U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Cover of StatPearls

StatPearls [Internet].

Show details

Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder

; .

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: October 28, 2023.

Introduction

Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) frequently emerges in late adolescence or early adulthood and is one of the most prevalent personality disorders. OCPD is marked by an intense focus on perfection, a strong sense of order, and a rigid need for control.[1] Individuals with OCPD often find themselves engrossed in these fixations to such an extent that they face significant functional impairments in various facets of their lives.[2] The characteristics of OCPD are consistent over time. Individuals with OCPD may be inflexible, often resist change, and can be overwhelmed by minute details, rules, and schedules, hindering their productivity. While there is overlap between OCPD and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), especially regarding thought content rigidity and a strong sense of personal responsibility, the two conditions have distinct diagnostic criteria, courses, and responses to interventions.[3]

OCPD was initially conceptualized by Janet in 1903 as a "psychasthenic state" and was further validated by Freud in 1908.[4] OCPD was officially designated "compulsive personality" in the inaugural 1952 edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).[5] The DSM-II further elucidated OCPD and introduced the term "anankastic personality" to differentiate OCPD from OCD.[5] Although the DSM eventually abandoned the term "anankastic personality," it persists in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11). In the DSM-III, OCPD was briefly termed "compulsive personality." However, the use of OCPD has been consistent since the publication of the DSM-III-R in 1987.[6]

Beginning with the DSM-III in 1980, personality disorders have been organized into three clusters, A, B, and C. Cluster A personality disorders comprise the paranoid, schizoid, and schizotypal personality disorders and are characterized predominately by odd or eccentric behavior. Cluster B personality disorders comprise histrionic, narcissistic, antisocial, and borderline personality disorders and are characterized by dramatic, emotional, or erratic behaviors. Cluster C personality disorders include avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders characterized by anxious or fearful behavior.[7] Despite its continued use, the categorical model of personality disorders has been criticized for lacking robust empirical support.[8] 

OCPD is underdiagnosed and not extensively researched. The etiology of OCPD appears multifactorial, and the pathophysiology of the disorder is not well elucidated. Despite its prevalence, data-driven therapeutic regimens for patients with OCPD are lacking.

Etiology

Research concerning the etiology of OCPD remains limited, and the findings are often inconsistent. Like other personality disorders, the origins of OCPD are multifactorial, blending genetic, environmental, and psychological factors.[9] Various studies have substantiated that biological considerations play a significant role in shaping personality. Twin research has indicated a notable hereditary component to OCPD, with genetic factors accounting for 27% to 78% of the traits associated with this disorder.[10] These wide-ranging estimates highlight the difficulties in pinpointing the genetic contributions of such a complex behavioral syndrome.

Further evidence for genetic contributions comes from studies that have produced mixed or conflicting results. For example, the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in SLC6A4, which encodes the serotonin transporter, has been linked to anxiety-related traits commonly observed in Cluster C personality disorders.[11] However, other research has questioned the strength of this association.[12] Additionally, associations have been discovered between symptoms of avoidant personality disorder and OCPD and genetic polymorphisms in the gene encoding the dopamine D3 receptor. These findings have been corroborated in subsequent research.[13][14] 

Medical conditions are often associated with personality disorders or changes, specifically conditions that may damage neurons. This includes but is not limited to head trauma, cerebrovascular diseases, cerebral tumors, epilepsy, Huntington disease, multiple sclerosis, endocrinopathies, heavy metal poisoning, neurosyphilis, and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).[15] Overall, the biological etiological factors contributing to OCPD are complex and warrant further investigation.

Various psychological factors contribute to the development of personality disorders. Freud posited that certain personality traits result from fixations at specific psychosexual developmental stages. For instance, individuals with OCPD are theorized to exhibit characteristics such as stubbornness, parsimony, and high conscientiousness, which Freud attributed to fixations at the anal stage due to struggles during toilet training.[16] Other psychological frameworks suggest that maladaptive defense mechanisms, such as isolation of affect, reaction formation, intellectualization, and undoing, play a role in developing and perpetuating obsessive-compulsive traits.[17] Parenting styles, specifically those of overly controlling parents, have been posited as a contributing factor in the development of OCPD, although empirical support for this hypothesis is limited.[18] Attachment theory offers another perspective, proposing that individuals with OCPD may have experienced difficulties in forming secure attachments during their formative years.[1] Alternative hypotheses suggest that traits associated with OCPD may stem from cognitive deficits or imbalances related to empathy and rule comprehension.[19] However, it is essential to note that these theories face critical scrutiny and require further empirical investigation for validation.

