NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].
Show detailsCRD summary
This generally well-conducted review compared inhaled corticosteroids and placebo in infants or pre-school children with recurrent wheezing or asthma. It showed that inhaled corticosteroids were associated with fewer asthma/wheezing exacerbations, a lower rate of withdrawals and better clinical and functional improvement than placebo. Despite a relatively limited search, the conclusions appear likely to be reliable.
Authors' objectives
To compare the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids compared to placebo in infants and pre-school children with recurrent wheezing or asthma.
Searching
MedLine, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to 2008. Search terms were reported. There were no language restrictions. Studies reported only as an abstract were excluded.
Study selection
Randomised controlled trials (RCT) were considered for inclusion. Infants (0 to 23 months) or pre-school children (two to five years) with a clinical diagnosis of wheezing or asthma for at least six months before study entry were examined. The intervention was use of inhaled corticosteroids delivered via metered-dose inhaler or nebulizer, compared to placebo. The primary eligible outcome was asthma/wheezing exacerbations (defined as aggravation of symptoms that required systemic corticosteroid use). Secondary outcome measures were discontinuation because of asthma/wheezing exacerbations, mean change from baseline in pulmonary function (peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)) and mean change in albuterol use from baseline.
Two reviewers independently evaluated the studies for inclusion.
Twenty-nine studies were included. The number of children in each study ranged from three to 481; 11 studies had over one hundred children. Age ranged from three to 48 months. Three types of inhaled corticosteroids were studied. Therapy duration ranged from four to 36 weeks; 18 trials lasted at least 12 weeks.
Assessment of study quality
Two authors independently evaluated methodological quality using the Jadad five-point scale of adequacy of randomization, blinding and handling of withdrawals and dropouts.
Data extraction
Two reviewers extracted data independently. Data was used to calculate relative risks (RR), standardised (SMD) or weighted mean differences (WMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Methods of synthesis
Pooled relative risks and standardised mean differences or weighted mean differences, with corresponding 95% CI, were calculated using a fixed-effect meta-analysis (where there was heterogeneity); where there was evidence of statistically significant heterogeneity (I2>40%), a random-effects model was used. Number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated for dichotomous outcomes with statistically significant results.
Sensitivity analysis of asthma/wheezing exacerbations was performed for the following factors: disease (wheeze versus asthma), age (<24 months versus two to five years), atopic status (>50% of children with personal and/or parental atopy characteristics versus non-atopic), quality assessment (Jadad score <4 versus ≥4), inhaled corticosteroids delivery (metered-dose inhaler versus nebulizer), inhaled corticosteroids choice (buticasone versus fluticasone) and study duration (<12 versus ≥12 weeks). Results were compared using the interaction test.
Results of the review
Twenty-nine RCTs were included in the review (3,592 children). Jadad quality score ranged from 2 to 5.
Asthma/wheezing exacerbations: Sixteen studies reported this outcome (2,805 children). Inhaled corticosteroids was associated with lower incidence of asthma/wheezing exacerbations compared to placebo (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.67, NNT=7). Test for heterogeneity was non significant.
Secondary outcomes: A lower rate of withdrawals because of asthma/wheezing exacerbations was reported in patients who took inhaled corticosteroids (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.63). Statistical heterogeneity was non significant. A significant decrease in mean change from baseline symptom score in patients who took inhaled corticosteroids (SMD: 0.93, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.37) was found. Heterogeneity was statistically significant. Other outcomes with significant differences were: mean change from baseline in albuterol use (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.63), FEV1 (WMD 0.07L, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.09) and peak expiratory flow (WMD 13.8L/minute, 95% CI 5.34 to 22.4). Heterogeneity was statistically significant only in mean change from baseline in albuterol use.
Authors' conclusions
Inhaled corticosteroids were useful in reducing exacerbations and withdrawals caused by exacerbations in infants and pre-school children with persistent wheeze/asthma. They also improved clinical scores, functional measurements and reduced albuterol use when compared to placebo in children of five years or less.
