Spine trauma is a common indication for diagnostic imaging, and there has been a gradual shift to using cross-sectional imaging techniques for screening and evaluating the injured spine, particularly in elderly patients where radiography can be challenging. The classification of spinal injuries has evolved in the past decades to rely on a combination of fracture morphology as defined by diagnostic imaging in conjunction with the clinical presentation to stratify patients to determine optimal management. Radiologists need to be familiar with these classification systems, which rely heavily on imaging findings using CT and MRI, to accurately describe spinal injury.

13.1. Craniocervical Junction (CCJ)

The craniocervical junction includes three bones (occipital base, C1, and C2), two joints (atlantooccipital and atlantoaxial), and several extrinsic and intrinsic ligaments, allowing for the delicate balance of flexibility while protecting the cranial blood supply, brainstem, and cranial nerves [1]. Careful description of each injured component and the degree of distraction is important, because these details determine stability and management [1, 2]. In this section, we will focus on C2 fractures, which account for 17–20% of cervical spine fractures [3, 4]. There are three main C2 fracture types: odontoid fractures, traumatic spondylolysis, and, less commonly, vertebral body/lateral mass fractures [2, 3].

Approximately 59% of C2 fractures involve the odontoid process [3, 4]. Mortality of C2 fractures in patients 65 years and older is substantial—approximately 15% at 30 days and 34% and 1 year [5]. The most common mechanism is motor vehicle accident, but in older patients even low energy trauma can result in odontoid process fractures [5]. There are three types of odontoid fractures as classified by Anderson and D’Alonzo (Fig. 13.1) [2, 6]. Type I (1–3%) fractures are through the odontoid tip and are likely due to alar ligament avulsion [3, 4, 6]. Because it is high in the odontoid, type I fractures are considered stable and typically heal with immobilization [3]. Type II (54–60%) fractures are at the junction of the odontoid and the vertebral body, and fractures with >6 mm displacement, comminution, and/or concomitant ligamentous injury have a greater risk of nonunion and likely require surgical management [3, 7, 8]. Hadley et al. also proposed a type IIA odontoid fracture with additional chip fracture fragments at the dens base, either anteriorly or posteriorly (Fig. 13.2) [8]. These fractures are unstable and tend toward nonunion [8]. Patients older than 50 years are at greater risk for nonunion [9]. Type III (39–42%) fractures are through the cancellous bone of the vertebral body [4, 6]. They are generally stable and heal with halo immobilization [3, 4].

Fig. 13.1

Odontoid fracture classification. (a, b) A 39-year-old male injured in motor vehicle accident. Coronal (a) and sagittal (b) images of the C2 vertebral body demonstrate a fracture through the tip of the C1 vertebral body, consistent with a type I odontoid (more...)

Fig. 13.2

An 85-year-old man with neck pain after unwitnessed fall. (a) Sagittal CT image demonstrates a displaced fracture through the base of the odontoid process, with more than 6 mm of displacement and small chip fragments anteriorly and posteriorly (arrows), (more...)

Traumatic spondylolisthesis is the second most common C2 fracture (approximately 38%) [1]. This fracture is commonly called the “hangman’s fracture,” although forensic research suggests that this fracture occurred in less than 10% of judicial hangings; currently it is most commonly due to motor vehicle accidents [10, 11]. There are five injury patterns as originally defined by Effendi and later revised by Levine and Starr (Fig. 13.3) [12]. The degree of distraction and anterior translation should be described, as these determine fracture stability [12]. Type I (65–72%) fractures are the most common, followed by type II (27–28%) (Fig. 13.4) and type III (1–7%) fractures [3, 13]. Type I and type II may appear similar on supine imaging, and upright radiographs may reveal distraction [1, 14]. Type IIA has more distraction than translation and therefore a greater degree of kyphosis when compared with type II [1, 14]. Neurologic injury is uncommon and only occurs if there is spinal canal narrowing, which may occur in type IA (33%) or type III (60%) injuries [1]. The other fracture types generally result in spinal canal widening [1].

