U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Cover of Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].

Show details

Dose-response relationship for risk of non-vertebral fracture with inhaled corticosteroids

, , , , , , and .

Review published: .

CRD summary

The authors concluded that the relative risk of non-verbral fractures increased by about 12% for each 1,000μg/day increase in dose of inhaled corticosteroids (beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent) in adults. The reliability of the conclusions is uncertain given a number of weaknesses in the review (potential for publication bias, unclear quality of included studies and small number of included studies).

Authors' objectives

To determine the strength of association between the dose of inhaled corticosteroids and risk of non-vertebral fracture in adults.

Searching

MEDLINE (1950 to 2007) and EMBASE (1988 to 2007) were searched. Search terms were reported. Reference lists of identifed relevant studies were handsearched.

Study selection

Case-control studies that assessed the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (with at least two doses reported predominantly as the equivalent dose of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) per day) on the risk of non-vertebral fractures were eligible for inclusion. Studies were also eligible for inclusion if they included data on the number of cases and controls using each dose of inhaled corticosteroids and odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of non-vertebral fracture for each inhaled corticosteroids dose compared with no use. Non-adult studies were excluded.

The included studies were conducted in USA, UK and Canada. The studies assessed varied non-vertebral fractures (hip, hip or upper extremity). Mean daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids, BDP or equivalent were varied. Mean age (where reported) ranged from 63 to 81 years. The mean prescription history ranged from one to four years.

Two reviewers assessed studies for inclusion; the authors did not state how any disagreements were resolved.

Assessment of study quality

The authors did not state that they assessed validity.

Data extraction

Data on the slope of coefficients and odds ratios for the risk of non-vertebral fractures, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were extracted for each daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids, BDP or equivalent.

The authors did not state how many reviewers conducted data extraction.

Methods of synthesis

Pooled odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated using inverse weighting variance meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using tests of homogeneity and I2 tests. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and statistically (details on specific tests were not reported). Sensitivity analysis was performed by examining the association between the risk of non-vertebral fractures and inhaled corticosteroids dose using both random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses.

Results of the review

Five matched case-control studies (n=303,719) were included.

Increased doses of inhaled corticosteroids (BDP or equivalent) were associated with an increase in the risk of non-vertebral fracture: fixed-effects OR per 1,000μg increase in daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids (BDP or equivalent) 1.08, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.12, p<0.001 for homogeneity test, I2=78.8%; random-effects OR per 1,000μg increase in daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids (BDP or equivalent) 1.12, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.26, I2=78.8%.

Authors' conclusions

The relative risk of non-vertebral fractures increased by about 12% for each 1,000μg/day increase in the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (BDP or equivalent) in older adults.

CRD commentary

The review question was clearly stated. Two relevant databases were searched. Publication bias was assessed and no evidence of it was found; however, the possibility of publication bias could not be excluded given the limited attempts to identify unpublished papers and the small number of studies included. Study selection was done in duplicate, which minimised the risk of error and bias; it was unclear whether similar efforts were taken during data extraction. The quality of included studies was unclear since no validity assessment was performed. Appropriate methods were used to combine study results. The authors acknowledged a number of weaknesses in the review (lack of randomised controlled trials, small number of studies, potential confounding).

The reliability of the authors' conclusion is uncertain given a number of weaknesses in the review (potential for publication bias, unclear quality of included studies and small number of included studies).

Implications of the review for practice and research

The authors did not state any implications for practice or further research.

Funding

Not stated.

Bibliographic details

Weatherall M, James K, Clay J, Perrin K, Masoli M, Wijesinghe M, Beasley R. Dose-response relationship for risk of non-vertebral fracture with inhaled corticosteroids. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 2008; 38(9): 1451-1458. [PubMed: 18537983]

Indexing Status

Subject indexing assigned by NLM

MeSH

Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones /administration & dosage /adverse effects /therapeutic use; Anti-Asthmatic Agents /administration & dosage /adverse effects /therapeutic use; Asthma /drug therapy; Beclomethasone /administration & dosage /adverse effects /therapeutic use; Case-Control Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fractures, Bone /chemically induced; Humans; Risk

AccessionNumber

12009100650

Database entry date

26/01/2011

Record Status

This is a critical abstract of a systematic review that meets the criteria for inclusion on DARE. Each critical abstract contains a brief summary of the review methods, results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the review and the conclusions drawn.

Copyright © 2014 University of York.
Bookshelf ID: NBK76490

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...