This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article, provided that you credit the author and journal.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.
StatPearls [Internet].
Show detailsDefinition/Introduction
Personal protective equipment (PPE) came into the spotlight at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, but these important materials and practices have been protecting healthcare providers for years. Regulation of PPE standards usually falls to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The availability, application, and disposal of PPE play an essential role in a healthcare system's ability to care for patients safely.[1] Part of standard precautions, PPE provides a barrier to minimizing workplace hazards that healthcare providers encounter from harmful exposures. Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear contamination threats are encountered throughout healthcare. This article discusses the application of PPE in relation to healthcare. See Table. Personal Protective Equipment Clinical Presentations and Recommended Precautions.
Issues of Concern
Types of Personal Protective Equipment
Commonly worn PPE includes a gown, gloves, masks, respirators, and face shields or goggles. Understanding the limitations and proper wearing of PPE is essential to ensuring safe practices. Specific gloves offer differing levels of standards for infection prevention. One commonly used metric in glove safety evaluation is the acceptable quality level (AQL). A lower AQL means a higher quality glove with less micro-perforation potential and fewer pinholes in the glove product. The FDA generally recommends a minimum AQL level of 1.5 for surgical gloves and 2.5 for medical exam gloves.[2]
Surgical procedural evidence supports using two layers of gloves as an infection prevention technique.[3][4] Surgical procedures also necessitate using sterile gloves, which have been treated to eliminate microbes.
The availability of appropriate gowns can prevent the spread of infection. Medical gowns follow the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Association of the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) ANSI/AAMI PB70 standards for medical gowns. The ANSI/AAMI PB70 has four levels of fluid barrier protection.[5]
USP 800 guidelines promote safety by outlining gown standards for handling hazardous drugs. Following suggested guidelines for PPE in the appropriate setting, whether using sterile gowns for surgery or non-sterile gowns for contact exposure, will ensure the safety of both healthcare workers and patients.[6][7]
Loosely woven cloth masks provide the least respiratory protection, while National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) approved respirators offer the most protection.[8][9] A key component of mask protection involves the proper fitting of masks.[10] All healthcare workers should be fit tested if required to use respirators, including N95 masks.[11][12]
If fit testing cannot be completed, then a NIOSH-approved powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) can be considered based on institutional and local regulatory requirements.[13][14][15] The COVID-19 pandemic created a high demand for face coverings with limited consistent standards comparing different products. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and NIOSH updated barrier face covering standards, ASTM F5302-21, allowing comparison between different barrier face coverings.[16]
Standard Precautions
Standard precautions serve as a framework all healthcare providers should follow as part of an initial approach to limiting exposure. These preventative steps should be considered for every patient encounter.[17][18][19][20]
Standard precaution components are listed here:
- Appropriate use of PPE, including gown, gloves, and eye protection, especially if there is a risk of bodily fluid exposure
- Respiratory/cough etiquette to prevent droplet transmission of respiratory pathogens
- Patient placement with consideration for single patient rooms and routes of transmission for specific infectious agents
- Safe needle and instrument handling
Infection Prevention
PPE infection prevention recommendations can be categorized into specific transmission-based precautions. Following these recommendations, in addition to standard precautions, can protect healthcare providers and patients from disease infection. Clinical presentations giving concern for certain organism exposures require different standards of transmission prevention.[24][25] Please see Table 1.[26][27]
Contact precautions require the use of a gown and gloves in clinical situations involving organisms spread by direct or indirect contact with a patient or patient's environment. For example, clinical scenarios involving wound drainage, fecal matter, or other bodily discharge exposure would suggest using contact precautions.[28][29]
Droplet precautions should be utilized in respiratory illness where close mucous membrane contact or respiratory droplet exposure may occur. Droplet precautions should include standard precautions, eye protection, and a mask. Generally, pathogens requiring droplet precautions do not remain infectious over extended distances. Eye protection and an N-95 mask or higher-level respirator should be utilized with standard precautions in the setting of airborne precautions. Airborne pathogens have long-distance exposure potential that necessitates the need for special air handling and ventilation systems. These ventilation systems should meet the Architects Facility Guidelines Institute standards for airborne infection isolation rooms. Easily visible signs should be placed outside patient rooms and contact zones listing the required PPE for a specific patient encounter.[26]
