- 1.
- 2.
Grover SA, Coupal L, Zowall H, Rajan R, Trachtenberg J, Elhilali M, et al. The economic burden of prostate cancer in Canada: forecasts from the Montreal Prostate Cancer Model.
CMAJ. 2000 Apr 4;162(7):987–992. [
PMC free article: PMC1232350] [
PubMed: 10763396]
- 3.
- 4.
Rugo S. Cancer. 47th edition. Chapter 39. In: McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, Tierney LM, editors. Current medical diagnosis & treatment 2008. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2008. pp. 1387–1458.
- 5.
Grover SA, Coupal L, Zowall H, Rajan R, Trachtenberg J, Elhilali M, et al. The clinical burden of prostate cancer in Canada: forecasts from the Montreal Prostate Cancer Model.
CMAJ. 2000 Apr 4;162(7):977–983. [
PMC free article: PMC1232349] [
PubMed: 10763395]
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Ramirez ML, Evans CP. Current management of small renal masses.
Can J Urol. 2007 Dec;14 Suppl 1:39–47. [
PubMed: 18163944]
- 10.
Rais-Bahrami S, Guzzo TJ, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR, Allaf ME. Incidentally discovered renal masses: oncological and perioperative outcomes in patients with delayed surgical intervention.
BJU Int. 2009 May;103(10):1355–1358. [
PubMed: 19239459]
- 11.
- 12.
Russo P. Functional preservation in patients with renal cortical tumors: the rationale for partial nephrectomy.
Curr Urol Rep. 2008 Jan;9(1):15–21. [
PubMed: 18366969]
- 13.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Surgical volume trends within and beyond wait time priority areas. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; Feb 5, 2007. (Analysis in Brief)
- 14.
Ghali WA, Quan A, Shrive FM, Hirsch GM. Outcomes after coronary bypass graft surgery in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01.
Can J Cardiol. 2003;19(7):774–781. [
PubMed: 12813610]
- 15.
Lamy A, Wang X, Farrokhyar F, Kent R. A cost comparison of off-pump coronary CABG versus on-pump CABG at one-year: the Canadian off-pump CABG registry.
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Jun;22(8):669–704. [
PMC free article: PMC2560563] [
PubMed: 16802001]
- 16.
Intuitive Surgical. Sunnyvale (CA): Intuitive Surgical. Hospital locator: hospital results; 2009.
- 17.
- 18.
Health Canada.
Medical Devices Active Licence Listing (MDALL) [database on the Internet]. Ottawa: Medical Devices Bureau, Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada; 2008. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Da Vinci S Surgical System - Control for endoscopic instruments. Available from:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/licen/mdlic-eng.php.
- 19.
Health Canada.
Medical Devices Active Licence Listing (MDALL) [database on the Internet]. Ottawa: Medical Devices Bureau, Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada; 2008. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Da Vinci Surgical System - Endoscopic instruments. Available from:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/licen/mdlic-eng.php.
- 20.
- 21.
Kiaii B, McClure RS, Stitt L, Rayman R, Dobkowski WB, Jablonsky G, et al. Prospective angiographic comparison of direct, endoscopic, and telesurgical approaches to harvesting the internal thoracic artery.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Aug;82(2):624–628. [
PubMed: 16863775]
- 22.
Intuitive Surgical. The da Vinci© SHD Surgical System. Sunnyvale (CA): Intuitive Surgical; 2006.
- 23.
Health Canada.
Medical Devices Active Licence Listing (MDALL) [database on the Internet]. Ottawa: Medical Devices Bureau, Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada; 2009. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Da Vinci Surgical System. Available from:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/licen/mdlic_e.html.
- 24.
Health Canada.
Medical Devices Active Licence Listing (MDALL) [database on the Internet]. Ottawa: Medical Devices Bureau, Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada; 2009. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Hermes Ready AESOP 3000 System. Available from:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/licen/mdlic_e.html.
- 25.
Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W III, Seigne JD. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy.
Urology. 2008 Nov;72(5):1068–1072. [
PubMed: 18313121]
- 26.
Artibani W, Fracalanza S, Cavalleri S, Iafrate M, Aragona M, Novara G, et al. Learning curve and preliminary experience with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Urol Int. 2008;80(3):237–244. [
PubMed: 18480623]
- 27.
Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Roine R.
Evidence for the benefits of telecardiology applications: a systematic review [Internet]. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2004. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. (HTA 34). Available from:
http://www.ihe.ca/documents/HTA34.FINAL.pdf.
- 28.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177–188. [
PubMed: 3802833]
- 29.
Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.
Urology. 2004 May;63(5):819–822. [
PubMed: 15134953]
- 30.
Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Clark PE, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
J Urol. 2010;183(3):990–996. [
PubMed: 20083261]
- 31.
Boris RS, Kaul SA, Sarle RC, Stricker HJ. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
Can J Urol. 2007 Jun;14(3):3566–3570. [
PubMed: 17594747]
- 32.
Breyer BN, Davis CB, Cowan JE, Kane CJ, Carroll PR. Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2010 Apr 29;106(11):1734–1738. [
PMC free article: PMC3565608] [
PubMed: 20438567]
- 33.
Burgess SV, Atug F, Castle EP, Davis R, Thomas R. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy.
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):827–830. [
PubMed: 17094763]
- 34.
Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Volz DS, Steineck G, et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1092–1097. [
PubMed: 20022085]
- 35.
- 36.
Chino J, Schroeck FR, Sun L, Lee WR, Albala DM, Moul JW, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is not associated with early postoperative radiation therapy.
BJU Int. 2009 Nov;104(10):1496–1500. [
PubMed: 19388991]
- 37.
Coronato EE, Harmon JD, Ginsberg PC, Harkaway RC, Singh K, Braitman L. A multi-institutional comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy, radical perineal prostatectomy, and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for treatment of localized prostate cancer.
J Robot Surg. 2009;3:175–178. [
PubMed: 27638375]
- 38.
D'Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, Albala DM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, et al. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Aug;21(5):322–328. [
PubMed: 19700296]
- 39.
Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload.
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):1–6. [
PubMed: 21035248]
- 40.
Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, Rahman MB, Rasiah KK, Pe BR, et al. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.
BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(3):378–384. [
PubMed: 20067454]
- 41.
Durand X, Vaessen C, Bitker MO, Richard F. Retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted total prostatectomies: comparison of postoperative course and histological and functional results based on a series of 86 prostatectomies.
Prog Urol. 2008 Jan;18(1):60–67. [
PubMed: 18342158]
- 42.
Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Urology. 2006 Feb;67(2):360–363. [
PubMed: 16461085]
- 43.
Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D'Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution.
BJU Int. 2009 Aug;104(4):534–539. [
PubMed: 19281468]
- 44.
Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Galfano A, Novara G, Mangano A, et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study.
BJU Int. 2008 May;101(9):1145–1149. [
PubMed: 18399830]
- 45.
Ham WS, Park SY, Kim WT, Koo KC, Lee YS, Choi YD. Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy: a prospective analysis based on a single surgeon's experience.
J Robot Surg. 2008;2:235–241. [
PubMed: 27637793]
- 46.
Hohwü L, Akre O, Pedersen KV, Jonsson M, Nielsen CV, Gustafsson O. Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a comparison of length of sick leave.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(4):259–264. [
PubMed: 19353381]
- 47.
Kordan Y, Barocas DA, Altamar HO, Clark PE, Chang SS, Davis R, et al. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2010 Feb 11;106:1036–1040. [
PubMed: 20151960]
- 48.
Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.
BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):448–453. [
PubMed: 18778350]
- 49.
Laurila TAJ, Huang W, Jarrard DF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
Urol Oncol. 2009;27(5):529–533. [
PubMed: 18640061]
- 50.
- 51.
- 52.
Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience.
Urology. 2002 Nov;60(5):864–868. [
PubMed: 12429317]
- 53.
Miller J, Smith A, Kouba E, Wallen E, Pruthi RS. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):854–858. [
PubMed: 17631338]
- 54.
Nadler RB, Casey JT, Zhao LC, Navai N, Smith ZL. Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.
J Robot Surg. 2010;3:201–207. [
PubMed: 27628630]
- 55.
Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Herrell SD, et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):929–931. [
PubMed: 17296378]
- 56.
