TABLE 7-1Overview of 13 Studies Reviewed by the Committee with Relevance to the Safety and Effectiveness of cBHT

AuthorObjectiveStudy DesignPopulationTreatmentOther NotesMeasureMain Outcomes Relevant to the Committee's ChargeSerious Adverse EventsLimitations
Dahir and Travers-Gustafson, 2014Determine effect of DHEA on sexual healthQuasi-experimental pilot (4 weeks)Women with breast cancer taking AI therapy

n = 12

Race/ethnicity not reported

Age (mean): 59.7 years
DHEA vaginal cream;

300 μg/daily
Exclusion criteria describedFemale Sexual Function Index (FSFI) surveyCompared to baseline, improvements in individual domain scores of desire (P = 0.000), arousal (P = 0.002), lubrication (P = 0.018), orgasm (P = 0.005), satisfaction (P = 0.001), and pain (P = 0.000)

No recurrence or progression of breast cancer over 3 years
Authors reported that no serious adverse events occurredNarrow time frame for enrollment and follow-up

Small sample size

Excluded surgical menopause under the age of 50 and women with recurrent G. vaginalis infection

Sexual functioning may have been affected by history or events such as relationship conflict, stress, or vacation

Absence of a randomized control group
Davis et al., 2018Determine effect of testosterone on sexual satisfaction, vaginal symptomsRandomized double-blind, placebo-controlled (26 weeks)Postmenopausal women taking an AI with VVA symptoms

n
= 44

Race/ethnicity not reported

Age (mean): 57.7 years (treatment) 55.1 years (placebo)
Testosterone intravaginal cream;

300 μg/dose
Exclusion criteria described

Treatment schedule: Daily for 2 weeks and then 3x/week for 24 weeks
FSFI survey Female Sexual Distress Scale–Revised (FSDS-R), Profile of Female Sexual Function

Questionnaire for UI Diagnosis; serum levels of sex steroids
Greater improvements seen in treatment group in FSFI satisfaction scores (P= 0.043); FSDS-R scores (P = 0.02); sexual concerns (P < 0.001); sexual responsiveness (P < 0.001); vaginal dryness (P = 0.009); dyspareunia (P = 0.014)

No between-group differences in serum levels of sex steroids at baseline or posttreatment

No between-group differences in reported UI symptoms at 26 weeks, adjusted for baseline status
Authors did not report on adverse events for this studyHigher dropout rate in control group

Low power to assess additional domains of sexual function

Recruitment was limited by patient concerns about the safety of hormone therapy after a diagnosis of breast cancer
Glaser et al., 2011Determine effect of testosterone on somatic, psychological and urogenital symptomsCohort (12 weeks)Pre- and postmenopausal women

n = 300

Race/ethnicity not reported

Age (mean):

42.7 years (premenopausal)

53.0 years (postmenopausal)
Testosterone pellet (3.1 mm)

Initial dose varied across patient based on their weight (ranged from 75 mg to 160 mg)

Subsequent dose adjustments based on weight, avoidance of adverse events, and adequacy of clinical response
Exclusion criteria describedMenopause Rating Scale (MRS)

Total scores and psychological, somatic, and urogenital subscale scores

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
Premenopausal women: Higher testosterone doses correlated with greater improvement in MRS total score (P < 0.05) and urogenital subscore (P < 0.01)

Higher testosterone doses did not correlate with greater improvement in either the psychological or somatic subscores (P > 0.05)

Postmenopausal women: Higher testosterone doses correlated with greater improvement in MRS total score and three subscores: somatic, psychological, and urogenital (P < .001)
Authors reported that no serious adverse events occurredShort-term study

Absence of a randomized control group or comparison group
Jankowski et al., 2006Determine effect of DHEA on BMD and body compositionRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (12 months)Older men and women

Participants were primarily White

Women
n = 70 (36 DHEA; 34 placebo)

Age (mean): 68 years

Men
n = 70 (35 DHEA; 35 placebo)

Age (mean): 69 years
Oral DHEA; 50 mg/dailyExclusion criteria describedBMD measured at baseline and 12 monthsMen and women: Greater increase in BMD in DHEA group: Total hip (1.0%, P = 0.05), trochanter (1.2%, P = 0.06), and shaft (1.2%, P = 0.05)

Women only: DHEA increased lumbar spine BMD (2.2%, P = 0.04; sex-by-treatment interaction, P = 0.05)
Placebo: One death (unrelated to study); one hospitalization for coronary artery stenting

DHEA: One hospitalization for transient ischemic attack and one hospitalization for urinary tract infection
Small sample size

Patient use of other reproductive steroids

Short duration of the therapy
Kenny et al., 2010Determine effect of DHEA and exercise on bone mass, strength, and physical functionRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (6 months)Women over 65 with DHEA levels < 550 ng/dL

n = 99 (assigned)

