Continuing Education Activity
The human parainfluenza virus (HPIV) is an enveloped, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the family of Paramyxoviridae. HPIV can cause both upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children, usually under the age of 5, immunocompromised adults, and the elderly. It is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in infants worldwide. This activity reviews the evaluation and treatment of parainfluenza virus infection and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in managing patients with this condition.
Objectives:
Identify the etiology of parainfluenza virus infection.
Describe the appropriate evaluation of parainfluenza virus infection.
Review the management options available for parainfluenza virus infection.
Summarize interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination and communication to advance the management of parainfluenza virus infection and improve outcomes.
Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.
Introduction
The human parainfluenza virus (HPIV) is an enveloped, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the family of Paramyxoviridae.[1] It is classified into four serotypes numbered from 1 to 4 (HPIV-1, HPIV-2, HPIV-3, and HPIV-4). Serotype 4 can even be more subdivided into HPIV-4A and HPIV-4B.[2] HPIV can cause both upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children usually under the age of 5, adults, immunocompromised adults, and the elderly.[1] It is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in infants worldwide.[2] These respiratory viruses were first observed in the late 1950s when they were isolated from children with croup and were known as croup-associated viruses.[1][3]
Although HPIV demonstrated a resemblance to the influenza virus, HPIV is unique and can be easily and simply separated from the myxoviruses (influenza virus). The parainfluenza virus shared some characteristics with the influenza virus, including few antigenic sites, as well as their poor growth in embryonated eggs.[4] In 1959, the fourth serotype was discovered that shared the same criteria with the 3 parainfluenza serotypes previously demonstrated, and a new family of viruses was created called "parainfluenza viruses".[3]
Etiology
The parainfluenza viruses belong to the Paramyxoviridaie family.[1] It is genetically and antigenically divided into four main serotypes, numbered as HPIV-1 to HPIV-4, with further subtypes of HPIV-4a and HPIV-4b.[3] The human parainfluenza viruses 1 and 3 belong to the genus of Respirovirus, and the genus Rubulavirus includes HPIV-2 and 4.[1] HPIV-1 to HPIV-3 are one of the leading causes of lower respiratory infections in infants, young children, adults, the immunocompromised, and the elderly.[3]
The virions of the parainfluenza viruses are pleomorphic, in which diameter ranges from 150 to 200 micrometers.[1] These six proteins their RNA encodes for include:
The nucleocapsid protein (NP)
the phosphoprotein (P)
the fusion glycoprotein (F)
the matrix protein (M)
The hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) glycoprotein
The RNA polymerase (L)
[1]
HPIVs share similarities in their structural and biological characteristics, but each of them infects people at different ages and causes different symptoms and illnesses.[3]
Epidemiology
The human parainfluenza virus is a community-acquired respiratory pathogen, that has some predisposing factors including:
Malnutrition
Overcrowding
Vitamin A deficiency
Environmental smoke or toxins
[3]
HPIVs are one of the main causes of hospitalization in children less than 5 years of age due to acute respiratory tract infection, with a rate accounting for up to 17% of hospitalizations.[5] Serological surveys have demonstrated that 60% of children infected with HPIV-3 are around 2 years of age, whereas for children around 4 years of age, the rate of HPIV-3 infection increases to up to 80%.[6] Co-infections of HPIV and other respiratory viruses are frequent and may cause a more serious, severe, and prolonged disease course.[5]
The seasonality of HPIV is specific to each of the four. HPIV-1 follows a biennial pattern, marked by a dramatic increase in cases in the months of September to December of odd-numbered years.[7][8] Biennial fall epidemics of HPIV-1 have been reported in many studies.[9] Outbreaks of HPIV-3 infections occur annually, primarily from April to June. During the even-numbered years, when HPIV-1 is not circulating, HPIV-3 often has a longer spring season that extends into the fall or a second increase in activity from November to December of that year. Outbreaks of HPIV-2, which are smaller in magnitude, occur biennially to alternate years with HPIV-1, or they can cause yearly outbreaks.[7][8][9] HPIV-4 is infrequently isolated with seasonality similar to that of HPIV-3.[7]
The parainfluenza virus spreads through direct person-to-person contact or from large droplets. Outbreaks can occur, for example, in nursing homes and daycare facilities.[1]
Pathophysiology