O'Malley PJ, Van AS, Bouchier-Hayes DM, Crowe H, Costello AJ. Robotic radical prostatectomy in Australia: initial experience.
World J Urol. 2006 Jun;24(2):165–170. [
PubMed: 16552598]
- 57.
Ou YC, Yang CR, Wang J, Cheng CL, Patel VR. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon.
Anticancer Res. 2009 May;29(5):1637–1642. [
PubMed: 19443379]
- 58.
Prewitt R, Bochkarev V, McBride CL, Kinney S, Oleynikov D. The patterns and costs of the da Vinci robotic surgery system in a large academic institution.
J Robot Surg. 2008;2:17–20. [
PubMed: 27637212]
- 59.
Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.
BJU Int. 2009;104(7):991–995. [
PubMed: 19426191]
- 60.
Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, Albala DM, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ, et al. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2008 Jul;102(1):28–32. [
PubMed: 18384634]
- 61.
Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385–2389. [
PubMed: 17936849]
- 62.
Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution.
BJU Int. 2003 Aug;92(3):205–210. [
PubMed: 12887468]
- 63.
Truesdale MD, Lee DJ, Cheetham PJ, Hruby GW, Turk AT, Badani KK. Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1055–1060. [
PubMed: 20575697]
- 64.
Webster TM, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Baumgartner RG, Anderson LW, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain.
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):912–914. [
PubMed: 16093986]
- 65.
White MA, De Haan AP, Stephens DD, Maatman TK, Maatman TJ. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
Urology. 2009 Mar;73(3):567–571. [
PubMed: 19167036]
- 66.
Williams SB, Chen MH, D'Amico AV, Weinberg AC, Kacker R, Hirsch MS, et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s).
Urology. 2010;76(5):1097–1101. [
PubMed: 20303147]
- 67.
Wood DP, Schulte R, Dunn RL, Hollenbeck BK, Saur R, Wolf JS, et al. Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy.
Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):945–949. [
PubMed: 17919694]
- 68.
Zorn KC, Katz MH, Bernstein A, Shikanov SA, Brendler CB, Zagaja GP, et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications.
Urology. 2009 Aug;74(2):296–302. [
PubMed: 19515403]
- 69.
Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R. Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience.
Urology. 2009;73(1):119–123. [
PubMed: 18952268]
- 70.
Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, Kawachi MH, Ramin SA, Lau C, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):541–546. [
PubMed: 16406991]
- 71.
Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences?
BJU Int. 2005 Jul;96(1):39–42. [
PubMed: 15963117]
- 72.
Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: Establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes.
J Urol. 2002;168(3):945–949. [
PubMed: 12187196]
- 73.
Ploussard G, Xylinas E, Paul A, Gillion N, Salomon L, Allory Y, et al. Is robot assistance affecting operating room time compared with pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?
J Endourol. 2009;23(6):939–943. [
PubMed: 19473064]
- 74.
Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, et al. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478–482. [
PubMed: 17561160]
- 75.
Srinualnad S. Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Mar;91(3):377–382. [
PubMed: 18575292]
- 76.
Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Strup SE, Lallas CD. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994–3999. [
PubMed: 18405448]
- 77.
Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Gomella LG, Lallas CD. Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution.
Urol Oncol. 2010;28(1):81–85. [
PubMed: 20123354]
- 78.
Ball AJ, Gambill B, Fabrizio MD, Davis JW, Given RW, Lynch DF, et al. Prospective longitudinal comparative study of early health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer: a short-term evaluation of five approaches from a single institution.
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):723–731. [
PubMed: 17094746]
- 79.
Drouin SJ, Vaessen C, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Misrai V, Haertig A, et al. Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
World J Urol. 2009 Oct;27(5):599–605. [
PubMed: 19421755]
- 80.
Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):357–359. [
PubMed: 18928973]
- 81.
Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience.
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):260–265. [
PubMed: 20153886]
- 82.
DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):412–417. [
PubMed: 18834620]
- 83.
Feuer G, Benigno B, Krige L, Alvarez P. Comparison of a novel surgical approach for radical hysterectomy: robotic assistance versus open surgery.
J Robot Surg. 2010;3(2):179–186. [
PubMed: 27638376]
- 84.