A complex interplay of biological, psychological, and environmental influences shapes personality, which is the basis for our behavioral responses to various internal and external stimuli. Temperament offers a valuable framework for analyzing personality, as it is genetically influenced and subject to environmental modulation.[20][21] These temperamental traits are universal across various cultural, ethnic, and generational lines, exhibit stability from early life onwards, and resemble crystallized intelligence in their resistance to rapid alterations over time.[22]  The 4 principal temperament traits of harm avoidance, novelty seeking, reward dependence, and persistence are foundational. In OCPD, high levels of harm avoidance are often present, manifesting as an intense focus on risk avoidance and meticulous planning to prevent unforeseen errors.[22] Additionally, individuals with OCPD frequently exhibit high persistence, which, while contributing to their diligence and attention to detail, can lead to rigidity and an overemphasis on perfectionism.[22] Understanding these temperamental traits offers critical insights for OCPD diagnosis and treatment planning. Although not entirely definitive, these traits provide a nuanced lens to understand the complexities of OCPD better.

Epidemiology

Research on the prevalence and course of OCPD has yielded inconsistent results due to varying diagnostic criteria, assessment tools, and populations studied. Despite this, studies suggest that OCPD is among the most common personality disorder in the general population. Based on DSM-IV criteria, lifetime prevalence rates of OCPD are between 3% and 8% within the general population.[19] The estimated prevalence of OCPD is 8.7% for outpatients and 23.3% in inpatient settings.[23][24] OCPD is more frequently diagnosed in men than women.[24] Demographically, younger adults and persons of Asian and Hispanic descent seem to have lower OCPD rates. In contrast, individuals with lesser education have higher rates of OCPD.[19]

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of OCPD remains poorly understood. Although they are separate disorders, OCD and OCPD have intersecting traits. It is therefore hypothesized that in OCPD, there is a disruption in serotonergic neurotransmission similar to that seen in OCD.[25] Neuroimaging has revealed anomalies in brain areas related to decision-making, emotional modulation, and habit formation. The prefrontal cortex and the amygdala have been emphasized in these studies. However, these findings are preliminary, and more research is needed to understand the neurobiological aspects of OCPD.[26]

History and Physical

Individuals diagnosed with OCPD typically demonstrate an enduring pattern of extreme perfectionism, heightened focus on details, unwavering adherence to rules and procedures, rigid belief systems, and reluctance to delegate responsibilities.[3] Their decision-making process is often hampered by a fear of making mistakes and a drive to meet unattainable standards. Consequently, they usually allocate extended periods to task completion, marked by meticulous scrutiny of every detail.[3] 

While people with OCPD may excel in environments that demand detail orientation, analytical skills, or a structured approach, they also experience significant functional limitations in multiple areas of life, such as occupational or educational spheres, social interactions, and recreational activities. The relentless pursuit of perfection often turns counterproductive, leading to inefficiencies such as focusing excessively on minor tasks, missing deadlines, and frequent requests for time extensions to refine their work. In past experiences, individuals with OCPD may have faced challenges when working in group settings in educational or occupational contexts. Such difficulties can stem from their inclination to take over the entire workload or micromanage contributions from others.

When attempting to diagnose an individual with OCPD, it is advisable to gather corroborative information from close friends, former partners, and family to comprehensively understand these persistent behavioral patterns. Particular attention should be given to whether these traits manifested during adolescence or early adulthood. Assessing the degree of functional impairment in social, occupational, and personal domains is paramount. A thorough concurrent investigation for any comorbid psychiatric conditions is also essential.

The mental status examination (MSE) findings will vary for patients with OCPD based on the impairment level and additional comorbid conditions. However, specific elements within the MSE can be indicators of OCPD.

  • Appearance and Behavior: Patients with OCPD typically exhibit a stiff, formal, and rigid demeanor that reflects their intrinsic need for control and order. Psychomotor activity and eye contact are generally within normal ranges. Patients with OCPD are usually cooperative but can quickly become anxious and irritable if their sense of order and control is challenged.
  • Speech: The speech patterns of patients with OCPD will vary with context. They may opt for brief, fact-based dialogue devoid of extraneous detail, or their speech may be replete with excessive factual elaborations.
  • Affect: The affect of patients with OCPD is neither blunted nor flat but generally constricted, mirroring their limited emotional expressiveness.
  • Thought content: Patients with OCPD are not prone to delusions or obsessions unless there are comorbid psychiatric conditions; this is a crucial distinguishing factor from OCD.
  • Thought process: The thought process of patients with OCPD is linear and goal-directed but may reach concrete levels. Responses to questions tend to be exceedingly detailed, indicating their preoccupation with precision and meticulousness.
  • Perceptual abnormalities: Hallucinations or illusions are not typically observed in patients with OCPD.
  • Cognition: The general cognition and orientation of patients with OCPD remain intact without observable impairments.
  • Insight: Patients with OCPD often demonstrate limited insight. The behaviors and thought patterns associated with OCPD are usually ego-syntonic, align with the individual’s self-concept, and are often not perceived as problematic.