Fig. 13.3

Traumatic spondylolisthesis classification

Fig. 13.4

A 62-year-old woman with multiple sclerosis who presents status post fall. (a, b) Sagittal CT images of the cervical spine demonstrate bilateral C2 pars interarticularis fractures. (c) Sagittal CT image of the cervical spine demonstrates anterolisthesis (more...)

Vertebral body/lateral mass fractures (22%) are the least common, and the vast majority are managed nonoperatively with good result [3]. C2 body fractures are difficult to detect on radiographs, and Pellei described a useful finding called the “fat” C2 sign to improve sensitivity (Fig. 13.5) [15]. The C2 vertebral body appears “fat” (increased anteroposterior diameter) when there is a displaced vertebral body fracture fragment and suggests that the fracture is unstable requiring further imaging. This sign may be the result of any fracture involving the C2 vertebral body, including a type III dens fracture or an atypical traumatic spondylolysis.

Fig. 13.5

A 79-year-old woman who was T-boned in a motor vehicle accident. (a) Lateral radiograph of the cervical spine demonstrates wider anterior-posterior (AP) diameter of the C2 vertebral body (white dotted line) compared to the AP diameter of the C3 vertebral (more...)

13.2. Mid to Lower Cervical

Mid to lower cervical spine (subaxial) injuries represent 65% of cervical spine fractures and are classified based on mechanism of injury: flexion compression, extension compression, vertical compression, flexion-distraction, extension-distraction, and lateral flexion or rotation [12]. The Subaxial Injury Classification and Scoring (SLIC) system incorporates imaging (CT and MRI) and clinical findings into a single score, placing the patient in nonsurgical (total SLIC score ≤3), indeterminate (=4), or surgical (≥5) management categories (Table 13.1) [12]. Each injured level receives a separate score. The abnormality with the highest score is used for the scoring system, i.e., fractures with distraction and translation are scored as translation [16, 17].

Table 13.1

Subaxial Injury Classification and Scoring (SLIC) system [2]

Familiarity with this scoring system is important for radiologists interpreting these studies, because communication of findings using this terminology enhances communication with the trauma surgeons. Patients with a high SLIC score typically require surgical management to relieve cord compression and stabilize the spine (Fig. 13.6). Conversely, patients with a low SLIC score can be managed conservatively (Fig. 13.7).

Fig. 13.6

An 18-year-old man who was a restrained passenger in a motor vehicle accident, where his car collided with another vehicle and rolled into a ditch. Unfortunately, the patient did not survive the accident and passed away several days later. (a) Lateral (more...)

Fig. 13.7

A 70-year-old man status post fall with head strike against a wall. Sagittal CT image demonstrates a comminuted C7 vertebral body fracture with compression (arrows). The fracture does not extend to the vertebral body posterior margin. There is bilateral (more...)

13.3. Upper Thoracic

The T1–T10 vertebrae are relatively immobile as they are stabilized by a ring formed by the spine, ribs, and sternum so traumatic injuries of this region are less common than at the more mobile cervical and thoracolumbar regions. In young adults, less than 25% of all thoracic fractures affect T1–T10, typically following a fall, motor vehicle accident or seizure [18]. The most common fracture pattern is superior endplate compression resulting in paraspinal swelling, anterior height loss, and disruption of the anterior cortex and subchondral bone, without posterior height loss, retropulsed bone, or malalignment. Mild height loss alone lacks specificity as it can be physiologic or due to Scheuermann disease, which is associated with disk height loss, Schmorl nodes, and kyphosis [19]. Impacted subchondral trabecular bone is more specific, appearing as a transverse zone of sclerosis paralleling the endplate that becomes more apparent as the fracture heals. Mild compression fractures are stable, but those with greater than 40% height loss can result in delayed kyphotic deformity, particularly if there are multiple contiguous fractures [20].

