U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

WHO guidelines for plague management: revised recommendations for the use of rapid diagnostic tests, fluoroquinolones for case management and personal protective equipment for prevention of post-mortem transmission [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.

Cover of WHO guidelines for plague management: revised recommendations for the use of rapid diagnostic tests, fluoroquinolones for case management and personal protective equipment for prevention of post-mortem transmission

WHO guidelines for plague management: revised recommendations for the use of rapid diagnostic tests, fluoroquinolones for case management and personal protective equipment for prevention of post-mortem transmission [Internet].

Show details

Annex 1Analytical framework and key questions

The analytical framework and key questions are represented in Fig. A1.1.

Key question 1. Among individuals with clinical suspicion of plague, does F1RDT accurately detect plague compared with isolation of Yersinia pestis by culture, PCR or paired serology?

ParticipantsAdults and children suspected to have plague
InterventionF1RDT
ComparisonIsolation of Y. pestis by culture, PCR or paired serology
OutcomesTest accuracy: sensitivity, specificity

We explored heterogeneity between study results by looking at findings for the following subgroups:

  • different forms of plague – bubonic, septicaemic and pneumonic;
  • type of reference standard – bacterial isolation by culture, PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA);
  • context – plague-endemic areas, areas where an outbreak is in progress.
Therefore, the four main questions that derived from the first key question were the following.

  • Should an RDT be used to detect pneumonic plague in plague-endemic areas?
  • Should an RDT be used to diagnose pneumonic plague in patients in areas where an outbreak is in progress?
  • Should an RDT be used to detect bubonic plague in plague-endemic areas?
  • Should an RDT be used to diagnose bubonic plague in patients in areas where an outbreak is in progress?
IMG-9789240015586-FA1.1.eps

Fig. A1.1Analytical framework and key questions covered by the guidelines

F1RDT: rapid diagnostic test based on the F1 antigen; RDT: rapid diagnostic test; PCR: polymerase chain reaction.

Key question 2. Among individuals with plague, how effective and safe are the following antibiotics?

ParticipantsAdults and children with confirmed or suspected plague
InterventionAny fluoroquinolone
Comparison

Streptomycin

Gentamicin

Tetracyclines, doxycycline

Chloramphenicol

Outcomes

Death

Cure (defined as resolution of fever and painful bubo swelling and, if initially present, recovery from pneumonia or any other symptoms of plague)

Complications after the initiation of antimicrobial therapy (including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, meningitis and secondary pneumonia)a

Defervescence time (number of days with fever)

Sputum negativity (for pneumonic plague)

Relapse (defined as the return of bubo tenderness, fever or other symptoms within 1 to 2 weeks after the end of therapy)a

Adverse effects

a

Mwengee W, Butler T, Mgema S, Mhina G, Almasi Y, Bradley C et al. Treatment of plague with gentamicin or doxycycline in a randomized clinical trial in Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:614–21. doi: 10.1086/500137. [PubMed: 16447105] [CrossRef]

We first gathered all the evidence from direct comparisons between any of the following antibiotics: any fluoroquinolone and streptomycin, gentamicin, doxycycline or chloramphenicol. As we anticipated that there were limited studies that directly compared one antibiotic with another, we then summarized the outcomes for each of the above antibiotics from single-arm studies and case reports.

These antibiotics were selected by the GDG members in consultation with the responsible technical officer.

Whenever possible, we aimed to examine the evidence of possible effect modifiers, including:

  • forms of plague – bubonic, septicaemic and pneumonic plague, and plague meningitis;
  • certainty of diagnosis – confirmed and probable or presumptive plague;
  • subgroup populations – adults, children.

Key question 3. What is the risk of plague transmission from exposure to the remains of people who died of plague?

We formulated a broad question because we anticipated that there was limited literature describing this topic. For this question, we aimed to answer, clarify and summarize the responses to a series of questions.

  • How contagious are the body fluids of people with bubonic, septicaemic or pneumonic plague?
  • How many studies described fluid or aerosol transmission among people?
  • How many cases of plague transmitted by human body fluid or other human remains have been documented? Was the possible route of transmission described?
  • How many cases of plague transmitted during the manipulation of contaminated material in a laboratory have been documented? Was the possible route of transmission described?
  • How many cases of plague transmitted by animal remains have been documented? Was the possible route of transmission described?
  • For how long can Y. pestis survive in a dead body and be infectious to a human?
We aimed to describe and summarize all reported cases of plague infection occurring during post-mortem exposure to human and animal remains. We collected data on the possible mode of transmission (inhalation, contact with blood or other body fluids and secretions, contact with infected tissues), duration of exposure and length of time since death.

© World Health Organization 2021.

Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.

Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.

Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).

Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.

Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization.

Bookshelf ID: NBK571133

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (1.1M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...