Chemical and Nuclear Personal Protective Equipment
Healthcare providers may come into contact with harmful chemicals as part of day-to-day activity. Whether in the form of cleaning, pharmaceutical, or contamination, exposures are a risk at several points throughout regular workplace flow. In the event of exposure to workplace-stocked chemicals, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) should be referenced for information specific to each chemical. Standard PPE should be utilized in the setting of chemical handling as defined by OSHA and CDC. Considerations should be made for areas of safe chemical handling, including adequate ventilation, safe handling areas, cleaning work surfaces, and spill procedures. In the scenario where a healthcare provider must enter a contaminated area with appropriate hazardous materials (HAZMAT), PPE must be utilized.[30][31][32]
HAZMAT equipment PPE recommendations follow OSHA standards as outlined by Levels A, B, C, and D. Different levels of protection are offered in each guideline, from the highest level of protection, Level A, including self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) to Level D least protective including standard precautions and appropriate work uniform. Level A PPE should be utilized when the hazardous substance requires the highest level of eye, skin, and respiratory protection.[33][34]
Level A PPE guidelines are also followed when entering areas of poor ventilation or when a substance has not yet been identified as appropriate for a lower level of protection. Level B PPE provides protection in areas requiring a high level of respiratory protection, including scenes with less than 19.5% oxygen or incompletely identified vapors/gasses. Level C PPE protection is appropriate in situations necessitating air-purifying respirators and contaminants which will not cause adverse harm through exposed skin. Level D PPE would be utilized when no known hazard is present in the atmosphere and contact or inhalation with hazardous levels is precluded by work functions. Other PPE may be included as defined by specific sceneries and OSHA recommendations. Part of the appropriate response to chemical exposure also includes decontamination processes in addition to proper disposal of used PPE.[35]
Recommendations for nuclear hazardous materials come from OSHA guidelines regarding events involving chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) agents.[36] Recommendations for specific exposure risks can be found in relation to the area of contamination. Three zones of contamination are outlined in the recommendations, with the red zone being the area of most significant contamination and the green zone being the area of lowest contamination. Level A OSHA protection is usually recommended in a red zone. Yellow zone area of contamination PPE needs should be decided with consideration for air monitoring results, skin contact risk, and proximity of the event. Green zone contamination with CBRN agents is unlikely to occur.
OSHA Defined PPE
- Level A: positive pressure full face-piece SCBA, encapsulating covering chemical protective suit, chemical-resistant outer gloves, chemical-resistant inner gloves, chemical-resistant boots with steel toe, disposable protective suit/gloves/boots
- Level B: positive pressure full face-piece SCBA, chemical-resistant clothes with hood, chemical-resistant outer gloves, chemical-resistant inner gloves, chemical-resistant boots with steel toe
- Level C: air purifying respirator, chemical-resistant clothes with hood, chemical-resistant outer gloves, chemical-resistant inner gloves, chemical-resistant boots with steel toe
- Level D: gloves, coveralls, chemical-resistant boots/shoes with steel toe, safety glasses or chemical splash goggles
Radiologic PPE
Exposure to ionizing radiation can present a significant long-term health risk to healthcare providers. PPE should be available for healthcare providers working within radiation-exposure settings. Of particular importance, dose reduction with exposure to x-ray and gamma radiation can be achieved with proper PPE.[37][38][39] Providers practicing with X-ray and gamma radiation exposure, especially fluoroscopy and other image-guided procedure devices, should have access to a lead apron/vest, lead-lined glasses, lead-lined cap, and lead protection collar.[40][41][42][43]
Dose monitoring is required by OSHA Ionizing Radiation standards for workers who enter a high radiation area or restricted area or receive a dose in any calendar quarter more than 25% of the appropriate occupational limit.[44][45][46][47] OSHA standards for monitoring radiation exposure can be followed by wearing a person's passive dosimeter for exposure dose evaluation.[48][49]
Clinical Significance
Personal protective equipment implementation has become the standard of care for medical providers. The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped healthcare in many ways, including the increased emphasis on health practitioner safety in the presence of communicable diseases. PPE has been shown to prevent the spread of disease and preserve the health of individual practitioners. Following guidelines regarding the use of PPE sets a standard for all healthcare organizations to follow. Proper training is needed for PPE to be effective, including the appropriate application and removal of PPE.
