U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013.

Cover of Madame Curie Bioscience Database

Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet].

Show details

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases and Disease

and .

Introduction

Doctor to Lady Macbeth: This disease is beyond my practice… I think, but dare not speak.

Lady Macbeth: Hell is murky.

- Act V, scene I. Macbeth, by William Shakespeare.

Understanding the role of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS) in human, animal or plant disease is a challenging work in progress. It does not matter in which biological model AARS are being studied, for all insights are relevant to understanding the complex pathophysiological mechanisms involved in disease production. By definition, a disease is “a pathological state characterized by an identifiable group of signs or symptoms.” But recognition of a pathological state implies a clear knowledge of the normal function of a particular cell, tissue, organ, or biochemical pathway. In the case of a chapter entitled “AARS and Disease,” this might seem to imply a complete understanding of normal primary and secondary AARS function. Wishful thinking. We are only beginning to understand the myriad of expanded functions mediated by class I and class II AARS. Thus a major barrier to our understanding the relationship between AARS and disease may be lifted through continued research into the diversity of species and enzyme-specific secondary functions of AARS.

Since the last time the general subject of AARS and disease associations was reviewed,1 many of our observations remain qualitative. However, there has been a proliferation of knowledge on AARS due to progress in genome projects and the cloning and expression of functional new AARS genes. As we discover new biochemical pathways in which AARS participate, our ability to define AARS-associated pathologies will improve significantly. In that context, this chapter reviews our present knowledge of AARS and disease in two parts—(1) disease with an unquestioned relationship to AARS, and (2) diseases, or pathological mechanisms, in which AARS are presumed to be involved because of circumstantial evidence involving biochemical pathways influenced by AARS. First, autoimmune disease is defined and illustrated using the specific example of an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, known as an “anti-synthetase syndrome.” Secondly, research is reviewed that encompasses a wide range of pathophysiological pathways (e.g., signal transduction in vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells, apoptosis and immune responsiveness) that can involve AARS via their alternative or “non-canonical” functions.

This chapter is meant to provide an overview of the diverse observations that link AARS to human disease. An excellent resource for researching specific human AARS and disease associations, is the Human GeneCard Database (http://bioinfo.weizmann.ac.il/cards) maintained by the Weizmann Institute of Science.2 Presently, thirty-seven Gene Cards representing human AARS are on file. This link summarizes primary and secondary function(s), chromosomal location and structural similarities, with links to pertinent literature citations. Information in this database is automatically extracted from various resources in the context of functional genomics and proteomics. Nomenclature on file has been approved by international consensus for about one third of genes encoded in the human genome. Approximately 20,000 more human genes will be added to this database as the human genome project nears completion.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Related Disease

Autoimmune Disease

Autoimmune diseases3 are a group of clinically diverse conditions, all characterized by the production of abnormal antibody and/or cellular immune responses that adversely effect host tissues (Table 1). Autoantibodies are immunoglobulins that bind to host (self ) antigens. Low levels of some autoantibodies (e.g., rheumatoid factor) develop as an apparently normal phenomenon in the course of human aging. Presumably, long term exposure to “hidden” self antigens via cell turnover and/or death during the aging process can lead to generation of autoantibodies with minimal clinical impact. Infectious diseases, notably those caused by human parasitic nematodes (e.g., filaria), can generate antibody that is cross reactive with many human cytoplasmic antigens.4

Table 1. Human autoimmune diseases and corresponding autoantibodies.

Table 1

Human autoimmune diseases and corresponding autoantibodies.

One uncommon type of human autoimmune disease is known as an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy5-10 (IIM). In this disease, patients demonstrate a spectrum of pulmonary, arthritic and/ or inflammatory muscle signs. A subset of IIM is now referred to as the “anti-synthetase syndrome.” The six known members of this disease subset are distinguishable by a highly enzyme-specific neutralizing autoantibody that inhibits aminoacylation by one particular cytoplasmic AARS.

Anti-Synthetase Syndrome

The history leading to the discovery of unique neutralizing anti-synthetase antibodies has been archived in the rheumatology literature.11-22 To date, six different human cytoplasmic AARS have been identified as autoantigens in human anti-synthetase syndromes (Table 2). In each case, a patient's serum contains a specific autoantibody that reacts with and inhibits aminoacylation by one cytoplasmic AARS. Anti-tRNA synthetase antibodies are found in about one third of patients with the chronic inflammatory muscle or skin-and-muscle disorders known as polymyositis and dermatomyositis.

Table 2. Six known human neutralizing anti-tRNA synthetase antibodies.

Table 2

Six known human neutralizing anti-tRNA synthetase antibodies.

Our understanding of exactly how AARS become autoantigens is incomplete. The lack of a consensus opinion based on current evidence may reflect different mechanisms responsible for each autoantibody. One clue to that possibility is that the specificity and immunological properties (e.g., epitopes recognized) of each anti-synthetase antibody differ greatly. Nonspecific antibodies can recognize short linear epitopes, or immunoprecipitate protein:RNA complexes. But true neutralizing anti-synthetase autoantibodies inhibit aminoacylation and can either precipitate AARS:tRNA complexes, or recognize isoacceptor tRNA alone. Classically, immunoprecipitation of HeLa cell extracts and amino acid specific aminoacylation inhibition have been used to identify “true” (neutralizing) anti-synthetase autoantibody. Interestingly, rarely is more than one anti-synthetase antibody ever found in a single patient. In a clinical study of 1,472 patients with suspected rheumatological disease, thirteen patients were found to have anti-AARS antibody by immunoprecipiation of HeLa cell extracts—4 persons had with Jo-1, three with PL-12, EJ in four and OJ in one person.11 Immunology reference laboratories have screened tens of thousands of persons with myositis, connective tissue disease, interstitial lung disease and other rheumatological afflictions, searching for anti-synthetase autoantibody. Yet only six amino acid specific enzymes have been documented worldwide.