Participants were primarily White

Age (mean): 76.6 years
Treatment arm 1: Oral DHEA 50 mg/d supplemented with yoga

Treatment arm 2: Oral DHEA 50 mg/d supplemented with aerobics

Control arm 1: Placebo supplemented with yoga

Control arm 2: Placebo supplemented with aerobics
Exclusion criteria described

All received calcium and Vitamin D supplements
BMD measured at baseline and 6 monthsThere were no significant changes in BMD or bone turnover markers between groupsAuthor did not report on adverse events for this studySmall sample size

Short duration of therapy
Leonetti et al., 1999Determine effect of progesterone on vasomotor symptoms, BMDRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (12 months)Healthy women within 5 years of menopause

n = 90 (assigned)

All participants were White

Age (mean): 52 years
20 mg transdermal progesterone cream; applied dailyExclusion criteria described

All received daily multivitamins and 1,200 mg of calcium
Weekly symptom diaries (self-report)

BMD measured in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip
Symptoms: Greater self-reported improvement in vasomotor symptoms found in treatment group compared to placebo (83% versus 19%); (P < 0.001)

BMD: No significant difference between group comparisons
Author did not report on adverse events for this studyLimited consumer access to the custom-compounded preparation

Limited generalizability of research results
Mahmud, 2010Determine effect of Bi-est, progesterone, testosterone and/or DHEA on menopausal symptomsObservational (average 30 month follow-up)Postmenopausal women

n = 189 (assigned)

Race/ethnicity not reported

Age (mean): 53.7 years
Treatment arm 1: transdermal Bi-est cream (estradiol 1 mg plus estriol 4 mg per gram) and sublingual progesterone (50–100 mg) and testosterone perivaginal cream

Participants began with a 0.5 gm twice daily dose of Bi-est cream, which was increased or decreased as needed to control hot flashes and breast tenderness

Total testosterone was maintained around 25 ng/dl with dose adjustments as needed based on blood levels

Adjustments to progesterone doses were made to achieve blood levels close to 4 ng/ml

Treatment arm 2: Transdermal Bi-est cream (estradiol 1 mg plus estriol 4 mg per gram) and sublingual progesterone (50–100 mg) and DHEA

Participants began with a 0.5 gm twice daily dose of Bi-est cream, which was increased or decreased as needed to control hot flashes and breast tenderness

Adjustments to progesterone doses were made to achieve blood levels close to 4 ng/ml

Participants received DHEA if levels were determined to be low. Average dose began at 25 mg/day and was typically reduced to 25 mg every other day to maintain the desired level (approx. 120 μg/dl)
No exclusion criteria providedPatient outcomes assessed over an average follow-up of 30 months

Common symptoms assessed: hot flashes, night sweats, insomnia, lack of energy, low libido, and minor stiffness or achy joints
122 patients reported improvement in all common symptoms, 49 patients reported relief of most symptoms; 13 patients reported some improvements; 5 patients reported little to no improvement in symptomsOne patient was found to have an ER+ and PR+ breast cancer after 6 months of treatment

Prior to joining this study the patient had been taking Premarin for 10 years, which the researchers believe may have caused the development of breast cancer in this patient
Absence of a randomized control group

Lack of predetermined dosage formulation, participant outcomes, and statistical analysis of results

Multiple dosage forms of treatments (subset of patients switched from Bi-est cream to sublingual route)
Morales, 1998Determine effect of DHEA on steroid levels, body composition and muscle strengthRandomized double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover (12 months)Older men and women

Women
n = 10 (assigned)

Race/ethnicity not reported

Age (mean): 54.5 years

Men
n = 9 (assigned)

Race/ethnicity not reported

Age (mean): 55.6 years
Oral DHEA; 100 mg/dailyExclusion criteria described

2-week washout period between crossover
BMD measured at baseline and 6 monthsThere were no significant changes from baseline in the BMD of the hip and spine in men or womenAuthor reported that no serious adverse events occurredSmall sample size
Narkwichean et al., 2017Determine effect of DHEA on In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) outcomesRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial (2 years)Women receiving IVF with diminished ovarian reserves

Treatment group: n = 27

All White British women

Age (mean) = 36.8 years

Placebo group: n = 25

84% White British women

Age (mean) = 35.2 years
Oral DHEA; 75 mg/day; 12 to 20 weeks before starting ovarian stimulationExclusion criteria described

Long protocol using hMG 300 IU/day
Number of oocytes retrieved; live birth rates; mRNA expression of developmental biomarkers in granulosa and cumulus cellsTreatment did not improve the response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation or oocyte quality or live birth rate during IVF

Treatment with long protocol in women predicted to have poor ovarian reserve
Author reported that no serious adverse reactions occurredNo power calculation to determine sample size
Panjari et al., 2009Determine safety of DHEA used to improve sexual functionRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial (52 weeks)Postmenopausal women with low libido