Specific steps for putting on (donning) and taking off (doffing) pieces of PPE will be reviewed here. Not all components of PPE are required for each patient, and specific isolation precautions should be followed as appropriate.[50][51][52]
Suggested Sequence for Application of PPE
Donning of PPE should take place outside patient rooms.
- Gown
- Cover body from neck to knees, arms to wrists, and ensure gown wraps around the back
- Tie neck and waist straps if available
- Mask or Respirator
- Place straps or ties around the head/neck
- Adjust the flexible band to the nose bridge for proper fit
- Fit-check respirator
- Eye protection
- Place eye protection on the face to ensure adequate protection of the face/eyes
- May include goggles and/or a face shield
- Gloves
- Ensure application of gloves extends to cover the wrist of the gown
Suggested Sequence for Removal of PPE
Doffing of PPE should take place outside patient rooms. If a respirator is in use, do not remove the respirator until after exiting the patient room.
- Gloves
- Remove the first glove by grasping the palmar surface with the other gloved hand, and discard the first glove in the appropriate disposal container
- Remove the second glove by sliding the fingers of the ungloved hand under the remaining glove at the wrist, and discard the second glove in the appropriate disposal container
- Eye protection
- Remove without touching the contaminated outside surface on the front of eye protection, and handle equipment by the strap or earpieces
- Dispose of in the appropriate reprocessing or waste container
- Gown
- Release gown straps or ties
- Touching inside of gown only, remove by pulling away from neck and shoulders
- Turn the gown inside out
- Place in an appropriate disposal container
- Mask or Respirator
- Do not touch the front or mouth area of the mask/respirator
- Remove by releasing ties or straps around the back of the head
- Discard in the appropriate disposal container
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
Proper use of CDC and OSHA-recommended PPE within a healthcare setting prevents the spread of infectious pathogens between patients and providers. However, more expansive studies are needed to review current practices and policies.[53][54][55][56]
PPE also serves to help healthcare workers avoid harmful outcomes in the setting of exposure to CBRN agents. Adherence to PPE standards is multifaceted, with several components factoring into healthcare workers' ability and desire to follow PPE guidelines. Areas of concern include workplace culture, availability of PPE, training, trust in PPE, and communication of hospital guidelines.[57]
Administrative teams are often responsible for ensuring the availability of PPE resources. Infection prevention teams that monitor and track hospital personal standard precaution use may increase compliance.[58][59] [Level 2] Following suggested doffing protocols can decrease the risk of potential contamination after providing care.[60][61] [Level 2]
PPE has been shown to offer protection against respiratory infections, especially COVID-19.[62] [Level 1]
References
- 1.
- Verbeek JH, Rajamaki B, Ijaz S, Sauni R, Toomey E, Blackwood B, Tikka C, Ruotsalainen JH, Kilinc Balci FS. Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Emergencias. 2021 Feb;33(1):59-61. [PubMed: 33496400]
- 2.
- Edlich RF, Wind TC, Heather CL, Thacker JG. Reliability and performance of innovative surgical double-glove hole puncture indication systems. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2003;13(2):69-83. [PubMed: 14510280]
- 3.
- Guo YP, Wong PM, Li Y, Or PP. Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery. Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):210-5. [PubMed: 22342011]
- 4.