One of the six AARS involved in an anti-synthetase syndromes, IleRS, is a class I enzyme. Also, IleRS is the only one of these six enzymes that is a member of the high molecular weight eukaryotic multi-enzyme complex that contains IleRS, MetRS, AspRS, ArgRS, LysRS, GlnRS, LeuRS, the bifunctional GluRS-ProRS and the proteins p18, p38 and p43.22 Even though anti-synthetase syndromes are generally considered to be a subset of IIM, the disease can occur in the absence of clinically significant myositis. In such cases, interstitial lung disease is often present and usually requires immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, anti-synthetase syndromes should be considered in patients with interstitial lung disease and anti-cytoplasmic antigen autoantibodies, or anti-nuclear antibodies in the context of an ill-defined autoimmune illness.

Genetic Factors in the Anti-Synthetase Syndrome

The concept of molecular mimicry frequently is invoked to explain why autoimmune diseases arise.3 While this explanation may be more straightforward in the case of some infection related autoimmune phenomenon (e.g., Rheumatic fever and myocarditis, or Mycoplasma infection and cold agglutinin induced hemolytic anemia), the causal relationship between stimulus and autoantibody is often obscure. Speculation on the etiology of anti-synthetase autoantibodies includes infection with tRNA-like structures in viral genomes, or anti-idiotype mechanisms arising from tRNA binding sites.

Genetic predisposition to many human diseases exists, including many autoimmune diseases and the antisynthetase syndromes. Both major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles and immunoglobulin allotype phenotypes may increase the risk of developing an anti-synthetase syndrome. Immunoglobulin allotypes are polymorphic genetic systems that show distinct racial arrays, thus making them powerful tools for studies of genetic admixture and biological relationships. The evidence supporting these assertions is again both direct and circumstantial.23 On one hand, the gene G7a in the mouse MHC encodes the ValRS.24 In Caucasians, HLA DR3 is associated statistically with polymyositis and dermatomyositis.24 In persons with polymyositis, DR3 and DR52 are strongly associated with Jo-1. The immunoglobulin allotype Gm3;5 has been associated with polymyositis in Caucasians and may interact with DR3 to increase the risk of Jo-1 autoantibody.25

Twenty five percent of patients with the anti-synthetase syndrome exhibit anti-HisRS, Jo-1, the most common antisynthetase antibody. Because Jo-1 is the most common, it has been studied most often. But even in the case of Jo-1, a consensus as to how autoantibody is generated has not been reached. Recent efforts to dissect this immune response more precisely have generated unexpectedly diverse results and conclusions. For example, histologically confirmed myositis has been induced by “naked DNA” immunization of BALB/c mice with cDNA encoding the human HisRS.26 In contrast, experimental up-regulation of human MHC class I in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice, led to clinical and immunological features of human myositis, including autoantibodies to HisRS.27 In other studies, the sera of patients with Jo-1 recognized at least three distinct epitopes on HisRS, suggesting that the immune response was not solely against a cross-reactive antigen.28 In research possibly relevant to PL-12 (AlaRS), analysis of the 5' flanking sequence of the murine adenosine deaminase gene (ADAT1), genomic clustering was observed with both AlaRS and LysRS within a locus, 16q22-24, recognized as a susceptibility candidate for autoimmune diseases.29 Also, the SerRS has been located on human chromosome 19, within a critical interval for the autosomal dominant deafness locus DFNA4.30

Pathology with Suspected AARS Association

Signal Transduction and Dinucleotide Oligophosphates (ApnA)

One of the first established alternative functions for a class II AARS, the E. coli LysRS, was the biosynthesis of the dinucleotide polyphosphates, Ap3A and Ap4A.31 The general formula for these dinucleotide polyphosphates is abbreviated “ApnA,” where “n” represents the number of phosphates bridging the two adeonsine moieties (Fig. 1). Over the past forty years, it has become clear that AARS are a primary source of ApnA in mammalian cells, but not all AARS can synthesize ApnA. Also, AARS can synthesize ApnA with or without the “main” substrate, tRNA.32,33 In other species, additional classes of enzymes can form nucleotidylates (Ap4A phosphorylases in yeast, guanylyltransferases in yeast and brine shrimp, firefly luciferase) have the capacity to synthetase nucleotide oligophosphates (NpnN.)34 The structural basis for ApnA synthesis in humans is presumably the same as that proposed for Ap4A synthesis by Thermus thermophilus SerRS.35 In that model, the enzyme bound serine adenylate intermediate reacts with a second molecule of ATP to form ApnA. However, in the original studies of enzymatic synthesis of Ap3A and Ap4A by a purified bacterial lysyl-tRNA synthetase, synthesis was observed even without the addition of exogenous l-lysine. In the future, details of biochemical pathways involving dinucleotide oligophosphate production/hydrolysis will be better understood. At that point, we will be better equipped to design experiments examining the pathophysiological sequelae of up- or down-regulation of ApnA biosynthesis. Recently, it has been reported that vascular invasiveness of some bacterial pathogens is associated with Nudix hydrolases, enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of diadenosine tetra-, penta-, and hexaphosphates, to form ATP and ADP.36

Figure 1. General structure of a diadenosine oligo-phosphate (ApnA).

Figure 1

General structure of a diadenosine oligo-phosphate (ApnA). “n” represents the number of linked phosphate moieties.