Evaluation

The diagnosis of OCPD is clinical. A detailed assessment is essential to differentiate OCPD from OCD and other personality disorders. The DSM-5-TR, published in 2022, offers 2 distinct diagnostic approaches to OCPD — the categorical and the dimensional.

Categorical Approach to the Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder

The categorical approach is the traditional method of diagnosing personality disorders. This approach assumes that personality disorders are distinct from normal personality and are different from each other with strict boundaries. According to this approach, the criteria for OCPD include a consistent tendency to focus intensely on orderliness, perfectionism, and control in mental and interpersonal domains at the expense of flexibility, openness, and efficiency. Symptoms must originate in late adolescence or early adulthood, be observable in various settings, lead to notable life distress, and be characterized by at least four of the following numbered criteria.

  1. Preoccupation with details, rules, lists, order, organization, or schedules to the extent that the central point of the activity is lost.
  2. Perfectionism that interferes with task completion. 
  3. Excessive devotion to work and productivity, excluding leisure activities and friendships.
  4. Over-conscientiousness and inflexibility about morality, ethics, or values.
  5. Difficulty in discarding worn-out or worthless objects with no sentimental value.
  6. Reluctance to delegate tasks or work.
  7. Adoption of a miserly spending style toward self and others.
  8. Demonstration of rigidity and stubbornness.

Dimensional Approach to the Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder

The dimensional approach introduced in Section III of the DSM-5 is an alternative model for diagnosing OCPD. Rather than relying on fixed categories, this approach perceives personality disorders as a spectrum of personality dysfunctions across various domains. These domains encompass identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy and are paired with pathological personality traits within the 5 key areas comprising negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism. By acknowledging the shared symptoms among personality disorders, this alternative diagnostic method seeks to measure the extent of dysfunction and offer a more detailed understanding of the functionality of the personality.

The proposed diagnostic criteria for OCPD are:

Moderate or severe impairment in personality functioning, manifested by characteristic difficulties in 2 or more of the following areas:

  • Identity: The sense of self is derived predominantly from work or productivity; there is a constricted experience of strong emotions.
  • Self-direction: There are difficulties completing tasks and realizing goals associated with rigid and unreasonably high and inflexible internal standards of behavior; individuals are overly conscientious and have moralistic attitudes.
  • Empathy: There is difficulty understanding and appreciating the ideas, feelings, or behaviors of others.
  • Intimacy: Relationships are seen as secondary to work and productivity, and interpersonal relationships are negatively affected by rigidity and stubbornness.

The patient must exhibit rigid perfectionism, defined as a demand for perfection and flawlessness in all tasks resulting in missed deadlines; a pervasive belief in one correct method; the reluctance to adopt the views of others; and a focus on detail and order. In addition to rigid perfectionism, the patient must exhibit 2 of the following 3 traits:

  • Perseveration, characterized as persistence at tasks long after the behavior has ceased to be functional or practical.
  • Intimacy avoidance, characterized by avoiding close or romantic relationships, interpersonal attachments, and intimate sexual relationships.
  • Restricted affectivity, exhibited as demonstrating little reaction to emotionally arousing situations, a constricted emotional experience and expression, and indifference or coldness.