- Edlich R, Wind TC, Heather CL, Thacker JG. An Update on the Innovative Surgical Double-Glove Hole Puncture Indication Systems: Reliability and Performance. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2017;27(2-4):339-353. [PubMed: 29773048]
- 5.
- Kahveci Z, Kilinc-Balci FS, Yorio PL. Barrier resistance of double layer isolation gowns. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Apr;49(4):430-433. [PMC free article: PMC7568468] [PubMed: 33080362]
- 6.
- Pissiotis CA, Komborozos V, Papoutsi C, Skrekas G. Factors that influence the effectiveness of surgical gowns in the operating theatre. Eur J Surg. 1997 Aug;163(8):597-604. [PubMed: 9298912]
- 7.
- Lankester BJ, Bartlett GE, Garneti N, Blom AW, Bowker KE, Bannister GC. Direct measurement of bacterial penetration through surgical gowns: a new method. J Hosp Infect. 2002 Apr;50(4):281-5. [PubMed: 12014901]
- 8.
- Offeddu V, Yung CF, Low MSF, Tam CC. Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1934-1942. [PMC free article: PMC7108111] [PubMed: 29140516]
- 9.
- Su WC, Lee J, Xi J, Zhang K. Investigation of Mask Efficiency for Loose-Fitting Masks against Ultrafine Particles and Effect on Airway Deposition Efficiency. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2022 Jan;22(1) [PMC free article: PMC9355369] [PubMed: 35937716]
- 10.
- Andrews AS, Kiederer M, Casey ML. Understanding Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Am J Nurs. 2022 Feb 01;122(2):21-23. [PMC free article: PMC8935363] [PubMed: 35085143]
- 11.
- Oberg T, Brosseau LM. Surgical mask filter and fit performance. Am J Infect Control. 2008 May;36(4):276-82. [PMC free article: PMC7115281] [PubMed: 18455048]
- 12.
- Howard J, Huang A, Li Z, Tufekci Z, Zdimal V, van der Westhuizen HM, von Delft A, Price A, Fridman L, Tang LH, Tang V, Watson GL, Bax CE, Shaikh R, Questier F, Hernandez D, Chu LF, Ramirez CM, Rimoin AW. An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4) [PMC free article: PMC7848583] [PubMed: 33431650]
- 13.
- Roberts V. To PAPR or not to PAPR? Can J Respir Ther. 2014 Fall;50(3):87-90. [PMC free article: PMC4456839] [PubMed: 26078617]
- 14.
- Licina A, Silvers A. Use of powered air-purifying respirator(PAPR) as part of protective equipment against SARS-CoV-2-a narrative review and critical appraisal of evidence. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Apr;49(4):492-499. [PMC free article: PMC7654369] [PubMed: 33186678]
- 15.
- Dardas AZ, Serra Lopez VM, Boden LM, Gittings DJ, Heym K, Koerber E, Grosh T, Ahn J. A simple surgical mask modification to pass N95 respirator-equivalent fit testing standards during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0272834. [PMC free article: PMC9401101] [PubMed: 36001554]
- 16.
- Radonovich LJ, Simberkoff MS, Bessesen MT, Brown AC, Cummings DAT, Gaydos CA, Los JG, Krosche AE, Gibert CL, Gorse GJ, Nyquist AC, Reich NG, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Price CS, Perl TM., ResPECT investigators. N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Sep 03;322(9):824-833. [PMC free article: PMC6724169] [PubMed: 31479137]
- 17.
- Garner JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996 Jan;17(1):53-80. [PubMed: 8789689]
- 18.
- Whitehouse JD, Sexton DJ, Kirkland KB. Infection control: past, present, and future issues. Compr Ther. 1998 Feb;24(2):71-7. [PubMed: 9533987]
- 19.
- Moralejo D, El Dib R, Prata RA, Barretti P, Corrêa I. Improving adherence to Standard Precautions for the control of health care-associated infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 26;2(2):CD010768. [PMC free article: PMC6491237] [PubMed: 29481693]
- 20.
