
   Depth, 1 m1< 896300PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported2 129 000
   Depth, 2 m1< 895300PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported36 800
   Depth, 3 m1< 8912 700PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported29 000
   Depth, 4 m
   Contaminated
1< 89400PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported10 300
   Depth, 1 m1< 89166 000PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported349 000
   Depth, 2 m1< 89698 000PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported202 000
   Depth, 3 m1< 8954 900PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported164 000
   Depth, 4 m1< 89200PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported700
   Depth, 5 m1< 89400PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported2 500
   Depth, 6 m1< 89500PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported3 900
   Depth, 7 m1< 8998 200PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported931 000
   Depth, 8 m1< 89300PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported1 500
   Depth, 9 m1< 89400PnCDD-HpCDD, only totals reported300
Hagenmaier et al. (1992)Rastatt; Cu smelter
   Site l

1

87
ABSI
2

4

3

8

8

62

400

30
189125954928026
   Site 21879047059010405806 7608 0005 900
189905405509505406 7706 6005 110
   Site 3187106060100607601600600
189106050100807001000600
   Site 4187104040801206501 300400
189105070110708201 100510
She & Hagenmaier (1996)Rastatt; all samplesd7787ABSI7
[1–130]
27
[2–1970]
35
[1–2080]
61
[4–3 680]
48
[4–3 430]
420
[31–22 400]
800
[40–20 800]
300
[12–14 500]
Deister & Pommer (1991)Schwabach
   750 m from MSWI
   750 m from MSWI
   550 m from MSWI
   350 m from MSWI
   350 m from MSWI

5
2
5
5
1

< 91
< 91
< 91
< 91
< 91
N
No isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information

0.2–4.3a
3.7–14.5a
0.2–4.1a
0.6–4.4a
20.7a
Unger & Prinz (1991)B5 road, 43 000e;
0.1 m from road
< 91NNSNNo isomer-specific information23.0
B3 road, 15 000e;
1.0 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information2.6
B5 road, 43 000e;
1.0 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information9.7
B31 road, 50 000e,
1.0 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information44.8
B5 road, 43 000e;
2.5 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information20.0
B5 road, 43 000e;
5.0 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information2.6
B3 road, 15 000e,
10 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information0.6
B5 road, 43 000e;
10 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information1.0
B31 road,50 000Te,
10 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information2.5
B5 road, 43 000e;
25 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information0.4
B5 road, 43 000e;
50 m from road
< 91No isomer-specific information0.4
Theisen et al. (1993)Kieselrot, Cu slag
Near Kieselrot, sports ground; garden soil
92
92
ABSI1800
4
8000
26
3800
8
4200
14
3900
11
78 300
439
530 000
3 450
64 500
154
Corresponding standard soil92< 0.51.40.72226.81703.8
McLachlan & Reissinger (1990)Bavaria;
Field 1 ; no sludgef
189ACSI0.040.140.120.280.213.39.40.84a
Field 2; sludge for
10yf
1890.050.470.765.02.7441003.7a
Field 3; sludge for
30yf
1890.161.12.117.08.21302509.4a
Meadow; Sludge for
30 yb
1890.241,93.9251320036015a
Sewage sludge1891.14.94.931209104 40042a
Rotard et al. (1994)Ploughland
Grassland
14
7
< 94
< 94
ACSIND
ND
ND
0.4 [0.4–0.4]
1.2 [0.8–1.4]
ND [ND]
1.5 [1.1–1.8]
1.9 [1.4–2.9]
2.0 [1.6–2.4]
1.7 [1.7–1.7]
9.1 [4.1–21.9]
14.6 [7.1–35]
32 [7.4–88]
44 [26–87]
1.7 [0.3–3.7]
2.3 [0.4–4.8]
Deciduous forest9< 941.4 [0.5–3.0]8.3 [1.1–29]6.5 [1.5–20.9]12.4 [3.1–49]19.1 [3.6–82]121 [23–399]283 [60–759]38 [5.9–102]
Coniferous forest11< 941.3 [ND-4.0]5.1 [ND-8.9]5.8 [2.1–14]11.1 [3.7–29]16.2 [5.3–54]109 [36–272]320 [100–692]37 [11.1–112]
Kujawa et al. (1995)Brandenburg; Rural49< 94ACSNNo isomer-specific information1–54
Italy
di Domenico et al.(1993b)Sea level
Alt 800–1300 m
10
11
91
91
ACSI0.025+
0.036+
0.045
0.084
0.068
0.074
0.11
0.18
0.23
0.32
2.2
3.6
15
29
Caves6910.025+0.030+0.038+0.038+0.038+0.112.5
Japan
Nakamura et al., (1994)Agricultural field
Agricultural field
Agricultural field
1
1
1
NG
NG
NG
ABSINo isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information
No isomer-specific information
271
49
42.4
Jordan
Alawi et al. (1996a)Landfill,Amman
Sample 1