Personality Assessment Tools

Specific personality assessment tools are invaluable in diagnosing OCPD accurately. Integrating these assessment tools with clinical judgment, collateral information, and a thorough history is crucial. This holistic approach ensures a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the personality profile. Some of the instruments that can help discern the intricate facets of OCPD include:

  • Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3[27]
  • Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV[28]
  • Personality Assessment Inventory[29]
  • Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)[30]

Treatment / Management

There is no empirically confirmed "gold standard" treatment for OCPD. The evidence supporting the effectiveness of various therapeutic methods is limited, and no head-to-head comparisons have been made. Therefore, treatment choices should be tailored to the needs of each patient and the available options. Psychotherapy is frequently suggested as an initial treatment option based on a body of research that, although not definitive, leans toward the effectiveness of psychotherapy in treating personality disorders in general and OCPD in particular.[1][31] However, much of the existing research comprises case studies and uncontrolled longitudinal designs, and the overall quality of the evidence is limited.[1] 

Psychodynamic therapy for OCPD aims to help patients uncover the underlying emotional insecurities that manifest as a need for perfectionism and rigid behaviors. By gaining this self-awareness, patients can adopt more flexible behavioral patterns. One study demonstrated the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy in improving the condition of 14 OCPD patients after 52 sessions; the study lacked a control group for comparison.[32] Another study indicated that psychodynamic therapy could enhance general well-being among OCPD patients but did not specifically measure changes in OCPD symptoms.[33] 

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) employs cognitive and behavioral strategies to modify dysfunctional thought patterns and behaviors in patients with personality disorders, including OCPD. Techniques include challenging "all-or-nothing" cognitive distortion and undertaking behavioral experiments, such as deliberately making minor mistakes to gauge the outcomes. While CBT has demonstrated potential in some OCPD studies, the evidence remains inconclusive. A study involving 40 patients with OCPD undergoing CBT showed encouraging results but did not juxtapose CBT with other treatment modalities.[34]

Schema therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy have also been reported as effective in mitigating comorbid depression and improving social and occupational functioning in patients with OCPD.[1] Whether psychodynamic therapy or CBT is most efficacious in treating patients with OCPD remains undetermined; further research is needed.

No medication is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat OCPD. However, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are frequently employed and have been the most studied. Fluvoxamine was studied in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial focusing on improving OCPD traits; the results warrant cautious interpretation because of an unvalidated scale and a limited sample size of 24 patients.[2] However, evidence from case reports suggests that fluvoxamine has a promising role in attenuating hoarding traits in patients with OCD.[35] Fluoxetine has also been extensively studied in patients with OCPD; results have been mixed. A single open-label study demonstrated the effectiveness of fluoxetine in mitigating perfectionism.[36] Case reports suggest that a 10 mg/d dosage of fluoxetine in children reduces rigidity and irritability and that dosages at or in excess of 20 mg/d in adults alleviate perfectionism and hoarding.[37][35] In a 24-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, citalopram at dosages of 40 to 60 mg/d was notably more effective than sertraline in reducing OCPD criteria in patients diagnosed with major depression.[38] However, the FDA advises against citalopram dosages exceeding 40 mg/d due to the risk of QTc prolongation.

Antipsychotics have demonstrated inconsistent efficacy in treating patients with OCPD. A dosage of 15 mg/d of aripiprazole showed promise in a randomized controlled trial; the results were limited by a small sample size of 26, OCPD trait improvement was not the primary outcome, and the presence of co-occurring borderline personality disorder among the patients.[39]

Lastly, carbamazepine has been suggested as a potentially effective treatment for aggression and hoarding in OCPD patients. However, this evidence is confined to isolated case reports.[40] 

In summary, while SSRIs, particularly fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, have received the most empirical support for treating OCPD, the evidence has limitations that must be considered. The effectiveness of other medication classes, such as antipsychotics and mood stabilizers, remains less substantiated and is based on studies with small sample sizes.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of OCPD includes many mental and behavioral health disorders, many of which have symptoms that overlap with the diagnostic criteria of OCPD. Disorders that should be considered in patients with the symptoms of OCPD include but are not limited to the following diagnoses.

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by unwanted and intrusive recurring thoughts or obsessions and behaviors or compulsions. In contrast, OCPD is a personality disorder characterized by a general pattern of concern with orderliness, perfectionism, and control. The symptoms seen in OCPD, although repetitive, are not linked with the repulsive thoughts, images, or urges seen in OCD. OCPD characteristics and behaviors are ego-syntonic; people with OCPD view these characteristics and behaviors as suitable and correct. 

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Like OCPD, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) can involve excessive worry. However, GAD often encompasses a broader range of anxieties, such as worrying excessively about everyday problems, rather than the more narrow focus on perfectionism and control seen in OCPD.

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and OCPD may include exhibited behaviors like a strong inclination for routines and meticulous attention to detail. However, ASD and OCPD differ fundamentally in their contexts, associated diagnostic features, onset, and progression. ASD often manifests in early childhood and comprises many symptoms, including social communication and interaction challenges. In contrast, OCPD typically emerges in late adolescence or early adulthood and revolves around perfectionism, orderliness, and a need for control.

Schizoid Personality Disorder or Schizotypal Personality Disorder

Patients with schizoid personality disorder or schizotypal personality disorder, like those with OCPD, might display social withdrawal and routine adherence, but the core characteristics of these disorders differ. Schizoid personality disorder is marked by a preference for solitude, limited emotional expression, and a lack of interest in social relationships. On the other hand, schizotypal personality disorder is frequently characterized by eccentric behaviors, unconventional beliefs such as magical thinking, and peculiar speech and thought patterns. 

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Like those with OCPD, individuals with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) may be preoccupied with issues of perfection and control. However, patients with NPD often focus on demonstrating their superiority or uniqueness, while those with OCPD concentrate more on correctness.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Individuals with OCPD often struggle with task completion due to their intense focus on perfection and orderliness. In contrast, those with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are challenged by attention deficits and easy distractibility. ADHD symptoms typically emerge in early childhood, while symptoms of OCPD more often present in adolescence or early adulthood.

Pertinent Studies and Ongoing Trials

Most research on OCPD is based on older editions of the DSM; there is a need for updated studies that reflect contemporary clinical practice. The categorical diagnostic approach of the DSM has limitations, especially related to the diagnosis of personality disorders. A growing consensus suggests that a dimensional diagnostic approach is more appropriate for personality disorders, and experts increasingly advocate for this dimensional approach over the existing categorical model.[41][42] The DSM-5 has partially acknowledged this paradigm shift by incorporating "Alternate DSM-5 Criteria for Personality Disorders"; future editions may fully adopt a dimensional model. ICD-11 has already transitioned to the dimensional approach, signaling probable changes in forthcoming DSM editions for OCPD and other personality disorders.

Prognosis

While many individuals with OCPD benefit from interventions, the condition can result in notable functional impairments in both occupational and social settings. Coexisting mental health conditions, such as anxiety or depression, can further complicate the prognosis. Nonetheless, addressing these comorbidities often enhances the treatment outcomes for OCPD itself.

The prognosis of OCPD tends to favor individuals with greater insight into their condition, a willingness to seek professional help, and compliance with therapeutic interventions. Such individuals frequently experience enhanced interpersonal relationships and an improved overall quality of life.

The ego-syntonic nature of OCPD symptoms presents a unique treatment challenge. Individuals with OCPD may not readily perceive the need to modify behaviors that align with their self-concept. This can create difficulties in the therapeutic alliance, as the patients' controlling tendencies may cause tension or anxiety for clinicians. Nevertheless, these patients often respond positively to logical, systematic, and rational approaches. They generally appreciate efficiency, punctuality, and cleanliness, valuing these traits in their clinicians. When feasible, empowering patients to participate in their treatment actively can facilitate a more cooperative therapeutic relationship and avoid unnecessary power struggles. This tailored approach can optimize the efficacy of the treatment process and shift the prognosis toward a more favorable outcome.

Complications

The potential complications of OCPD include social isolation secondary to rigid behavior and interpersonal conflicts, difficulties in relationships or work due to an excessive need for control and perfection, and psychiatric comorbidities such as major depressive or anxiety disorders. Patients with OCPD and a concurrent eating disorder have a worse prognosis.[43] 

While substance use disorders often coexist with personality disorders, the specific risks of substance misuse associated with each type of personality disorder remain insufficiently explored.[44] Individuals diagnosed with OCPD should undergo screening for other psychiatric comorbidities, including substance use disorders. Patients with personality disorders carry an increased risk of suicide and suicide attempts compared to those without personality disorders, and individuals with OCPD should be screened for suicidal ideation regularly.[45] These complications can significantly impair the quality of life and emphasize the need for timely diagnosis and intervention. 

Consultations

Consultations with psychiatrists or psychologists are typically required for diagnosing and managing OCPD. A multidisciplinary approach involving social workers or occupational therapists may be beneficial in addressing the social and occupational impairments associated with OCPD.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Educating patients with OCPD about their diagnosis and available treatment options is critical to effectively managing the condition. Psychoeducation can help patients understand, reduce stigma, increase adherence to treatment plans, and enhance therapeutic relationships. The effectiveness of treating OCPD hinges on establishing and sustaining a solid therapeutic relationship. Patients may not easily recognize the need to change behaviors that they consider integral to their self-identity, posing challenges to the therapeutic alliance. Their inclination to control can generate tension or unease for healthcare providers. However, these individuals often resonate with structured, logical, and reason-based treatment methods. Patients with OCPD highly value traits like efficiency, punctuality, and tidiness, which should be mirrored by clinicians where possible. Encouraging active patient participation in treatment can enhance the overall success of the therapeutic intervention.