ApnA are potent intercellular and intracellular signaling molecules that affect a wide variety of cellular processes via stimulation of a subset of cell surface purinoreceptors37-51 (Table 3). What is difficult to discern is exactly how these compounds are regulated and how they interact with known signal transduction pathways. In cultured human promyelocytic leukemic cells (HL60), it has been proposed that Ap3A may bind to protein kinase C, similar to the phorbol esters that induce cellular differentiation. Cell surface purinergic receptors are classified as either P1 or P2, based on ligand specificity.52-54 P1 (adenosine) receptors belong to the large family of G protein coupled receptors. P2 receptors are molecularly distinct from the P1 family, and they preferentially bind ATP and modulate phospholipase C and intracellular calcium. ApnA receptors are believed to belong to the P2 subset. Numerous P1 and P2 receptors subsets still are being defined by cDNA sequencing. Some degree of heterogeneity in ApnA receptors between species and cell types may reflect different affinities to dinucleotides. In humans, ApnA receptors have been shown on a wide variety of cell types including brain, liver, kidney, cardiac, spleen, bladder, adipose, bone and endothelial cells.55-57

Table 3. Reported biological activities of diadenosine oligophosphates in mammalian cells.

Table 3

Reported biological activities of diadenosine oligophosphates in mammalian cells.

Platelets

Abundant amounts of several different diadenosine phosphates (Ap4A, -5A and -6A), are measurable in human platelets. Ap3A and Ap4A are quantitatively released by thrombin mediated platelet aggregation. Dinucleotides are degraded by plasma phosphodiesterases, and are rapidly incorporated and “recycled” in the form of red blood cell ATP.58-59 The concentration of Ap6A in platelets derived from hypertensive patients is reportedly higher than that found in normotensive patients.60

Neurotransmission

Diadenosine oligophosphates likely play an important role as neutrotransmitters61 in various cells given their abundance in neurosecretory granules. For example, chromaffin cells from the adrenal gland contain Ap4A, Ap5A, and Ap6A along with other chemical agents. Neurotransmitter receptors are present on both pre and post synaptic nerve membranes and they contain a variety of chemical receptors, including those stimulated by adenine dinucleotides. In peripheral and central nervous system models, Ap5A exerts its effect by stimulating gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) release. Specific inhibition of GABA release in these tissues is obtained with the Ap5A antagonist, P1, P5 di-(inosine) 5' pentaphosphate. Ap5A also acts in cardiac muscle cells as a signaling molecular during ischemic responses to stress via stimulation of an ATP-sensitive K+ channel.45

Apoptosis and Immunomodulation

Mammalian cells have two distinct pathways that lead to programmed cell death, or apoptosis.62-66 The family of cysteine aspartate proteases known as effector capsases (e.g., capsase 3), participate in the apoptotic pathways by cleavage of structural proteins or intracellular enzymes of DNA repair, and cleave regulatory proteins such as Bcl1 and DNAse. Other capsasess such as interleukin 1-converting enzyme (ICE), play more of a role in inflammation than apoptosis. A biochemical relationship between apoptosis and AARS has been suggested for several reasons. Ap4A, a known product of some AARS, can induce apoptosis in human endothelial cells.39 In neural cells undergoing apoptosis, evidence exists that SerRS is actually one of the substrates of caspase 3.67 If these observations are confirmed, then by delineation of the role ApnA in apoptosis, novel therapies can be envisioned in which apoptosis of abnormal cells can be induced and/or programmed death of normal tissues can be prevented.

The existence of extracellular cytoplasmic AARS in various disease states such as thyroiditis, breast cancer, colon cancer, myocardial infarction, and renal cell cancer has been established,68 but their biological significance is not completely understood. Extracellular cytoplasmic enzymes could simply represent the outcome of cell death and release of cytoplasmic enzymes. But given the propensity of AARS to mediate secondary functions in the absence of tRNA, AARS conceivably could function in extracellular locations. In the case of intracellular pathogens such as Mycobacteria, secretion of the ATP-utilizing enzymes nucleoside diphosphate kinase and ATPase69,70 has been proposed as a protective mechanism. ATP can be sequestered by these enzymes from macrophage P2Z receptors, thus preventing macrophage apoptotic cell death. To our knowledge, the ability of excreted or secreted mycobacterial AARS to scavenge ATP has not been studied. Similar immunomodulatory scenarios can be envisioned for cytokine-like activities of AARs that are not tRNA dependent. For example in a human myeloid tumor cell line, the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase seems to be excreted intact during apoptosis, and split into two fragments with endothelial cell monocyte activating protein (EMAP II) or tumor necrosis alpha-like activities.71-74 Also, the human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase is itself cytokine (interferon) inducible, presumably because it plays a role in biochemical feedback loops.75-78 A cofactor of tRNA synthetase multienzyme complex, p43, is reportedly secreted intact from mammalian cells.78

Carcinogenesis

Given the varied effects of AARS on cell growth and differentiation, it is not surprising that AARS are implicated in the development of human cancers. A variety of experimental observations involving apoptosis and other pathways, link AARS to human cancers.

