U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cover of NTP Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Technical Report on the Prenatal Development Studies of Dimethylaminoethanol Bitartrate (CASRN 5988-51-2) in Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley® SD®) Rats (Gavage Studies)

NTP Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Technical Report on the Prenatal Development Studies of Dimethylaminoethanol Bitartrate (CASRN 5988-51-2) in Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley® SD®) Rats (Gavage Studies)

DART Report 04

NTP DART Report

.

Author Information and Affiliations
Research Triangle Park (NC): National Toxicology Program; .

Abstract

Dimethylaminoethanol is a close structural analog of choline, an essential nutrient. Dietary supplements containing dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate, a salt of dimethylaminoethanol, are marketed to improve memory and general cognitive function due to the ability of dimethylaminoethanol to increase levels of acetylcholine in the brain. Human exposure to dimethylaminoethanol may also occur through occupational and industrial routes (e.g., spray painting, beverage can lacquering). Dimethylaminoethanol was nominated by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) for toxicological characterization due to concerns for widespread human exposure through its use in industrial and consumer products. Because of the limited literature indicating that dimethylaminoethanol could be a teratogen and reproductive toxicant and because of the possibility for widespread exposure to the salt form of dimethylaminoethanol (dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate) as a dietary supplement in women of childbearing age, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted prenatal developmental toxicology studies in Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley® SD®) rats. In these studies, time-mated female rats received dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate in sterile water by gavage from implantation on gestation day (GD) 6 to the day before expected parturition (GD 20). To identify dose levels that would appropriately challenge the model system, dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate-related maternal and fetal toxicity were examined in the dose range-finding study followed by the prenatal developmental toxicity study.

Dose Range-finding Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study:

Groups of 10 time-mated female rats were administered 0, 250, 500, or 1,000 mg dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate/kg body weight per day (mg/kg/day) in sterile water by gavage from GD 6 to GD 20. Vehicle control (0 mg/kg) animals received sterile water.

There were no indications of maternal or fetal toxicity in the dose range-finding study. All animals survived to study termination. There were no dose-related effects on maternal body weights, body weight gains, body weights corrected for live litter size, or feed consumption. The number of pregnant females, mean number of corpora lutea, dead fetuses, early and late resorptions, and fetal sex ratio were similar across all treatment groups. There was a significant positive trend in the mean number of live female fetuses per litter relative to dose. There were no exposure-related fetal findings.

Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study:

As no maternal toxicity was observed in the dose range-finding study, groups of 25 time-mated female rats were administered 0, 250, 500, or 1,000 mg/kg/day in sterile water by gavage from GD 6 to GD 20. Vehicle control (0 mg/kg) animals received sterile water. In this study, dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate was well tolerated and there were no significant effects on mortality, maternal body weights, body weight gains, body weights corrected for litter size, or feed consumption during gestation. In the 1,000 mg/kg/day group, one dam was euthanized moribund (GD 21) and one was found dead (GD 10); however, those deaths were not considered dose-related. Clinical observations were limited to single or sporadic incidences with the exception of brown or red vaginal discharge, which was observed between GD 14 and GD 21 in 10/20, 3/20, 4/20, and 10/24 dams in the 0, 250, 500, and 1,000 mg/kg/day groups, respectively. There were no notable placental or other maternal gross observations at necropsy except for a significant, but not biologically relevant, positive trend in mean absolute liver weight.

The number of pregnant females, mean number of corpora lutea, implantations, litter size, live fetuses per litter, and fetal sex ratio were similar across all treatment groups.

External and visceral malformations were limited to common background findings and singular or sporadic incidences. There were no observed incidences of fetal head, specifically brain, abnormalities. Skeletal malformations and variations occurred predominantly in the ribs. A significant increase in the incidence of absent innominate artery (a variation) and total, short thoracolumbar ribs (a variation) was observed in the 1,000 mg/kg group, along with a significant positive trend. Additionally, there was a significant increase in the number of supernumerary sites, or ossification sites, in the skull in 1,000 mg/kg fetuses as well as a significant positive trend across all exposed groups. These effects might be reversible (supernumerary ribs) or of uncertain biological significance (supernumerary sites in the skull); however, in the absence of maternal toxicity or effects on fetal body weight, the increased incidences of extra ossification sites in two separate locations, each occurring through two different skeletal developmental pathways, suggest that these effects could be related to dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate exposure.