While fractures of the upper thoracic spine in young patients are typically the result of significant force, upper thoracic fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients often result from trivial injury and can be challenging to visualize on radiographs. Osteoporotic thoracic fractures are common; 18% of white women older than 50 and 78% of white women older than 90 years have at least one thoracic compression fracture, typically in conjunction with additional fractures in the lumbar region [21]. Bone fragility allows the fracture to propagate easily to the posterior vertebral body margin, resulting in greater height loss and retropulsion of bone into the canal.

In elderly patients, distinguishing osteoporotic fractures from pathologic fractures can be challenging. Findings suggesting underlying neoplasia include isolated fractures above T7, preferential posterior height loss or bulging of the posterior cortex, cortical erosion of the vertebral body or posterior elements, soft tissue mass, and diffuse replacement of the vertebral body fat signal, whereas a simple transverse fracture line with band-like partial marrow replacement limited to the upper or lower half of the vertebral body and the presence of a linear cleft of fluid or gas favor a benign process [22] (Fig. 13.8). MR techniques that identify regions of restricted diffusion within neoplastic tissue and phase imaging to identify microscopic fat within benign lesions are useful in equivocal cases though some fractures remain indeterminate, requiring biopsy [23].

Fig. 13.8

A 74-year-old male with history of prostate cancer. Sagittal CT (a) and T1-weighted MR (b) of the thoracic spine show a pathologic fracture at T10 (arrows) and a benign osteoporotic compression fracture at T12. The CT shows subtle increased density at (more...)

Severe upper thoracic injuries such as burst fractures with retropulsed bone, anterior and posterior distraction injuries, and fracture-dislocation are uncommon. Fracture-dislocation of the upper thoracic spine is the result of combined hyperflexion, axial loading, and rotary/shear forces resulting in extensive ligament disruption, complex fractures, and spinal malalignment including translation, rotation, and telescoping of vertebrae [23] (Fig. 13.9). In such injuries, the disproportionately small ratio of the spinal canal to the cord in the upper thoracic region leads to a high risk of neurologic deficit. Soft tissue hemorrhage and associated visceral and mediastinal injuries are common [18]. CT and MR are needed to fully characterize these complex injuries, affording detailed assessment of fractures, ligaments, neural elements, and paraspinal soft tissues.

Fig. 13.9

A 56-year-old involved in all-terrain vehicle accident with fracture-dislocation of the upper thoracic spine resulting in paraplegia. Sagittal CT (a) of the thoracic spine illustrates multiple upper thoracic fractures with comminution of the T6 body (asterisk), (more...)

13.4. Thoracolumbar

The thoracolumbar region is commonly injured, representing the second most common site of spinal trauma following the lower cervical spine. Modern classification systems of spinal injury are based on systems initially developed to organize thoracolumbar injuries according to injury mechanism, using fracture morphology and degree of displacement to assess stability and plan management. The initial system widely used was the Denis classification that divided the spine into anterior, middle, and posterior columns, emphasizing the role of the middle column (posterior vertebral margin, posterior longitudinal ligament, and posterior annulus) in maintaining stability [24]. Denis classified thoracolumbar injuries into (1) compression fracture limited to the anterior column; (2) burst fracture involving anterior and middle columns; (3) seat belt injury resulting from distraction of the middle and posterior columns from distraction; and (4) fracture-dislocation with disruption of all three columns. This classification was based on radiographs and did not account for many spinal injuries, particularly those where the anterior spine was compressed while the posterior ligaments failed by distraction, a pattern well appreciated on MR imaging. Current classification systems have expanded Denis’ system to offer a more comprehensive classification and account for more injury patterns and also include clinical parameters. Currently, the most widely used thoracolumbar injury classification is based on combining features of the AO-Magerl classification (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) and TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score) system [16, 20]. The AO/TLICS system, based on a consensus of international spine surgeons, classifies fracture morphology into three main patterns: type A (compression), type B (tension band disruption, either anterior or posterior), and type C (displacement/translation) with several subtypes in the first two categories. The grading of morphology relies on accurate assessment of both bone and ligament injury and emphasizes the utility of CT and MRI for assessment of thoracolumbar trauma [25].