In the 1970's it was observed that some murine leukemia cells were resistant to the effects of the chemotherapeutic drug L-asparaginase.79 This generated many inquiries into the possible regulatory roles of AsnRS, isoacceptor tRNAAsn and asparagine synthetase.80-90 L-asparaginase is a component of the chemotherapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemias (ALL). ALL is usually sensitive to L-asparaginase because such leukemic cells are unable to synthesize asparagine de novo. Studies revealed temperature sensitive mutations in the human AsnRS can cause cell cycle arrest in early S phase.85 Also, functional temperature sensitive AsnRS mutation have been identified in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell lines, accompanied by twofold increase in asparagine synthetase activity.87 In certain myeloid leukemic cell lines, there is increased expression of the human TyrRS,73 the same AARS that demonstrates a unique capacity for cytokine-like activity. Similarly, increased PheRS activity has been reported in myeloid leukemias.93 In colorectal cancers, Miyaki et al reported that 59% of tumors demonstrated mutations in the mitochondrial IleRS.94

Diadenosine polyphosphate hydrolases are ubiquitous, present in blood plasma, and on neural and endothelial cell surfaces.95 One such hydrolase, the Ap3A hydrolase, is also known as the fragile histidine triad protein (FHIT) a known tumor suppressor.96 In several human tumor cell lines, hydrolysis of exogenous Ap4A, but not Ap3A, induces programmed cell death and morphological cell differentiation.39 The implication of this work is that cellular ratios of ApnA do reflect the state of cellular differentiation, cell cycle phase, and the influence of cytokines. Thus future research into mechanisms of signal transduction via ApnA, may result in pharmacologic approaches to regulate apoptosis and cell growth in neoplastic tissues.

Perspectives

Our ability to recognize physiologically important synthetase-disease associations will improve as research progresses in understanding eukaryotic AARS structure-function relationships. As the subtle details of catalytic site – substrate chemistries unfold, pharmacological interventions will be designed to test prototype inhibitors of AARS-controlled pathways. Most certainly, our definition of “AARS-Associated Disease” will expand. Not only will AARS inhibitors be considered as novel anti-infective drugs (see the chapter, Synthetases and Drug Targets), but their potential therapeutic value can be assessed in far reaching cellular processes—as mediators of vasomotor control, endothelial cell and neutrotransmitter function, apoptosis, immune modulation and regulation of cell growth and differentiation of any tissue.97-98 New diagnostic techniques may be developed to identify abnormal or injured cells expressing abnormal AARS, or if dysregulation of dinucleotide oligophosphate receptors occurs on abnormal cells. For example, research on the immunopathology of Alzheimer's disease concluded that TrypRS, localized in the abnormal neurons of tryptamine treated mouse brain, can be used as a disease marker.99

Novel therapeutic approaches to an array of human diseases may arise from understanding pathophysiological pathways involving AARS. For example, human mitochondrial tRNA gene mutations have been associated with a variety of neurogenerative and chronic diseases.100 Under conditions where these point mutations cause disease via decreased activity of the corresponding AARS, therapeutic upregulation of a specific AARS may overcome the deleterious effects of the tRNA mutation.101 In the case of human TyrRS, a natural fragment of the entire gene produced by alternate splicing has been shown to be angiostatic.102 In human retinal diseases such as macular degeneration where there is abnormal vascular proliferation, this angiostatic effect may prove therapeutic.103 The discovery that human LysRS and possibly other class II AARS are non-randomly incorporated into HIV-1 virions, should fuel new hypotheses on how to disrupt viral replication.104 Since MetRS, IleRS and LeuRS in humans exhibit continuous editing of incorrectly charged tRNAs, it has been suggested that inhibition of factors disrupting translational accuracy (i.e., homocysteine incorporation into protein) may be useful to manage cardiovascular disease.105

As the intricacies of the human genome are deciphered, new insights will be gleaned from the observation of genetic clustering and organization of certain AARS within candidate disease loci.29 Information on the genomic organization of human AARS, and measurement of tissue specific AARS gene expression may yield important insight into physiologically relevant AARS functions. Comparative structure function studies using host and pathogen AARS can identify phylogenetic anomalies that could be targeted for disruption by new therapies.

As expressed AARS “gene fragments”, products of alternate splicing, isoforms or pseudogenes are encountered in the study of normal and disease states, their functional significance as cytokines, ApnA producers, etc. deserves careful study. For example, in the plant, Arabadopsis thaliana, transcribed cysteinyland asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase genes are duplicated and quadruplicated, respectively.106 The absence of intact conserved substrate binding sites in expressed isoforms of AsnRS in Arabadopsis, suggests that these products are incapable of aminoacylation. Other biological activities have not yet been identified. Similarly, in the human filarial nematode parasite, Brugia malayi, cytoplasmic AsnRS is a multicopy gene107 that becomes an immunodominant antigen in the sera of infected persons.108 While the cytokine-like properties of human TyrRS and AARS-associated p43 have been recently identified, the full spectrum of immunological activities of other human or other eukaryotic AARS has not been fully explored. In the future, research to define the biological activities of what now are considered spontaneous deletion derivatives may broaden our understanding of AARS structure-function relationships.

Dedication

We dedicate this chapter to the memory of Carmen Berthet-Colominas, an extraordinary human being who devoted her life to solving the mysteries of protein structure and function. We trust that the disease that robbed this world of her many talents, someday will be conquered in no small part by the scientific insights she has provided.

Figure 2. Carmen Berthet-Colominas.

Figure 2

Carmen Berthet-Colominas.

