U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cover of Shorter Versus Longer Durations of Exclusive Human Milk Feeding and Diabetes Outcomes in Offspring: A Systematic Review

Shorter Versus Longer Durations of Exclusive Human Milk Feeding and Diabetes Outcomes in Offspring: A Systematic Review

, MS, , PhD, , MPH, , , MLS, , MLS, MPH, , MD, , PhD, RD, , MS, RD, , MD, PhD, , PhD, RD, IBCLC, , PhD, , MD, MPH, , PhD, , MD, , PhD, RD, , MS, RDN, and , PhD.

Author Information and Affiliations
Alexandria (VA): USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review; .

TECHNICAL ABSTRACT

Background

  • This systematic review was conducted as part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project.
  • The goal of this systematic review was to examine the following question: What is the relationship between shorter versus longer durations of exclusive human milk feeding and diabetes outcomes in offspring?
  • This systematic review examines comparisons of infants who were fed human milk exclusively for shorter durations with infants who were fed human milk exclusively for longer durations. Exclusive human milk feeding was defined as feeding human milk alone and not in combination with infant formula and/or complementary foods or beverages such as cow’s milk. This definition is inclusive of the World Health Organization definitions of exclusive and predominant breastfeeding, which permit limited quantities of (a) drops or syrups containing vitamins, minerals, or medicines, (b) water and water-based drinks such as sweetened water and teas, (c) fruit juice, (d) oral rehydration salts solution, and (e) ritual fluids4. Human milk was defined as mother’s own milk provided at the breast (i.e., nursing) or expressed and fed fresh or after refrigeration or freezing. Donor milk (e.g., banked milk) was not examined in this review.
  • This systematic review examines available evidence related to diabetes outcomes in offspring, including fasting glucose, HbA1C, glucose tolerance/insulin resistance, and the incidence and prevalence of prediabetes, type 1 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes.

Conclusion statement and grade

  • Limited evidence from observational studies suggests that shorter versus longer durations of exclusive human milk feeding are associated with higher risk of type 1 diabetes. Limited evidence, from a single study that used a strong design, also suggests that the duration of exclusive human milk feeding is not associated with fasting glucose or insulin resistance at 11.5 years of age.
    There is insufficient evidence to determine whether or not there is a relationship between shorter versus longer durations of exclusive human milk feeding and type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, and HbA1c throughout the lifespan, and fasting glucose and insulin resistance at ages other than 11.5 years
    Grade: Limited –fasting glucose and insulin resistance at age 11.5 years, type 1 diabetes; Grade Not Assignable – fasting glucose and insulin resistance at ages other than 11.5 years, type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, HbA1C

Methods

  • The systematic review was conducted by a team of staff from the Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review in collaboration with a Technical Expert Collaborative.
  • A single literature search was conducted to identify literature for several related systematic reviews that examined infant milk-feeding practices and different outcomes. The search was conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed, and used a search date range of January 1980 to March 2016. A manual search was done to identify articles that may not have been included in the electronic databases searched.
  • Articles were screened independently by 2 NESR analysts to determine which articles met predetermined criteria for inclusion.
  • Data from each included article were extracted, risks of bias were assessed, and both were checked for accuracy.
  • The body of evidence was qualitatively synthesized, a conclusion statement was developed, and the strength of the evidence (grade) was assessed using pre-established criteria including evaluation of the internal validity/risk of bias, adequacy, consistency, impact, and generalizability of available evidence.

Summary of evidence

  • Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review, including 17 with evidence about type 1 diabetes, and 1 with evidence about fasting glucose and insulin resistance.
  • Evidence about the association between shorter versus longer durations of exclusive human milk feeding and higher risk of type 1 diabetes was limited. Seven studies found significant associations, all of which were inverse associations between the duration of exclusive human milk feeding and type 1 diabetes risk. However, some of the studies most likely to have sufficient statistical power found nonsignificant associations. The ability to draw stronger conclusions was primarily limited by this inconsistency, insufficient sample sizes for some of the studies, concerns about internal validity such as the potential for confounding, and the retrospective collection of exposure data, which increases the risk of misclassification of the exposure.
  • Evidence about the lack of an association between the duration of exclusive human milk feeding and fasting glucose and insulin resistance at 11.5 years of age was also limited. One cluster randomized controlled trial provided strong evidence. The ability to draw stronger conclusions was limited by only having 1 study and because the study was not conducted in the United States where metabolic risk may be higher.
  • There was no evidence related to type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, and HbA1C, or about fasting glucose and insulin resistance outside of age 11.5 years.
4

World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: conclusions of a consensus meeting held 6–8 November 2007 in Washington D.C. WHO. 2008.

Funding source: United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Alexandria, VA

Suggested citation:

Güngör D, Nadaud P, Dreibelbis C, LaPergola C, Terry N, Wong YP, Abrams SA, Beker L, Jacobovits T, Järvinen KM, Nommsen-Rivers LA, O’Brien KO, Oken E, Pérez-Escamilla R, Ziegler, EE, Casavale KO, Spahn JM, Stoody E. Shorter Versus Longer Durations of Exclusive Human Milk Feeding and Diabetes Outcomes in Offspring: A Systematic Review. April 2019. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.52570/NESR.PB242018.SR0216.

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.

Persons using assistive technology should be able to access information in this report. For further assistance please email vog.ADSU@RSEN.NF.MS.

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by:

(1)

mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410;

(2)

fax: (202) 690-7442; or

(3)

email: vog.adsu@ekatni.margorp.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Related citations:

This systematic review has also been published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Güngör D, Nadaud P, LaPergola CC, Dreibelbis C, Wong YP, Terry N, Abrams SA, Beker L, Jacobovits T, Järvinen KM, Nommsen-Rivers LA, O’Brien KO, Oken E, Pérez-Escamilla R, Ziegler, EE, Spahn JM. Infant milk-feeding practices and diabetes outcomes in offspring: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(7):817S-837S. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy311 [PMC free article: PMC6500931] [PubMed: 30982877].

Related citations are published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition:

  • P/B-24 Project overview: Stoody EE, Spahn JM, Casavale KO. The Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project: a series of systematic reviews on diet and health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(7):685S–97S. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy372 [PubMed: 30982878].
  • P/B-24 Project systematic review methodology: Obbagy JE, Spahn JM, Wong YP, Psota TL, Spill MK, Dreibelbis C, Gungor DE, Nadaud P, Raghavan R, Callahan EH, English LK, Kingshipp BL, LaPergola CC, Shapiro MJ, Stoody EE. Systematic review methodols used in the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(7):698S–704S. Available at https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy226 [PubMed: 30445449].

Copyright Notice

The contents of this document may be used and reprinted without permission. Endorsements by NESR, NGAD, CNPP, FNS, or USDA of derivative products developed from this work may not be stated or implied.

Bookshelf ID: NBK581194PMID: 35696497DOI: 10.52570/NESR.PB242018.SR0216

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.8M)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...