U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Rentel MC, Simpson K, Davé A, et al. A 10-year impact assessment of the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme: an independent mixed-method evaluation study. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Nov. (Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation, No. 8.20.)

Cover of A 10-year impact assessment of the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme: an independent mixed-method evaluation study

A 10-year impact assessment of the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme: an independent mixed-method evaluation study.

Show details

Appendix 1Secondary data sources

Data made available by NETSCC used in this analysis are listed in Table 5. Evidence was supplemented with desk research (e.g. publication review and targeted online searches).

TABLE 5

TABLE 5

Data sources used in this portfolio analysis

Researchfish data

The Researchfish question set73 does not specifically stress that entries should relate to outputs and outcomes achieved only as a result of the award that is being reported on. Many of the questions also refer to aspects that underpinned the project. For example, questions in the area ‘collaborations’ can be applied to collaborations in the EME project itself (i.e. an activity, rather than an output or outcome of the award) or to collaborations formed as a result of the funded research beyond the EME award. In some data fields, the reported outputs and outcomes predate the EME award itself and it can, therefore, be assumed that the entries refer to the context or set-up of the project rather than its outputs.

For this analysis, we have defined ‘collaborations and partnerships’ and ‘PPI’ as activities carried out as part of the EME projects. All other fields are interpreted as ‘outputs’ or ‘outcomes’ (see Chapter 3, The EME programme logic model). For these fields, entries that predated the start of the award were removed as they cannot be a result of the funding (Table 6).

TABLE 6

TABLE 6

Details of entries removed that predated the start of the award

Copyright © 2021 Rentel et al. This work was produced by Rentel et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited.
Bookshelf ID: NBK575343

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.9M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...