The pathogenesis of the parainfluenza virus consists of the host immune response and viral mechanisms.[7] The attachment and the fusion of the virus to the host cell are mediated by the virus surface proteins hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) and fusion glycoproteins (F) with the sialic acid residues on the surface of host epithelial cells respectively.[1] Transcription and maturation are mediated by the actin and the cytoskeleton, which also play a role in the movement of viral glycoproteins towards the surface of the host cells.[3]
The HN protein cleaves the sialic acid residue and facilitates the release of new virions from the host cell.[1] The fusion glycoproteins, as well as the HN proteins, are the most important targets for neutralizing antibodies.[1] The inner surface of the virus envelope is covered by the matrix protein.[1] A template for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, containing the P and L proteins, is generated by binding and coating the viral RNA with the NP protein, to facilitate transcription, the P gene also encodes more nonessential viral replication proteins that vary among the four serotypes.[1] HPIV-2 RNA encodes a V protein, and HPIV-1 and HPIV-3 RNAs encode short C proteins, both of which decrease type 1 interferon activity of the host cell, which results in inhibiting the host immune response. The D protein is expressed by HPIV-3, but the relevance and function of it remain unclear. Replication occurs in the cytoplasm of the host cell, and the negative-sense RNA strands are then exported as a new virion.[1]
The infection with parainfluenza virus first starts at the pseudostratified mucociliary airway epithelium of the nose and oropharynx, then spreading to the large and small airways.[8] The attachment and the replication of the virus occur in the ciliated epithelial cells of the upper and lower respiratory tract, with peak replication 2 to 5 days after the initial infection.[1] The extent of infection and the severity of the disease correlates with the location, that is, mild symptoms are associated with upper respiratory tract infection, and more severe ones, croup, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia occur with infection in the distal airways or lower respiratory tract.[8]
When the infection of epithelial cells of the small airways occurs, inflammatory infiltrates develop, and the host immune response is thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis.[1] The first morphologic changes seen when a cell is infected with the HPIV, are the cytoplasm and nucleus increasing in size, focal rounding, and the host cell mitotic activity is decreased as soon as 24 hours after inoculation of the HPIV.[3] Basophilic or eosinophilic inclusions can be found as well, as more changes, including single or multilocular cytoplasmic vacuoles and the formation of multinucleated giant cells, are noticed.[3] These giant cells are generally observed late in the infection, and they contain between two and seven nuclei. Paramyxoviruses are one family of pathogens that cause apoptosis in tissue culture cells.[3]
HPIV usually causes a mild and rapidly repaired focal tissue destruction that may even be unnoticed.[3] Giant-cell pneumonia can lead to death in immunocompromised hosts.[3] Viremia and infection beyond the respiratory epithelium can also cause death, although they are rare and typically only found in immunocompromised patients.[8]
History and Physical
Human parainfluenza virus is associated with upper and lower respiratory tract illnesses in all age groups, including:
The common cold
Croup
Tracheobronchitis
Bronchiolitis
Exacerbations of underlying diseases are also frequent including:[8]
These infections can be mild in healthy individuals, but they may lead to more serious respiratory illnesses in young age children and immunocompromised adults.[6]
Clinical presentation can differ by type; HPIV-1 and HPIV-2 are associated with croup and cold-like symptoms, while HPIV-3 often causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia. HPIV-4 is less well-characterized but has been suggested to have symptoms similar to HPIV-3.[8]
Croup: Most children present with fever, inspiratory stridor, a hoarse barking cough, as well as laryngeal obstruction. Some of the lower airway signs, such as wheezing and air trapping, also occur.
[1][3] The subglottic region of the trachea is encircled by the cricoid cartilage, which is less distensible than other parts of the trachea and makes it more prone to inflammatory obstruction, which involves both the larynx and this subglottic region. The inflammation then extends lower into the bronchi causing the croup, otherwise known as laryngotracheobronchitis.
[1] On chest or neck radiographs, the croup's characteristic sign called the “steeple sign” can be seen.
[1]
Bronchiolitis: Due to the infant's terminal airways being so small, bronchiolitis is observed only in infants and young children.
[3] The typical illness starts 1 to 3 days before the onset of lower respiratory signs and symptoms. It starts with a fever, and nasal congestion then spreads to the lower respiratory tract, causing cough, rales, tachypnea, and chest wall retractions. The median duration of symptoms is from 8 to 15 days, and most healthy children recover from bronchiolitis within 21 days.
