U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

US Public Health Service. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services. 2nd edition. Washington (DC): Department of Health and Human Services (US); 1999.

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Cover of Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services

Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services. 2nd edition.

Show details

41Sigmoidoscopy

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of death from cancer in the United States. The disease most often afflicts persons older than age 40 years. Of the three widely used methods of screening for colorectal cancer (digital rectal examination, sigmoidoscopy, and fecal occult blood testing), examination using a sigmoidoscope is the most specific and sensitive. The specificity of sigmoidoscopy approaches 100%, because this procedure enables the examiner to perform a biopsy during the procedure. The sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy is largely determined by the skill of the examiner and the length of the instrument. Approximately 30% of colorectal cancers are within reach of the 25-cm rigid sigmoidoscope. The 35-cm flexible sigmoidoscope can reach 45% to 50% of cancers, and the 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscope can reach 50% to 60% of cancers.

Screening with sigmoidoscopy has been limited by costs, patient and provider compliance, and earlier controversies about the effectiveness of this approach. Patient compliance problems have been somewhat diminished by development of the more comfortable flexible instruments. The 35-cm sigmoidoscope is particularly well accepted by patients, and the 60-cm sigmoidoscope is relatively well accepted. The controversy about effectiveness had stemmed from a lack of evidence that screening with sigmoidoscopy decreases mortality from colorectal cancer. Two recent case-control studies (Selby et al, 1992; Newcomb et al, 1992) demonstrated significant decreases (59% and 79%, respectively) in the risk of death from colorectal cancer among screened patients. In the Selby study, a significant benefit of rigid sigmoidoscopy was suggested even if screening was performed as infrequently as every 10 years.

See chapters 30 and 34 for information about colorectal cancer and other methods of screening for it.

Recommendations of Major Authorities

Normal Risk

  • American Academy of Family Physicians --
  • Individuals aged 50 years and older and those aged 40 years and older with a family history of early colorectal cancer should be screened for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or barium enema.
  • American Cancer Society (ACS) and American Gastroenterological Association --
  • Patients at normal risk should be screened with sigmoidoscopy every 5 years in combination with yearly fecal occult blood testing beginning at 50 years of age. Other recommended screening options beginning at age 50 include: colonoscopy every 10 years or double contrast barium enema every 5 to 10 years. The ACS further advises that digital rectal examination be performed along with the endoscopic or radiological procedure.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists --
  • Patients at normal risk should be screened with sigmoidoscopy every 3 to 5 years beginning at 50 years of age.
  • American College of Physicians --
  • Men and women should be offered flexible sigmoidoscopies every 10 years from 50 to 70 years of age. In most settings and for most people, this strategy will provide the best balance of benefits and harms, logistic feasibility, and costs. In settings where it is logistically feasible and cost is reasonable, persons who want to achieve the maximum protection against colorectal cancer should be offered colonoscopy every 10 years from 50 to 70 years of age. In some settings, air-contrast barium enemas every 10 years from 50 to 70 years of age might be logistically preferable to colonoscopies, and some patients might prefer that procedure. For persons who decline these options, annual fecal occult blood testing should be offered.
  • Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
  • There is insufficient evidence to support the inclusion or exclusion of sigmoidoscopic or colonoscopic screening of asymptomatic individuals over 40 years of age in the periodic health examination.
  • US Preventive Services Task Force --
  • Screening for colorectal cancer is recommended for all persons 50 years of age or over. Sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood testing are effective methods of screening. There is insufficient evidence to determine which of these methods is preferable or whether the combination of both methods produces greater benefit than either method alone. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a periodicity for sigmoidoscopy screening.

Increased Risk

  • All major authorities --
  • Patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer should consider more intensive screening. What constitutes increased risk and the nature and frequency of recommended screening differs slightly among the authorities.
  • American Cancer Society --
  • For patients having a first-degree relative with a history of colorectal cancer at 55 years of age or younger, the entire colon and rectum should be examined with colonoscopy or air-contrast barium enema every 5 years beginning at 35 to 40 years of age. Members of families with a history of familial adenomatous polyposis should receive earlier screening utilizing flexible sigmoidoscopy. Members of families with a history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer require earlier and more intense surveillance utilizing colonoscopy. Individuals with inflammatory bowel disease are at exceptionally high risk and require individualized treatment. Patients under age 55 years with a first-degree family member with a history of colorectal cancer are at increased risk and may need earlier and more frequent examinations. People with a history of breast, ovarian, or endometrial cancer are at some increased risk but should follow screening recommendations for normal-risk patients.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists --
  • Colonoscopy should be a part of primary preventive care for individuals with a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease or colonic polyps, or a family history of familial polyposis coli, colorectal cancer, or cancer family syndrome.
  • American College of Physicians --
  • Individuals who have one or more first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer should be offered colonoscopy at 40 years of age and at least every 10 years thereafter.
  • American Gastroenterological Association --
  • Individuals with a first-degree relative who has had colorectal cancer or an adenomatous polyp should be screened beginning at age 40 years. Gene carriers for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or people with a family history of FAP whose gene carrier status is indeterminate should be offered yearly flexible sigmoidoscopy beginning at puberty to see if they are expressing the gene. If polyposis is present, they should begin to consider when they should have colectomy. People with a family history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer should be offered an examination of the entire colon (via colonoscopy or double contrast barium enema, preferably with sigmoidoscopy) every 1 to 2 years starting between the ages 20 and 30 years and every year after age 40 years. In patients with long-standing, extensive inflammatory bowel disease, surveillance colonoscopy should be considered, along with the extent and duration of the disease, as a guide to when or if colectomy should be considered. A common practice is to perform surveillance colonoscopy every 1 to 2 years beginning after 8 years of disease in patients with pancolitis or after 15 years in those with colitis involving only the left colon.
  • Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination --
  • There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the inclusion or exclusion of sigmoidoscopy in the periodic health examination of asymptomatic individuals over 40 years old (including those with a family history of one or two relatives with colorectal cancer). There is fair evidence to exclude sigmoidoscopy from the periodic health examination of individuals with true cancer family syndrome; however, there is fair evidence for the inclusion of colonoscopy in the periodic health examination of individuals with true cancer family syndrome.
  • US Preventive Services Task Force --
  • In high-risk groups, there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against early or frequent screening or the use of colonoscopy rather than sigmoidoscopy. However, early and frequent colonoscopy screening of patients with a family history of familial polyposis coli or cancer family syndrome or with personal histories of previous adenomatous polyps or colorectal cancer may be recommended on other grounds, including the increased risk of colorectal cancer and of lesions in the proximal colon.

