U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Smith GCS, Moraitis AA, Wastlund D, et al. Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Feb. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 25.15.)

Cover of Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Show details

Appendix 2Supporting data for the systematic review of the diagnostic effectiveness of universal ultrasonic screening using late pregnancy cerebroplacental ratio in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome

MEDLINE and EMBASE

Date range searched: inception to 30 May 2019.

Search strategy

  1. exp pregnant woman/
  2. exp pregnancy/
  3. pregnan*.mp.
  4. exp fetus echography/
  5. exp prenatal diagnosis/
  6. exp Doppler ultrasonography/
  7. exp fetus monitoring/
  8. ultraso*.mp.
  9. exp middle cerebral artery/
  10. middle cerebral artery.mp.
  11. uteroplacental.mp.
  12. utero-placental.mp.
  13. cerebroplacental.mp.
  14. cerebro-placental.mp.
  15. cerebroumbilical.mp.
  16. cerebro-umbilical.mp.
  17. fetal brain doppler.mp.
  18. fetal cerebral doppler.mp.
  19. 1 or 2 or 3
  20. 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8
  21. 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18
  22. 19 and 20
  23. 21 and 22.
FIGURE 29. Literature search PRISMA flow diagram for the systematic review on CPRs.

FIGURE 29

Literature search PRISMA flow diagram for the systematic review on CPRs.

FIGURE 30. Risk of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 tool for the studies included in the meta-analysis of CPRs.

FIGURE 30

Risk of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 tool for the studies included in the meta-analysis of CPRs.

TABLE 20

TABLE 20

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis of CPRs to predict adverse pregnancy outcome

FIGURE 31. Deeks’ funnel plot for publication bias for CPRs for the prediction of neonatal unit admission.

FIGURE 31

Deeks’ funnel plot for publication bias for CPRs for the prediction of neonatal unit admission. Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test: p = 0.28. ESS, effective sample size.

Copyright © 2021 Smith et al. This work was produced by Smith et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited.
Bookshelf ID: NBK568305
Contents

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (4.2M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...