1

95
ACSI
< 10

343

536

733

567

3 960

3250

1470a
Sample 2195< 1087851329813903510323a
Sample 3195< 1037488656453474122a
Sample 4195< 1036315034210202192a
Sample 5195< 1030163522428544111a
Sample 6195< 10< 10< 10< 10< 10661548.2a
The Netherlands1
van Wijnen et al. (1992)Scrap ear dealer
Cable burning
4
3
6/88
6/88
ACSIND
ND-1100
ND-110
67–2 000
ND-12
0–2 100
30–80
91–6 800
24–88
130–3 400
290–820
550–25000
790–3 600
860–17 000
60–160
380–16 000
Scrap metal dealer, cable burning16/88170590724602802100089 0001600
26/88NDNDNDNDND950–14 0004 600–5 000230–800
Scrap car and open air cable burning46/88130–840350–2 200ND-1200360–3400320–2 800900–14 0001 100–10 0001 200–9 900
36/882100–34006 800–8 8008 100–14 00030 000–33 00020 000–28 000150 000–200 000140 000–370 00072 000–98 000
36/88190–240100–930610–1 9001 900–4 8001 300–3 40013 000–37 0008 500–730 0004 100–12 000
Russian Federation
Pervunina et al. (1992)Bashkiriya;
Chlorophenol, 2,4-D production site
3NGACSI900–40 000No further isomer-specific information
Moscow region; TCP production site2NG1 000–4 800No further isomer-specific information
Samara region; PCP production site1NG18 700No further isomer-specific information
Fedorov (1993)ChapaevskN
Soil, near sect. 2310/9018 700Only total reported
Street dust6/910.2Only total reported6602 000
Farming area6/91Only total reported34120
Farming area7/92Only total reported9 600
Potato field7/9268Only total reported13 300
Russian Federation (contd)
Fedorov (1993)
(contd)
Chapaevsk; rest zone
Incinerator Ufa
17/9256Only total reported76256
Near sect. N 1510/908 0001 2301 90056 00018 100
Near sect. N 1110/9040 0009 0004 30010 20029 000
Fedorov et al. (1993)Chapaevsk;
CFP on site
392–93ACNN20–3 000Only total reported30 000–134 000100–46 200
1.5 km from CFP292–93< 1–7.5Only total reported3 900–64 00050–298
2 km from CFP192–931.5Only total reported13 00040
3 km from CFP192–93< 1Only total reported4 80030
6 km from CFP192–93< 1Only total reported431014
7 km from CFP192–93< 1Only total reported96010
8 km from CFP192–93< 1Only total reported2004
12 km from CFP192–93< 1Only total reported< 5< 4
Spain
Jiménez et al. (1996a)Madrid;
SW, 400 m fr. CWI

1

93
ABSO
0.98

0.23


0.23


1.60

6.52

2.28
SE, 1200 m fr. CWI1931.510.530.421.181.5326.24136.74.11
NE, 600 m fr. CWI193ND0.310.150.36ND4,2820.41.85
NW, 1200 m fr. CWI1930.361.736.841.36
W, 2000 m fr. CWI1930.89NDNDNDND2.078.761.99
SW, 2000 m fr. CWI1932.621.041.272.924.0534.6171.311.4
N, 2000 m fr. CWI193ND0.140.130.210.291.759.420.69
S, 1200 m fr. CWI1930.150.300.611.747.432.03
NE, 2600 m fr. CWI1930.130.240.210.320.392.9315.71.23
NE, 2600 m fr. CWI1931.030.370.270.430.573.6424.92.59
NE, 2600 m fr. CWI1930.100.300.180.400.523.6621.91.83
NE, 3000 m fr, CWI193ND0.260.150.320.463.7517.51.52
NE, 3000 m fr. CWI1930.130.200.080.200.252.5423.010.82
NE, 3000 m fr. CWI193ND0.160.100.210.251.587.010.82
Control; NW, 4500 m fr. CWI193NDND0.130.320.481.365.930.71
Jiménez et al. (1996a) (contd)Madrid, control;
NE, 4500 m fr. CWI
193ABSO0.070.160.060.160.321.528.850.69
Schuhmacher et al. (1996)Tarragona;
250 m fr. MSWI