CRD commentary
This review addressed a well-defined question in terms of patients, interventions, outcomes and study design. Only two relevant databases were searched and no attempts were made to identify unpublished studies, which increased risk of publication bias. Efforts to minimise other biases and errors were made by not using language restrictions and independently extracting data and evaluating quality.
Characteristics of the included studies were presented clearly and methods used to pool the results were appropriate. Proper methods were used to explore heterogeneity. The author's conclusions accurately reflected the results of the review and, despite a somewhat limited search, appear likely to be reliable.
Both authors had financial ties with a number of pharmaceutical companies.
Implications of the review for practice and research
Practice: The authors stated that inhaled corticosteroids should be used in infant/ preschoolers with persistent wheeze/ asthma.
Research: The authors did not state implications for further research.
Funding
Not stated.
Bibliographic details
Castro-Rodriguez JA, Rodrigo GJ. Efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in infants and preschoolers with recurrent wheezing and asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2009; 123(3): e519-e525. [PubMed: 19254986]
Original Paper URL
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/123/3/e519
Indexing Status
Subject indexing assigned by NLM
MeSH
Adrenal Cortex Hormones /administration & dosage; Androstadienes /administration & dosage; Asthma /drug therapy; Beclomethasone /administration & dosage; Budesonide /administration & dosage; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Lung Volume Measurements; Metered Dose Inhalers; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence /prevention & control; Respiratory Sounds /drug effects
AccessionNumber
Database entry date
31/03/2010
Record Status
This is a critical abstract of a systematic review that meets the criteria for inclusion on DARE. Each critical abstract contains a brief summary of the review methods, results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the review and the conclusions drawn.
- CRD summary
- Authors' objectives
- Searching
- Study selection
- Assessment of study quality
- Data extraction
- Methods of synthesis
- Results of the review
- Authors' conclusions
- CRD commentary
- Implications of the review for practice and research
- Funding
- Bibliographic details
- Original Paper URL
- Indexing Status
- MeSH
- AccessionNumber
- Database entry date
- Record Status
- Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects of different drugs and delivery devices on growth.[Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019]Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects of different drugs and delivery devices on growth.Axelsson I, Naumburg E, Prietsch SO, Zhang L. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 10; 6(6):CD010126. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
- Daily inhaled corticosteroids or montelukast for preschoolers with asthma or recurrent wheezing: A systematic review.[Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018]Daily inhaled corticosteroids or montelukast for preschoolers with asthma or recurrent wheezing: A systematic review.Castro-Rodriguez JA, Rodriguez-Martinez CE, Ducharme FM. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018 Dec; 53(12):1670-1677. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
- Review Daily vs. intermittent inhaled corticosteroids for recurrent wheezing and mild persistent asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis.[Respir Med. 2013]Review Daily vs. intermittent inhaled corticosteroids for recurrent wheezing and mild persistent asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Rodrigo GJ, Castro-Rodríguez JA. Respir Med. 2013 Aug; 107(8):1133-40. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
- Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering corticosteroids in asthma.[BMJ. 2001]Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering corticosteroids in asthma.Brocklebank D, Wright J, Cates C. BMJ. 2001 Oct 20; 323(7318):896-900.
- Review Inhaled corticosteroids or long-acting beta-agonists alone or in fixed-dose combinations in asthma treatment: a systematic review of fluticasone/budesonide and formoterol/salmeterol.[Clin Ther. 2009]Review Inhaled corticosteroids or long-acting beta-agonists alone or in fixed-dose combinations in asthma treatment: a systematic review of fluticasone/budesonide and formoterol/salmeterol.Frois C, Wu EQ, Ray S, Colice GL. Clin Ther. 2009 Dec; 31(12):2779-803.
- Efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in infants and preschoolers with recurrent w...Efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in infants and preschoolers with recurrent wheezing and asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis - Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...