Geisler JP, Orr CJ, Khurshid N, Phibbs G, Manahan KJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Apr;20(3):438–442. [
PubMed: 20375811]
- 85.
Gocmen A, Sanlikan F, Ucar MG. Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282(5):539–545. [
PubMed: 20652285]
- 86.
Halliday D, Lau S, Vaknin Z, Deland C, Levental M, McNamara E, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison of outcomes and cost.
J Robot Surg. 2010;4(4):211–216. [
PubMed: 27627947]
- 87.
Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):425–430. [
PubMed: 18929400]
- 88.
Lowe MP, Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Singh DK, Buttin BM. A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
J Robot Surg. 2010;3(1):19–23. [
PubMed: 27628448]
- 89.
Maggioni A, Minig L, Zanagnolo V, Peiretti M, Sanguineti F, Bocciolone L, et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Oct;115(1):60–64. [
PubMed: 19638333]
- 90.
Nevadunsky N, Clark R, Ghosh S, Muto M, Berkowitz R, Vitonis A, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in obese and morbidly obese patients.
J Robot Surg. 2010;4(4):247–252. [
PubMed: 27627953]
- 91.
- 92.
Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Reaume PS, Kimball KJ, Huh WK, Fowler JM, et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients.
Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):16–21. [
PubMed: 19546753]
- 93.
Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, Everett EN, Shah C III, Peters WA. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(6):679–681. [
PubMed: 18538151]
- 94.
Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):224–228. [
PMC free article: PMC2896309] [
PubMed: 20144471]
- 95.
Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, Abaid LN, Mendivil A, Boggess JF. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(1):41–45. [
PubMed: 18694588]
- 96.
Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, Chernick M, Dunton CJ. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul;17(4):500–503. [
PubMed: 20547112]
- 97.
- 98.
Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May;15(3):286–291. [
PubMed: 18439499]
- 99.
Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy?
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):36–41. [
PubMed: 19168206]
- 100.
Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Int J Med Robot. 2007 Sep;3(3):224–228. [
PubMed: 17924449]
- 101.
- 102.
Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407–411. [
PubMed: 18829091]
- 103.
Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):360–362. [
PubMed: 18928974]
- 104.
Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, Estape E, Dunkin N, Rivera A. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jun;113(3):357–361. [
PubMed: 19345987]
- 105.
Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim JW, et al. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;101(2):116–121. [
PubMed: 19902479]
- 106.
Aron M, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Nguyen MM, Desai MM, Gill IS. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre.
BJU Int. 2008 Jul;102(1):86–92. [
PubMed: 18336600]
- 107.
Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Dulabon LM, Patel MN, Lipkin M, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):866–872. [
PubMed: 19616229]
- 108.
Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, Melamud O, Yee DS, Abraham JBA, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution.
J Endourol. 2008;22(5):947–952. [
PubMed: 18397157]
- 109.
DeLong JM, Shapiro O, Moinzadeh A. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon's initial experience.
Can J Urol. 2010 Jun;17(3):5207–5212. [
PubMed: 20566016]
- 110.
Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S, White MA, Forest S, Autorino R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients.
Urology. 2010;76(3):754–758. [
PubMed: 20646744]
- 111.
Hemal AK, Kumar A. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.
World J Urol. 2009 Feb;27(1):89–94. [
PubMed: 18704439]
- 112.
Jeong W, Park SY, Lorenzo EIS, Oh CK, Han WK, Rha KH. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
J Endourol. 2009;23(9):1457–1460. [
PubMed: 19698038]
- 113.
Kural AR, Atug F, Tufek I, Akpinar H. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes.
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1491–1497. [
PubMed: 19694519]
- 114.
Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of >100 consecutive procedures.
Urology. 2009 Feb;73(2):306–310. [
PubMed: 19038419]
- 115.
- 116.
Ak K, Aybek T, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Ozaslan F, Bakhtiary F, Moritz A, et al. Evolution of surgical techniques for atrial septal defect repair in adults: a 10-year single-institution experience.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;134(3):757–764. [
PubMed: 17723830]
- 117.
