Continuing Education Activity

Face and brow presentation is a malpresentation during labor when the presenting part is either the face or, in the case of brow presentation, it is the area between the orbital ridge and the anterior fontanelle. This activity reviews the evaluation and management of these two presentations and explains the interprofessional team's role in safely managing delivery for both the mother and the baby.

Objectives:

• Identify the mechanism of labor in the face and brow presentation.
• Differentiate potential maternal and fetal complications during the face and brow presentations.
• Evaluate different management approaches for the face and brow presentation.

Introduction

The term presentation describes the leading part of the fetus or the anatomical structure closest to the maternal pelvic inlet during labor. The presentation can roughly be divided into the following classifications: cephalic, breech, shoulder, and compound. Cephalic presentation is the most common and can be further subclassified as vertex, sinciput, brow, face, and chin. The most common presentation in term labor is the vertex, where the fetal neck is flexed to the chin, minimizing the head circumference. Face presentation is an abnormal form of cephalic presentation where the presenting part is the mentum. This typically occurs because of hyperextension of the neck and the occiput touching the fetal back. Incidence of face presentation is rare, accounting for approximately 1 in 600 of all presentations.[1][2][3] In brow presentation, the neck is not extended as much as in face presentation, and the leading part is the area between the anterior fontanelle and the orbital ridges. Brow presentation is considered the rarest of all malpresentation, with a prevalence of 1 in 500 to 1 in 4000 deliveries.[3]

Both face and brow presentations occur due to extension of the fetal neck instead of flexion; therefore, conditions that would lead to hyperextension or prevent flexion of the fetal neck can all contribute to face or brow presentation. These risk factors may be related to either the mother or the fetus. Maternal risk factors are preterm delivery, contracted maternal pelvis, platypelloid pelvis, multiparity, previous cesarean section, and black race. Fetal risk factors include anencephaly, multiple loops of cord around the neck, masses of the neck, macrosomia, and polyhydramnios.[2][4][5] These malpresentations are usually diagnosed during the second stage of labor when performing a digital examination. Palpating orbital ridges, nose, malar eminences, mentum, mouth, gums, and chin in face presentation is possible. Based on the position of the chin, face presentation can be further divided into mentum anterior, posterior, or transverse. In brow presentation, the anterior fontanelle and face can be palpated except for the mouth and the chin. Brow presentation can then be further described based on the position of the anterior fontanelle as frontal anterior, posterior, or transverse. Diagnosing the exact presentation can be challenging, and face presentation may be misdiagnosed as frank breech. To avoid any confusion, a bedside ultrasound scan can be performed.[6] Ultrasound imaging can show a reduced angle between the occiput and the spine or the chin is separated from the chest. However, ultrasound does not provide much predictive value for the outcome of labor.[7]

Anatomy and Physiology

Before discussing the mechanism of labor in the face or brow presentation, it is crucial to highlight some anatomical landmarks and their measurements. 

Planes and Diameters of the Pelvis

The 3 most important planes in the female pelvis are the pelvic inlet, mid-pelvis, and pelvic outlet. Four diameters can describe the pelvic inlet: anteroposterior, transverse, and 2 obliques. Furthermore, based on the landmarks on the pelvic inlet, there are 3 different anteroposterior diameters named conjugates: true conjugate, obstetrical conjugate, and diagonal conjugate. Only the latter can be measured directly during the obstetric examination. The shortest of these 3 diameters is obstetrical conjugate, which measures approximately 10.5 cm and is the distance between the sacral promontory and 1 cm below the upper border of the symphysis pubis. This measurement is clinically significant as the fetal head must pass through this diameter during the engagement phase. The transverse diameter measures about 13.5 cm and is the widest distance between the innominate line on both sides. The shortest distance in the mid pelvis is the interspinous diameter and usually is only about 10 cm. 

Fetal Skull Diameters

There are 6 distinguished longitudinal fetal skull diameters:

1. Suboccipito-bregmatic: from the center of anterior fontanelle (bregma) to the occipital protuberance, measuring 9.5 cm. This is the diameter presented in the vertex presentation. 
2. Suboccipito-frontal: from the anterior part of bregma to the occipital protuberance, measuring 10 cm 
3. Occipito-frontal: from the root of the nose to the most prominent part of the occiput, measuring 11.5 cm
4. Submento-bregmatic: from the center of the bregma to the angle of the mandible, measuring 9.5 cm. This is the diameter in the face presentation where the neck is hyperextended. 
5. Submento-vertical: from the midpoint between fontanelles and the angle of the mandible, measuring 11.5 cm 
6. Occipito-mental: from the midpoint between fontanelles and the tip of the chin, measuring 13.5 cm. It is the presenting diameter in brow presentation. 