- Taylor E, Card AJ, Piatkowski M. Single-Occupancy Patient Rooms: A Systematic Review of the Literature Since 2006. HERD. 2018 Jan;11(1):85-100. [PubMed: 29448834]
- 21.
- Reilly JS, Price L, Lang S, Robertson C, Cheater F, Skinner K, Chow A. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of 6-Step vs 3-Step Hand Hygiene Technique in Acute Hospital Care in the United Kingdom. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;37(6):661-6. [PubMed: 27050843]
- 22.
- Fuller C, Savage J, Besser S, Hayward A, Cookson B, Cooper B, Stone S. "The dirty hand in the latex glove": a study of hand hygiene compliance when gloves are worn. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;32(12):1194-9. [PubMed: 22080658]
- 23.
- Doebbeling BN, Pfaller MA, Houston AK, Wenzel RP. Removal of nosocomial pathogens from the contaminated glove. Implications for glove reuse and handwashing. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Sep 01;109(5):394-8. [PubMed: 3136685]
- 24.
- Link T. Guideline Implementation: Transmission-Based Precautions. AORN J. 2019 Dec;110(6):637-649. [PubMed: 31774162]
- 25.
- Spruce L. Transmission-Based Precautions. AORN J. 2020 Nov;112(5):558-566. [PubMed: 33113203]
- 26.
- Ather B, Mirza TM, Edemekong PF. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Mar 13, 2023. Airborne Precautions. [PubMed: 30285363]
- 27.
- Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L., Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164. [PMC free article: PMC7119119] [PubMed: 18068815]
- 28.
- Verbeek JH, Rajamaki B, Ijaz S, Sauni R, Toomey E, Blackwood B, Tikka C, Ruotsalainen JH, Kilinc Balci FS. Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 15;5(5):CD011621. [PMC free article: PMC8785899] [PubMed: 32412096]
- 29.
- Muto CA, Jernigan JA, Ostrowsky BE, Richet HM, Jarvis WR, Boyce JM, Farr BM., SHEA. SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 May;24(5):362-86. [PubMed: 12785411]
- 30.
- Hick JL, Hanfling D, Burstein JL, Markham J, Macintyre AG, Barbera JA. Protective equipment for health care facility decontamination personnel: regulations, risks, and recommendations. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Sep;42(3):370-80. [PubMed: 12944890]
- 31.
- Borron SW. Checklists for hazardous materials emergency preparedness. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2015 Feb;33(1):213-32. [PubMed: 25455670]
- 32.
- Borron SW. Introduction: Hazardous materials and radiologic/nuclear incidents: lessons learned? Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2015 Feb;33(1):1-11. [PubMed: 25455659]
- 33.
- Coates MJ, Jundi AS, James MR. Chemical protective clothing; a study into the ability of staff to perform lifesaving procedures. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;17(2):115-8. [PMC free article: PMC1725348] [PubMed: 10718233]
- 34.
- Holland MG, Cawthon D. Personal protective equipment and decontamination of adults and children. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2015 Feb;33(1):51-68. [PubMed: 25455662]
- 35.
- Johnston GM, Wills BK. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jun 12, 2023. Chemical Decontamination. [PubMed: 30844188]
- 36.
- Kako M, Hammad K, Mitani S, Arbon P. Existing Approaches to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Education and Training for Health Professionals: Findings from an Integrative Literature Review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Apr;33(2):182-190. [PubMed: 29455699]
- 37.
- Durán A. [Radiation protection in interventional cardiology]. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2015 Jul-Sep;85(3):230-7. [PubMed: 26169040]
- 38.
- Durán A, Hian SK, Miller DL, Le Heron J, Padovani R, Vano E. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 01;82(1):29-42. [PubMed: 23475846]
- 39.
- Bushong SC, Morin RL. Radiation safety. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Feb;1(2):144-5. [PubMed: 17411545]
- 40.