The fracture morphology score is combined with a grading of neurologic status and a description of patient-specific modifiers that affect the likelihood of surgery to help select management [16]. This classification has similar considerations as the SLIC grading system of cervical trauma previously discussed.

13.4.1. Type A: Compression Injuries

The most common injury mechanism is compression which produces a range of fracture morphologies that include superior and inferior endplate impaction, anterior wedging of varying severity, burst fractures, and sagittal splitting of the vertebral body. Similar to the remainder of the spine, mild compression fractures result in anterior height loss, buckling of the cortex, and endplate comminution producing band-like sclerosis adjacent to the fractured endplate. On CT, these appear as an arc of irregular bony fragments displaced circumferentially at the level of the endplate. Posterior vertebral and intervertebral disk height are preserved and there is no listhesis. Compression fractures with greater than 40% height loss, particularly in the setting of multiple contiguous fractures and posterior ligament sprain may require prolonged bracing [26]. Severe compression fractures showing with greater than 70% height loss may require posterior stabilization to avoid kyphotic deformity. Unlike simple compression fractures, burst fractures involve the posterior vertebral body margin, leading to posterior vertebral height loss and retropulsed bone in the spinal canal. The thoracolumbar region is the most common site of spinal burst fractures, and such injuries make up 16% of all spinal injuries encountered at a trauma center. CT scanning is the most efficient method for characterizing the fracture, identifying associated posterior element fractures and evaluating bone encroaching on the spinal canal (Fig. 13.10).

Fig. 13.10

A 28-year-old male with spinal injury after falling downstairs while intoxicated. The lateral radiograph (a) shows a mild superior endplate compression fracture of L1 with anterior cortical disruption and minimal height loss. Note the sclerosis below (more...)

13.4.2. Type B: Distraction (Tension Band) Injuries

The vast majority of distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine results from flexion with the resulting tensile force, leading to purely osseous, purely ligamentous, or combined bony and soft tissue injury starting at the posterior spine allowing separation between the posterior elements, followed by anterior soft tissue injury or vertebral fracture. The classic horizontally oriented Chance fracture is one example of a distraction injury, but there is a broad spectrum of distraction injury patterns depending on whether the injury is primarily ligamentous or osseous and whether distraction affects the entire spine or only the posterior elements. Distraction injuries are associated with variable amounts of splaying of the posterior elements, which can be overlooked on radiographs and CT, particularly if the patient is recumbent [27]. In practice, many posterior tension band injuries with vertebral body fractures are easily confused for simple compression or burst fractures without MR imaging, which should be obtained whenever posterior ligament injury is suspected (Fig. 13.11). Anterior tension band injuries caused by hyperextension are far less common. The typical injury pattern is a horizontal fracture through the vertebral body or through an ossified disk in an elderly patient with underlying degenerative spinal fusion, leading to increased vertebral or disk height and lordosis [28].

Fig. 13.11

A 39-year-old female injured during motor vehicle accident. Sagittal CT (a) and T2-weighted MR (b) images of the lumbar spine show a fracture of the L1 vertebral body (asterisk) with height loss and a small bulge of retropulsed bone arising from the posterior (more...)

13.5. Lower Lumbar

Pars interarticularis fracture or spondylolysis is a stress fracture of the bony arch connecting the upper and lower facet joints and occurs primarily at the L5 (85–95%) and L4 (5–15%) levels [29, 30]. The prevalence is approximately 6%, and many are asymptomatic, but spondylolysis can cause pain in athletes with high lower back stress (football, wrestling, dancing, weight lifting), particularly in the adolescent and preadolescent population [31, 32]. Diagnosis on radiographs is best made on the oblique view, but radiographs have low sensitivity for stress injury and nondisplaced stress fractures (Fig. 13.12) [30, 33]. Flexion and extension views can detect motion and instability in the case of spondylolisthesis, which occurs in 50–81% of patients with spondylolysis [29, 31, 33].

Fig. 13.12

A 24-year-old baseball player with acute on chronic unilateral left-sided lower back pain. (a) Oblique radiograph of the spine demonstrates the “Scottie dog” appearance of the vertebrae, outlined at the L4 level (dotted white line). P = pedicle, (more...)