Conclusions:

Under the conditions of the prenatal study, there was equivocal evidence of developmental toxicity of dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate in Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley® SD®) rats attributable to increased incidences of absent innominate artery, short thoracolumbar ribs, and supernumerary sites in the skull in the absence of overt maternal toxicity.

Synonyms: 2-Dimethylaminoethanol bitartrate; 2-dimethylaminoethanol tartrate; dimethylethanolamine bitartrate; N,N-dimethylethanolamine- tartaric acid salt; ethanol, 2-(dimethylamino)-, [R(R*,R*)]-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioate; ethanol, 2-(dimethylamino)-, tartrate

See Explanation of Levels of Evidence for Developmental Toxicity.

Summary of Exposure-related Findings in Rats in the Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Gavage Study of Dimethylaminoethanol Bitartrate

0 mg/kg250 mg/kg500 mg/kg1,000 mg/kg
Maternal Parameters
Animals on Study25252525
Number Pregnant20202024
Number Found Dead0001
Number Euthanized Moribund0001
Number Euthanized – Early Delivery1001
Clinical ObservationsNoneNoneNoneNone
Body Weight and Feed Consumptiona
Terminal Body Weight359.6 ± 8.8375.2 ± 5.3380.3 ± 5.1367.1 ± 6.5
Body Weight Change GD 6 to 21120.5 ± 7.5135.2 ± 4.7140.0 ± 4.2*127.7 ± 5.8
Feed Consumption GD 6 to 2121.2 ± 0.421.6 ± 0.422.0 ± 0.321.5 ± 0.4
Necropsy ObservationsNoneNoneNoneNone
Developmental/Fetal Parameters
Number of Litters Examined19202022
Number of Live Fetuses Evaluated209265260249
Number of Live Fetuses per Litterb11.00 ± 1.1213.25 ± 0.6013.00 ± 0.5611.32 ± 1.07
Number of Early Resorptionsc9101014
Number of Late Resorptionsc0000
Number of Dead Fetusesc00011
Number with Whole Litter Resorptions0000
Percent Postimplantation Lossb5.05 ± 1.573.80 ± 1.533.45 ± 1.1011.17 ± 5.56
Fetal Body Weight per Littera5.38 ± 0.155.26 ± 0.055.33 ± 0.065.22 ± 0.09
Male Fetal Weight per Littera5.44 ± 0.16 (18)5.37 ± 0.05 (19)5.50 ± 0.06 (20)5.51 ± 0.09 (20)
Female Fetal Weight per Littera5.15 ± 0.12 (18)5.14 ± 0.06 (20)5.18 ± 0.07 (20)5.21 ± 0.08 (20)
Gravid Uterine Weighta80.18 ± 7.3695.85 ± 3.9396.17 ± 3.8285.25 ± 6.38
External FindingsNoneNoneNoneNone
Visceral Findingsd
Arteries
   Innominate artery, absent – [V]
      Fetuses3 (1.44)**##4 (1.51)6 (2.31)12 (4.62)*#
      Litters3 (15.79)*4 (20.00)4 (20.00)10 (45.45)*
Skeletal Findingsd
Supernumerary Rib
   Thoracolumbar short, total – [V]
      Fetuses56 (26.79)**##56 (21.21)59 (22.69)100 (38.46)**#
      Litters17 (89.47)18 (90.00)18 (90.00)19 (86.36)
Skull
   General, supernumerary site – [V]
      Fetuses1 (1.0)**##3 (2.34)2 (1.59)13 (10.16)**#
      Litters1 (5.56)**3 (15.00)2 (10.00)10 (50.00)**
Level of Evidence of Developmental Toxicity: Equivocal Evidence
*

Statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) trend (denoted in vehicle control column) or pairwise comparison (denoted in dose group column); **p ≤ 0.01.

#

Statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) trend (denoted in vehicle control column) or pairwise comparison (denoted in dose group column) in litter-based analysis of fetuses; ##p ≤ 0.01

GD = gestation day; [V] = variation.

a

Results given in grams. Data are displayed as mean ± standard error.

b

Data are displayed as mean ± standard error.

c

No statistical analyses were performed on number of early resorptions, number of late resorptions, or number of dead fetuses.

d

Upper row denotes number of affected fetuses (%) and lower row the number of affected litters (%).

Contents

About the Series

NTP DART Report
ISSN (Electronic): 2690-2052
Copyright Notice

This is a work of the US government and distributed under the terms of the Public Domain

Bookshelf ID: NBK562911PMID: 33052641DOI: 10.22427/NTP-DART-04

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (945K)

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...