Cardinal Movements of Normal Labor

1. Engagement
2. Decent
3. Neck flexion
4. Internal rotation
5. Extension (delivers head)
6. External rotation (restitution)
7. Expulsion (delivery of anterior and posterior shoulders)

Some key movements are impossible in the face or brow presentations. Based on the information provided above, it is obvious that labor be arrested in brow presentation unless it spontaneously changes to the face or vertex, as the occipito-mental diameter of the fetal head is significantly wider than the smallest diameter of the female pelvis. Face presentation can, however, be delivered vaginally, and further mechanisms of face delivery are explained in later sections.

Indications

As mentioned previously, spontaneous vaginal delivery can be successful in face presentation. However, the main indication for vaginal delivery in such circumstances would be a maternal choice. It is crucial to have a thorough conversation with a mother, explaining the risks and benefits of vaginal delivery with face presentation and a cesarean section. Informed consent and creating a rapport with the mother is an essential aspect of safe and successful labor.

Contraindications

Vaginal delivery of face presentation is contraindicated if the mentum is lying posteriorly or is in a transverse position. In such a scenario, the fetal brow is pressing against the maternal symphysis pubis, and the short fetal neck, which is already maximally extended, cannot span the surface of the maternal sacrum. In this position, the diameter of the head is larger than the maternal pelvis, and it cannot descend through the birth canal. Therefore, the cesarean section is recommended as the safest mode of delivery for mentum posterior face presentations. Attempts to manually convert face presentation to vertex, manual or forceps rotation of the persistent posterior chin to anterior are contraindicated as they can be dangerous. Persistent brow presentation itself is a contraindication for vaginal delivery unless the fetus is significantly small or the maternal pelvis is large.

Equipment

Continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is recommended for face and brow presentations, as heart rate abnormalities are common in these scenarios. One study found that only 14% of the cases with face presentation had no abnormal traces on the cardiotocograph.[8] External transducer devices are advised to prevent damage to the eyes. When internal monitoring is inevitable, monitoring devices on bony parts should be placed carefully. 

Personnel

Consultations that are typically requested for patients with delivery of face/brow presentation include the following:

• Experienced midwife, preferably looking after laboring women 1:1
• Senior obstetrician 
• Neonatal team - in case of need for resuscitation 
• Anesthetic team - to provide necessary pain control (eg, epidural)
• Theatre team  - in case of failure to progress, an emergency cesarean section is required.

Preparation

No specific preparation is required for face or brow presentation. However, discussing the labor options with the mother and birthing partner and informing members of the neonatal, anesthetic, and theatre co-ordinating teams is essential.

Technique or Treatment

Mechanism of Labor in Face Presentation

During contractions, the pressure exerted by the fundus of the uterus on the fetus and the pressure of the amniotic fluid initiate descent. During this descent, the fetal neck extends instead of flexing. The internal rotation determines the outcome of delivery. If the fetal chin rotates posteriorly, vaginal delivery would not be possible, and cesarean section is permitted. The approach towards mentum-posterior delivery should be individualized, as the cases are rare. Expectant management is acceptable in multiparous women with small fetuses, as a spontaneous mentum-anterior rotation can occur. However, there should be a low threshold for cesarean section in primigravida women or women with large fetuses.

The pubis is described as mentum-anterior when the fetal chin is rotated towards the maternal symphysis. In these cases, further descent through the vaginal canal continues, with approximately 73% of cases delivering spontaneously.[9] The fetal mentum presses on the maternal symphysis pubis, and the head is delivered by flexion. The occiput is pointing towards the maternal back, and external rotation happens. Shoulders are delivered in the same manner as in vertex delivery.

Mechanism of Labor in Brow Presentation

As this presentation is considered unstable, it is usually converted into a face or an occiput presentation. Due to the cephalic diameter being wider than the maternal pelvis, the fetal head cannot engage; thus, brow delivery cannot occur. Unless the fetus is small or the pelvis is very wide, the prognosis for vaginal delivery is poor. With persistent brow presentation, a cesarean section is required for safe delivery.

Complications

As the cesarean section is becoming a more accessible mode of delivery in malpresentations, the incidence of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality during face presentation has dropped significantly.[10] However, some complications are still associated with the nature of labor in face presentation. Due to the fetal head position, it is more challenging for the head to engage in the birth canal and descend, resulting in prolonged labor. Prolonged labor itself can provoke fetal distress and arrhythmias. If the labor arrests or signs of fetal distress appear on CTG, the recommended next step in management is an emergency cesarean section, which in itself carries a myriad of operative and post-operative complications. Finally, due to the nature of the fetal position and prolonged duration of labor in face presentation, neonates develop significant edema of the skull and face. Swelling of the fetal airway may also be present, resulting in respiratory distress after birth and possible intubation.