- Planz V, Huang J, Galgano SJ, Brook OR, Fananapazir G. Variability in personal protective equipment in cross-sectional interventional abdominal radiology practices. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Mar;47(3):1167-1176. [PMC free article: PMC8744567] [PubMed: 35013750]
- 41.
- Mayer MN, Koehncke NK, Belotta AF, Cheveldae IT, Waldner CL. Use of personal protective equipment in a radiology room at a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2018 Mar;59(2):137-146. [PubMed: 29230889]
- 42.
- Colangelo JE, Johnston J, Killion JB, Wright DL. Radiation biology and protection. Radiol Technol. 2009 May-Jun;80(5):421-41. [PubMed: 19457846]
- 43.
- Kuon E, Birkel J, Schmitt M, Dahm JB. Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology. Heart. 2003 Oct;89(10):1205-10. [PMC free article: PMC1767881] [PubMed: 12975420]
- 44.
- Matsuzaki S, Moritake T, Sun L, Morota K, Nagamoto K, Nakagami K, Kuriyama T, Hitomi G, Kajiki S, Kunugita N. The Effect of Pre-Operative Verbal Confirmation for Interventional Radiology Physicians on Their Use of Personal Dosimeters and Personal Protective Equipment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24) [PMC free article: PMC9778706] [PubMed: 36554706]
- 45.
- Rose A, Uebel K, Rae WID. Personal dosimeter utilisation among South African interventionalists. J Radiol Prot. 2021 Jun 01;41(2) [PubMed: 33873176]
- 46.
- Qureshi F, Ramprasad A, Derylo B. Radiation Monitoring Using Personal Dosimeter Devices in Terms of Long-Term Compliance and Creating a Culture of Safety. Cureus. 2022 Aug;14(8):e27999. [PMC free article: PMC9469909] [PubMed: 36134041]
- 47.
- Frye S, Reynolds AM, Botkin C, Muzaffar R, Osman MM. Monitoring Individual Occupational Radiation Exposure at Multiple Institutions. J Nucl Med Technol. 2021 Nov 08; [PubMed: 34750239]
- 48.
- Hassan M, Patil A, Channel J, Khan F, Knight J, Loos M, Hazard H, Schaefer G, Wilson A. Do we glow? Evaluation of trauma team work habits and radiation exposure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):605-11. [PubMed: 22929491]
- 49.
- Rose A, Rae WID. Personal Protective Equipment Availability and Utilization Among Interventionalists. Saf Health Work. 2019 Jun;10(2):166-171. [PMC free article: PMC6598824] [PubMed: 31297278]
- 50.
- Hegde S. Which type of personal protective equipment (PPE) and which method of donning or doffing PPE carries the least risk of infection for healthcare workers? Evid Based Dent. 2020 Jun;21(2):74-76. [PMC free article: PMC7317256] [PubMed: 32591668]
- 51.
- Mulvey D, Mayer J, Visnovsky L, Samore M, Drews F. Frequent and unexpected deviations from personal protective equipment guidelines increase contamination risks. Am J Infect Control. 2019 Sep;47(9):1146-1147. [PubMed: 31027940]
- 52.
- Verbeek JH, Rajamaki B, Ijaz S, Sauni R, Toomey E, Blackwood B, Tikka C, Ruotsalainen JH, Kilinc Balci FS. Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 15;4(4):CD011621. [PMC free article: PMC7158881] [PubMed: 32293717]
- 53.
- Brown L, Munro J, Rogers S. Use of personal protective equipment in nursing practice. Nurs Stand. 2019 Apr 26;34(5):59-66. [PubMed: 31468815]
- 54.
- Wilson J, Prieto J. Re-visiting contact precautions - 25 years on. J Infect Prev. 2021 Nov;22(6):242-244. [PMC free article: PMC8647642] [PubMed: 34880945]
- 55.
- Tschudin-Sutter S, Lucet JC, Mutters NT, Tacconelli E, Zahar JR, Harbarth S. Contact Precautions for Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of Extended-Spectrum β Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli: A Point/Counterpoint Review. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 15;65(2):342-347. [PubMed: 28379311]
- 56.
