Figure 5.6—Flow diagram shows a tobacco industry document that describes how its youth smoking prevention strategy would result in a paradigm shift, viewing the industry as a partner in reducing youth smoking. The diagram notes three shifts: (a) from medical model to positive youth development model, (b) from blame industry to reducing risk factors and building protective factors, and (c) from demonizing the industry to an industry that can help.

Figure 5.6Tobacco industry paradigm shift

Source: Figure A (a tobacco document reproduced as Figure 1 in Mandel et al. 2006).

Note: This slide, from a 1999 Philip Morris (PM) “Key Initiative Update,” describes how it hoped to use its youth smoking prevention strategy as it sought a “paradigm shift” (Philip Morris USA 1999a) away from the “medical model,” such as the California Tobacco Control Program (California Department of Health Services/Tobacco Control Section 1998), which highlights the industry’s deceptive behavior, to a “positive youth development model” that permits the industry to be viewed as a partner in reducing youth smoking. PM selected Life Skills Training (LST) because it believed that LST supported this objective.

From: 5, The Tobacco Industry’s Influences on the Use of Tobacco Among Youth

Cover of Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults
Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.