NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
In response to a request from the US Department of Agriculture, the Health and Medicine Division (HMD) of the National Academies established the Standing Committee to Review the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Framework. The committee was asked to respond to DRI-related questions to inform the Federal DRI working group about the conduct of new DRI reviews and DRI-related issues more broadly, including their application.
This second letter report advises the Federal DRI Working Group on three questions: 1) Are de novo systematic reviews are needed in future DRI reviews or can qualified systematic reviews be used? 2) If qualified systematic reviews can be used, what are the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria? 3) Can previously published systematic review be updated? In response, the standing committee developed a report that includes a decision tree that addresses the need for systematic reviews to support the DRI process.
Contents
- The National Academies of SCIENCES • ENGINEERING • MEDICINE
- STANDING COMMITTEE FOR THE REVIEW OF THE DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKE FRAMEWORK
- Reviewers
- Summary
- 1. Letter to the Sponsor
- 2. Charge to the Committee
- 3. Use of New or Existing Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes
- 4. Decision Tree to Determine the Need for a De Novo or Update of an Existing Systematic Review
- 5. Assessment of a Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Carbohydrates
- A. References
- B. Committee Member Biographies
- C. Acronyms and Abbreviations
Suggested citation:
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2023. Using systematic reviews to support future Dietary Reference Intakes: A letter report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/27031.
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/27031
This publication is available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
Printed in the United States of America.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Vitamin D and Calcium: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes (Update).[Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full ...]Vitamin D and Calcium: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes (Update).Newberry SJ, Chung M, Shekelle PG, Booth MS, Liu JL, Maher AR, Motala A, Cui M, Perry T, Shanman R, et al. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2014 Sep; (217):1-929.
- Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.[Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022]Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1; 2(2022). Epub 2022 Feb 1.
- The future of Cochrane Neonatal.[Early Hum Dev. 2020]The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov; 150:105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
- Review Vitamin D and calcium: a systematic review of health outcomes.[Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full ...]Review Vitamin D and calcium: a systematic review of health outcomes.Chung M, Balk EM, Brendel M, Ip S, Lau J, Lee J, Lichtenstein A, Patel K, Raman G, Tatsioni A, et al. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Aug; (183):1-420.
- Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D[ 2011]Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin DInstitute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium, Ross AC, Taylor CL, Yaktine AL, Del Valle HB. 2011
- Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference IntakesUsing Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...