- Kullar R, Vassallo A, Turkel S, Chopra T, Kaye KS, Dhar S. Degowning the controversies of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A review. Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jan 01;44(1):97-103. [PubMed: 26375351]
- 57.
- Barratt R, Gilbert GL. Education and training in infection prevention and control: Exploring support for national standards. Infect Dis Health. 2021 May;26(2):139-144. [PMC free article: PMC7816900] [PubMed: 33461891]
- 58.
- Thandar MM, Matsuoka S, Rahman O, Ota E, Baba T. Infection control teams for reducing healthcare-associated infections in hospitals and other healthcare settings: a protocol for systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 05;11(3):e044971. [PMC free article: PMC7938975] [PubMed: 33674376]
- 59.
- Thandar MM, Rahman MO, Haruyama R, Matsuoka S, Okawa S, Moriyama J, Yokobori Y, Matsubara C, Nagai M, Ota E, Baba T. Effectiveness of Infection Control Teams in Reducing Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24) [PMC free article: PMC9779570] [PubMed: 36554953]
- 60.
- Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Mischke C, Ruotsalainen JH, Mäkelä E, Neuvonen K, Edmond MB, Sauni R, Kilinc Balci FS, Mihalache RC. Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 19;4:CD011621. [PMC free article: PMC10068873] [PubMed: 27093058]
- 61.
- Sanford J, Holdsworth J. PPE training and the effectiveness of universal masking in preventing exposures: The importance of the relationship between anesthesia and infection prevention. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Oct;49(10):1322-1323. [PubMed: 34022296]
- 62.
- Schoberer D, Osmancevic S, Reiter L, Thonhofer N, Hoedl M. Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022 Dec;4:100280. [PMC free article: PMC9190185] [PubMed: 35722539]
Disclosure: Matthew Kening declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Kimberly Groen declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
- Personal protective equipment (PPE) for both anesthesiologists and other airway managers: principles and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.[Can J Anaesth. 2020]Personal protective equipment (PPE) for both anesthesiologists and other airway managers: principles and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.Lockhart SL, Duggan LV, Wax RS, Saad S, Grocott HP. Can J Anaesth. 2020 Aug; 67(8):1005-1015. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
- Review Strategies for Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Among Healthcare Providers During the COVID-19 Crisis.[Cureus. 2020]Review Strategies for Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Among Healthcare Providers During the COVID-19 Crisis.Mahmood SU, Crimbly F, Khan S, Choudry E, Mehwish S. Cureus. 2020 May 23; 12(5):e8248. Epub 2020 May 23.
- Knowledge and practice of Protective Personal Equipment (PPE) among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia during the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.[J Prev Med Hyg. 2021]Knowledge and practice of Protective Personal Equipment (PPE) among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia during the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.Ashoor M, Alshammari S, Alzahrani F, Almulhem N, Almubarak Z, Alhayek A, Alrahim A, Alardhi A. J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Dec; 62(4):E830-E840. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
- The dangers of reused personal protective equipment: healthcare workers and workstation contamination.[J Hosp Infect. 2022]The dangers of reused personal protective equipment: healthcare workers and workstation contamination.Doos D, Barach P, Alves NJ, Falvo L, Bona A, Moore M, Cooper DD, Lefort R, Ahmed R. J Hosp Infect. 2022 Sep; 127:59-68. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
- Review Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.[Infect Chemother. 2020]Review Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Park SH. Infect Chemother. 2020 Jun; 52(2):165-182.
- Personal Protective Equipment - StatPearlsPersonal Protective Equipment - StatPearls
- Nutritional supplements and hydration strategies - The Prevention and Management...Nutritional supplements and hydration strategies - The Prevention and Management of Pressure Ulcers in Primary and Secondary Care
- MPV17 mitochondrial inner membrane protein MPV17 [Bos taurus]MPV17 mitochondrial inner membrane protein MPV17 [Bos taurus]Gene ID:505763Gene
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...