References

1.
Dang CV, Dang CV. Higher eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in physiologic and pathologic states. Mol Cell Biochem. 1986;71(2):107–20. [PubMed: 3534543]
2.
Rebhan M, Chalifa-Caspi V, Prulusky J. et al. GeneCards: encyclopedia for genes, proteins and diseases. Weizmann Institute of Science, Bioinformatics Unit and genome Center (Rohovot, Israel), 1997. www.http://bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il/cards.
3.
BL Kotzin. Autoimmunity, Chapter 22 in Kelley's Text of Rheumatology. Saunders. 2001
4.
Meilof JF, Van der Lelij A, Rokeach LA. et al. Autoimmunity and filariasis. Autoantibodies against cytoplasmic cellular proteins in sera of patients with onchocerciasis. J Immunol. 1993;151(10):5800–9. [PubMed: 7901281]
5.
Targoff IN, Miller FW, Medsger TA. et al. Classification criteria for the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1997;9(6):527–35. [PubMed: 9375282]
6.
Targoff IN. Autoantibodies. In: Wortmann RD, ed. Diseases of skeletal muscle. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 1999:267–91.
7.
Targoff I. Update on myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2000;12:475–481. [PubMed: 11092195]
8.
Targoff I. Humoral immunity in polymyositis/dermatomyosistis. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100(1):116S–23S. [PubMed: 8423380]
9.
Genth E, Mierau R. Jo-1 antisynthetase syndrome—do autoantibodies improve classification of myositis? Z Rheumatol. 1993;52(5):259–63. [PubMed: 8259716]
10.
Plotz PH, Rider LG, Targoff IN. et al. NIH conference. Myositis: immunologic contributions to understanding cause, pathogenesis, and therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(9):715–24. [PubMed: 7702234]
11.
Ohosone Y, Ishida M, Takahashi Y. et al. Spectrum and clinical significance of autoantibodies against transfer RNA. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(9):1625–31. [PubMed: 9751095]
12.
Targoff IN, Trieu EP, Miller FW. Reaction of anti-OJ autoantibodies with component of the multi-enzyme complex of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in addition to isoleucyl tRNA synthetase. J Clin Invest. 1993;91(6):25556–64. [PMC free article: PMC443318] [PubMed: 8514867]
13.
Raben N, Nichls R, Dohlman J. et al. A motif in human histidyl-tRNA synthetase which is shared among several aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is a coiled coil that is essential for enzymatic activity and contains the major autoantigenic epitope. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(39):24277–83. [PubMed: 7523371]
14.
Hirakata M, Suwa A, Takeda Y. et al. Autoantibodies to glycl-transfer RNA synthetase in myositis. Association with dermatomyositis and immunologic heterogeneity. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(1):146–51. [PubMed: 8546723]
15.
Targoff IN, Treiu EP, Plotz PH. et al. Antibodies to glycyl-tRNA synthetase in patients with myositis and interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35(7):821–30. [PubMed: 1622421]
16.
M Beaulande. Etude de l'asparaginyl-ARNt synthetase cytosolique humaine et son implication dans des reactions auto-immunitaires. PhD Thesis, University of Grenoble. 2000
17.
Beaulande M, Kron M, Hartlein M. Anti-KS autoantibody inhibits human asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase and increases the affinity of tRNA for enzyme. FEBS Lett. 2001;494(3):170–4. [PubMed: 11311235]
18.
Beaulande M, Tarbouriech N, Härtlein M. Human cytosolic asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase: cDNA sequence, functional expression in E. coli and characterization as human autoantigen. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26(2):521–4. [PMC free article: PMC147268] [PubMed: 9421509]
19.
Hirakata M, Suwa A, Nagai S. et al. Anti-KS: identification of autoantibodies to asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase associated with interstitial lung disease. J Immunol. 1999;162(4):2315–20. [PubMed: 9973509]
20.
Bunn CC, Mathews MB. Autoreactive epitope defined as the anticodon region of alanine tRNA. Science. 1987;238(4830):1116–9. [PubMed: 2446387]
21.
Dang CV, Tan EM, Traugh JA. Myositis autoantibody reactivity and catalytic function of threonyl-tRNA synthetase. FASEB J. 1988;2(8):2376–9. [PubMed: 2452112]
22.
Dang CV, Dang CV. The Multienzyme complex of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: an essence of being eukaryotic. Biochem J. 1986;239(2):249–55. [PMC free article: PMC1147274] [PubMed: 3545179]
23.
Garlepp MJ. Immunogenetics of inflammatory myopathies. Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1993;2(3):579–97. [PubMed: 8156144]
24.
Snoek M, Van VugtH. The sequence and organization of the mouse valyl-tRNA synthetase gene G7a/Bat6 located in the MHC class III region. Immunogenetics. 1999;49(5):468–70. [PubMed: 10199925]
25.
Arnett FC, Targoff IN, Mimori T. et al. Interrelationship of major histocompatibility complex class II alleles and autoantibodies in four ethnic groups with various forms of myositis. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(9):1507–18. [PubMed: 8814062]
26.
Blechynden LM, Lawson MA, Tabaria H. et al. Myositis induced by naked DNA immunization with the gene for histidyl-tRNA synthetase. Hum Gene Ther. 1997;8(12):1469–80 27. [PubMed: 9287147]
27.
Nagaraju K, Raben N, Loeffler L. et al. Conditional up-regulation of MHC class I in skeletal muscle leads to self-sustaining autoimmune myositis and myositis-specific autoantibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(16):9209–14. [PMC free article: PMC16847] [PubMed: 10922072]