Basics of Sigmoidoscopy Screening

Performing sigmoidoscopies requires technical training and practice. It is beyond the scope of this book to explain the performance of this procedure; only very basic aspects will be addressed.

1. Training:

Sigmoidoscopy should be performed only by or under the supervision of a trained examiner. Training should be obtained from an experienced endoscopist. Training may consist of diagnostic instruction with audiovisual materials, endoscopic models, and photo atlases, followed by patient demonstrations and successful completion of a number of supervised examinations.

2. Sigmoidoscope type:

Most authorities recommend use of a flexible sigmoidoscope (preferably 60 cm in length) rather than a rigid sigmoidoscope because of better patient acceptance and the ability to visualize lesions higher in the sigmoid colon.

3. Patient preparation:

Proper bowel preparation is essential for performance of an adequate screening examination. Recommendations for bowel preparation differ somewhat. The minimum preparation consists of administration of two enemas a few hours before examination.

4. Follow-up of abnormal results:

All authorities agree that patients found to have adenomatous polyps of 1 cm or larger need colonoscopic examination of the entire colon. Approximately 10% of individuals screened will have small tubular adenomas less than 1 cm in diameter. Controversy exists about whether patients with these lesions need colonoscopic follow-up in view of their low potential for malignancy.

5. Maintenance of competence:

Clinicians need to perform sigmoidoscopy routinely to maintain competence. Performing procedures only occasionally may lead to missed or inappropriate diagnoses and a high rate of complications.

Patient Resources

  • Colorectal Cancer: Questions & Answers; Colonoscopy: Questions and Answers; Polyps of the Colon and Rectum: Questions and Answers. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, 800 E Northwest Hwy, Suite 1080, Palatine, IL 60067; (708)359-9184.
  • What You Need to Know about Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Office of Cancer Communications, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892; (800)4-CANCER.

Selected References

  1. American Academy of Family Physicians. Summary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examination . Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; 1997.
  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures-1997 . Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 1997.
  3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Information Database . Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; June 1997.
  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Women's Health Care. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1996.
  5. American College of Physicians, Health and Public Policy Committee. Clinical competence in the use of flexible sigmoidoscopy for screening purposes. Ann Intern Med . 1987; 107:589–591. [PubMed: 3631797]
  6. American College of Physicians. Guidelines. In: Eddy DM, ed. Common Screening Tests. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1991:415-416.
  7. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Screening for colorectal cancer. In: The Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services; 1994: chap 66.
  8. Eddy DM. Screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med . 1990; 113:373–384. [PubMed: 2200321]
  9. Eddy DM, Ferioli C, Anderson DS. Screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. In press.
  10. Fleischer DE, Goldberg SB, Browning TH, et al. Detection and surveillance of colorectal cancer. JAMA . 1989; 261:580–585. [PubMed: 2642563]
  11. Gorse GJ, Messner RL. Infection control practices in gastrointestinal endoscopy in the United States: a national survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol . 1991; 12:289–296. [PubMed: 1865099]
  12. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer B, Surawicz, Marcus PM. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst . 1992; 84:1572–1575. [PubMed: 1404450]
  13. Ransohoff DF, Lang CA. Sigmoidoscopic screening in the 1990s. JAMA . 1993; 269:1278–1281. [PubMed: 8437306]
  14. Selby JV, Friedman GD. Sigmoidoscopy in the periodic examination of asymptomatic adults. JAMA . 1989; 261:595–601. [PMC free article: PMC1138866] [PubMed: 2642564]
  15. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med . 1992; 326:653–657. [PubMed: 1736103]
  16. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer.In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996: chap 8.
  17. Wigton RS, Blank LL, Monsour H, Nicolas JA. Procedural skills of practicing gastroenterologists. [A national survey of 700 members of the American College of Physicians.] Ann Intern Med . 1990; 113:540–546. [PubMed: 2393208]
  18. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. . 1997; 112:594–642. [PubMed: 9024315]

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...