Key points

People living longer is seen as a societal triumph, while at the same time population ageing is perceived as problematic. There is a belief that ageing is fiscally unsustainable, and that old people have the power to hold politicians to ransom at the expense of younger generations. This narrative paints a picture of an intergenerational conflict that only one side can win. It is not true. This brief shows that:

• The politics of health and ageing vary from country to country and there are few narratives that apply consistently across Europe.
• Some of the beliefs associated with population ageing are popular myths that are simply false:

  ⚬

  There is little empirical evidence to support the claim that ageing societies’ health care systems are unsustainable.

  ⚬

  It is equally inaccurate that older voters consistently elect politicians that support policies benefiting them at the expense of younger people.

  ⚬

  Politicians do not pander to older voters with additional government-funded benefits. If anything, overall public expenditure in European countries is tilting away from older people and towards younger people.

  ⚬

  Older voters are not a homogeneous group agreed on common interests; within countries they are diverse and have many different political identities and commitments.

  ⚬

  Voter preferences rarely explain policy choices; instead, the politics of ageing are shaped by coalitions of interested parties that can support policies with mutually beneficial objectives.

• These myths are created and magnified by policies and political systems, and can obscure other kinds of conflicts in the society, such as those around gender, income, wealth, nationality, ethnicity and race.
• It is possible to construct politically powerful coalitions for life-course policies that invest in people’s health and wellbeing at all stages of life. Creating win–win solutions such as promoting healthy ageing can enable older people to participate in work, caring and society and benefit all groups.

Contents

• About this brief
• About the series
• Acronyms
• Executive summary
• Policy brief
  • 1. Introduction: why this brief?
  • 2. Myths of ageing and health
  • 3. Designing win–win policies and politics
  • 4. Conclusion: Getting to win–win policies
• References

The authors and editors are grateful to the reviewers who commented on this publication and contributed their expertise.

All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.

The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.

All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The views expressed by authors, editors, or expert groups do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization.