Evidence Table 9. Accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for detecting internal carotid artery stenosis

Author YearPopulation/settingMean/median age (range)Female (%)Symptomatic patients (%)TIA(%)Stroke subtypesReference standardMethod for measuring degree of stenosisStenosis defined as positive on reference standardPrevalence of positive stenosisPrevalence of occlusionMRA methodCategorization of flow voidCutoff for positive test by NASCET criteriaNumber of arteries/patientsIndeterminate resultsSensitivitySpecificityPositive LRNegative LRQualityComments
Young 199470 consecutive patients with non-disabling stroke/TIA, > 30% stenosis on duplex ultrasound at a hospital in the UK62 (37-76)30%100%51%Carotid territory onlySelective carotid DSACommon carotid denominator70-99%41% (arteries)11% (arteries)2D & 3D TOF90% stenosis50%137 arteries190% (89%)95% (94%)19.83 (15.10)0.10 (0.12)GOOD. One indeterminate result was excluded.Figures in parentheses represent sensitivity, specificity, and LRs when indeterminate result is assumed to be false + or false -
Huston 199850 consecutive patients scheduled for angiography after CUS at a referral hospital in Minnesota70 (42-87)32%Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedSelective carotid angiographyNASCET70-99%25% (arteries)10% (arteries)2D & 3D TOF98% stenosis70%100 arteriesReported results indicate 3 arteries missing from analysis94% (86%)84% (78%)5.93 (4.27)0.07 (0.16)FAIR. Discretionary subject selection. 3 arteries were missing from reported results.Figures in parentheses represent sensitivity, specificity, and LRs when 3 missing results are assumed to be all false + or all false -
Sardanelli 199930 consecutive patients with symptoms of cerebrovascular disease, who had undergone DSA64.541%100%Not reportedNot reportedCerebral DSANASCET70-99%23% (arteries)10% (arteries)3D TOF





Gadolinium-enhanced
99% stenosis70%60 arteriesNone100%





100%
85%





100%
6.67





Infinite
0.00





0.00
FAIR. Moderate sample size. Discretionary subject selection.
No inter-rater reliability testing.
 
Vanninen 199545 consecutive patients with carotid territory TIA or non-disabling stroke, referred for angiography58 (34-72)16%100%Not reportedNot reportedSelective carotid DSANASCET70-99%14% (arteries)Not reported3D TOF85% stenosis70%90 arteriesNone93%95%17.640.08FAIR. Moderate sample size. Discretionary subject selection. 
Jackson 199850 consecutive patients referred for carotid angiography after CUS at a military hospital in Washington, DC69.528%76%Not reportedNot reportedConventional cerebral angiography and DSANASCET60-99%36% (arteries)6% (arteries)2D TOF> 80% stenosis60%99 arteries1 indeterminate 5 missing from analysis85% (74%)70% (63%)2.87 (2.32)0.21 (0.37)POOR. Moderate sample size. Discretionary subject selection. No inter-rater reliability testing. One indeterminate result was excluded. 5 arteries were missing from reported results.Figures in parentheses represent sensitivity, specificity, and LRs when 6 missing results are assumed to be all false + or all false -
Riles 199241 patients referred for angiography due to symptoms or asymptomatic stenosis > 80% on CUS68 (44-87)48%Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedConventional selective carotid angiography or DSANASCET50-99%





80-99%
60% (arteries)




27% (arteries)
7% (arteries)2D TOFNot reported





Not reported
50%





80%
75 arteries





75 arteries
None





None
100%





88%
64%





88%
2.78





7.33
0.00





0.14
POOR. Moderate sample size. Discretionary subject selection.
No inter-rater reliability testing. Testing methods were not well described. Potential unblinding in some cases.
 

TIA: transient ischemic attack; DSA; digital subtraction angiography; NASCET; North American Symptomatic Carotid ENdarterectomy Tial; CUS; carotid ultrasound; TOF; time-of-flight; 2D; two-dimensional; 3D; three dimensional; LR; likelihood ratio

From: Evidence Tables

Cover of Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Echocardiography and Carotid Imaging in the Management of Stroke
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Echocardiography and Carotid Imaging in the Management of Stroke.
Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 49.
Meenan RT, Saha S, Chou R, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.