NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Evidence-based medicine arose from a clear need and represents a major advance in the science of clinical decision making. Despite broad acceptance of evidence-based medicine, however, a fundamental issue remains unresolved: evidence is derived from groups of people, yet medical decisions are made by and for individuals. Despite persistent assertions from clinicians that determining the best therapy for each patient is a more complicated endeavor than just picking the best treatment on average, traditional approaches have been overly reliant on the average effects estimated from the outcomes of clinical trials.
This Special Publication is based on a workshop, held by the National Academy of Medicine, that considered patient and stakeholder perspectives on the importance of understanding heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) and best practices for implementing clinical programs that take HTE into account. For evidence to be more applicable to individual patients, we need to combine methods for strong causal inference (first and foremost, randomization) with methods for prediction that permit inferences about which particular patients are likely to benefit and which are not. Better population-based outcomes will only be realized when we understand more completely how to treat patients as the unique individuals they are.
Contents
- ABOUT THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE
- WORKSHOP PLANNING COMMITTEE
- REVIEWERS
- PREFACE
- SUMMARY
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. THE PROMISE OF PERSONALIZED EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
- 3. PATIENT PERSPECTIVES OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF UNDERSTANDING HETEROGENEOUS TREATMENT EFFECTS
- 4. NEW METHODS FOR THE PREDICTION OF TREATMENT BENEFIT AND MODEL EVALUATION
- 5. NEXT STEPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION
- 6. A RESEARCH AGENDA FOR PERSONALIZING CARE AND IMPROVING TREATMENT OUTCOMES
- REFERENCES
- Appendix A. GLOSSARY
- Appendix B. WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS, WEB PARTICIPANTS, AND STAFF
- Appendix C. WORKSHOP AGENDA
Suggested citation:
Kent, D., J. Paulus, M. Ahmed, and D. Whicher, Editors. 2019. Caring for the Individual Patient: Understanding Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine.
Support for this publication was provided by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI®), through two awards: a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Award (1900-TMC) and the Predictive Analytics Resource Center (SA.Tufts.PARC.OCSCO.2018.01.25); and the Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center at the Tufts Medical Center. The views presented in this publication are solely the responsibility of the editors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI®), its Board of Governors, or its Methodology Committee; or of the PACE Center and/or the Tufts Medical Center.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2019948398
Printed in the United States of America
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Overall average treatment effects from clinical trials, one-variable-at-a-time subgroup analyses and predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects: Toward a more patient-centered evidence-based medicine.[Clin Trials. 2023]Overall average treatment effects from clinical trials, one-variable-at-a-time subgroup analyses and predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects: Toward a more patient-centered evidence-based medicine.Kent DM. Clin Trials. 2023 Aug; 20(4):328-337. Epub 2023 May 6.
- The future of Cochrane Neonatal.[Early Hum Dev. 2020]The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov; 150:105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
- Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.[Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022]Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1; 2(2022). Epub 2022 Feb 1.
- Review Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses[ 2014]Review Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice NursesMcCleery E, Christensen V, Peterson K, Humphrey L, Helfand M. 2014 Sep
- Review Prostate cancer disparities in South Carolina: early detection, special programs, and descriptive epidemiology.[J S C Med Assoc. 2006]Review Prostate cancer disparities in South Carolina: early detection, special programs, and descriptive epidemiology.Drake BF, Keane TE, Mosley CM, Adams SA, Elder KT, Modayil MV, Ureda JR, Hebert JR. J S C Med Assoc. 2006 Aug; 102(7):241-9.
- Caring for the Individual PatientCaring for the Individual Patient
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...