[1] It can be caused by all four types of HPIV, but most commonly is caused by HPIV-1 and HPIV-3. Both of the types can be the cause of bronchiolitis in 10% to 15% of nonhospitalized children. However, HPIV-1 causes fewer cases in hospitalized children compared to HPIV-3. Only second to the respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus is considered as one of the main causes of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in young infants.
[3]
Pneumonia:
Pneumonia is one of the main causes of hospitalization among US adults.
[8] Fever, cough, and rales are considered to be the main clinical symptoms present in children with pneumonia. In addition, infiltrates or consolidations are found on chest radiographs. Whereas all parainfluenza serotypes can be associated with pneumonia, HPIV1 and HPIV3 are more likely to cause it. HPIV-3 causes from 2% to 12% of pneumonia hospitalizations in children, while HPIV-1 causes from 1% to 6%.
[1] Parainfluenza has been reported as the cause of 0.2%–11.5% of pneumonia-related adult hospitalizations.
[8] Pneumonia was most common (10.5%) in patients more than 15 years of age, out of all hospitalized patients infected with HPIV.
[8]
Tracheobronchitis: Lower respiratory tract signs and symptoms that do not fit with the croup, bronchiolitis, or pneumonia often receive a diagnosis of tracheobronchitis.
[3] In general, it is the inflammation of the lower and large airways.
[1] It is mostly associated with cough and rhonchi on auscultation, but patients may also experience a fever and upper respiratory tract infection. 20% to 30% of children with lower respiratory tract infections are diagnosed with tracheobronchitis.
[3]
Although HPIVs primary infection location is the respiratory tract, dissemination of the infection has been described, affecting other organ systems, including neurologic, renal, rheumatologic, and gastrointestinal tract.[9] Studies of infection of adults with HPIV demonstrated a high rate (75%) of asymptomatic shedding. In addition, a prolonged asymptomatic shedding period of HPIV-1 and HPIV-3 in healthy young adult males was found to continue for up to >8 months.[8]
Evaluation
Although human parainfluenza virus 1 (HPIV-1) is commonly associated with croup and may be diagnosed only based on clinical presentations, other HPIV serotypes do not have certain clinical features that allow them to be diagnosed clinically.[1] Therefore, laboratory testing is needed for a specific viral diagnosis.[1][3] When collecting swabs, it is recommended that flocked swabs be used in preference to cotton swabs due to enhanced yield.[1] Many types of samples are approved for testing, which include nasopharyngeal swabs, nasal aspiration and washes, nose and throat swabs, sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage.[1]
The timing of the sample collection is important. Early in the illness, it is more convenient to test samples from the upper airway, which have shown to be positive. Later in the illness, it is better to test secretions such as sputum and bronchoalveolar fluid from the lower airways.[1]
HPIV-3 has been isolated in children from as early as 6 days prior to 6 weeks past the first symptom. Immunocompromised patients and adults have been noted to shed HPIV-1, HPIV-2, and HPIV-3 for many months.[3]
Viral culture: Considered for years to be the gold standard for diagnosis. The detection of hemadsorption (HAD) to the monolayers or the development of structural changes in host cells called cytopathic effect (CPE), the existence of either one of them is significantly important for viral isolation on the cell culture.
[1] The hemadsorption and the CPE can be confirmed by the use of the fluorescent-labeled monoclonal antibodies (Mab) that are viral-specific.
[1] Viral culture is rarely used as it is time-consuming and takes much more time for the results to be available.
[2]
Fluorescent antibody assays: As a rapid method of diagnosis, it has been used since the 1970s and is based on the identification of viral antigens directly on clinical samples.
[1] For some viruses, there is a newly developed commercial colorimetric enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIAs), but unfortunately, for the parainfluenza virus, there is no availability in terms of a commercial rapid antigen test.
[1] Specific immunofluorescent-labeled antibodies are possible for direct detection of HPIV 1–3 with sensitivities of 63 to 95%; yet, antibodies to HPIV-4 are not available.
[1] Therefore, because of the narrowing of clinical features of the HPIV infection, clinical samples tested by the immunofluorescent assay (IFA) may be a logical alternative.
[1]
Molecular assays: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays can be used easily and efficiently to detect and diagnose the HPIV infection. Based on the sensitivity, specificity, and rapidity of the PCR, it is the most accurate test for HPIV diagnosis.
[1] Compared to viral culture and IFA testing, the PCR has been reported to have superior sensitivity and specificity. With the developed commercial assays being accessible, it became more widely available to use in clinical microbiology laboratories.