28.
Martin A, Shulman MJ, Tsui FW. Epitope studies indicate that histidyl-tRNA synthetase is a stimulating antigen in idiopathic myositis. FASEB J. 1995;9(12):1496. [PubMed: 7672516]
29.
Maas S, Kim YG, Richaa A. Genomic clustering of tRNA specific adenosine deaminase ADAT1 and two tRNA synthetases. Mamm Genome. 2001;12(5):387–93. [PubMed: 11331948]
30.
Shah ZH, Toompuu M, Hakkinen T. et al. Novel coding-region polymorphisms in mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase (SARSM) and mitoribosomal protein S12 genes in DFNA4 autosomal dominant deafness families. Hum Mutat. 2001;17(5):433–4. [PubMed: 11317363]
31.
Zamecnik PC, Stephenson ML, Janeway CM. et al. Enzymatic synthesis of diadenosine tetraphosphate and diadenosine triphosphate with a purified lysyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1966;24(1):91–7. [PubMed: 5338216]
32.
Bochner B, Lee P, Wilson S. et al. Ap4A and related adenylated nucleotides are synthesized as a consequence of oxidation stress. Cell. 1984;37:225–232. [PubMed: 6373012]
33.
Kisselev LL, Jutesen J, Wolfson A. et al. Diadenosine oligophosphates Ap(n)A, a novel class of signaling molecules. FEBS Lett. 1998;427(2):157–63. [PubMed: 9607303]
34.
Alexander E, McLennan G. Ap4A and other dinucleoside polyphosphates. CRC Press. 1992
35.
Belrhali H, Yaremchu A, Tukalo M. et al. The structural basis for seryl-adenylate and Ap4A synthesis by seryl-tRNA synthetase. Structure. 1995;3:341–352. [PubMed: 7613865]
36.
Bessman MJ, Walsh JD, Dunn CA. et al. The gene ygdP, associated with the invasiveness of Escherichia coli K1, designates a nudix hydrolase, Orf176, active on adenosine (5')-pentaphospho- (5')-adenosine (Ap5A). J Biol Chem. 2001;276(41):37834–8. [PubMed: 11479323]
37.
Hilderman RH, Christensen E. Ap4A induces nitric oxide release from bovine aortic endothelial cells. FEBS Lett. 1998;427:320–4. [PubMed: 9637249]
38.
Biryukov AI, Zhukov Y, Lavrik OI. et al. Influence of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors and the Ap5A analogues on the catalysis of ApnA formation. FEBS Lett. 1990;273(1-2):208–10. [PubMed: 2226855]
39.
Vartanian A, Alexandrov I, Prudowski I. et al. Ap4A induces apoptosis in human cultured cells. FEBS Lett. 1999;456(1):175–80. [PubMed: 10452553]
40.
Schluter H, Tepel M, Zidek W. Vascular actions of diadenosine phosphates. J Auton Pharmacol. 1996;16(6):357–62. [PubMed: 9131416]
41.
Leventhal PS, Bertics PJ. Kinetic analysis of protein C: product and dead-end inhibition studies using ADP, Polyl(L-lysine), nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues and diadenosine oligophosphates. Biochemistry. 1991;30(5):1385–90. [PubMed: 1991118]
42.
Griffiths M, Beaumont N, Yao SY. et al. Cloning of a human nucleoside transporter implicated in the cellular uptake of adenosine and chemotherapeutic drugs. Nat Med. 1997;3:89–93. [PubMed: 8986748]
43.
Verspohl EJ, Johannwille B, Kaiserling-Buddemeier I. et al. Diadenosine polyphosphates in cultured vascular smooth-muscle cells and endothelium cells—their interaction with specific receptors and their degradation. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1999;51(10):1175–81. [PubMed: 10579689]
44.
Pintor J, Puche JA, Gualix J. et al. Diadenosine polyphosphates evoke Ca+ transients in guinea pig brain via receptors distinct from those for ATP. J Physiol. 1997;504(Pt 2):327–35. [PMC free article: PMC1159913] [PubMed: 9365907]
45.
Jovanovic A, Jovanovic S, Mays DC. et al. Diadenosine pentaphosphate (Ap5A) harbors the properties of a signaling molecule in the heart. FEBS Lett. 1998;423(3):314–8. [PubMed: 9515730]
46.
Hoyle CH, Pintor J, Gualix J. et al. Antagonism of P2X receptors in guinea-pig vas deferens by diinosine pentaphosphate. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;333(2-3):R1–2. [PubMed: 9314047]
47.
Delaney SM, Blackburn GM, Geiger JD. Diadenosine polyphosphates inhibit adenosine kinase activity but decrease levels of endognous adenosine in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;332(1):35–42. [PubMed: 9298923]
48.
Boyer JL, Waldo GL, Harden TK. Molecular cloning and expression of an avian G protein-coupled P2Y receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 1997;52(6):928–34. [PubMed: 9415702]
49.
Ferrari D, Idzko M, Dichmann S. et al. P2 purinoreceptors of human eosinophils: characterization and coupling to oxygen radical production. FEBS Lett. 2000;486(3):217–224. [PubMed: 11119707]
50.
Campbell S, Kemrling AJ, Hilderman RH. Characterization of Ap5A binding on bovine aortic endothelial cells. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1999;364(2):280–5. [PubMed: 10190985]
51.
Stachon A, Stegemann H, Hohage H. et al. Effects of diadenosine polyphosphates on the intracellular Ca2+ concentration in endothelial cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 1998;8(4):175–84. [PubMed: 9694344]
52.
Miras-Portugal MT, Castro E, Mateo J. et al. The diadenosine polyphosphate receptors: P2D purinoreceptors. Ciba Found Symp. 1996;198:35–47. [PubMed: 8879817]
53.
Burnstock G. P2 purinoceptors: historical perspective and classification. In: Chadwick DJ, Goode JA, eds. P2 purinoceptors: localization, function and transduction mechanisms. 198th ed. Chichester: Wiley. 1996:1–34.
54.
Ralevic V, Burnstock G. Receptors for Purines and Pyrimidines. Pharmacol Rev. 1998;50(3):413–475. [PubMed: 9755289]