Clinical Significance

During vertex presentation, the fetal head flexes, bringing the chin to the chest, forming the smallest possible fetal head diameter, measuring approximately 9.5 cm. With face and brow presentation, the neck hyperextends, resulting in greater cephalic diameters. As a result, the fetal head engages later, and labor progresses more slowly. Failure to progress in labor is also more common in both presentations compared to the vertex presentation. Furthermore, when the fetal chin is in a posterior position, this prevents further flexion of the fetal neck, as browns are pressing on the symphysis pubis. As a result, descending through the birth canal is impossible. Such presentation is considered undeliverable vaginally and requires an emergency cesarean section. Manual attempts to change face presentation to vertex or manual or forceps rotation to mentum anterior are considered dangerous and discouraged.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

A multidisciplinary team of healthcare experts supports the woman and her child during labor and the perinatal period. For a face or brow presentation to be appropriately diagnosed, an experienced midwife and obstetrician must be involved in the vaginal examination and labor monitoring. As fetal anomalies, such as anencephaly or goiter, can contribute to face presentation, sonographers experienced in antenatal scanning should also be involved in the care. It is advised to inform the anesthetic and neonatal teams in advance of the possible need for emergency cesarean section and resuscitation of the neonate.[11][12]

Review Questions

• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
• Comment on this article.

References

1.

Gardberg M, Leonova Y, Laakkonen E. Malpresentations--impact on mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 May;90(5):540-2. [PubMed: 21501123]

2.

Tapisiz OL, Aytan H, Altinbas SK, Arman F, Tuncay G, Besli M, Mollamahmutoglu L, Danışman N. Face presentation at term: a forgotten issue. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jun;40(6):1573-7. [PubMed: 24888918]

3.

Zayed F, Amarin Z, Obeidat B, Obeidat N, Alchalabi H, Lataifeh I. Face and brow presentation in northern Jordan, over a decade of experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Nov;278(5):427-30. [PubMed: 18283473]

4.

Bashiri A, Burstein E, Bar-David J, Levy A, Mazor M. Face and brow presentation: independent risk factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Jun;21(6):357-60. [PubMed: 18570114]

5.

Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, Laros RK, Caughey AB. Face presentation: predictors and delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):e10-2. [PubMed: 16647888]

6.

Bellussi F, Ghi T, Youssef A, Salsi G, Giorgetta F, Parma D, Simonazzi G, Pilu G. The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):633-641. [PubMed: 28743440]

7.

Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, Kalache K, Rozenberg P, Youssef A, Salomon LJ, Tutschek B. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):128-139. [PubMed: 29974596]

8.

Benedetti TJ, Lowensohn RI, Truscott AM. Face presentation at term. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Feb;55(2):199-202. [PubMed: 7352081]

9.

Ducarme G, Ceccaldi PF, Chesnoy V, Robinet G, Gabriel R. [Face presentation: retrospective study of 32 cases at term]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006 May;34(5):393-6. [PubMed: 16630740]

10.

Cruikshank DP, Cruikshank JE. Face and brow presentation: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jun;24(2):333-51. [PubMed: 7307363]

11.

Domingues AP, Belo A, Moura P, Vieira DN. Medico-legal litigation in Obstetrics: a characterization analysis of a decade in Portugal. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2015 May;37(5):241-6. [PubMed: 26107576]

12.

Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London: Dec 14, 2022. [PubMed: 32212591]

13.

Zhang Y, Fu T, Chen L, Ouyang Y, Han X, Chen D. Face presentation at term: incidence, risk factors and influence on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;310(2):923-931. [PubMed: 38594406]

14.

Ghesquière L, Demetz J, Dufour P, Depret S, Garabedian C, Subtil D. Type of breech presentation and prognosis for delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov;49(9):101832. [PubMed: 32574703]

15.

Ghi T, Dall'Asta A. Sonographic evaluation of the fetal head position and attitude during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S890-S900. [PubMed: 37278991]

16.

Nagaraj UD, Habli MA, Kline-Fath BM. Comparison of best landmarks for calculating fetal jaw measurements by ultrasound and MRI in micrognathia. Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Oct;54(11):1862-1863. [PubMed: 39214867]

17.

Iversen JK, Kahrs BH, Eggebø TM. There are 4, not 7, cardinal movements in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100436. [PubMed: 34214716]

18.

Kuba K, Estrada-Trejo F, Lambert C, Vani K, Eisenberg R, Nathan L, Bernstein P, Hughes F. Novel Evidence-Based Labor Induction Algorithm Associated with Increased Vaginal Delivery within 24 Hours. Am J Perinatol. 2022 Nov;39(15):1622-1632. [PubMed: 35709742]

Disclosure: Julija Makajeva declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Mohsina Ashraf declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.