U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Jones F, Gombert-Waldron K, Honey S, et al. Using co-production to increase activity in acute stroke units: the CREATE mixed-methods study. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Aug. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 8.35.)

Cover of Using co-production to increase activity in acute stroke units: the CREATE mixed-methods study

Using co-production to increase activity in acute stroke units: the CREATE mixed-methods study.

Show details

Appendix 5Topic guide for members of staff post implementation

  • Setting the scene: what group were you part of? What did you do in your group? What was your contribution?
  • Have you noticed anything being different in the unit? In terms of patient experience? In terms of activity?
  • Feeling: how did you like the process? What did you like/did not like?
  • Group: how did you perceive your place in the group? What did you think about the group dynamics? What did you like/not like? What could have been improved?
  • Outcomes: are you happy with the outcomes? Did it meet your expectations? How could the outcomes be improved? Are some outcomes visible to you? If yes, how? If no, why do you think they are not being implemented? Are you satisfied with the outcomes? How could they be improved?
  • What are barriers to/facilitators of introducing and embedding the interventions to the unit(s)?
  • Facilitation: what did you think about the overall process? Do you think working together with the patients and family members made a difference? How was CREATE different from other improvement projects you have been involved in? How could it have been better? Challenges?
  • The process: how did you perceive the process? Were there particular points in the process that you liked/did not like? How did you feel/what did you think at particular points in time? What had been the most important parts of the project? And why did you think they were important?
  • Work balance: in what ways has (or did) the EBCD process impact on or affect your working practice? Were there any challenges?
  • Long-term outcomes: what will you take away from the process?
  • Any other thoughts?
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2020. This work was produced by Jones et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.
Bookshelf ID: NBK561462

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (13M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...