55.
Roman R, Fitz JG. Emerging roles of purinergic signaling in gastrointestinal epithelial secretion and hepatobiliary function. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:964–979. [PubMed: 10092320]
56.
Lambrecht G. Agonist and antagonists acting at P2x receptors: selectivity profiles and functional implications. Arch Pharm. 2000;362(4-5):340–50. [PubMed: 11111828]
57.
North RA, Surprenant A. Pharmacology of cloned P2X receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2000;40:563–80. [PubMed: 10836147]
58.
Luthje J, Ogilvie A. Catabolism of Ap4A and Ap3A in whole blood. Eur J Biochem. 1987;173:241–245. [PubMed: 3356191]
59.
Flodgaard H, Klenow H. Abundant amounts of Ap4A are present and releasable, but metabolically inactive, in human platelets. Biochem J. 1982;208:737–742. [PMC free article: PMC1154025] [PubMed: 6299279]
60.
Hollah P, Hausberg M, Kosch M. et al. A novel assay for determination of diadenosine polyphosphates in human platelets: studies in normotensive subjects and in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertension. 2001;19(2):237–45. [PubMed: 11212966]
61.
Miras-Portugal MT, Gualix J, Pintor J. The neurotransmitter role of diadenosine polyphosphates. FEBS Lett. 1998;430:78–82. [PubMed: 9678598]
62.
Evan G, Littlewood T. A matter of life and cell death. Science. 1998;281(5381):1317–21. [PubMed: 9721090]
63.
Ashkenai A, Dixit VM. Death receptors: signaling and modulation. Science. 1998;281(5381):1305–08. [PubMed: 9721089]
64.
Van ParijsL, Abbas AK. Homeostasis and self-tolerance in the immune system: turning lymphocytes off. Science. 1998;280(5361):243–8. [PubMed: 9535647]
65.
Thornberry NA, Lazebnik Y. Capsases: enemies within. Science. 1998;(5381):1312–6. [PubMed: 9721091]
66.
Green DR, Reed JC. Mitochondria and apoptosis. Science. 1998;281(5381):1309–12. [PubMed: 9721092]
67.
Casas C, Ribera J, Esquerda JE. Antibodies against c-Jun N-terminal peptide cross-react with neo-epitopes emerging after capsase-mediated proteolysis during apoptosis. J Neurochem. 2001;77(3):904–15. [PubMed: 11331419]
68.
Pasternak K. Extracellular presence of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Ann Univ Maria Curie-Sklodowska. 1997;52(5):29–38. [PubMed: 10023153]
69.
Zaborina O, Li X, Cheng G. et al. Secretion of ATP-utilizing enzymes, nucleoside diphosphate kinase and ATPases, by Mycobacterium: sequestration of ATP from macrophage P2 receptors. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31(5):1333–43. [PubMed: 10200955]
70.
Chopade BA, Shankar S, Sundin GW. et al. Characterization of membrane-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ras-like protein Pra, a GTP biding protein that forms complexes with truncated nucleoside diphosphate kinase and pyruvate kinase to modulate GTP synthesis. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:2181–88. [PMC free article: PMC178953] [PubMed: 9079902]
71.
Wakasugi K, Schimmel P. Highly differentiated motifs responsible for two cytokine activities of a split human tRNA synthetase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(33):23155–9. [PubMed: 10438485]
72.
Wakasugi K, Schimmel P. Two distinct cytokines released from a human aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Science. 1999;284:147–150. [PubMed: 10102815]
73.
Kleeman TA, Wei D, Simpson KL. et al. Human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase shares amino acid sequence homology with a putative cytokine. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(22):14420–5. [PubMed: 9162081]
74.
Weiner A, Maizels N. A deadly double life. Science. 1999;284:63–5. [PubMed: 10215533]
75.
Kisselev L, Frovola L, Haenni A. Interferon inducibility of mammalian tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase: new perspectives. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993;18:263–7. [PubMed: 7692626]
76.
Fleckner J, Rasmusen HH, Justesen J. Human interferon gamma potently induces the synthesis of a 55 kDa protein homologous to bovine tryptophaynl-tRNA synthetase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:11520–4. [PMC free article: PMC53167] [PubMed: 1763065]
77.
Turpaev K, Hartmann R, Kisselev L. et al. Ap3A and Ap4A are primers for oligoadenylate synthesis catalyzed by interferon-inducible 2-5A synthetase. FEBS Lett. 1997;408(2):177–81. [PubMed: 9187362]
78.
Ko YG, Park H, Kim T. et al. A cofactor of tRNA synthetase, p43, is secreted to up-regulate proinflammatory genes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(25):23028–33. [PubMed: 11292833]
79.
Gallo RC, Longmore JL, Adamson RH. Asparaginyl-tRNA and resistance of murine leukemias to L-asparaginase. Nature. 1970;227(263):1134–6. [PubMed: 5451107]
80.
Gallo RC, Pestka S. Transfer RNA species in normal and leukemic human lymphoblasts. J Mol Biol. 1970;52(2):195–219. [PubMed: 5274398]
81.
Herrera F, Adamson RH, Gallo RC. Update of transfer ribonucleic acid by normal and leukemic cells. PNAS. 1970;67(4):1943–50. [PMC free article: PMC283451] [PubMed: 4923121]
82.
Gantt JS, Chiang CS, Hatfield GW. et al. Chinese hamster ovary cells resistant to beta aspartyl hydroxamate contain increased levels of asparagine synthetase. J Biol Chem. 1980;255(10):4808–13. [PubMed: 6102991]
83.
Cirullo RE, Arredondo-Vega FX, Smith M. et al. Isolation and characterization of interspecific heat-resistant hybrids between a temperature-sensitive CHO asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase mutant and normal human leukocytes. Somatic Cell Genet. 1983;9(2):215–33. [PubMed: 6836455]