Pearls and Other Issues

OCPD is a prevalent personality disorder with an intense fixation on perfectionism, order, and control. Unlike OCD, OCPD focuses on daily order and control rather than specific obsessions and compulsions. The origins of OCPD are a blend of genetic, environmental, and psychological influences. Those with OCPD often face relational and occupational difficulties due to their inflexible nature. Diagnosing personality disorders like OCPD requires obtaining a comprehensive history, performing a mental status examination, and obtaining corroborative information, ideally from people who have known the patient long-term, possibly since adolescence. Additional personality assessment tools may be used as required. A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation is crucial as OCPD can mirror other disorders and be comorbid with other psychiatric illnesses. The prognosis of OCPD varies, with many finding relief through treatment, but severe cases can lead to significant impairment in social, occupational, and personal domains. A holistic treatment team approach can offer the most effective management.

Patients with OCPD are encouraged to vocalize symptoms they would like addressed or any psychosocial stressors a treatment team can alleviate, rather than clinicians focusing on reducing behaviors if the patient is not in clinical distress or if they do not have a socio-occupational impairment. Involving the patient's family is another way of monitoring for decompensation and providing education on how to provide stable social factors for the patient.[46] Utilizing standardized assessments for quality of life may reveal ways to optimize the ability to function in major areas of life for an individual with OCPD.[47]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Diagnosing and treating OCPD presents a complex challenge that necessitates further research in psychiatry. As the conceptual framework for personality disorders is shifting from a definite "cluster" system to a dimensional model, the repercussions on clinical practice require meticulous scrutiny. This shift is particularly pertinent for OCPD, which, under a dimensional model, may be considered not a unique personality disorder but a constellation of specific traits. When clinicians suspect OCPD, gathering comprehensive patient history, seeking collateral information, and consulting a trained psychologist for personality assessment tests are crucial before confirming a diagnosis. Incorporating the patient's perspective is imperative to delineate appropriate care objectives for an individual potentially suffering from OCPD.

This inclusive approach is essential to circumvent overmedicalization and prevent iatrogenic harm, particularly when the patient may not exhibit clinically treatable symptoms. Multidisciplinary collaboration involving social workers, therapists, primary care providers, and family members can significantly enhance the social aspects of a patient's life, thus offering a more stable therapeutic environment.

Review Questions

References

1.
Diedrich A, Voderholzer U. Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder: a current review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Feb;17(2):2. [PubMed: 25617042]
2.
Pinto A, Teller J, Wheaton MG. Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder: A Review of Symptomatology, Impact on Functioning, and Treatment. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2022 Oct;20(4):389-396. [PMC free article: PMC10187387] [PubMed: 37200888]
3.
Eisen JL, Coles ME, Shea MT, Pagano ME, Stout RL, Yen S, Grilo CM, Rasmussen SA. Clarifying the convergence between obsessive compulsive personality disorder criteria and obsessive compulsive disorder. J Pers Disord. 2006 Jun;20(3):294-305. [PMC free article: PMC2548413] [PubMed: 16776557]
4.
Pitman RK. Janet's Obsessions and Psychasthenia: a synopsis. Psychiatr Q. 1984 Winter;56(4):291-314. [PubMed: 6399751]
5.
Reddy MS, Vijay MS, Reddy S. Obsessive-compulsive (Anankastic) Personality Disorder: A Poorly Researched Landscape with Significant Clinical Relevance. Indian J Psychol Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):1-5. [PMC free article: PMC4782437] [PubMed: 27011394]
6.
Coolidge FL, Segal DL. Evolution of personality disorder diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998 Aug;18(5):585-99. [PubMed: 9740979]
7.
Massaal-van der Ree LY, Eikelenboom M, Hoogendoorn AW, Thomaes K, van Marle HJF. Cluster B versus Cluster C Personality Disorders: A Comparison of Comorbidity, Suicidality, Traumatization and Global Functioning. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;12(4) [PMC free article: PMC9031793] [PubMed: 35447677]
8.
Trull TJ, Durrett CA. Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:355-80. [PubMed: 17716092]
9.
Coolidge FL, Thede LL, Jang KL. Heritability of personality disorders in childhood: a preliminary investigation. J Pers Disord. 2001 Feb;15(1):33-40. [PubMed: 11236813]
10.
Torgersen S, Czajkowski N, Jacobson K, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Røysamb E, Neale MC, Kendler KS. Dimensional representations of DSM-IV cluster B personality disorders in a population-based sample of Norwegian twins: a multivariate study. Psychol Med. 2008 Nov;38(11):1617-25. [PubMed: 18275631]
11.
Lesch KP, Bengel D, Heils A, Sabol SZ, Greenberg BD, Petri S, Benjamin J, Müller CR, Hamer DH, Murphy DL. Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science. 1996 Nov 29;274(5292):1527-31. [PubMed: 8929413]
12.
Munafò MR, Clark T, Flint J. Does measurement instrument moderate the association between the serotonin transporter gene and anxiety-related personality traits? A meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;10(4):415-9. [PubMed: 15599377]
13.
Joyce PR, Rogers GR, Miller AL, Mulder RT, Luty SE, Kennedy MA. Polymorphisms of DRD4 and DRD3 and risk of avoidant and obsessive personality traits and disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2003 Jul 15;119(1-2):1-10. [PubMed: 12860355]
14.
Light KJ, Joyce PR, Luty SE, Mulder RT, Frampton CM, Joyce LR, Miller AL, Kennedy MA. Preliminary evidence for an association between a dopamine D3 receptor gene variant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder in patients with major depression. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2006 Jun 05;141B(4):409-13. [PubMed: 16583407]
15.
Leppla I, Fishman D, Kalra I, Oldham MA. Clinical Approach to Personality Change Due to Another Medical Condition. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021 Jan-Feb;62(1):14-21. [PubMed: 33190792]
16.
Mollinger RN. Antitheses and the obsessive-compulsive. Psychoanal Rev. 1980 Winter;67(4):465-77. [PubMed: 6785772]
17.
Blum LD. Minding our Minds: Obsessive-Compulsiveness, Psychiatry, and Psychology. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;47(2):543-554. [PMC free article: PMC10167162] [PubMed: 35066727]
18.
Pollak JM. Obsessive--compulsive personality: a review. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):225-41. [PubMed: 382220]
19.
Grant JE, Mooney ME, Kushner MG. Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity of DSM-IV obsessive-compulsive personality disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Apr;46(4):469-75. [PubMed: 22257387]
20.
Sanchez-Roige S, Gray JC, MacKillop J, Chen CH, Palmer AA. The genetics of human personality. Genes Brain Behav. 2018 Mar;17(3):e12439. [PMC free article: PMC7012279] [PubMed: 29152902]
21.
Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):291-318. [PubMed: 17437562]
22.
Komasi S, Rezaei F, Hemmati A, Rahmani K, Amianto F, Miettunen J. Comprehensive meta-analysis of associations between temperament and character traits in Cloninger's psychobiological theory and mental disorders. J Int Med Res. 2022 Jan;50(1):3000605211070766. [PMC free article: PMC8743952] [PubMed: 34994240]
23.
Zimmerman M, Rothschild L, Chelminski I. The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;162(10):1911-8. [PubMed: 16199838]
24.
Rossi A, Marinangeli MG, Butti G, Kalyvoka A, Petruzzi C. Pattern of comorbidity among anxious and odd personality disorders: the case of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. CNS Spectr. 2000 Sep;5(9):23-6. [PubMed: 17637577]
25.
Blom RM, Samuels JF, Riddle MA, Joseph Bienvenu O, Grados MA, Reti IM, Eaton WW, Liang KY, Nestadt G. Association between a serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism (5HTTLPR) and personality disorder traits in a community sample. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Sep;45(9):1153-9. [PMC free article: PMC3128677] [PubMed: 21450307]