[1]
Serologic diagnosis: Rarely used in clinical practice and is primarily a research tool.
[1]
Treatment / Management
Treatment of HPIV infection is basically symptomatic in healthy children and adults. Unfortunately, no antiviral agent with proven efficacy for human parainfluenza virus infection is available.[1]
Treatment of croup: Corticosteroids have been shown to be beneficial for mild and moderate to severe croup.[1] Corticosteroids may be administered orally or given intramuscularly, and both have been shown to be superior to inhaled therapy.[1] The dosing is a single dose of dexamethasone at 0.6 mg/kg, although lower doses have been proposed. Epinephrine can be used nebulized, which results in some relief of symptoms within 30 minutes, but treatment effects do not last for more than 2 hours. This treatment may be beneficial and cause some relief while waiting for the anti-inflammatory activity of steroid therapy to take effect.[1]
The exacerbation of chronic respiratory diseases caused by different viruses, including HPIVs, can be potentially prevented by early treatment with some of the antivirals. Although there is no effective antiviral treatment for HPIV in clinical practice, new strategies are being developed that may be practical and available for HPIV respiratory infections. The most direct approach consists of removing the sialic acid receptors, which are necessary for the attachment and fusion by the parainfluenza's HN and F proteins, thereby inhibiting the first step in infection. It is the DAS181, a recombinant sialidase protein, that has been proposed to inhibit HPIV infection effectively.[6] Peptide insertion into the cell membrane is also another therapeutic concept that can be used, which may allow the use of fusion-inhibitory peptides like peptides derived from the HR region, to inhibit the fusion of viruses to the host cells. It has been reported that the antiviral potency of a paramyxovirus HRC-derived peptide can be significantly increased by adding a cholesterol moiety.[6]
The most severe disease is found in immunocompromised patients, and treatment at present remains largely supportive.[6]
Differential Diagnosis
Viruses are the most common etiological agents of acute respiratory tract infection (ARTIs). HPIV shares practically the same signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infection with other bacterial and viral pathogens, which makes it more difficult to have a diagnosis based only on clinical features. Some of the common viral respiratory pathogens that are considered in the differential diagnoses of HPIV include:
Prognosis
Parainfluenza viruses represent one of the main causes of respiratory viral infection. They can cause more severe and serious problems that may lead to death in immunocompromised patients than they do in the healthy general population.[10] Thus in healthy children and adults, HPIV infection has a better prognosis and outcome with only symptomatic treatment.[1] However, once viral replication and invasive infections take place in the immunocompromised population, it worsens the prognosis, which can be grave.[10] Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment of viral infections continue to be of supreme importance in immunocompromised patients.[10]
Complications
Infection with the human parainfluenza virus in immunocompromised and older patients is generally associated with a range of diseases, from mild upper respiratory tract symptoms to more severe diseases in the lower respiratory tract, which might require mechanical ventilation and can lead to death.[2] The infection with HPIV-3 is associated with more serious illness in immunocompromised patients, followed by HPIV-1 and HPIV-2; HPIV-4 is rarely associated with serious illness.[2]
Early childhood infection with the Paramyxoviridae family of viruses (especially respiratory syncytial virus and human parainfluenza virus) is strongly associated with the development of asthma and COPD later in life.[11]
Deterrence and Patient Education
The parainfluenza virus is primarily transmitted between people via large-particle aerosols. High quantities of viruses excreted by young children can last on porous surfaces for a duration of as long as 10 hours.[1] To prevent health care settings from a nosocomial spread, droplet isolation is sufficient since small particle aerosols are not an important mechanism for transmission.[1] However, in both asymptomatic healthy populations as well as immunocompromised persons, a prolonged shedding of low levels of HPIV has been documented.[1]
Enhanced infection control measures are recommended in places of immunocompromised patient health care if HPIV outbreaks are detected. These measures include strict limits on visitors and patient-to-patient contact, physical distancing, masking of people in contact with HPIV patients, and hygienic and cleaning measures of the environmental surfaces. In difficult-to-control outbreaks, screening of asymptomatic patients and staff might be needed.[1][12]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
The management of the parainfluenza virus is best done with an interprofessional team of healthcare professionals that includes a nurse, a primary clinician, an infectious disease expert, a pediatrician, an epidemiologist, a pharmacist, and in the more severe cases, the ICU team is also involved. Once a diagnosis of the parainfluenza virus is made, the key is to prevent further spread of the infection. The primary clinician and the nurse are in the prime position to educate the patient and the family about the importance of prevention measures, including isolation and physical distancing.