84.
Cirullo RE, Wasmuth JJ. Isolation of CHO cells that overproduce asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase. Mol Cell Biol. 1984;4(9):1939–41. [PMC free article: PMC369004] [PubMed: 6493235]
85.
Diamond G, Cedar H, Marcus M. A temperature sensitive mutation in asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase causes cell cycle arrest in early S phase. Exp Cell Res. 1989;184(1):53–60. [PubMed: 2792229]
86.
Waye M, Stanners C. Role of asparagine synthetase and asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase in the cell killing activity of asparaginase in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants. Cancer Res. 1981;41:3104–6. [PubMed: 6113889]
87.
Andrulis IL, Chiang CS, Argin SM. et al. Biochemical characterization of a mutant asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase from Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem. 1978;253(1):58–62. [PubMed: 618867]
88.
Moore PA, Jame DW, Oxender DL. A role for aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase in the regulation of amino acid transport in mammalian cell lines. J Biol Chem. 1977;252(21):7427–30. [PubMed: 914817]
89.
Arfin SM, Simpson DR, Chiang CS. et al. A role for asparaginyl-tRNA in the regulation of asparagine synthetase in a mammalian cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74(6):2367–9. [PMC free article: PMC432172] [PubMed: 18735]
90.
Iiboshi Y, Papst PJ, Hunger SP. et al. L-asparaginase inhibits the rapamycin target signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;260(2):534–9. [PubMed: 10403802]
91.
Asselin BL. The three asparaginases. Comparative pharmacolgoy and optimal use in childhood leukemia. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;457(4):621–9. [PubMed: 10500842]
92.
Dubbers A, Wurthwein G, Muller HG. et al. Asparagine synthetase activity in pediatric acute leukemias; AMO-M5 subtype shows lowest activity. Br J Hematol. 2000;109(2):427–9. [PubMed: 10848836]
93.
Sen S, Zhou H, Ripmaster T. et al. Expression of a gene encoding a tRNA synthetase-like protein is enhanced in tumorigenic human myeloid leukemia cells and is cell cycle stage- and differentiation-dependent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(12):6164–9. [PMC free article: PMC21020] [PubMed: 9177188]
94.
Miyaki M, Iijima T, Shiba K. et al. Alternations in repeated sequences in 5' upstream and coding regions in colorectal tumors from patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and Turcot syndrome. Oncogene. 2001;20(37):5215–18. [PubMed: 11526511]
95.
Pleser L. EctoATPases: identities and functions. Int Rev Cytol. 1995;158:141–214. [PubMed: 7721538]
96.
Barnes LD, Garrison PN, Siprashvili Z. et al. Fhit, a putative tumor suppressor in humans, is a dinucleoside triphosphate hydrolase. Biochemistry. 1996;35(36):11529–35. [PubMed: 8794732]
97.
Williams M, Jarvis MF. Purinergic and pyrimidinergic receptors as potential drug targets. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;59(10):1173–85. [PubMed: 10736418]
98.
Burnstock G, Williams M. P2 purinergic receptors: modulation of cell function and therapeutic potential. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000;295(3):862–9. [PubMed: 11082418]
99.
Solomon B. Immunotherapeutic strategies for prevention and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. DNA Cell Biol. 2001;20(11):697–703. [PubMed: 11788047]
100.
Florentz C, Sissler M. Disease-related versus polymorphic mutations in human mitochondrial tRNAs. EMBO Rep. 2001;2(6):481–6 101. [PMC free article: PMC1083905] [PubMed: 11415979]
101.
Rabilloud T, Strub JM, Carte N. et al. Comparative proteomics as a new tool for exploring human mitochondrial tRNA disorders. Biochemistry. 2002;41(1):144–50. [PubMed: 11772011]
102.
Wakasugi K, Slike BM, Hood J. et al. A human aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase as a regulator of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(1):173–77. [PMC free article: PMC117534] [PubMed: 11773626]
103.
Otani A, Slike BM, Dorrell MI. et al. A fragment of human TrpRS as a potent antagonist of ocular angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(1):178–83. [PMC free article: PMC117535] [PubMed: 11773625]
104.
Cen S, Khorchid A, Javanbakht H. et al. Incorporation of lysly-tRNA synthetase into human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 2001;75(11):5043–8. [PMC free article: PMC114908] [PubMed: 11333884]
105.
Jakubowski H. Translation accuracy of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: implications for atherosclerosis. J Nutr. 2001;131(11):2983S–7S. [PubMed: 11694633]
106.
Peeters NM, Chapron A, Giritch A. et al. Duplication and Quadruplication of Arabidopsis thaliana cysteinyl- and asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase genes of organellar origin. J Mol Evol. 2000;50(5):413–23. [PubMed: 10824085]
107.
Perrine KG, Kenker JA, Nilsen TW. A multicopy gene [AsnRS] encodes a potentially protective antigen in Brugia malayi. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1988;30(1):97–104. [PubMed: 2840577]
108.
Kron M, Marquard K, Price S. et al. An immunodominant antigen of Brugia malayi is an asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase. FEBS Lett. 1995;394:122–5. [PubMed: 7589498]
Copyright © 2000-2013, Landes Bioscience.
Bookshelf ID: NBK6128

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed