References

Andrea K Biddle; Linda R Watson; Celia R Hooper; Kathleen N Lohr; Sonya F Sutton

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Biddle AK, Watson LR, Hooper CR, et al. Criteria for Determining Disability in Speech-Language Disorders. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2002 Jan. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 52.)

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Criteria for Determining Disability in Speech-Language Disorders.

Show details

Contents

< PrevNext >

References

1.: Disability Evaluation Under Social Security. SSA Publication No. 64-039, Baltimore, Md: Social Security Administration; 1998.
2.: Strategic plan: Plain language version. (no date); accessed August 8, 2001. Web Page. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/about/director/nsrp.htm.
3.: ASHA Factsheets. accessed June 1, 2000. Web Page. Available at: http://www.asha.org/marketing/bhs_factsheets.htm.
4.: Ruben RJ Redefining the survivial of the fittest: communication disorders in the 21st century. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:241–245. [PubMed: 10680923]
5.: Gierut JA Treatment efficacy: Functional phonological disorders in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:S85–S100. [PubMed: 9493748]
6.: Conture EG Treatment efficacy: Stuttering. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:S18–S26. [PubMed: 8898263]
7.: Ramig LO, Verdolini K Treatment efficacy: Voice disorders. J Speech Hear Lang Res. 1998;41:S101–S116. [PubMed: 9493749]
8.: Tallal P, Ross R, Curtiss S Unexpected sex-ratios in families of language/learning-impared children. Neuropsychologia. 1989;27:987–998. [PubMed: 2771037]
9.: Tomblin JB Familial concentration of developmental language impairment. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;54:287–295. [PubMed: 2468827]
10.: Felsenfeld S, Plomin R Epidemiological and offspring analyses of developmental speech disorders using data from the Colorado Adoption Project. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:778–791. [PubMed: 9263943]
11.: Tomblin JB, Records NL, Buckwalter P, Zhang X, Smith E, O'Brien M Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:1245–1260. [PMC free article: PMC5075245] [PubMed: 9430746]
12.: Gibbs DP, Cooper EB Prevalence of communication disorders in students with learning disabilities. J Learning Disabilities. 1989;22:60–63. [PubMed: 2703789]
13.: Cohen NJ, Vallance DD, Barwick M, et al The interface between ADHD and language impairment: An examination of language, achievement and cognitive processing. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Disciplines. 2000;41:353–362. [PubMed: 10784082]
14.: Giddan JJ, Milling L Comorbidity of psychiatric and communication disorders in children. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1999;8:19–36. [PubMed: 9894027]
15.: Tirosh E, Cohen A Language deficit with attention-deficit disorder: A prevalent comorbidity. J Child Neurol. 1998;13:493–7. [PubMed: 9796755]
16.: Cohen NJ, Davine M, Horodezky N, Lipsett L, et al Unsuspected language impairment in psychiatrically disturbed children: Prevalence and language and behavioral characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatr. 1993;32:595–603. [PubMed: 8496124]
17.: Skenes LL, McCauley RJ Psychometric review of nine aphasia tests. J Commun Disord. 1985;18:461–474. [PubMed: 4078036]
18.: Kilmon CA, Barber N, Chapman K Instruments for the screening of speech/language development in children. J Pediatr Health Care. 1991;5:61–70. [PubMed: 2005543]
19.: Engen E, Engen T Rhode Island Test of Language Structure Manual. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press; 1983.
20.: Westby C Multicultural issues in speech and language assessment. In: Tomblin JD, Morris HL, Spriesterbach DC, eds. 2nd ed. San Diego, Calif: Singular. Diagnosis in Speech-Language Pathology. 2000:35–62.
21.: Johnson W, Darley F, Spriestersbach D New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1978. Diagnostic Methods in Speech Pathology.
22.: ICID H-2: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. accessed October 1, 1910. Web Page. Available at: http://www.who.int/icidh/ 2001. [PMC free article: PMC369639]
23.: Yorkston K, Beukelman D Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1984. The Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech.
24.: Frattali CM, Thompson CK, Holland AL, Wohl CB, Ferketic MM The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults (ASHA FACS). Rockville, Md: ASHA; 1995.
25.: Benninger MS, Ahuja AS, Gardner G, Grywalski C Assessing outcomes for dysphonic patients. J Voice. 1998;12:540–550. [PubMed: 9988041]
26.: Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 1997;6:66–70.
27.: Harris LG, Shelton IS San Antonio, Tex: Communication Skill Builders; 1998. Desk Reference of Assessment Instruments in Speech and Language (Revised).
28.: Washington, DC: 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