6

< 96
ABSO
ND

0.10

0.05

0.09

0.17

2.12

234.1

0.48
500 m fr. MSWI6< 960.030.060.120.220.153.3923.10.36
750 m fr. MSWI6< 960.010.110.180.260.356.6754.80.84
1000 m fr. MSWI6< 960.020.090.080.140.211.727.620.53
NE fr. MSWI8< 960.030.060.070.080.110.692.270.23
SE fr. MSWI8< 960.040.080.230.450.238.1160.00.63
SE fr, MSWI8< 960.050.070.130.121.377.060.23
Sweden
Rappe et al. (1991b)Plant B; soil I
Plant B; soil II
1
1
90
90
ABSI< 10
< 7
< 11
< 11
< 2.8
< 3.3
< 13
< 6.9
< 2.4
< 2.2
33
69
160
400
11 000b
870b
Outside plant B
Grassfield; soil III
190< 0.1< 0.10.20.30.34.1255.3b
Plant B;soil IV190< 0.1< 0.1< 0.23.6281820440b
Plant B; soil V190< 0.4< 0.4< 0.8< 0.7< 0.81.53096b
Plant B; C12 prod.; soil VI190< 0.5< 0.5< 1.2219.96.8491 400b
Taiwan
Huang et al. (1992)Electric wire incinerator site1
1
89
89
ABSI17
2
64
249
25
242
81
289
20
242
607
2162
37
5
Mainly magnetic card189NDND181
incinerator site189NDNDNDNDNDNDND
18984229
189NDNDNDNDND1
Soong & Ling (1996)PCP production plant site1
1
< 96
< 96
ACSO19
2646
69
28850
192
50 770
794
1 337 000
375
130 600
39530
23 670 000
433 900
206 900 000
2 150
1 357 000
United Kingdom
Kjeller et al. (1991)Rothamsted
(semi-rural);
Archived samples
(0–23 cm depth)
1

1
1
1846

1856
1893
ABSI0.048

0.033
0.029
0.13

0.09
0.09
0.18

0.13
0.12
0.31

0.12
0.1
0.28

0.14
0.13
2.8

1.2
1.5
13

7.8
11
119140.0400.110.160.230.182.011
119440.0430.180.210.200.171.812
119560.0490.180.260.460.343.513
119660.0600.220.290.520.515.332
119800.0790.200.300.670.414.620
119860.0580.270.310.570.486.325
Creaser et al., (1989)50 km grid UK;
All samples
77< 89ABSI< 0.5
[< 0.5–6.4]
< 0.5
[< 0.5–7.8]
Only totals reported277 [29–1365]
Reduced data-set65< 89< 0.5
[0.5–2.1]
< 0.5
[0.5–2.4]
Only totals reported191 [29–832]
Creaser et al. (1990)Urban soils (5 cities)19< 90ABSI0.7
[< 0.5–4.2]
2.4
[< 0.5–11]
Only totals reported9980
[176–99 000]
Stenhouse & Badsha (1990)Different semi-urban sites1290ABSO3 [1–7]< 1 [< 1–1]4 [2–8]33 [10–61]58 [20–150]8 [3–20]
Foxall & Lovett (1994)South Wales; close to incinerator plant4291/93N66 [2.5–1745]
United States
Kimbrough et al. (1977)E. Missouri;
Horse arena A

8/71
N
31.8–33 × 106

No further isomer-specific information
Arena A (excavated)8/74NoneNo further isomer-specific information
Arena C8/740.22–0.85
× 106
No further isomer-specific information
Farmroad soil9/740.61 × 106No further isomer-specific information
United States (contd)
Viswanathan et al. (1985)E. Missouri;
Denney's farm
27NGACSO46 × 106
9.6 × 109
No further isomer-specific information
Other sites22NG2 200–
1 500 000
No further isomer-specific information
Nestrick et al. (1986)Dow, Midland;
Chlorophenol
prod. area, top soil

83
ACSI
41–5 200

No further isomer-specific information
Waste incinerator area, top soil108318–4 300No further isomer-specific information
Background, top soil11836.5–590No further isomer-specific information
Various; Industrial areas of US cities, top soil2083< 0.2–9.4No further isomer-specific information
Reed et al. (1990)Elk River, MI
Site 1 untilledg
19/88ABSINDNDND149.93002300
Site 1 tilledg19/88NDNDNDNDND37340
Site 2 untilledg19/88NDNDNDNDND78680
Site 2 tilledg19/88NDNDNDND8.73603 300
Rappe et al. (1995)S. Mississippi; rural3694ABSINo further isomer-specific informationRange:
11–15 000
3.14
[0.08–22.6]
Lorber et al. (1996b)Columbus, OH;
MSWI, on site
495ABSI291801431382027651495
MSWI, downwind off site4954181626284593893
City of Columbus; urban149523366112892
Ohio; Rural3950.40.10.40.81.218161
Viet Nam
Matsuda et al. (1994)Hanoi; background
Hue, Phu Loc; sprayed area
5
6
89–91
89–91
ACSIND
4.37–16.8
No further isomer-specific information
No further isomer-specific information
66.3–578
72.8–1 318
Ho Chi Minh; sprayed area989–912.98–59.2No further isomer-specific information317–1 865
Tay Ninh; sprayed area5489–911.2–38.5No further isomer-specific information17–16 000
Song Be; sprayed area1189–916.0No further isomer-specific information11–880
Tarn Nong; sprayed area489–91No further isomer-specific information69
Dog Bin Kieu; sprayed area689–91No further isomer-specific information180–380
Ca Mau; sprayed area1689–91No further isomer-specific information210–900