Management of an outbreak of the parainfluenza virus is interprofessional work, requiring the participation and the mobilization of not just the team within the hospital setting managing the patient but also local resources to contain the spread of the disease as early as possible. It is especially important in immunocompromised, neonatal, and in older care facilities to identify infected individuals, educate the population, and prevent further transmission.[13]
National resources such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), as well as global resources such as the World Health Organization (WHO), must be informed to assist in managing the local cases, prevent further spread, identify the origin of the outbreak, provide diagnostic aid from high-level biosafety laboratories, and provide experimental treatment options.[12][13][14]
References
- 1.
Branche AR, Falsey AR. Parainfluenza Virus Infection.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):538-54. [
PMC free article: PMC7171724] [
PubMed: 27486735]
- 2.
Indumathi CP, Gunanasekaran P, Kaveri K, Arunagiri K, Mohana S, Sheriff AK, SureshBabu BV, Padmapriya P, Senthilraja R, Fathima G. Isolation & molecular characterization of human parainfluenza virus in Chennai, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2015 Nov;142(5):583-90. [
PMC free article: PMC4743346] [
PubMed: 26658594]
- 3.
Henrickson KJ. Parainfluenza viruses.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003 Apr;16(2):242-64. [
PMC free article: PMC153148] [
PubMed: 12692097]
- 4.
Wu KW, Wang SM, Shen CF, Ho TS, Wang JR, Liu CC. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of human parainfluenza virus infections of children in southern Taiwan.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018 Dec;51(6):749-755. [
PubMed: 28757139]
- 5.
DeGroote NP, Haynes AK, Taylor C, Killerby ME, Dahl RM, Mustaquim D, Gerber SI, Watson JT. Human parainfluenza virus circulation, United States, 2011-2019.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Mar;124:104261. [
PMC free article: PMC7106518] [
PubMed: 31954277]
- 6.
Pawełczyk M, Kowalski ML. The Role of Human Parainfluenza Virus Infections in the Immunopathology of the Respiratory Tract.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Mar;17(3):16. [
PMC free article: PMC7089069] [
PubMed: 28283855]
- 7.
Russell E, Yang A, Tardrew S, Ison MG. Parainfluenza Virus in Hospitalized Adults: A 7-Year Retrospective Study.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 07;68(2):298-305. [
PubMed: 29961826]
- 8.
Russell E, Ison MG. Parainfluenza Virus in the Hospitalized Adult.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 16;65(9):1570-1576. [
PubMed: 28591775]
- 9.
Liu WK, Liu Q, Chen DH, Liang HX, Chen XK, Huang WB, Qin S, Yang ZF, Zhou R. Epidemiology and clinical presentation of the four human parainfluenza virus types.
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jan 23;13:28. [
PMC free article: PMC3560251] [
PubMed: 23343342]
- 10.
Shahani L, Ariza-Heredia EJ, Chemaly RF. Antiviral therapy for respiratory viral infections in immunocompromised patients.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017 Apr;15(4):401-415. [
PMC free article: PMC7103713] [
PubMed: 28067078]
- 11.
Garcia GL, Valenzuela A, Manzoni T, Vaughan AE, López CB. Distinct Chronic Post-Viral Lung Diseases upon Infection with Influenza or Parainfluenza Viruses Differentially Impact Superinfection Outcome.
Am J Pathol. 2020 Mar;190(3):543-553. [
PMC free article: PMC7073775] [
PubMed: 31866346]
- 12.
Maziarz RT, Sridharan P, Slater S, Meyers G, Post M, Erdman DD, Peret TC, Taplitz RA. Control of an outbreak of human parainfluenza virus 3 in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Feb;16(2):192-8. [
PMC free article: PMC7172256] [
PubMed: 19781656]
- 13.
Kerper M, Puckett Y.
StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Mar 27, 2023. Filovirus. [
PubMed: 31334978]
- 14.
Lamunu M, Lutwama JJ, Kamugisha J, Opio A, Nambooze J, Ndayimirije N, Okware S. Containing a haemorrhagic fever epidemic: the Ebola experience in Uganda (October 2000-January 2001).
Int J Infect Dis. 2004 Jan;8(1):27-37. [
PubMed: 14690778]
Disclosure: Hayat Elboukari declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Muddasir Ashraf declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