A low threshold for obtaining a CT or MRI in patients with a suspicious clinical history and physical examination is recommended, because early detection and appropriate treatment (primarily rest and pain management) is important to prevent progression and more aggressive intervention [29]. CT has the highest sensitivity for fracture detection, while MRI has the advantage of detecting edema in early-stage injury (Fig. 13.13) [29]. Most patients are successfully managed conservatively, with surgery reserved for the 9–15% of cases that remain symptomatic after conservative care [29]. Because the condition can be asymptomatic, diagnostic steroid and anesthetic injection can be helpful to confirm the spondylolysis as the source of the patient’s pain prior to surgery [34].

Fig. 13.13

An 18-year-old multisport collegiate athlete with acute on chronic left lower back pain since elementary school. (a) Sagittal T1 MRI image demonstrates nondisplaced left L5 pars interarticularis fracture (arrow). There is no anterolisthesis (dotted line). (more...)

13.6. Concluding Remarks

Diagnostic imaging plays a critical role in identifying and classifying spinal injury. Understanding the unique features of each spinal segment and relevant classification systems can help the radiologist both with injury detection and with generating clinically relevant reports to help guide management.

References

1.

Bransford RJ, Alton TB, Patel AR, Bellabarba C. Upper cervical spine trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:718–29. [PubMed: 25344597] [CrossRef]

2.

Dreizin D, Letzing M, Sliker CW, Chokshi FH, Bodanapally U, Mirvis SE, Quencer RM, Munera F. Multidetector CT of blunt cervical spine trauma in adults. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2014;34:1842–65. [PubMed: 25384284]

3.

Greene KA, Dickman CA, Marciano FF, Drabier JB, Hadley MN, Sonntag VK. Acute axis fractures. Analysis of management and outcome in 340 consecutive cases. Spine. 1997;22:1843–52. [PubMed: 9280020] [CrossRef]

4.

Pryputniewicz DM, Hadley MN. Axis fractures. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:68–82. [PubMed: 20173530] [CrossRef]

5.

Shafafy R, Valsamis EM, Luck J, Dimock R, Rampersad S, Kieffer W, Morassi GL, Elsayed S. Predictors of mortality in the elderly patient with a fracture of the odontoid process. Bone Jt J. 2019;101-B:253–9. [PubMed: 30813791] [CrossRef]

6.

Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1663–74. [PubMed: 4434035] [CrossRef]

7.

Hadley MN, Browner C, Sonntag VK. Axis fractures: a comprehensive review of management and treatment in 107 cases. Neurosurgery. 1985;17:281–90. [PubMed: 4033879] [CrossRef]

8.

Hadley MN, Browner CM, Liu SS, Sonntag VK. New subtype of acute odontoid fractures (type IIA). Neurosurgery. 1988;22:67–71. [PubMed: 3344089] [CrossRef]

9.

Lennarson PJ, Mostafavi H, Traynelis VC, Walters BC. Management of type II dens fractures: a case-control study. Spine. 2000;25:1234–7. [PubMed: 10806499] [CrossRef]

10.

James R, Nasmyth-Jones R. The occurrence of cervical fractures in victims of judicial hanging. Forensic Sci Int. 1992;54:81–91. [PubMed: 1618457] [CrossRef]

11.

Ferro FP, Borgo GD, Letaif OB, Cristante AF, Marcon RM, Lutaka AS. Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: epidemiology, management and outcome. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20:84–7. [PMC free article: PMC3718423] [PubMed: 24453586] [CrossRef]

12.

Riascos R, Bonfante E, Cotes C, Guirguis M, Hakimelahi R, West C. Imaging of atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial traumatic injuries: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2015;35:2121–34. [PubMed: 26562241]

13.

Effendi B, Roy D, Cornish B, Dussault RG, Laurin CA. Fractures of the ring of the axis. A classification based on the analysis of 131 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B:319–27. [PubMed: 7263741] [CrossRef]

14.