Analytical methods; A, high-resolution gas chromatography; B, high-resolution mass spectrometry; C, low-resolution mass spectrometry; I, isomer-specific; O, others; N, no information; S, sophisticated clean-up; R, reduced clean-up; W, WHO-accepted laboratory

ND, not detected, detection limit in parentheses; [ ], range; +, contains 50% of detection limit

Data presented are means. Figures in parentheses are ranges. Levels of congeners not detected at known detection limits (for examples, 0.02 pg/m3) are presented as < 0.02

S, soluble; PB, particle bound; MWTP, municipal water treatment plant; CFP, chemical fertilizer plant; CWI, clinical waste incinerator; MSWI, municipal solid-waste incinerator; NG, not given

a

German TEQ

b

Sample depth, 0–20 cm

c

Nordic TEQ

d

Median values

e

Cars per day

f

Sample depth: 0–30 cm

g

Sample depth, 0–2.5 cm

Table 4PCDD/PCDFF content in various materials from different areas of Brazil

AreaMaterialng I-TEQ/kg
Amazon basin
   Eucalipto (eucalyptus trees)Leaves (n = 5)
< 2 mm (n = 3)a
Soil (n = 2)
0.19
0.04
0.4
   Capoeira (wood cut)Leaves (n = 5)
< 2 mm (n = 3)
Soil (n = 3)
0.07
0.08
0.05
   Mata natural 1 (natural forest)Leaves (n =5)
< 2 mm (n = 3)
Soil (n = 2)
0.03
0.1
0.05
   Mata natural 2 (natural forest)Leaves (n = 5)
< 2 mm (n = 3)
Soil (n = 2)
0.02
0.02
0.03
   Mata degradada (new-grown forest)Leaves (n = 5)
< 2 mm (n = 3)
Soil (n = 2)
0.03
0.05
0.1
Rio de Janeiro – industrial regions
   Niterói, hospital waste incinerationSoil (from plant)
Soil (street nearby)
Soil (reference)
23
73
3
   São Gonçalo, metal industrySoil (nearby)
Soil (outer wall)
35
15
   Santa Cruz, iron industrySludge
Soil
Leaves
Soil beyond leaves
21
27
77
654
Rio de Janeiro – recreation areas
   ItaipuaçuLeaves
1. Soil layer
2. Soil layer
2.6
0.6
1.8
   Serra de MauáLeaves
Soil
0.6
0.4
   SaquaremaLeaves
Soil (sand)
0.4
0.03
Cubatão, São Paulo – industrial region
   Ultrafertil (fertilizer production)Leaves
Soil
10
11
   Eletropaulo (chlorochemistry plant)Leaves
Soil
12
54
   Carbocloro (chlorochemistry plant)Leaves
Soil
49
341
a

Fraction < 2 mm (detritus plus soil particles)

Table 5Concentrations of PCDDs/PCDFs in soil samples from former East and West Germany (ng I-TEQ/kg)

Soil typeEastWest
For defined emitters — traffic, incinerators, landfills2–141–160
Diffuse sources — green land, parks, playgrounds1–90.8–1594
Background — forest soils, forest litter, green land1–540.01–140

Table 62,3,7,8-TCDD soil levels (in ng/kg) in the City of Midland, MI

Range
Chlorophenol production site
   Locally elevated level area 152–52 000
   Locally elevated level area 21000–34 000
   Other sites41–1 100
Chemical plant
   Waste incinerator site18–4 300
   Background areaND-590
City of Midland
   Close to chemical plant22–450
   Further from chemical plant0.6–9.2

ND, not detected

Table 72,3,7,8-TCDD soil levels in industrialized areas of US cities (ng/kg)

Lansing, MI (n = 2)ND (0.8)−3Pittsburgh, PA2.6
Gaylord, MIND (0.2)Marcus Hook, PA0.4
Detroit, MI (n = 2)2.1–3.6Philadelphia, PA0.9
Chicago, IL (n = 2)4.2–9.4Clifton Heights, PAND (0.4)
Middletown, OH (n = 2)ND (0.3)Brooklyn, NY2.6
Barberton, OH5.6South Charleston, WVND (0.4)
Akron, OH6.3Arlington, VAND (0.4)
Nashville, TN0.8Newport News, VA0.4

ND, not detected; detection limits in parentheses

Table 8PCDD/PCDF concentrations in Mississippi (USA) soil samples (ng/kg dry matter)

CountyOCDDI-TEQCountyOCDDI-TEQCountyOCDDI-TEQ
George     36  0.16Jones  4 00020.30Perry   1400.52
Jackson     98  0.42Jones     590  1.31Perry     180.17
Jackson     67  0.38Jones13 00014.30Wayne     390.17
Jackson     34  0.31Jones  1 200  2.81Wayne   2107.15
Jackson     29  0.37Lamar     110  0.64Wayne2 4003.41
Jackson     20  0.27Lamar     174  0.55Wayne     110.08
Forrest4 30010.90Lamar     500  1.42Wayne   8801.66
Forrest   260  1.12Lamar     140  0.36Greene     510.20
Forrest   200  1.05Lamar       37  0.15Greene   4101.03
Forrest   450  0.93Perry  7 100  8.09Greene3 5005.26
Forrest   110  0.25Perry  1 200  2.75Greene     360.18
Jones   260  0.90Perry15 00022.60Greene     750.37
I-TEQ:Mean3.14Min0.08
Median0.77Max22.60