29.: McCauley RJ, Swisher L Psychometric review of language and articulation tests for preschool children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1984;49:34–42. [PubMed: 6700200]
30.: Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Burnam MA, Patrick DL, Perrin EB, Roberts JS Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of Scientific Review Criteria. Clin Ther. 1996;18:979–991. [PubMed: 8930436]
31.: Anastasi A 6th ed. New York, NY: MacMillan Publishing Co.; 1988. Psychological Testing.
32.: Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1994. Psychometric Theory.
33.: Cronbach LJ 5th ed. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.; 1990. Essentials of Psychological Testing.
34.: Lohr KN, Carey TS Assessing 'best evidence': issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews. Joint Commission J Qual Improvement. 1999;25:470–479. [PubMed: 10481816]
35.: 2nd ed. Alexandria, Va: International Medical Publishing; 1996. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services.
36.: Cohen J A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
37.: Carmines EG, Zeller RA Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage; 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment.
38.: Domino G Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2000. Psychological Testing. An Introduction.
39.: Kuder GF, Richardson MW The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika. 1937;2:–. [PubMed: 18145837]
40.: Landis JR, Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. [PubMed: 843571]
41.: Halmstadter GG New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.; 1964. Principles of Psychological Measurement.
42.: Cohen J Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70 [PubMed: 19673146]
43.: Goodglass H, Kaplan E Media, Pa: Williams and Wilkins; 1983. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders.
44.: Crary MA, Wertz RT, Deal JL Classifying aphasias: cluster analysis of Western Aphasia Battery and Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination results. Aphasiology. 1992;6:29–36.
45.: Rosselli M, Ardila A, Florez A, Castro C Normative data on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination in a Spanish-speaking population. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990;12:313–322. [PubMed: 1692843]
46.: Porch B Chicago, Ill: Riverside Publishing Company; 1967. Porch Index of Communicative Ability.
47.: Clark C, Crockett D, Klonoff H Factor analysis of the Porch Index of Communication Ability. Brain Lang. 1979;7:1–7.
48.: Lendrem W, Lincoln NB Spontaneous recovery of language in patients with aphasia between 4 and 34 weeks after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48:743–748. [PMC free article: PMC1028444] [PubMed: 2411876]
49.: Lincoln NB, McGuirk E Prediction of language recovery in aphasic stroke patients using the Porch Index of Communicative Ability. Br J Disord Commun. 1986;21:83–88. [PubMed: 2425841]
50.: Kertesz A 2nd ed. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1982. Western Aphasia Battery Test Manual.
51.: Shewan CM, Kertesz A Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). J Speech Hear Disord. 1980;45:308–324. [PubMed: 7412225]
52.: Kertesz A Orlando, Fla: Grune & Stratton; 1972. The Western Aphasia Battery.
53.: Shewan CM The language quotient (LQ): A new measure for the Western Aphasia Battery. J Commun Disord. 1986;19:427–439. [PubMed: 2433314]
54.: Kertesz A, McCabe P Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia. Brain. 1977;100 Pt 1:1–18. [PubMed: 861709]
55.: Crary MA, Gonzalez Rothi LJ Predicting the Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;54:163–166. [PubMed: 2468826]
56.: Lincoln NB, Blackburn M, Ellis S, et al An investigation of factors affecting progress of patients on a stroke unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:493–496. [PMC free article: PMC1032298] [PubMed: 2472468]
57.: Semel E, Wiig EH, Secord WA 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1995. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals.
58.: Perez E, Slate JR, Neeley R, McDaniel M, et al Validity of the CELF-R, TONI, and SIT for children referred for auditory processing problems. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51:540–543. [PubMed: 7593675]
59.: Kotsopoulos S, Walker S, Beggs K, Jones B, Kotsopoulos A, Patel P Reading and spelling deficits among children attending a psychiatric day treatment program. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;5:83–92. [PubMed: 8814414]
60.: Lewis BA, O'Donnell B, Freebairn LA, Taylor HG Spoken language and written expression--interplay of delays. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 1998;7:77–84.
61.: Wiig EH, Secord WA, Semel E San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1992. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals- Preschool.
62.: Semel E, Wiig ES, Secord WA San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1987. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals. Revised.
63.: Wechsler D San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1989. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Intelligence Scale. Revised.