Levine AM, Edwards CC. The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:217–26. [PubMed: 3968113] [CrossRef]

15.

Pellei DD. The fat C2 sign. Radiology. 2000;217:359–60. [PubMed: 11058628] [CrossRef]

16.

Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine. 2007;32:2365–74. [PubMed: 17906580] [CrossRef]

17.

Patel AA, Dailey A, Brodke DS, Daubs M, Anderson PA, Hurlbert RJ, Vacccaro AR, Spine Trauma Study Group. Subaxial cervical spine trauma classification: the subaxial injury classification system and case examples. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25:E8. [PubMed: 18980482] [CrossRef]

18.

Splendiani A, Bruno F, Patriarca L, Barile A, Di Cesare E, Masciocchi C, Gallucci M. Thoracic spine trauma: advanced imaging modality. Radiol Med (Torino). 2016;121:780–92. [PubMed: 27307000] [CrossRef]

19.

Palazzo C, Sailhan F, Revel M. Scheuermann’s disease: an update. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:209–14. [PubMed: 24468666] [CrossRef]

20.

Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994;3:184–201. [PubMed: 7866834] [CrossRef]

21.

Gerdhem P. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures: vertebral fractures. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27:743–55. [PubMed: 24836333] [CrossRef]

22.

Mauch JT, Carr CM, Cloft H, Diehn FE. Review of the imaging features of benign osteoporotic and malignant vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39:1584–92. [PMC free article: PMC7655272] [PubMed: 29348133] [CrossRef]

23.

Geith T, Schmidt G, Biffar A, Dietrich O, Duerr HR, Reiser M, Baur-Melnyk A. Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:582–8. [PubMed: 25148160] [CrossRef]

24.

Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine. 1983;8:817–31. [PubMed: 6670016] [CrossRef]

25.

Khurana B, Sheehan SE, Sodickson A, Bono CM, Harris MB. Traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries: what the spine surgeon wants to know. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2013;33:2031–46. [PubMed: 24224597]

26.

Raniga SB, Skalski MR, Kirwadi A, Menon VK, Al-Azri FH, Butt S. Thoracolumbar spine injury at CT: trauma/emergency radiology. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2016;36:2234–5. [PubMed: 27831845]

27.

Bernstein MP, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K. Chance-type fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: imaging analysis in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:859–68. [PubMed: 16985126] [CrossRef]

28.

Balling H, Weckbach A. Hyperextension injuries of the thoracolumbar spine in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Spine. 2015;40:E61–7. [PubMed: 25575089] [CrossRef]

29.

Syrmou E, Tsitsopoulos PP, Marinopoulos D, Tsonidis C, Anagnostopoulos I, Tsitsopoulos PD. Spondylolysis: a review and reappraisal. Hippokratia. 2010;14:17–21. [PMC free article: PMC2843565] [PubMed: 20411054]

30.

Standaert CJ, Herring SA. Spondylolysis: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34:415–22. [PMC free article: PMC1724260] [PubMed: 11131228] [CrossRef]

31.

Hu SS, Tribus CB, Diab M, Ghanayem AJ. Spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis. Instr Course Lect 57:431–445. JBJS. 2008;90:656–71. [PubMed: 18399601]

32.

McTimoney CAM, Micheli LJ. Current evaluation and management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2003;2:41–6. [PubMed: 12831675] [CrossRef]

33.

Scavone JG, Latshaw RF, Weidner WA. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs: an adequate lumbar spine examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136:715–7. [PubMed: 6784466] [CrossRef]

34.

Kershen LM, Nacey NC, Patrie JT, Fox MG. Accuracy and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided pars interarticularis injections on immediate and short-term pain relief. Skelet Radiol. 2016;45:1329–35. [PubMed: 27444614] [CrossRef]

35.

Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Fehlings MG, Rampersaud YR, Oner FC, Aarabi B, Vaccaro AR. The surgical approach to subaxial cervical spine injuries: an evidence-based algorithm based on the SLIC classification system. Spine. 2007;32:2620–9. [PubMed: 17978665] [CrossRef]