Table 9Concentrations of PCDDs in background cow's milk

ReferenceOrigin; sample description (and no.)Coll. periodPCDD concentration (ng/kg fat)
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Canada
Ryan et al. (1990)6 cities (2% fat)61985–881.9NRNRNRNRNRNR10.0
France
Fraisse et al. (1996)571994NRNRNRNRNRNRNR1.74
Germany
Beck et al. (1987)Berlin81987∼0.20.70.31.10.4< 2< 101.79
Fürst et al. (1990)NR West.101989∼0.41.20.84.00.86.2113.83
Fürst et al. (1992a)NR West.1201990NRNRNRNRNRNRNR1.38
Netherlands
Liem et al. (1991b)NR19910.250.520.250.730.281.393.641.50
Russian Federation
Khamitov et al. (1996)Bashkortostan1519950.16NRNRNRNRNRNR0.26
Spain
Ramos et al. (1996)Asturias151995ND0.360.248.9315.8a7.211363.94
Sweden
Rappe et al. (1990b)Malmö
Stockholm
Umeå
Vaxjo
Gothenburg
1
1
1
1
1
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
< 0.4
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.3
< 0.2
0.49
< 0.2
0.2
< 0.2
< 0.2
0.3
< 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.2
1.5
0.3
0.3
1.0
1.0
< 0.3
< 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.2
0.2
3.1
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.8
3.5
2
1.4
4.9
1.6
1.77
0.48
0.47
1.08
0.82
Switzerland
Rappe et al. (1987b)Bern (retail)
Bowil (pool)
1
1
1986
1986
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 1.0
< 1.4
< 1.7
< 1.4
< 1.7
< 1.4
< 1.7
< 1.4
< 1.6
< 1.5
< 4.0
< 2.8
2.68
2.48
Bowil11986< 0.3< 1.83< 2.29< 2.29< 2.29< 1.51< 5.952.96
Schmid & Schlatter (1992)Retail91990–910.20.460.210.490.270.982.51.31
United Kingdom
Harrison et al. (1996)Derbyshire
(4% fat assumed)
471991–931.252.2551.753.2511.753.64
Startin et al. (1990)Rural farms
(4% fat assumed)
719890.2250.40.80.251.155.751.11
Wright & Startin (1995)TDSpool19820.841.42.24.41.212324.53
Wright & Startin (1995)TDSpool1992< 0.400.800.500.950.566.6512.02
USA
Eitzer (1995)Connecticut
(4% fat assumed)
1719910.4250.160.7750.80.3752.3519.250.99

NR, not reported; ND, not detected and detection limit not reported; TDS, total diet study; NR West., North Rhine Westphalia

a

[Dubious concentration]

TEQ concentrations recalculated where possible assuming congeners that were not detected were present at the full value of the detection limit

Table 10Summary of concentrations (ng/kg fat) of PCDDs in background cow's milk, reported in Table A1.10

TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Number of positives1013101611151523
Mean  0.58  0.72  0.57  2.0  0.58  3.419  2.3
Minimum  0.16  0.16  0.13  0.30  0.20  0.20  1.4  0.26
5th %tile  0.18  0.18  0.17  0.30  0.23  0.68  1.5  0.47
25th %tile  0.74  0.80  0.71  2.1  0.68  4.7  16  2.8
Median  0.33  0.49  0.30  0.97  0.38  2.44.9  1.7
75th %tile  0.21  0.40  0.24  0.71  0.28  1.12.9  1.1
95th %tile  1.6  1.7  1.6  6.0  1.5  8.676  4.5
Maximum  1.9  2.3  2.2  8.9  1.81214010.0