Morgan JA, Peacock JC, Kohmoto T, Garrido MJ, Schanzer BM, Kherani AR, et al. Robotic techniques improve quality of life in patients undergoing atrial septal defect repair.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(4):1328–1333. [
PubMed: 15063261]
- 118.
Folliguet T, Vanhuyse F, Constantino X, Realli M, Laborde F. Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Mar;29(3):362–366. [
PubMed: 16423535]
- 119.
Kam JK, Cooray SD, Smith JA, Almeida AA. A cost-analysis study of robotic versus conventional mitral valve repair.
Heart Lung Circ. 2010;19(7):413–418. [
PubMed: 20356784]
- 120.
Mihaljevic T, Jarrett CM, Gillinov AM, Williams SJ, Devilliers PA, Stewart WJ, et al. Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: potential realized.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;141(1):72–80. [
PubMed: 21093881]
- 121.
Tabata M, Cohn LH. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair with and without robotic technology in the elderly.
Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2006 Sep;15(5):306–310. [
PubMed: 16957450]
- 122.
Woo YJ, Nacke EA. Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay.
Surgery. 2006 Aug;140(2):263–267. [
PubMed: 16904978]
- 123.
- 124.
- 125.
Gershenson DM, Ramirez PT. Endometrial Cancer. In: Porter RS, Kaplan JL, editors. The Merck Manuals online medical library. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp; 2008.
- 126.
Swanson DA. Genitourinary cancer. In: Porter RS, Kaplan JL, editors. The Merck Manuals online medical library. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp; 2007.
- 127.
- 128.
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
Ottawa:
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health;
Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada [Internet] (3rd ed). 2006 Mar [cited 2011 Jul 5]; Available from:
http://www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/186_EconomicGuidelines_e.pdf.
- 129.
Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):453–458. [
PubMed: 19931979]
- 130.
Ollendorf DA, Hayes J, McMahon P, Pearson SD.
Active surveillance & radical prostatectomy for the management of low-risk, clinically-localized prostate cancer [Internet]. Boston (MA): Institute for Clinical and Economic Review; Sep 11, 2009. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Available from:
http://www.icer-review.org/index.php/as-rp.html.
- 131.
- 132.
Mayer E, Winkler M, Hrouda D, Karim O, Vale J, Ogden C, et al. The 'true' cost of robotic prostatectomy in a taxation based healthcare system. Eur Urol Suppl. 2007;6(2):125.
- 133.
Mouraviev V, Nosnik I, Sun L, Robertson CN, Walther P, Albala D, et al. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):311–314. [
PubMed: 17320670]
- 134.
O'Malley SP, Jordan E. Review of a decision by the medical services advisory committee based on health technology assessment of an emerging technology: the case for remotely assisted radical prostatectomy.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(2):286–291. [
PubMed: 17493316]
- 135.
Burgess SV, Atug F, Castle EP, Davis R, Thomas R. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy.
J Endourol. 2006;20(10):827–830. [
PubMed: 17094763]
- 136.
Scales CD, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2323–2329. [
PubMed: 16280833]
- 137.
Guru KA, Bhandari A, Peabody JO, Oja-Tebbe N, Kaul S, Dasari S, et al. Cost comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy) and radical retropubic prostatectomy [abstract] J Urol. 2004;171(4 Suppl):43–44. (Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, May 08-13, 2004, San Fransisco)
- 138.
Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques.
J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1431–1435. [
PubMed: 15371862]
- 139.
Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, et al. The influence of body mass index on the cost of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2010;106(8):1188–1193. [
PubMed: 20346046]
- 140.
Hohwü L, Ehlers L, Borre M, Pedersen KV. Cost-effectiveness study of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy [abstract] Eur Urol Suppl. 2010;9(5 Suppl 3):505.
- 141.
Joseph JV, Leonhardt A, Patel HR. The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches.
J Robot Surg. 2008;2:21–24. [
PubMed: 27637213]
- 142.
Laungani RG, Shah NL. The economics of robotic urologic surgery in the United States and its role within a community hospital and cancer center [abstract] Eur Urol Suppl. 2010 Sep;9(5 Suppl 3):507.
- 143.
Lotan Y, Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, et al. The effect of the approach to radical prostatectomy on the profitability of hospitals and surgeons.
BJU Int. 2010 Jun;105(11):1531–1535. [
PubMed: 19874301]
- 144.
Bachinsky WB, Boga G, Kiljanek L, Tang A, Hubbard CR, Wali A, et al. Comparison of same sitting, robotic assisted Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in multi-vessel coronary artery disease [abstract] J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Sep 21;56(13 Supp 1):B40–B41.
- 145.
Morgan JA, Thornton BA, Peacock JC, Hollingsworth KW, Smith CR, Oz MC, et al. Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques.
J Card Surg. 2005 May;20(3):246–251. [
PubMed: 15854086]
- 146.
- 147.
Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD Jr, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):685–693. [
PubMed: 20733453]
- 148.
Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, Ross S, Moore M, Gunnarsson C. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov;17(6):730–738. [
PubMed: 20850391]
- 149.
Raju KS, Papadopoulos AJ, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. A pilot study to assess the feasibility, safety and cost of robotic assisted total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
J Robot Surg. 2010;4(1):41–44. [
PubMed: 27638571]
- 150.
Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Einarsson JI. A comparison of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomies: surgical outcomes and operative cost in a single institution [abstract] Fertil Steril. 2010 Sep;94(4 Suppl 1):S226.
- 151.
Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92–96. [
PubMed: 20207063]
- 152.
Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic.
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):101–104. [
PubMed: 16194714]
- 153.
Parker WR, Montgomery JS, Wood DP Jr. Quality of life outcomes following treatment for localized prostate cancer: is there a clear winner?
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 May;19(3):303–308. [
PubMed: 19300266]
- 154.
Tseng TY, Kuebler HR, Cancel QV, Sun L, Springhart WP, Murphy BC, et al. Prospective health-related quality-of-life assessment in an initial cohort of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy.
Urology. 2006 Nov;68(5):1061–1066. [
PubMed: 17113898]
- 155.
- 156.
- 157.
- 158.
Krahn MD, Bremner KE, Tomlinson G, Naglie G. Utility and health-related quality of life in prostate cancer patients 12 months after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2009;12(4):361–368. [
PubMed: 19901935]
- 159.
Thornton AA, Perez MA, Oh S, Crocitto L. A prospective report of changes in prostate cancer related quality of life after robotic prostatectomy.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2011;29(2):157–167. [
PubMed: 21391068]
- 160.
Krahn M, Ritvo P, Irvine J, Tomlinson G, Bremner KE, Bezjak A, et al. Patient and community preferences for outcomes in prostate cancer: implications for clinical policy.
Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):153–164. [
PubMed: 12544552]
- 161.
Hohwu L, Borre M, Ehlers L, Venborg PK. A short-term cost-effectiveness study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
J Med Econ. 2011 May 23;14(4):403–409. [
PubMed: 21604962]
- 162.
Cookson MS, Chang SS. Margin control in open radical prostatectomy: what are the real outcomes?
Urol Oncol. 2010 Mar;28(2):205–209. [
PubMed: 20219560]
- 163.
Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):903–907. [
PubMed: 16093984]
- 164.
Paul A, Ploussard G, Nicolaiew N, Xylinas E, Gillion N, De La TA, et al. Oncologic outcome after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: midterm follow-up of 1115 procedures.
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):267–272. [
PubMed: 19775807]
- 165.
- 166.
Richardson AW, Gafni A. Treatment of capital costs in evaluating health care programmes. Cost Management. 1983;26:30.
- 167.
- 168.
- 169.
- 170.
Alberta Health and Wellness.
Government of Alberta. Schedule of medical benefits. Health professional fees [Internet]. Edmonton: Government of Alberta; 2010. [cited 2011 Jul 15]. Available from:
http://www.health.alberta.ca/professionals/SOMB.html Updated Mar 31, 2011.
- 171.
- 172.
- 173.
Briggs AH, Goeree R, Blackhouse G, O'Brien BJ. Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Med Decis Making. 2002 Jul;22(4):290–308. [
PubMed: 12150595]
- 174.
- 175.
- 176.
- 177.
- 178.
Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L, Caro J, Mullins CD, Nuijten M, et al. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.
Value Health. 2007 Sep;10(5):336–347. [
PubMed: 17888098]
- 179.