Race/ethnicity not reported

Treatment group: n = 47 (assigned; age (mean) = 55.1 years

Placebo group: n = 46 (assigned); age (mean) = 53.9 years
Oral DHEA; 50 mg/dayExclusion criteria describedDHEA versus placebo on androgenic side effects, lipid profile, insulin–glucose homeostasis, and the endometrium were assessed over 52 weeksDHEA did not significantly alter lipid profile or insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women

The pattern of breakthrough bleeding did not substantially differ between the DHEA and placebo groups, and no significant adverse endometrial effects were apparent
Author reported that no serious adverse events occurredLength of study is insufficient to have confidence in the reported endometrial safety outcomes

Endpoint for endometrial effects was not sufficiently powered
Virkki et al., 2010Effect of DHEA on Sjorgren's syndrome-related fatigueMulticentered, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial (9 months)Men and women with primary Sjorgren's Syndrome (reported as one group)

n = 107 (including 7 men)

Race/ethnicity not reported

Age (range): 18–80 years
Oral DHEA; 50 mg/dayExclusion criteria described

1 month washout period between crossover (2 treatment groups lasting 4 months each)
General fatigue using the 20-item Multiple Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20); Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)All of the MFI-20 subscales and the fatigue Visual Analog Scale showed improvements from baseline levels as a result of treatment (P < 0.001)

No significant differences between placebo and DHEA treatment
Placebo Treatment: One case of pneumonia and pneumococcal sepsis

Other serious events resulting in patient dropout: (1) unilateral numbness, (2) suspected transient ischemic attack, and (3) exanthema

DHEA treatment: Serious events resulting in patient dropout: muscle cramps in the calves and maculae on the back and cheek, (suspected as being discoid lupus erythematosus lesions)
Owing to increased number of statistical analyses of the MFI-20s six subscale variables, there is an increased risk of analyses resulting in statistical significance by chance
Wiser et al., 2010Effect of DHEA on IVF outcomesProspective, randomized, open-labeled, controlled trial (19 months)Women with poor ovarian response to previous IVF cycles

Race / ethnicity not reported

Treatment group: n = 17; age (mean) = 36.9 years

Control group: n = 16; age (mean) = 37.8 years
Oral DHEA; 75 mg/day, at least 6 weeks before starting first cycle of IVF ovulation

Women who did not conceive took DHEA for at least 16–18 weeks
Exclusion criteria described

All patients received long-protocol IVF
Estradiol levels, number of retrieved oocytes, quality and number of embryos, pregnancy and birth rateLive birth rate for women in the DHEA group for both IVF treatment cycles = 23.1%; Live birth rate from women in the control group = 4.0%. (p = 0.05)Author reported that no serious adverse events occurredSmall sample size

Outcomes may have been affected by variations in IVF protocol
Witherby et al., 2011Effect of vaginal testosterone on estradiol and testosterone levels, and vaginal atrophy in breast cancer patients on AIsObservational (28 days)Women undergoing treatment with an AI in early stage breast cancer with reported vaginal itching, dryness, or dyspareunia

Ethnicity not reported

n = 20 (divided into two treatment groups)

Age (range): 45–69 years
Group 1 (n = 10): 300 μg intravaginal testosterone cream compounded with 13.5 mg of testosterone propionate

Group 2 (n =10): 150 μg intravaginal testosterone cream compounded with 6.75 mg of testosterone propionate
Exclusion criteria describedAssessment of hormone levels to confirm estradiol suppression

Clinical effect based on analyses of serial questionnaire results

Pathologic improvement of vaginal atrophy was analyzed based on a comparison of baseline and posttreatment maturation index, pH, and clinical examination
No significant difference in median serum estradiol levels before and after treatment (P = 0.91)

No difference in posttreatment estradiol levels between dosing levels (P >0.99)

Significant improvement in mean total symptom score for vaginal atrophy (P < 0.001) and remained low at 1 month post-therapy (P = 0.003)

No significant difference between dosing levels

Posttreatment maturation values were significantly higher for 300 μg group (P = 0.005)
Author reported that no serious adverse events occurredLack of a randomized control group

Recruitment of subjects was not systematic

Small sample size

NOTE: AI = aromatase inhibitor; BMD = bone mineral density; DHEA = dehydroepiandrosterone; ER = estrogen receptor; FSDS-R = Female Sexual Distress Scale– Revised; FSFI = Female Sexual Function Index; IVF = in vitro fertilization; MFI = Multiple Fatigue Inventory; MRS = Menopause Rating Scale; PR = progesterone receptor: UI = urinary incontinence; VVA = vulvovaginal atrophy.

From: 7, The Safety and Effectiveness of Compounded Bioidentical Hormone Therapy

Cover of The Clinical Utility of Compounded Bioidentical Hormone Therapy
The Clinical Utility of Compounded Bioidentical Hormone Therapy: A Review of Safety, Effectiveness, and Use.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on the Clinical Utility of Treating Patients with Compounded Bioidentical Hormone Replacement Therapy; Jackson LM, Parker RM, Mattison DR, editors.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2020 Jul 1.
Copyright 2020 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.