U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cover of Dietary Patterns during Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain: A Systematic Review

Dietary Patterns during Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain: A Systematic Review

, PhD, RD, , PhD, , PhD, RDN, LD, , PhD, MPH, RD, , MD, MPH, , MD, , DrPH, MPH, MSc, , PhD, , MS, , PhD, MPH, RD, , MS, MLS, , MLIS, MEd, and , PhD, RD.

Author Information and Affiliations
Alexandria (VA): USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review; .

TECHNICAL ABSTRACT

Background

  • This important public health question was identified by the U.S. Departments of Agriculture (USDA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) to be examined by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee.
  • The 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, Pregnancy and Lactation Subcommittee conducted a systematic review to answer this question with support from the Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team.
  • The goal of this systematic review was to examine the following question: What is the relationship between dietary patterns consumed during pregnancy and gestational weight gain?

Conclusion statement and grade

  • Limited evidence suggests that certain dietary patterns during pregnancy are associated with a lower risk of excessive gestational weight gain during pregnancy. These patterns are higher in vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, fish, and lower in added sugar, and red and processed meat. (Grade: Limited)

Methods

  • A literature search was conducted using four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and CINAHL) to identify articles that evaluated the intervention/exposure of dietary patterns during pregnancy and the outcome of gestational weight gain. A manual search was conducted to identify articles that may not have been included in the electronic databases searched. Articles were screened by two NESR analysts independently for inclusion based on pre-determined criteria.
  • Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted for each included study, and both were checked for accuracy. The Committee qualitatively synthesized the body of evidence to inform development of a conclusion statement(s), and graded the strength of evidence using pre-established criteria for risk of bias, consistency, directness, precision, and generalizability.

Summary of the evidence

  • This systematic review includes 26 articles, including five from four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 21 from 19 prospective cohort studies published between 2009 and 2019.
  • Articles included in this review assessed one of the following interventions/exposures during pregnancy:
    • Dietary patterns (DPs) (24 studies).
    • Diets based on macronutrient distributions outside of the acceptable macronutrient distribution range (AMDR) (2 studies).
  • Eight of the 15 articles that assessed maternal DPs using an index/score method showed an association with gestational weight gain (GWG).
    • Five of the eight articles showed that greater adherence to a DP (identified as beneficial by the study) was associated with lower GWG.
    • Three articles showed that greater adherence to a DP (identified as beneficial by the study) was associated with greater GWG in all participants or only women with obesity.
  • Four of the five articles that assessed maternal DPs using a factor or cluster analysis showed one or more associations between adherence to DPs and GWG.
    • One article showed that greater adherence to a DP (identified as beneficial by the study) was associated with lower GWG.
    • Four articles showed that greater adherence to a DP (identified as detrimental by the study) was associated with higher GWG.
  • One study that assessed maternal DPs using reduced rank regression showed that greater adherence to a DP was associated with higher GWG.
  • Two RCTs showed that participants randomized to a DP (identified as beneficial by the study) had lower GWG.
  • One RCT and one prospective cohort study showed no association between maternal consumption of a diet higher in fat (i.e. >35 percent of total energy from fat, which is greater than the AMDR) and GWG.
  • Although the DPs examined were characterized by combinations of different foods and beverages, the patterns that were consistently shown to be associated with lower risk of excessive GWG were: higher in vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, and fish and lower in added sugar and red and processed meat.
    • Not all foods were part of the same DP. The evidence did not show a consistent association between grains or dairy and GWG.
  • The ability to draw strong conclusions was limited by the following issues:
    • There were few RCTs and thus data were primarily observational in nature, limiting the ability to determine causal effects of DPs on GWG.
    • Key confounders were not consistently controlled for in most of the studies.
    • Studies had risk-of-bias issues, including exposure misclassification, self-reported outcomes, and selection bias.
    • Most of the studies were not designed to assess the association between DPs and GWG.
    • People with lower SES, adolescents, and racially and ethnically diverse populations were underrepresented in the body of evidence.
FUNDING SOURCE: United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Alexandria, VA

Suggested citation:

Donovan S, Dewey K, Novotny R, Stang J, Taveras E, Kleinman R, Raghavan R, Nevins J, Scinto-Madonich S, Kim JH, Terry N, Butera G, Obbagy J. Dietary Patterns during Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain: A Systematic Review. July 2020. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.52570/NESR.DGAC2020.SR0201

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.

Persons using assistive technology should be able to access information in this report. For further assistance please email vog.ADSU@RSEN.NF.MS.

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by:

(1)

mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410;

(2)

fax: (202) 690-7442; or

(3)

email: vog.adsu@ekatni.margorp.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Related citation: Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. July 2020. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Available at: https://doi.org/10.52570/DGAC2020

Copyright Notice

The contents of this document may be used and reprinted without permission. Endorsements by NESR, NGAD, CNPP, FNS, or USDA of derivative products developed from this work may not be stated or implied.

Bookshelf ID: NBK578487PMID: 35258871DOI: 10.52570/NESR.DGAC2020.SR0201

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.9M)

Other titles in this collection

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...