Dexter H. Surgical robots: systematic planning and implementation. Plymouth Meeting (PA): ECRI Institute; Dec 16, 2009. (ECRI Institute's December web conference on surgical robots)
- 180.
Patel VR. Essential elements to the establishment and design of a successful robotic surgery programme.
Int J Med Robot. 2006 Mar;2(1):28–35. [
PubMed: 17520611]
- 181.
Steers WD, LeBeau S, Cardella J, Fulmer B. Establishing a robotics program.
Urol Clin North Am. 2004 Nov;31(4):773–780. [
PubMed: 15474605]
- 182.
Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr. Building a surgical robotics program.
Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4A Suppl):16S–18S. [
PubMed: 15476647]
- 183.
Palmer KJ, Lowe GJ, Coughlin GD, Patil N, Patel VR. Launching a successful robotic surgery program.
J Endourol. 2008;22(4):819–824. [
PubMed: 18419223]
- 184.
- 185.
Francis P. Evolution of robotics in surgery and implementing a perioperative robotics nurse specialist role.
AORN J. 2006 Mar;83(3):630–642. [
PubMed: 16579121]
- 186.
Paraiso MFR, Falcone T.
UpToDate [database on the Internet]. Version 17.1. Waltham (MA): Dec 24, 2008. [cited 2011 Jul 15]. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecology. UpToDate; c2005 - . Available from:
http://www.uptodate.com Subscription required.
- 187.
Kypson AP, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr. Robot-assisted surgery: training and re-training surgeons.
Int J Med Robot. 2004 Jun;1(1):70–76. [
PubMed: 17520598]
- 188.
- 189.
Boehm DH, Arnold MB, Detter C, Reichenspurner HC. Incorporating robotics into an open-heart program.
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1369–1380. [
PubMed: 14712872]
- 190.
Amodeo A, Linares QA, Joseph JV, Belgrano E, Patel HRH. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2009;61(2):121–128. [
PubMed: 19451894]
- 191.
Patel HR, Linares A, Joseph JV. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
Surg Oncol. 2009 Sep;18(3):242–246. [
PubMed: 19560913]
- 192.
Intuitive Surgical - da Vinci Surgical System [Internet]. Sunnyvale (CA): Intuitive Surgical, Inc; 2005. c2005. Training overview.
- 193.
Tooher R, Pham C.
Adelaide (SA):
ASERNIP-S; The da Vinci surgical robotics system: technology overview. 2004 Jul (Report no. 45).
- 194.
Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience.
Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):854–857. [
PubMed: 9426713]
- 195.
- 196.
Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1738–1741. [
PubMed: 14532766]
- 197.
Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases.
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):269–272. [
PubMed: 15947662]
- 198.
Herrell SD, Smith JA. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):105–107. [
PubMed: 16194715]
- 199.
Zorn KC, Wille MA, Thong AE, Katz MH, Shikanov SA, Razmaria A, et al. Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies.
Can J Urol. 2009 Aug;16(4):4742–4749. [
PubMed: 19671227]
- 200.
Sammon J, Perry A, Beaule L, Kinkead T, Clark D, Hansen M. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning rate analysis as an objective measure of the acquisition of surgical skill.
BJU Int. 2010 Sep;106(6):855–860. [
PubMed: 20089107]
- 201.
Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X, Harmon J, Rozet F, Barret E, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve.
Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):127–133. [
PubMed: 18952261]
- 202.
Rodriguez AR, Rachna K, Pow-Sang JM. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes and margin status.
JSLS. 2010 Jan;14(1):6–13. [
PMC free article: PMC3021300] [
PubMed: 20529523]
- 203.
Hellawell GO, Moon DA. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reducing the learning curve.
Urology. 2008 Dec;72(6):1347–1350. [
PubMed: 18400266]
- 204.
Brown JA, Sajadi KP. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: six months of fellowship training doesn't prevent the learning curve when incorporating into a lower volume practice.
Urol Oncol. 2009 Mar;27(2):144–148. [
PubMed: 18367119]
- 205.
Fabrizio MD, Tuerk I, Schellhammer PF. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach.
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2063–2065. [
PubMed: 12771720]
- 206.
Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK, Tan YH, Wong MY, Cheng CW. Team-based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Int J Urol. 2006 May;13(5):560–564. [
PubMed: 16771713]
- 207.
Martinez CH, Chalasani V, Lim D, Nott L, Al-Bareeq RJ, Wignall GR, et al. Effect of prostate gland size on the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does size matter initially?
J Endourol. 2010 Feb;24(2):261–266. [
PubMed: 20073551]
- 208.
- 209.
Freire MP, Choi WW, Lei Y, Carvas F, Hu JC. Overcoming the learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Urol Clin North Am. 2010;37(1):37–47. [
PubMed: 20152518]
- 210.
- 211.
Klein EA, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Pontes JE, et al. Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories.
J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2212–2216. [
PMC free article: PMC3567913] [
PubMed: 18423716]
- 212.
- 213.
O'Brien T, Viney R, Doherty A, Thomas K. Why don't mercedes benz publish randomized trials?
BJU Int. 2010 Feb;105(3):293–295. [
PubMed: 19888986]
- 214.
Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy.
Urology. 2008 Aug;72(2):412–416. [
PubMed: 18267330]
- 215.
Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
Eur Urol Suppl. 2009;8(4):364. [
PubMed: 19931979]
- 216.
- 217.
Gettman MT, Blute ML. Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: Techniques, outcomes, and cost. Curr Prostate Rep. 2007;5(2):61–67.
- 218.
Uranus S, Machler H, Bergmann P, Huber S, Hobarth G, Pfeifer J, et al. Early experience with telemanipulative abdominal and cardiac surgery with the Zeus[trademark] robotic system. European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca. 2002;34(3):190–193.
- 219.
Onnasch JF, Schneider F, Falk V, Mierzwa M, Bucerius J, Mohr FW. Five years of less invasive mitral valve surgery: from experimental to routine approach.
Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(2):132–135. [
PubMed: 12125665]
- 220.
Sur RL, Scales CD, Haleblian GE, Jones PJ, Borawski KM, Eisenstein EL, et al. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy [Internet]; Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association; 2006 May 20–25; Atlanta, G.A. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Available from:
http://www.abstracts2view.com/aua_archive/view.php?nu=200691727.
- 221.
Zebrowski B, Kinney S, McBride C, Oleynikov D. Da Vinci robotic surgical experience at a university setting: first one hundred cases. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(4 Suppl 2):A814.
- 222.
Sur RL, Scales CD, Haleblian GE, Jones PJ, Springhart WP, Eisenstein EL, et al. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2005;19 Suppl 1:A65.
- 223.
Joseph JV, Rosenbaum RS, Madeb R, Vicente I, Erturk E, Patel HRH. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RAP): is this a cost-viable option? J Endourol. 2005;19 Suppl 1:A65.
- 224.
Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Vicente I, Madeb RR, Erturk E, Patel HRH. Cost-profit analysis of davinci robotic surgery: is it worth it? [Internet]; Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the American-Urological-Association; May 21–26, 2005; San Antonio, TX. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Available from:
http://www.abstracts2view.com/aua_archive/view.php?nu=20055925.
- 225.
Bernstein AJ, Kernen KM, Gonzalez J, Balasubramaniam M. A cost and revenue analysis for retropubic, perineal and robotic prostatectomy at a large community hospital [Internet]; Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association; May 21–26, 2005; San Antonio, TX. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Available from:
http://www.abstracts2view.com/aua_archive/view.php?nu=20051813.
- 226.
Atug F, Burgess S, Castle E, Thomas R, Davis R. Cost-analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single institutional analysis. Eur Urol Suppl. 2005;4(3):76.
- 227.
Morgan JA, Thornton BA, Hollingsworth KW, Colletti NJ, Kherani AR, Vigilance DW, et al. Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(6 Suppl A):523A. [
PubMed: 15854086]
- 228.
Parsons JK, Bennett L. Outcomes of radical retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy: A quantitative, evidence-based analysis [Internet]; Abstract presented at: American Urological Association Annual Meeting 2007; May 19–24 2007; Anaheim, Ca.. Anaheim, CA: 2007. [cited 2011 Jul 5]. Available from:
http://www.abstracts2view.com/aua_archive/view.php?nu=200791682.