Table 11Concentrations of PCDDs in milk products

Sample descriptionOriginReferenceColl. periodNo.PCDD concentration (ng/kg fat)
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
ButterEgyptMalisch & Saad (1996)1994–96331.062.10.530.80.311.148.367.68
ButterGermany, NR West.Fürst et al. (1992a)199022NRNRNRNRNRNRNR1.11
ButterGermany, Berlin, retailBeck et al. (1989a)1987∼10.080.410.150.950.26  0.34  3.40.79
ButterGermany, NR West.Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.50.7< 0.5  1.711.61.76
ButterNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–910.240.670.360.830.31  0.91  0.981.78
ButterNorwayBiseth et al. (1990)1989∼3< 0.50.350.261.00.41  1.0  4.61.38
ButterRussian Federation,
Baikalsk
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.0< 0.49< 0.490.6< 0.49  1.0173.37
CheeseGermanyFürst et al. (1992b)19904NRNRNRNRNRNRNR1.83
CheeseGermany, NR West.Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼100.50.60.30.80.5  2.310.52.17
CheeseNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–910.220.50.240.720.22  1.16  3.771.41
CheeseRussian Federation,
Moscow
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.0< 0.670.41.60.4  8.0222.13
Cheese/butterRussian Federation,
Novosibirsk
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.0< 0.5< 0.50.8< 0.5  2.0151.78
CreamGermanyFürst et al. (1992a)199022NRNRNRNRNRNRNR1.37
CreamRussian Federation,
Irkutsk
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.0< 0.47< 0.470.9< 0.47  3.0216.26
Mixed (TDS)Spain, BasqueStartin (1996)199480.510.50.590.940.55  3.14142.30
Mixed (TDS)United KingdomWright & Startin (1995); MAFF (1995)1982pool0.561.42.24.91.413253.42
Mixed (TDS)United KingdomWright & Startin (1995); MAFF (1995)1992pool0.170.280.220.340.290.953.60.75

NR, not reported; NR West., North Rhine Westphalia; MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

I-TEQ concentrations recalculated where possible assuming congeners that were not detected were present at the full value of the detection limit

Table 12Concentrations of PCDDs in meat and meat products

Sample
description
OriginReferenceColl.
period
No.PCDD concentration (ng/kg fat)
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Mixed (TDS)Spain, Basque regionStartin (1996)19948< 0.50.33< 0.50.850.58.7501.64
Mixed (TDS)United KingdomWright & Startin (1995)1982pool< 0.440.881.52.30.813512.81
Mixed (TDS)United KingdomWright & Startin (1995)1992pool< 0.120.440.300.70< 0.152.06.60.95
BeefGermany, Berlin, retailBeck et al. (1989a)1987∼10.60.80.61.90.618252.59
BeefGermany,
NR West.
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼3< 0.51.71.93.22.03.95.43.73
BeefRussian Fed.,
Bashkortostan
Khamitov et al. (1996)199580.12NRNRNRNRNRNR0.20
BeefRussian Fed.,
Irkutsk
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.0< 0.67< 0.670.6< 0.675.2215.84
Beef fatRussian Fed.,
Novosibirsk
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.0< 0.5< 0.51.0< 0.5310.02.05
BeefUSAFerrario et al. (1996)1993630.050.350.461.40.534.504.800.89
Beef
(hamburger)
CanadaRyan et al. (1990)1985–8860006.3021.335.61.29
Beef fatNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool0.210.570.31.320.311.952.861.77
Beef fatViet Nam, HanoiSchecter et al. (1989a)1985–8711.61.32.14.12.1003.61
Canned
(unspecified)
Germany, NR
West.
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼2< 0.5< 0.51.03.21.213.2532.10
Liver (cow)NetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool0.161.12.823.561.5939.21445.72
GoatNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool0.81.981.276.40.6412.826.84.20
Horse fatNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool1.985.167.3620.752.792.217113.8
Horse liverNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool2.0315.924.239.312941175161.2
Liver (pooled)NetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool1.255.396.4914.84.0227101730.7
Mutton fatNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool0.320.860.441.410.282.444.731.81
Offal (TDS)UKWright & Startin (1995); MAFF
(1995)
1982pool0.321.34.97.41.9360440019.0
Offal (TDS)UKWright & Startin (1995); MAFF
(1995)
1992pool0.811.72.92.61.3302009.86
Liver (pig)NetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool0.240.733.414.41.29120343115.3
PorkGermany, Berlin, retailBeck et al. (1989a)1987∼10.030.120.210.290.062.1190.28
PorkGermany,
NR West.
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼3< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.50.78.21.20
PorkNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool0.070.070.180.540.13.8244.80.42
PorkRussian Fed.,
Baikalsk
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.52.0161.97
PorkRussian Fed.,
Bashkortostan
Khamitov et al. (1996)199560.14NRNRNRNRNRNR0.34
Pork fatViet Nam,
Ho Chi Minh City
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.00.50.61.70.47.5302.34
Pork sticksViet Nam,
Ho Chi Minh City
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 10.50.71.40.38.4282.31
Pork fatViet Nam, Song
Be
Schecter et al. (1989a)198610.60.90.41.20.813.2642.65
ProductsNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool0.090.130.190.410.062.9332.90.67
Products (TDS)UKWright & Startin (1995); MAFF
(1995)
1982pool0.150.341.52.10.33191111.44
Products (TDS)UKWright & Startin (1995); MAFF
(1995)
1992pool< 0.040.110.230.340.132.9180.40
SausageMoscowSchecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1< 0.51< 0.51< 0.51< 0.511.0101.73
SheepGermany, Berlin, retailBeck et al. (1989a)1987∼10.010.50.31.50.415681.65
SheepGermany, NR
West.
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼2< 0.5< 0.50.83.00.711.419.32.43
VealGermany, NR
West.
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼4< 0.53.11.95.31.814.422.37.68

NR, not reported; NR West., North Rhine Westphalia; TDS, total diet survey; MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

I-TEQ, concentrations recalculated where possible assuming congeners that were not detected were present at the full value of the detection limit

Table 13Summary of concentrations (ng/kg fat) of PCDDs for meat and meat products reported in Table 12

TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Number of positives2429313430363639
Mean  0.54  1.9  2.4  5.0  1.662350  6.5
Minimum  0.01  0.07  0.18  0.29  0.06  0.70  2.9  0.20
5th %tile  0.03  0.11  0.20  0.39  0.08  1.7  4.8  0.33
25th %tile  0.14  0.44  0.42  1.3  0.35  3.018  1.4
Median  0.30  0.86  1.0  2.5  0.751229  2.3
75th %tile  0.70  1.7  2.5  5.8  1.92279  5.8
95th %tile  1.9  5.4  6.917  4.2  2602 200  22
Maximum  2.0  16  2439129414 40061

Table 14Concentrations of PCDDs in poultry

Sample descriptionOriginReferenceSample
year
No.Concentration ng/kg fat
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Chicken fat,
PCP contamination
CanadaRyan et al. (1985a)198026NDNDa27ND52903.31
ChickenGermany, Berlin, retailBeck et al. (1989a)10.30.70.52.80.66522.25
ChickenGermany, North
Rhine Westphalia,
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼2< 0.510.61.80.64.516.52.53
Chicken fatNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–910.290.530.41.840.646.7325.61.62
ChickenRussian Federation,
Bashkortostan
Khamitov et al. (1996)1995101.02NRNRNRNRNRNR4.54
Chicken (TDS)United KingdomWright & Startin (1995)1982pool0.761.35.1121.5651505.41
Chicken (TDS)United KingdomWright & Startin (1995)1992pool< 0.510.360.370.790.613.8101.68
Chicken fatViet Nam, HanoiSchecter et al. (1989a)198611.00.61.01.2< 4.5< 152.94
Chicken liverViet Nam, Ho Chi
Minh City
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.02.42.69.73.7344210.2
ChickenVietnam, Ho Chi
Minh City
Schecter et al. (1990a)1988–891< 1.01.00.54.00.714242.80
Chicken fatVietnam, Song BeSchecter et al. (1989a)198614.1106.9275.4717521.8

NR, not reported; ND, not detected and detection limit not reported; TDS, total diet surveyl-TEQ concentrations recalculated where possible assuming congeners that were not detected were present at the full value of the detection limit

a

Included with 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD

Table 15Concentrations of PCDDs in poultry eggs

Sample
description
OriginReferenceColl.
period
No.PCDD concentration (ng/kg fat)
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
ChickenGermany,
Berlin, retail
Beck et al. (1989a)1987∼10.20.41.31.40.50.4121.52
ChickenNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–910.270.760.441.490.687.170.92.02
ChickenSpain, Basque region, TDSStartin (1996)199480.230.280.292.00.5114641.26
Chicken
(TDS)
UKWright & Startin (1995)1982pool0.652.78.6186.31207208.26
Chicken
(TDS)
UKWright & Startin (1995)1992pool0.430.510.540.960.656.2381.80
DuckUK, ruralLovett et al. (1996)1993–9470.7

TDS, total diet survey

Table 16Concentrations of PCDDs in fish

SpeciesOriginReferenceColl.
period
No.Concentration ng/kg fat
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Barbel (river)GermanyFrommberger (1991)198815.18.31.04.71.14.19.039.2
Brown trout
(river)
GermanyFrommberger (1991)198811.41.3< 1.30.6< 0.20.7< 510.6
Catfish (farmed)USACooper et al. (1996)199512.23.61.94.22.311485.0
Catfish (farmed)USACooper et al. (1996)1995132161.45.7148.84942.9
CodNorwayBiseth et al. (1990)1989∼2< 29.4< 17.6< 14.7< 14.7< 29.4< 29.435359.6
Cod (retail)Germany, BerlinBeck et al. (1989a)1231.30.01175.2108342.7
EelGermanyFrommberger (1991)198813.13.52.4142.6156015.2
EelGermanyFrommberger (1991)198813.33.4< 2.0102.3195216.2
HerringNorwayBiseth et al. (1990)1989∼6< 3.60< 1.08< 0.72< 0.72< 2.16< 2.1617.317.6
Herring, retailGermany, BerlinBeck et al. (1989a)14.7121.25.81.03.61933.7
Lean sea fishNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–9116.36.612.387.114.1022.921348.6
MackerelNorwayBiseth et al. (1990)1989∼3< 1.57< 0.47< 0.31< 0.31< 0.94< 0.9416.63.49
MixedRussian Federation,
Bashkortostan
Khamitov et al. (1996)1995130.11NANANANANANA0.18
Mixed (TDS)Spain, Basque RegionStartin (1996)199482.22.01.52.91.623987.24
Mixed (TDS)UKWright & Startin (1995); MAFF
(1995)
1982pool0.791.20.613.61.514575.29
Mixed (TDS)UKWright & Startin (1995); MAFF
(1995)
1992pool< 0.250.900.591.00.742.7162.72
Mixed, freshwaterGermany,
North Rhine Westphalia
Fürst (1990)1989∼18NA9.72.414.91.89.919.330.5
Mixed, saltwaterGermany,
North Rhine Westphalia
Fürst (1990)1989∼156.5
(n = 6)
7.51.07.32.88.810.535.3
Redilsh, retailGermany, BerlinBeck et al. (1989a)1987∼12.86.50.58.41.331130.6
Salmon (farmed)NorwayBiseth et al. (1990)1989∼4< 19.0< 4.76< 3.81< 3.81< 9.5216.712953.0

NA, not analyzed; TDS, total diet survey; MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

Table 17Summary of concentrations (ng/kg fat) of PCDDs in fish reported in Table 16

TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Number of positives1415131514161819
Mean  7.4  5.6  1.3  7.1  3.0117025
Minimum  0.11  0.90  0.01  0.60  0.74  0.70  9.0  0.2
5th %tile  0.55  1.1  0.30  0.88  0.91  2.210  3.4
25th %tile  2.2  1.6  0.61  3.9  1.4  4.017  9.1
Median  3.2  3.6  1.2  5.8  2.0  9.94931
75th %tile  6.2  7.9  1.9  9.2  2.8157741
95th %tile2613  2.416  8.32323054
Maximum3216  2.417142335060

Table 18Concentrations of PCDDs in miscellaneous foods

Sample
description
OriginReferenceColl. periodNo.PCDD concentration (ng/kg fat)
TCDDPeCDDHxCDDHpCDDOCDDI-TEQ
PCDD/PCDF
2378123781234781236781237891234678
Bread (Mixed,
TDS)
United
Kingdom
Wright & Startin (1995)1982pool< 0.23< 0.31< 0.260.870.709.9551.27
Bread (Mixed,
TDS)
United
Kingdom
Wright & Startin (1995)1992pool< 0.49< 0.14< 0.22< 0.22< 0.2215941.34
Cereal products
(Mixed, TDS)
United
Kingdom
Wright & Startin (1995)1982pool< 0.14< 0.160.554.452.710501.76
Cereal products
(Mixed, TDS)
United
Kingdom
Wright & Startin (1995)1992pool< 0.41< 0.56< 0.80< 0.66< 0.93168702.66
CheesecakeUnited States,
Mississippi
Fiedler et al. (1996)199510.080.440.452.20.42540.95
Cod liver oilGermany,
NRW
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼41.71.90.44.10.91.4  9.616.4
Fish oilGermany, NRWFürst et al. (1990)1989∼4< 1.01.00.41.51.01.8  4.84.39
Fish oilsNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–9150.531.170.651.21.466.19  14.92.24
Fish oil (dietary supplement)SpainJiménez et al. (1996b)199470.500.440.110.580.402.1  6.42.15
HamburgerUnited States,
Mississippi
Fiedler et al. (1996)19951< 0.050.220.180.970.253  3.90.47
Infant formulaGermany,
NRW
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼10< 0.50.40.30.30.32.225.81.11
LardGermany,
NRW
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼4< 0.5< 0.5< 0.50.3< 0.52.816.01.23
MargarineGermany,
NRW
Fürst et al. (1990)1989∼6< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5< 0.50.911.01.2
MargarineNorwayBiseth et al. (1990)1989∼4< 0.9< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.21.3181.53
Mexican dishUnited States,
Mississippi
Fiedler et al. (1996)199510.040.090.090.120.120.889.10.22
Mexican dishUnited States,
Mississippi
Fiedler et al. (1996)199510.060.06< 0.08< 0.07< 0.080.372.80.19
Mexican dishUnited States,
Mississippi
Fiedler et al. (1996)19951< 0.050.170.150.740.162.12.50.40
NutsNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91pool0.17NDNDNDND0.887.250.20
Oils and fats
(Mixed, TDS)
Spain, Basque regionStartin (1996)19948< 0.22< 0.18< 0.25< 0.25< 0.251.48  17.70.24
Oils and fats
(Mixed, TDS)
United
Kingdom
Wright & Startin (1995)1982pool0.150.170.571.31.511501.26
Oils and fats
(Mixed, TDS)
United
Kingdom
Wright & Startin (1995)1992pool< 0.020.090.070.140.181.5100.26
Vegetable oilsNetherlandsLiem et al. (1991b)1990–91< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.050.58.30.03

ND, not detected and detection limit not reported; TDS, total diet survey; NRW, North Rhine Westphalia

©International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1997.
Bookshelf ID: NBK409961

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (50M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...