26.
Mataix-Cols D, Wooderson S, Lawrence N, Brammer MJ, Speckens A, Phillips ML. Distinct neural correlates of washing, checking, and hoarding symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;61(6):564-76. [PubMed: 15184236]
27.
Whitman MR, Tylicki JL, Mascioli R, Pickle J, Ben-Porath YS. Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) in a clinical neuropsychology setting. Psychol Assess. 2021 Feb;33(2):142-155. [PubMed: 33090829]
28.
Choca JP, Grossman SD. Evolution of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. J Pers Assess. 2015;97(6):541-9. [PubMed: 26151730]
29.
Meaux L, Cox J, Edens JF, DeMatteo D, Martinez A, Bownes E. The Personality Assessment Inventory in U.S. Case Law: A Survey and Examination of Relevance to Legal Proceedings. J Pers Assess. 2022 Mar-Apr;104(2):179-191. [PubMed: 34506220]
30.
Gomez R, Watson S, Stavropoulos V. Personality inventory for DSM-5, Brief Form: Factor structure, reliability, and coefficient of congruence. Personal Disord. 2020 Jan;11(1):69-77. [PubMed: 31670543]
31.
Zhan Yuen Wong N, Barnett P, Sheridan Rains L, Johnson S, Billings J. Evaluation of international guidance for the community treatment of 'personality disorders': A systematic review. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0264239. [PMC free article: PMC10010515] [PubMed: 36913403]
32.
Thamby A, Khanna S. The role of personality disorders in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;61(Suppl 1):S114-S118. [PMC free article: PMC6343421] [PubMed: 30745684]
33.
Abbass A, Sheldon A, Gyra J, Kalpin A. Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy for DSM-IV personality disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Mar;196(3):211-6. [PubMed: 18340256]
34.
Strauss JL, Hayes AM, Johnson SL, Newman CF, Brown GK, Barber JP, Laurenceau JP, Beck AT. Early alliance, alliance ruptures, and symptom change in a nonrandomized trial of cognitive therapy for avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Apr;74(2):337-45. [PMC free article: PMC3268072] [PubMed: 16649878]
35.
Winsberg ME, Cassic KS, Koran LM. Hoarding in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a report of 20 cases. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;60(9):591-7. [PubMed: 10520977]
36.
Fava M, Bless E, Otto MW, Pava JA, Rosenbaum JF. Dysfunctional attitudes in major depression. Changes with pharmacotherapy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Jan;182(1):45-9. [PubMed: 8277301]
37.
Garland EJ, Weiss M. Case study: obsessive difficult temperament and its response to serotonergic medication. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Jul;35(7):916-20. [PubMed: 8768352]
38.
Ekselius L, von Knorring L. Personality disorder comorbidity with major depression and response to treatment with sertraline or citalopram. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Sep;13(5):205-11. [PubMed: 9817625]
39.
Nickel MK, Muehlbacher M, Nickel C, Kettler C, Pedrosa Gil F, Bachler E, Buschmann W, Rother N, Fartacek R, Egger C, Anvar J, Rother WK, Loew TH, Kaplan P. Aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):833-8. [PubMed: 16648324]
40.
Stein DJ, Laszlo B, Marais E, Seedat S, Potocnik F. Hoarding symptoms in patients on a geriatric psychiatry inpatient unit. S Afr Med J. 1997 Sep;87(9):1138-40. [PubMed: 9358832]
41.
Tackett JL, Silberschmidt AL, Krueger RF, Sponheim SR. A dimensional model of personality disorder: incorporating DSM Cluster A characteristics. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 May;117(2):454-9. [PubMed: 18489222]
42.
Trull TJ, Widiger TA. Dimensional models of personality: the five-factor model and the DSM-5. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013 Jun;15(2):135-46. [PMC free article: PMC3811085] [PubMed: 24174888]
43.
Lilenfeld LR, Wonderlich S, Riso LP, Crosby R, Mitchell J. Eating disorders and personality: a methodological and empirical review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 May;26(3):299-320. [PubMed: 16330138]
44.
Parmar A, Kaloiya G. Comorbidity of Personality Disorder among Substance Use Disorder Patients: A Narrative Review. Indian J Psychol Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;40(6):517-527. [PMC free article: PMC6241194] [PubMed: 30533947]
45.
Attademo L, Bernardini F, Spatuzzi R. Suicidality in Individuals with Schizoid Personality Disorder or Traits: A Clinical Mini-Review of a Probably Underestimated Issue. Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Fall;33(3):261-265. [PubMed: 34795159]
46.
Caligor E, Levy KN, Yeomans FE. Narcissistic personality disorder: diagnostic and clinical challenges. Am J Psychiatry. 2015 May;172(5):415-22. [PubMed: 25930131]
47.
Cramer V, Torgersen S, Kringlen E. Personality disorders and quality of life. A population study. Compr Psychiatry. 2006 May-Jun;47(3):178-84. [PubMed: 16635645]
48.
Böttiger M, Christenson B, Strandell A, Romanus V. Vaccination with a combined vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella aiming at elimination of the three diseases. Dev Biol Stand. 1986;65:37-43. [PubMed: 3556776]

Disclosure: Abid Rizvi declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Tyler Torrico declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK597372PMID: 37983323

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...