U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Phung OJ, Coleman CI, Baker EL, et al. Effectiveness of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (rhGH) in the Treatment of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2010 Oct. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 23.)

Cover of Effectiveness of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (rhGH) in the Treatment of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis

Effectiveness of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (rhGH) in the Treatment of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis [Internet].

Show details
Figure 24. KQ4 — meta-analysis of change from baseline in fasting blood glucose in CF patients treated with rhGH.

Figure 24KQ4 — meta-analysis of change from baseline in fasting blood glucose in CF patients treated with rhGH

Legend: CF=cystic fibrosis; FBG=fastng blood glucose; rhGH=recombinant human growth hormone

Note: The squares represent individual point estimates. The size of the square represents the weight given to each study in the meta-analysis. Horizontal lines through each square represent 95 percent confidence intervals. The diamond represents the combined results. The solid vertical line extending from 0 is the null value.

Uppercase letters represent study arms within the same trial, where A is the high dose and B is the low dose of rhGH.

Narrative: This figure depicts the meta-analysis of change from baseline in fasting blood glucose. The first trial by Hardin and colleagues in 2001 provided a mean difference of 9.00 mg/dl with a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.11 to 17.89 mg/dl. The second trial by Schnabel and colleagues in 2007 provided a mean difference of 3.70 mg/dl with a 95 percent confidence interval of −5.14 to 12.54 mg/dl with the higher dose of rhGH and a mean difference of 4.10 mg/dl with a 95 percent confidence interval of −5.77 to 13.97 mg/dl with the lower dose of rhGH. The combined effect of the studies showed a weighted mean difference of 5.68 mg/dl, with a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.43 to 10.93 mg/dl. The I-squared value was 0 percent and the Egger’s p-value was not applicable.

Views

  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.0M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...