64.: Brown CL, Sherbenou RJ, Johnson SK Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1982. Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (TONI).
65.: Slossen RL East Aurora, NY: Slossen Education Publications; 1984. Slossen Intelligence Test.
66.: Kaufman AS, Kaufman N Circle Pines, Minn: American Guidance Service; 1985. Kaufman Test of Educationial Achievement.
67.: Hammill DD, Larsen SC Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1978. Test of Written Language (TOWL).
68.: Semel E, Wiig EH, Secord WA Spanish Version. 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1997. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals.
69.: Newcomer PL, Hammill DD 3rd ed. Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1997. Test of Language Development-Primary.
70.: Fodness RW, McNeilly J, Bradley-Johnson S Test-retest reliability of the Test of Language Development-2: Primary and Test of Language Development-2: Intermediate. J School Psychol. 1991;29:161–166.
71.: Hammill D, Newcomer P 3rd ed. Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1997. Test of Language Development-Intermediate.
72.: Lewis BA, Freebairn LA, Taylor HG Academic outcomes in children with histories of speech sound disorders. J Commun Disord. 2000;33:11–30. 89–92. [PubMed: 10665511]
73.: Hammill DD, Brown VL, Larsen SC, Winderholt JL 3rd ed. Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1994. Test of Adolescent and Adult Language.
74.: Zimmerman I, Steiner V, Pond R 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1992. Preschool Language Scale.
75.: McLoughlin CS, Gullo DF Comparison of three formal methods of preschool language assessment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools. 1984;15:146–153.
76.: Berryman JD Use of the revised Preschool Language Scale with older preschool children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools. 1983;14:79–85.
77.: Pecyna Rhyner PM, Bracken BA Concurrent validity of the Bracken Basic Concept Scale with language and intelligence measures. J Commun Disord. 1988;21:479–489. [PubMed: 3235710]
78.: Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, et al Denver II. Denver, Colo: Denver Developmental Materials; 1990.
79.: Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE Rev ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1979. Preschool Language Scale.
80.: Hresko WP, Reid DK, Hammill DD Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1981. The Test of Early Language Development.
81.: Dunn LM, Dunn LM Rev ed. Minneapolis, Minn: American Guidance Service; 1981. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test.
82.: Bracken BA San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1984. Bracken Basic Concept Scale: Diagnostic Scale.
83.: Long EE Native American children's performance on the Preschool Language Scale-3. J Child Commun Dev. 1998;19:43–47.
84.: Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE Spanish Version, 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1993. Preschool Language Scale.
85.: Phelps-Terasaki D, Phelps-Gunn T Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1992. Test of Pragmatic Language.
86.: Hresko WP, Reid DK, Hammill DD, Ginsburg HP, Baroody AJ Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1988. Screening Children for Related Early Educational Needs.
87.: Bryant B, Newcomer PL Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1991. Scholastic Aptitude Scale.
88.: Drummond S San Antonio, Tex: Communication Skills Builders; 1993. Dysarthria Examination Battery.
89.: Riley GD 3rd ed. Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1994. Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults. [PubMed: 5057250]
90.: Yarrus JS, Conture EG Relationship between mother-child speaking rates in adjacent fluent utterances ASHA. 199234(10):–.
91.: Riley G Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1981. Stuttering Prediction Instrument for Young Children.
92.: Goldman R, Fristoe M Circle Pines, Minn: American Guidance Service; 2000. Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation.
93.: Seymour HN, Seymour CM Black English and standard American English contrasts in consonantal development of four and five-year old children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1981;46:274–280. [PubMed: 7278171]
94.: Goldman R, Fristoe M Circle Pines, Minn: American Guidance Service, Inc.; 1969. Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation.
95.: Botting N, Conti-Ramsden G, Crutchley A Concordance between teacher/therapist opinion and formal language assessment scores in children with language impairment. Eur J Disord Commun. 1997;32:317–327. [PubMed: 9474284]
96.: Mullen PA, Whitehead RL Stimulus picture identification in articulation testing. J Speech Hear Disord. 1977;42:113–118. [PubMed: 839747]
97.: Fudala JB Los Angeles, Calif: Western Psychological Services; 1970. Arizona Articulation Proficiency Scale.
98.: Hirano M New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1981:100. Clinical Examination of Voice.
99.: De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice. 1997;11:74–80. [PubMed: 9075179]
100.: Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, de Moor GM, Wieneke GH Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatrica. 1993;45:76–83. [PubMed: 8325573]
101.: de Krom G Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37:985–1000. [PubMed: 7823566]
102.: Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Revue De Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie. 1996;117:219–224. [PubMed: 9102729]
103.: Millet B, Dejonckere PH What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopedica. 1998;50:305–310. [PubMed: 9925953]
104.: Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de Heyning PH Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice. 1999;13:508–517. [PubMed: 10622517]
105.: Langeveld TP, Drost HA, Frijns JH, Zwinderman AH, Baatenburg de Jong RJ Perceptual characteristics of adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109:741–748. [PubMed: 10961807]
106.: Kay Elemetrics Corporation Lincoln, NJ: Kay Elemetrics; 1999. Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) Model 5105: Software Instruction Manual.
107.: Deliyski DD, Gress CD Inter-system reliability of MDVP for Windows 95/98 and DOS. Kay Elemetrics Corporation. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corporation. Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) Model 5105: Software Instruction Manual. 1999:67–73.
108.: Kent RD, Vorperian HK, Duffy JR Reliability of the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program for the analysis of voice samples of subjects with dysarthria. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 1999;8:129–136.
109.: van As CJ, Hilgers FJM, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Koopmans-van Beinum FJ Acoustical analysis and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice. J Voice. 1998;12:239–248. [PubMed: 9649080]
110.: Deliyski DD Acoustic model and evaluation of pathological voice production. Kay Elemetrics Corporation. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corporation. Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) Model 5105: Software Instruction Manual. 1999:75–83.
111.: Goodglass H, Kaplan E Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1972. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders.
112.: Newcomer PL, Hammill DD Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1977. Test of Language Development.
113.: Newcomer PL, Hammill DD Austin, Tex: Pro-Ed; 1982. Test of Language Development-Primary.
114.: Newcomer PL, Hammill DD 2nd Edition ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1988. Test of Language Development-Primary.
115.: Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE Columbus, Oh: Merrill; 1969. Preschool Language Scale.
116.: Riley GD A stuttering severity instrument for children and adults. J Speech Hear Disord. 1972;37:314–322. [PubMed: 5057250]
117.: Mayo R, Grant WC Fundamental frequency, perturbation, and vocal tract resonance characteristics in African-American and white American males. ECHO. 1995;17
118.: Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF 2nd ed. San Diego, Calif: Singular Publishing Group; 2000. Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice.
119.: Mayo R, Watkins TR A Cross-Linguistic Study of Female RFo Characteristics. Presented March 24, 2000: 46th Annual Convention of the North Carolina Speech, Hearing and Language Association: Raleigh, NC.
120.: Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:21–35.
121.: DiSimoni FG, Keith RL, Holt DL, Darley FL Practicality of shortening the Porch Index of Communicative Ability. J Speech Hear Res. 1975;18:491–497. [PubMed: 1186158]
122.: DiSimoni FG, Keith RL, Darley FL Prediction of PICA overall score by short versions of the test. J Speech Hear Res. 1980;23:511–516. [PubMed: 7421154]
123.: Hanson WR, Riege WH, Metter EJ, Inman VW Factor-derived categories of chronic aphasia. Brain Lang. 1982;15:369–380. [PubMed: 7074351]
124.: Kotsopoulos S, Walker S, Beggs K, Jones B A clinical and academic outcome study of children attending a day treatment program. Can J Psychiatry. 1996;41:371–378. [PubMed: 8862856]

Bookshelf ID: NBK36550

Contents

< PrevNext >

PubReader
Print View
Cite this Page
Biddle AK, Watson LR, Hooper CR, et al. Criteria for Determining Disability in Speech-Language Disorders. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2002 Jan. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 52.) References.

Other titles in these collections

Recent Activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

References - Criteria for Determining Disability in Speech-Language Disorders
References - Criteria for Determining Disability in Speech-Language Disorders

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Bookshelf

Criteria for Determining Disability in Speech-Language Disorders.

References

Views

Other titles in these collections

Recent Activity